Top

Management Review Quarterly

Published in:

28-04-2022

A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature

Authors: Justin R. Hall, Selen Savas-Hall, Eric H. Shaw

Published in: Management Review Quarterly | Issue 3/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Due to the diversity of disciplines, scholars, and journals that publish entrepreneurship research, the literature has become a disorganized clutter, hindering the field’s ability to develop theory. The purpose of this research is to establish a meta-framework that could unify and subsume the diverse disciplines, scholars, and approaches to understanding entrepreneurship phenomena. In contrast to all the inductive approaches to organizing entrepreneurship literature, this exploratory study is the first to use a deductive approach based on General Systems Theory (GST). The paper begins by utilizing the process model of the GST to deduce seven fundamental categories for understanding entrepreneurship, which include: (1) the Entrepreneur, (2) Entrepreneurial Assistance, (3), Strategy, (4) Performance, (5) Academics, (6) Entrepreneurship Environment, and (7) Interactions (among the other categories). The paper then tests the validity and reliability of the GST framework using “expert” entrepreneurship researchers, based on a sample of 621 articles from several of the field’s most highly respected journals using content analysis. Based on this exploratory study, the GST meta-framework of entrepreneurship is shown valid and reliable. Consequently, virtually all entrepreneurship literature can be subsumed under its umbrella. Lastly, this paper organizes almost 50 years of entrepreneurship literature according to the GST framework and offers an overview of the literature across the seven categories and areas of future research.

previous article The impact of external auditors on firms’ financial restatements: a review of archival studies and implications for future research

next article Meta-analysis: associated factors for the adoption and disclosure of CSR practices in the banking sector

Available only for authorised users

Academic Journal Guide 2021 (2021) Chart Assoc of Bus Schools https://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2021-available-now/. Accessed September 2021

Alderete MV (2017) Mobile broadband: A key enabling technology for entrepreneurship? J Small Bus Manag 55(2):254–269CrossRef

Bamiatzi V, Jones S, Mitchelmore S, Nikolopoulos K (2015) The role of competencies in shaping the leadership style of female entrepreneurs: the case of North West of England, Yorkshire, and North Wales. J Small Bus Manag 53(3):627–644CrossRef

Barney JB, Busenitz LW, Fiet JO, Moesel DD (1996) New venture teams’ assessment of learning assistance from venture capital firms. J Bus Ventur 11(4):257–272CrossRef

Bartels R (1962) The development of marketing thought. Homewood, IL: Richard D Irwin

Beal RM (2000) Competing effectively: environmental scanning, competitive strategy, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. J Small Bus Manag 38(1):27

Berrone P, Gertel H, Giuliodori R, Bernard L, Meiners E (2014) Determinants of performance in microenterprises: Preliminary evidence from Argentina. J Small Bus Manag 52(3):477–500CrossRef

Bollingtoft A, Ulhoi JP (2005) The networked business incubator—Leveraging entrepreneurial agency? J Bus Ventur 20(2):265–290CrossRef

Bönte W, Procher VD, Urbig D (2016) Biology and selection into entrepreneurship—the relevance of prenatal testosterone exposure. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 40(5):1121–1148CrossRef

Borch OJ, Huse M (1993) Informal strategic networks and the board of directors. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 18(1):23–36CrossRef

Borch OJ, Huse M, Senneseth K (1999) Resource configuration, competitive strategies, and corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical examination of small firms. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 24(1):49–70CrossRef

Boulding KE (1956) General systems theory—the skeleton of science. Manag Sci 2(3):197–208CrossRef

Brea-Solís H, Casadesus-Masanell R, Grifell-Tatjé E (2015) Business model evaluation: quantifying Walmart’s sources of advantage. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 9(1):12–33CrossRef

Breugst N, Domurath A, Patzelt H, Klaukien A (2012) Perceptions of entrepreneurial passion and employees’ commitment to entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 36(1):171–192CrossRef

Brinckmann JAN, Kim SM (2015) Why we plan: the impact of nascent entrepreneurs’ cognitive characteristics and human capital on business planning. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 9(2):153–166CrossRef

Brinckmann J, Grichnik D, Kapsa D (2010) Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–performance relationship in small firms. J Bus Ventur 25(1):24–40CrossRef

Bruton G, Khavul S, Siegel D, Wright M (2015) New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: microfinance, crowdfunding, and peer-to-peer innovations. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 39(1):9–26CrossRef

Busenitz LW, West GP III, Shepherd D, Nelson T, Chandler GN, Zacharakis A (2003) Entrepreneurship research in emergence: past trends and future directions. J Manag 29(3):285–308

Bygrave WD (1987) Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: a networking perspective. J Bus Ventur 2(2):139–154CrossRef

Carraher SM, Paridon TJ (2008) Entrepreneurship journal rankings across the discipline. J Small Bus Strateg 19(2):89–98

Carsrud A, Brännback M (2011) Entrepreneurial motivations: What do we still need to know? J Small Bus Manag 49(1):9–26CrossRef

Cavanagh S (1997) Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurs Res 4(3):5–16

Chandler GN, Hanks SH (1994) Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. J Bus Ventur 9(4):331–349CrossRef

Chandler GN, Jansen E (1992) The founder’s self-assessed competence and venture performance. J Bus Ventur 7(3):223–236CrossRef

Chen CC, Greene PG, Crick A (1998) Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? J Bus Ventur 13(4):295–316CrossRef

Chrisman JJ, McMullan WE (2000) A preliminary assessment of outsider assistance as a knowledge resource: the longer-term impact of new venture counseling. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 24(3):37–53CrossRef

Ciuchta MP, Letwin C, Stevenson R, McMahon S, Huvaj MN (2018) Betting on the coachable entrepreneur: signaling and social exchange in entrepreneurial pitches. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 42(6):860–885CrossRef

Clarysse B, Bruneel J, Wright M (2011) Explaining growth paths of young technology-based firms: structuring resource portfolios in different competitive environments. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 5(2):137–157CrossRef

Cohen B, Winn MI (2007) Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 22(1):29–49CrossRef

Cooper AC, Folta TB, Woo C (1995) Entrepreneurial information search. J Bus Ventur 10(2):107–120CrossRef

Covin TJ (1994) Perceptions of family-owned firms: the impact of gender and education level. J Small Bus Manag 32(3):29

Covin JG, Garrett RP Jr, Gupta JP, Kuratko DF, Shepherd DA (2018) The interdependence of planning and learning among internal corporate ventures. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 42(4):537–570CrossRef

Craig BR, Jackson WE, Thomson JB (2009) The economic impact of the small business administration’s intervention in the small firm credit market: a review of the research literature. J Small Bus Manag 47(2):221–231CrossRef

Crocker L, Algina J (2008) Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Cengage Learning, Mason

Dabić M, Vlačić B, Kiessling T, Caputo A, Pellegrini M (2021) Serial entrepreneurs: a review of literature and guidance for future research. J Small Bus Manag 1–36

Davidsson P (2017) A future of entrepreneurship research. In: ed The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp 1–23

Dew N, Sarasathy S, Read S, Wiltbank R (2009) Affordable loss: Behavioral economic aspects of the plunge decision. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 3(2):105–126CrossRef

Dos Santos BL, Holsapple CW, Ye Q (2011) The intellectual influence of entrepreneurship journals: a network analysis. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 35(4):735–754CrossRef

Dowling GR (1983) The application of general systems theory to an analysis of marketing systems. J Macromark 3(2):22–32CrossRef

Downe-Wamboldt B (1992) Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health Care Women Int 13(3):313–321CrossRef

Edelman LF, Manolova T, Shirokova G, Tsukanova T (2016) The impact of family support on young entrepreneurs’ start-up activities. J Bus Ventur 31(4):428–448CrossRef

Elo S, Kyngäs H (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 62(1):107–115CrossRef

Engel JF, Kollat DT, Blackwell RD (1968) Consumer behavior. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York

Ewing RH (1981) IRS rulemaking: drawing the fine line between debt and equity. Am J Small Bus 5(3):46–52CrossRef

Fagenson EA, Marcus EC (1991) Perceptions of the sex-role stereotypic characteristics of entrepreneurs: women’s evaluations. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 15(4):33–48CrossRef

Fairchild GB (2009) Residential segregation influences on the likelihood of ethnic self-employment. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 33(2):373–395CrossRef

Ferreira MP, Reis NR, Miranda R (2015) Thirty years of entrepreneurship research published in top journals: analysis of citations, co-citations and themes. J Glob Entrepreneursh Res 5(1):1–22

Fisk G (1967) Marketing systems: an introductory analysis. Harper & Row

Fitz-Koch S, Nordqvist M, Carter S, Hunter E (2018) Entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector: a literature review and future research opportunities. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 42(1):129–166CrossRef

Francl TJ, Erikson W, Lin WT (1982) Selecting the first small business computer. Am J Small Bus 6(4):50–58CrossRef

Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J (2006) What you are is what you like—similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams. J Bus Ventur 21(6):802–826CrossRef

Garg S, Furr N (2017) Venture boards: past insights, future directions, and transition to public firm boards. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 11(3):326–343CrossRef

Gibb AA (1993) Small business development in Central and Eastern Europe—Opportunity for a rethink? J Bus Ventur 8(6):461–486CrossRef

Gielnik MM, Zacher H, Frese M (2012) Focus on opportunities as a mediator of the relationship between business owners’ age and venture growth. J Bus Ventur 27(1):127–142CrossRef

Gopinath C (1995) Bank strategies toward firms in decline. J Bus Ventur 10(1):75–92CrossRef

Grégoire DA, Noel MX, Déry R, Béchard JP (2006) Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co–citation analysis of frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 1981–2004. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 30(3):333–373CrossRef

Grünhagen M, Mittelstaedt RA (2005) Entrepreneurs or investors: Do multi-unit franchisees have different philosophical orientations? J Small Bus Manag 43(3):207–225CrossRef

Gupta VK, Goktan AB, Gunay G (2014) Gender differences in evaluation of new business opportunity: a stereotype threat perspective. J Bus Ventur 29(2):273–288CrossRef

Hall AD, Fagen RE (1968) Definition of system organizations. Syst Res Behav Sci 1:31–43

Hsu DK, Wiklund J, Anderson SE, Coffey BS (2016) Entrepreneurial exit intentions and the business-family interface. J Bus Ventur 31(6):613–627CrossRef

Hunt SD (2010) Marketing theory: foundations. controversy, strategy, resource-advantage theory. ME Sharpe, Armonk

Ireland RD, Webb JW (2007) A cross-disciplinary exploration of entrepreneurship research. J of Manag 33(6):891–927

Jänkälä S, Silvola H (2012) Lagging effects of the use of activity-based costing on the financial performance of small firms. J Small Bus Manag 50(3):498–523CrossRef

Jenkins AS, Wiklund J, Brundin E (2014) Individual responses to firm failure: appraisals, grief, and the influence of prior failure experience. J Bus Ventur 29(1):17–33CrossRef

Jennings DF, Seaman SL (1990) Aggressiveness of response to new business opportunities following deregulation: an empirical study of established financial firms. J Bus Ventur 5(3):177–189CrossRef

Jones CD, Makri M, Gomez-Mejia LR (2008) Affiliate directors and perceived risk bearing in publicly traded, family-controlled firms: the case of diversification. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 32(6):1007–1026CrossRef

Kast FE, Rosenzweig JE (1972) General systems theory: applications for organization and management. Acad Manag J 15(4):447–465CrossRef

Katz D, Kahn RL (1966) Organizations and the system concept. Soc Psychol Org 1:14–29

Katz JA (2020) Doctoral Programs in Entrepreneurship. https://sites.google.com/a/slu.edu/eweb/doctoral-programs-in-entrepreneurship. Accessed January 24, 2020

Keats BW, Bracker JS (1988) Toward a theory of small firm performance: a conceptual model. Am J Small Bus 12(4):41–58CrossRef

Kraus S, Breier M, Dasí-Rodríguez S (2020) The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. Int Entrepreneursh Manag J 16(3):1023–1042CrossRef

Kraus S, Palmer C, Kailer N, Kallinger FL, Spitzer J (2018) Digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda on new business models for the twenty-first century. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res

Kraus S, Mahto RV, Walsh ST (2021) The importance of literature reviews in small business and entrepreneurship research. J Small Bus Manag 1–12

Krippendorff K (1980) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Newbury Park

LiPuma JA, Park S (2014) Venture capitalists’ risk mitigation of portfolio company internationalization. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 38(5):1183–1205

Low MB, Abrahamson E (1997) Movements, bandwagons, and clones: industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process. J Bus Ventur 12(6):435–457CrossRef

Low MB, MacMillan IC (1988) Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. J Manag 14(2):139–161

MacMillan IC, Day DL (1987) Corporate ventures into industrial markets: dynamics of aggressive entry. J Bus Ventur 2(1):29–39CrossRef

Markman GD, Balkin DB, Baron RA (2002) Inventors and new venture formation: the effects of general self–efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 27(2):149–165CrossRef

McGrath RG, MacMillan IC, Yang EAY, Tsai W (1992) Does culture endure, or is it malleable? Issues for entrepreneurial economic development. J Bus Ventur 7(6):441–458CrossRef

McKenny AF, Short JC, Ketchen DJ Jr, Payne GT, Moss TW (2018) Strategic entrepreneurial orientation: configurations, performance, and the effects of industry and time. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 12(4):504–521CrossRef

Mueller SL, Thomas AS (2001) Culture and entrepreneurial potential: a nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. J Bus Ventur 16(1):51–75CrossRef

Olanrewaju AST, Hossain MA, Whiteside N, Mercieca P (2020) Social media and entrepreneurship research: a literature review. Int J Inf Manag 50:90–110CrossRef

Packard MD, Bylund PL (2018) On the relationship between inequality and entrepreneurship. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 12(1):3–22CrossRef

Paik Y (2014) Serial entrepreneurs and venture survival: Evidence from US venture-capital-financed semiconductor firms. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 8(3):254–268CrossRef

Pedhazur E, Schmelkin L (1991) Measurement, design and analysis: an integrated approach. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

Rauch A (2020) Opportunities and Threats in Reviewing Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 44(5):847–860CrossRef

Runyan RC, Droge C, Swinney JL (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation versus small business orientation: What are their relationships to firm performance? J Small Bus Manag 46(4):567–588CrossRef

Sandelowski M (1995) Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin? Res Nurs Health 18:371–375CrossRef

Sapienza HJ (1992) When do venture capitalists add value? J Bus Ventur 7(1):9–27CrossRef

Schlosser F (2015) Identifying and differentiating key employees from owners and other employees in SMEs. J Small Bus Manag 53(1):37–53CrossRef

Semrau T, Werner A (2012) The two sides of the story: Network investments and new venture creation. J Small Bus Manag 50(1):159–180CrossRef

Shaw EH (2009) A general theory of systems performance criteria. Int J Gen Syst 38(8):851–869CrossRef

Shelton LM (2010) Fighting an uphill battle: expansion barriers, intra–industry social stratification, and minority firm growth. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 34(2):379–398CrossRef

Shepherd DA, Wennberg K, Suddaby R, Wiklund J (2019) What are we explaining? A review and agenda on initiating, engaging, performing, and contextualizing entrepreneurship. J of Manag 45(1):159–196

Stewart A, Cotton J (2013) Making sense of entrepreneurship journals. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res

Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2007) Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 1(3–4):211–227CrossRef

Tan Y, Huang H, Lu H (2013) the effect of venture capital investment—evidence from China’s small and medium-sized enterprises board. J Small Bus Manag 51(1):138–157CrossRef

Tan J, Zhang H, Wang L (2015) Network closure or structural hole? The conditioning effects of network-level social capital on innovation performance. Entrepreneursh Theory Pract 39(5):1189–1212CrossRef

Timmons JA (1978) Characteristics and role demands of entrepreneurship. Am J Small Bus 3(1):5–17CrossRef

Van Ness RK, Seifert CF (2016) A theoretical analysis of the role of characteristics in entrepreneurial propensity. Strateg Entrepreneursh J 10(1):89–96CrossRef

Vesper KH, Pederson AM (1977) Venture capital through ‘Regulation A’Public Offering. Am J Small Bus 2(2):40–49CrossRef

Von Bertalanffy L (1972) The history and status of general systems theory. Acad Manag J 15(4):407–426CrossRef

Von Bertalanffy L (1968) General systems theory. New York, NY: G. Braziller

Watson J (2003) Failure rates for female-controlled businesses: Are they any different? J Small Bus Manag 41(3):262–277CrossRef

Wiseman RM, Skilton PF (1999) Divisions and differences: exploring publication preferences and productivity across management subfields. J Manag Inquiry 8(3):299–320CrossRef

Zacharakis AL, Shepherd DA (2001) The nature of information and overconfidence on venture capitalists’ decision making. J Bus Ventur 16(4):311–332CrossRef

Zhao H (2013) Turning small business interns into applicants: the mediating role of perceived justice. J Bus Ventur 28(3):443–457CrossRef

Title: A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature
Authors: Justin R. Hall
Selen Savas-Hall
Eric H. Shaw
Publication date: 28-04-2022
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Management Review Quarterly / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 2198-1620
Electronic ISSN: 2198-1639
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00266-9

Springer Professional

A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

A bibliometric analysis of scientific literature on guilt in marketing

Does public service motivation predict performance in public sector organizations? A longitudinal science mapping study

Organizational behavior in international strategic alliances and the relation to performance – a literature review and avenues for future research

Setbacks, interruptions and turnarounds in the internationalization process: a bibliometric and literature review of de-internationalization

The impact of external auditors on firms’ financial restatements: a review of archival studies and implications for future research

Replication studies in top management journals: An empirical investigation of prevalence, types, outcomes, and impact

Premium Partner