Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Agile Requirement Engineering Maturity Framework for Industry 4.0

Authors : Samaa Elnagar, Heinz Weistroffer, Manoj Thomas

Published in: Information Systems

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Industry 4.0 (I4.0) is changing business models and processes. I4.0 uses innovative trends such as Big Data, Cloud Computing, and Internet of things (IOT) to maximize economic benefits and return on investments. However, developing an I4.0 project may be costly, complex and risky for some companies. Therefore, careful requirements definition and mature Requirement Engineering (RE) processes are necessary. Undeveloped RE processes and poorly defined business requirements will often result in an inferior or a cancelled project. In addition, to ensure agility and allow for iterative changes in developing projects for I4.0, agile methodologies should be applied and prudently assessed. Unfortunately, most of existing assessment models are narrow focused and lack theoretical foundation and proper validation. This research proposes a comprehensive maturity framework called agile Requirement Engineering Maturity Model for Industry 4.0 (ARE-MMI4.0). The framework provides assessment of the minimum maturity levels to start a project for I4.0. The framework integrates an I4.0 maturity model with RE and agile maturity models to ensure the ultimate maturity assessment for the business processes.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Roblek, V., Meško, M., Krapež, A.: A complex view of industry 4.0. SAGE Open 6, 2158244016653987 (2016)CrossRef Roblek, V., Meško, M., Krapež, A.: A complex view of industry 4.0. SAGE Open 6, 2158244016653987 (2016)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vogel-Heuser, B., Hess, D.: Guest editorial industry 4.0–prerequisites and visions. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 13, 411–413 (2016)CrossRef Vogel-Heuser, B., Hess, D.: Guest editorial industry 4.0–prerequisites and visions. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 13, 411–413 (2016)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schumacher, A., Erol, S., Sihn, W.: A maturity model for assessing industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Proc. CIRP 52, 161–166 (2016)CrossRef Schumacher, A., Erol, S., Sihn, W.: A maturity model for assessing industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Proc. CIRP 52, 161–166 (2016)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thames, L., Schaefer, D.: Software-defined cloud manufacturing for industry 4.0. Proc. CIRP 52, 12–17 (2016)CrossRef Thames, L., Schaefer, D.: Software-defined cloud manufacturing for industry 4.0. Proc. CIRP 52, 12–17 (2016)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pfeiffer, S.: Robots, industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work is more than routine work. Societies 6, 16 (2016)CrossRef Pfeiffer, S.: Robots, industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work is more than routine work. Societies 6, 16 (2016)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference El Sawy, O.A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y., Pavlou, P.A.: Research commentary—seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: it takes three to tango. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 835–848 (2010)CrossRef El Sawy, O.A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y., Pavlou, P.A.: Research commentary—seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: it takes three to tango. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 835–848 (2010)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leyh, C., Bley, K., Schäffer, T., Bay, L.: The application of the maturity model SIMMI 4.0 in selected enterprises (2017) Leyh, C., Bley, K., Schäffer, T., Bay, L.: The application of the maturity model SIMMI 4.0 in selected enterprises (2017)
9.
go back to reference Lu, Y.: Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 6, 1–10 (2017) Lu, Y.: Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 6, 1–10 (2017)
10.
go back to reference Lukac, D.: The fourth ICT-based industrial revolution “Industry 4.0”, HMI and the case of CAE/CAD innovation with EPLAN P8, pp. 835–838 (2015) Lukac, D.: The fourth ICT-based industrial revolution “Industry 4.0”, HMI and the case of CAE/CAD innovation with EPLAN P8, pp. 835–838 (2015)
11.
go back to reference Scheuermann, C., Verclas, S., Bruegge, B.: Agile factory-an example of an industry 4.0 manufacturing process. In: 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, Networks, and Applications (CPSNA), pp. 43–47. IEEE (2015) Scheuermann, C., Verclas, S., Bruegge, B.: Agile factory-an example of an industry 4.0 manufacturing process. In: 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, Networks, and Applications (CPSNA), pp. 43–47. IEEE (2015)
12.
go back to reference Comuzzi, M., Patel, A.: How organisations leverage big data: a maturity model. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116, 1468–1492 (2016)CrossRef Comuzzi, M., Patel, A.: How organisations leverage big data: a maturity model. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116, 1468–1492 (2016)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Erol, S., Schumacher, A., Sihn, W.: Strategic guidance towards industry 4.0–a three-stage process model. In: International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing (2016) Erol, S., Schumacher, A., Sihn, W.: Strategic guidance towards industry 4.0–a three-stage process model. In: International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing (2016)
15.
go back to reference De Bruin, T., Freeze, R., Kaulkarni, U., Rosemann, M.: Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model (2005) De Bruin, T., Freeze, R., Kaulkarni, U., Rosemann, M.: Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model (2005)
16.
go back to reference Bondar, S., Hsu, J.C., Pfouga, A., Stjepandić, J.: Agile digital transformation of system-of-systems architecture models using Zachman framework. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 7, 33–43 (2017) Bondar, S., Hsu, J.C., Pfouga, A., Stjepandić, J.: Agile digital transformation of system-of-systems architecture models using Zachman framework. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 7, 33–43 (2017)
18.
go back to reference Glazer, H., Dalton, J., Anderson, D., Konrad, M.D., Shrum, S.: CMMI or agile: why not embrace both! (2008) Glazer, H., Dalton, J., Anderson, D., Konrad, M.D., Shrum, S.: CMMI or agile: why not embrace both! (2008)
19.
go back to reference Torrecilla-Salinas, C., Sedeño, J., Escalona, M., Mejías, M.: Agile, web engineering and capability maturity model integration: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 71, 92–107 (2016)CrossRef Torrecilla-Salinas, C., Sedeño, J., Escalona, M., Mejías, M.: Agile, web engineering and capability maturity model integration: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 71, 92–107 (2016)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sommerville, I., Ransom, J.: An empirical study of industrial requirements engineering process assessment and improvement. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 14, 85–117 (2005)CrossRef Sommerville, I., Ransom, J.: An empirical study of industrial requirements engineering process assessment and improvement. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 14, 85–117 (2005)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Niazi, M., Cox, K., Verner, J.: A measurement framework for assessing the maturity of requirements engineering process. Softw. Qual. J. 16, 213–235 (2008)CrossRef Niazi, M., Cox, K., Verner, J.: A measurement framework for assessing the maturity of requirements engineering process. Softw. Qual. J. 16, 213–235 (2008)CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Beecham, S., Hall, T., Rainer, A.: Software process improvement problems in twelve software companies: an empirical analysis. Empir. Softw. Eng. 8, 7–42 (2003)CrossRef Beecham, S., Hall, T., Rainer, A.: Software process improvement problems in twelve software companies: an empirical analysis. Empir. Softw. Eng. 8, 7–42 (2003)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gorschek, T., Svahnberg, M., Tejle, K.: Introduction and application of a lightweight requirements engineering process. In: Ninth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (2003) Gorschek, T., Svahnberg, M., Tejle, K.: Introduction and application of a lightweight requirements engineering process. In: Ninth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (2003)
24.
go back to reference C.P. Team: CMMI for development, version 1.2 (2006) C.P. Team: CMMI for development, version 1.2 (2006)
25.
go back to reference Sidky, A., Arthur, J., Bohner, S.: A disciplined approach to adopting agile practices: the agile adoption framework. Innovations Syst. Softw. Eng. 3, 203–216 (2007)CrossRef Sidky, A., Arthur, J., Bohner, S.: A disciplined approach to adopting agile practices: the agile adoption framework. Innovations Syst. Softw. Eng. 3, 203–216 (2007)CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stojanov, I., Turetken, O., Trienekens, J.J.: A maturity model for scaling agile development. In: 2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 446–453. IEEE (2015) Stojanov, I., Turetken, O., Trienekens, J.J.: A maturity model for scaling agile development. In: 2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pp. 446–453. IEEE (2015)
27.
go back to reference Lichtblau, K., et al.: Studie: industrie 4.0 readiness (2017) Lichtblau, K., et al.: Studie: industrie 4.0 readiness (2017)
28.
go back to reference Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuß, J.: Developing maturity models for IT management. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1, 213–222 (2009)CrossRef Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuß, J.: Developing maturity models for IT management. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1, 213–222 (2009)CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Posada, J., et al.: Visual computing as a key enabling technology for industrie 4.0 and industrial internet. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 35, 26–40 (2015)CrossRef Posada, J., et al.: Visual computing as a key enabling technology for industrie 4.0 and industrial internet. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 35, 26–40 (2015)CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)CrossRef Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Pöppelbuß, J., Röglinger, M.: What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. In: ECIS, p. 28 (2011) Pöppelbuß, J., Röglinger, M.: What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. In: ECIS, p. 28 (2011)
32.
go back to reference Checkland, P., Scholes, J.: Soft systems methodology: a 30-year retrospective. Wiley, Chichester (1999) Checkland, P., Scholes, J.: Soft systems methodology: a 30-year retrospective. Wiley, Chichester (1999)
33.
go back to reference Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19, 213–236 (1995)CrossRef Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19, 213–236 (1995)CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)CrossRef Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Karokola, G., Kowalski, S., Yngstrom, L.: Secure e-government services: towards a framework for integrating IT security services into e-government maturity models. In: Information Security South Africa (ISSA), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2011) Karokola, G., Kowalski, S., Yngstrom, L.: Secure e-government services: towards a framework for integrating IT security services into e-government maturity models. In: Information Security South Africa (ISSA), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2011)
Metadata
Title
Agile Requirement Engineering Maturity Framework for Industry 4.0
Authors
Samaa Elnagar
Heinz Weistroffer
Manoj Thomas
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_31

Premium Partner