Skip to main content
Top

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Consensus in Collaborative Governance

Author : James Agbodzakey

Published in: Collaborative Governance Primer

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The gravity of challenges associated with complex public problems necessitates cross-sector stakeholders working together to formulate strategies and solutions through consensus to foster constructive implementation actions. The usual nature of the problem, diverse representation and participation, variations of interests, perspectives of a realistic path to a solution, and different levels of expertise and resources demand savvy negotiation of the interrelated dimensions to reach a consensus that advances the collaborative agenda. Stakeholders’ willingness to engage on the various collaborative governance agenda associated with the collaborative process or forum correlates with acceptance of challenges of deliberation, i.e., delays, disagreements, or conflicts, the tabling of items with eventual consensus either by a unanimous vote or simple majority voting defining the collective path forward. Consensus or consensus orientation associated with collaborative governance highlights its uniqueness in promoting inclusive involvement for solutions that benefit target populations and society. This chapter relates the what and why of consensus in collaborative governance, attendant elements with a real health services case, and a proposed intervention case to promote a somewhat robust understanding in the public affairs context.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Agbodzakey, J. (2010). Collaborative Governance and the Implementation of the Ryan White Act: A Case Study of HIV Health Services Planning Councils in Two South Florida Counties. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG & Co.KG. Agbodzakey, J. (2010). Collaborative Governance and the Implementation of the Ryan White Act: A Case Study of HIV Health Services Planning Councils in Two South Florida Counties. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG & Co.KG.
go back to reference Agbodzakey, J. (2012). Collaborative governance of HIV health services planning councils in Broward and Palm Beach counties of South Florida. Public Organization Review, 12, 107–126.CrossRef Agbodzakey, J. (2012). Collaborative governance of HIV health services planning councils in Broward and Palm Beach counties of South Florida. Public Organization Review, 12, 107–126.CrossRef
go back to reference Agbodzakey, J. (2015). Ryan white CARE act and HIV/AIDS services collaborative governance: The South Florida experience. LAP/OmniScriptum. Agbodzakey, J. (2015). Ryan white CARE act and HIV/AIDS services collaborative governance: The South Florida experience. LAP/OmniScriptum.
go back to reference Agbodzakey, J. K. (2017). Ryan white CARE act and collaborative governance re-examined: The South Florida experience. Public Organization Review, 17(2), 293–314.CrossRef Agbodzakey, J. K. (2017). Ryan white CARE act and collaborative governance re-examined: The South Florida experience. Public Organization Review, 17(2), 293–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Agbodzakey, J. K. (2021). Leadership in collaborative governance: The case of HIV/AIDS health services planning Council in South Florida. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(13), 1051–1064.CrossRef Agbodzakey, J. K. (2021). Leadership in collaborative governance: The case of HIV/AIDS health services planning Council in South Florida. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(13), 1051–1064.CrossRef
go back to reference Amsler, L. B. (2016). Collaborative governance: Integrating management, politics, and law. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 700–711.CrossRef Amsler, L. B. (2016). Collaborative governance: Integrating management, politics, and law. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 700–711.CrossRef
go back to reference Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.CrossRef Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.CrossRef
go back to reference Bahri, S., Rakhmat, R., Yunus, M., & Allorante, A. I. (2020). Wajo regency regional revenue and expenditure budgeting process in the perspective of the collaborative governance model. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(4), 105–115. Bahri, S., Rakhmat, R., Yunus, M., & Allorante, A. I. (2020). Wajo regency regional revenue and expenditure budgeting process in the perspective of the collaborative governance model. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(4), 105–115.
go back to reference Bang, M. S., & Kim, Y. (2016). Collaborative governance difficulty and policy implication: Case study of the Sewol disaster in South Korea. Disaster Prevention and Management, 25(2), 212–226.CrossRef Bang, M. S., & Kim, Y. (2016). Collaborative governance difficulty and policy implication: Case study of the Sewol disaster in South Korea. Disaster Prevention and Management, 25(2), 212–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. (1992). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared power world. Jossey-Bass. Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. (1992). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared power world. Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from literature. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue), 44–55.CrossRef Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from literature. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue), 44–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.CrossRef Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.CrossRef
go back to reference Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2014). Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: A simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 495–518.CrossRef Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2014). Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: A simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 495–518.CrossRef
go back to reference Daniel, J. R., Pinel, S. L., & Brooks, J. (2013). Overcoming barriers to collaborative transboundary water governance. Mountain Research and Development, 33, 215–224.CrossRef Daniel, J. R., Pinel, S. L., & Brooks, J. (2013). Overcoming barriers to collaborative transboundary water governance. Mountain Research and Development, 33, 215–224.CrossRef
go back to reference Cabral, S., & Krane, D. (2018). Civic festivals and collaborative governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(1), 185–205.CrossRef Cabral, S., & Krane, D. (2018). Civic festivals and collaborative governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(1), 185–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Praeger Publishers. Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Praeger Publishers.
go back to reference Dewulf, A., Mancero, M., Cárdenas, G., & Sucozhanay, D. (2011). Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: A case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 50–75.CrossRef Dewulf, A., Mancero, M., Cárdenas, G., & Sucozhanay, D. (2011). Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: A case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 50–75.CrossRef
go back to reference Dukes, E. F., Piscolish, M. A., & Stephens, J. B. (2000). Reaching for higher ground: Creating purpose-driven, principled & powerful groups. BookSurge Pub. Dukes, E. F., Piscolish, M. A., & Stephens, J. B. (2000). Reaching for higher ground: Creating purpose-driven, principled & powerful groups. BookSurge Pub.
go back to reference DuPraw, M. E., Brennan, B. V., & Placht, M. T. (2013). Case study: Collaborative governance as a tool for natural resource management in China and the United States. Environmental Practice, 15, 228–239.CrossRef DuPraw, M. E., Brennan, B. V., & Placht, M. T. (2013). Case study: Collaborative governance as a tool for natural resource management in China and the United States. Environmental Practice, 15, 228–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29.CrossRef Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Fitriana, K. N., Satlita, L., & Winarni, F. (2019, June). The implementation of collaborative governance in Segoro Amarto social movement in Yogyakarta City. In IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science (Vol. 271, No. 1, p. 012008). IOP Publishing. Fitriana, K. N., Satlita, L., & Winarni, F. (2019, June). The implementation of collaborative governance in Segoro Amarto social movement in Yogyakarta City. In IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science (Vol. 271, No. 1, p. 012008). IOP Publishing.
go back to reference Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522.CrossRef Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522.CrossRef
go back to reference Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Gunningham, N. (2009). The new collaborative environmental governance: The localization of regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 36(1), 145–166.CrossRef Gunningham, N. (2009). The new collaborative environmental governance: The localization of regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 36(1), 145–166.CrossRef
go back to reference Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
go back to reference Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423.CrossRef Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423.CrossRef
go back to reference Ismail, L., & Materwala, H. (2019). A review of blockchain architecture and consensus protocols: Use cases, challenges, and solutions. Symmetry, 11(10), 1198.CrossRef Ismail, L., & Materwala, H. (2019). A review of blockchain architecture and consensus protocols: Use cases, challenges, and solutions. Symmetry, 11(10), 1198.CrossRef
go back to reference Jacobson, C., & Ok Choi, S. (2008). Success factors: Public works and public-private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(6), 637–657.CrossRef Jacobson, C., & Ok Choi, S. (2008). Success factors: Public works and public-private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(6), 637–657.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnston, E. W., Hicks, D., Nan, N., & Auer, J. C. (2011). Managing the inclusion process in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 699–721.CrossRef Johnston, E. W., Hicks, D., Nan, N., & Auer, J. C. (2011). Managing the inclusion process in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 699–721.CrossRef
go back to reference Kossmann, C. M., Behagel, J. H., & Bailey, M. (2016). Action and inertia in collaborative governance. Marine Policy, 72, 21–30.CrossRef Kossmann, C. M., Behagel, J. H., & Bailey, M. (2016). Action and inertia in collaborative governance. Marine Policy, 72, 21–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Lang, A., & Brüesch, C. (2020). Collaborative governance in program implementation: The development of e-relocation notification in the Swiss canton of Zurich. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(12), 1083–1095.CrossRef Lang, A., & Brüesch, C. (2020). Collaborative governance in program implementation: The development of e-relocation notification in the Swiss canton of Zurich. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(12), 1083–1095.CrossRef
go back to reference Larsson, O. L. (2017). Meta-governance and collaborative crisis management – Competing rationalities in the management of the Swedish security communications system. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 8(4), 312–334.CrossRef Larsson, O. L. (2017). Meta-governance and collaborative crisis management – Competing rationalities in the management of the Swedish security communications system. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 8(4), 312–334.CrossRef
go back to reference Margerum, R. D. (2002). Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 237–253.CrossRef Margerum, R. D. (2002). Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 237–253.CrossRef
go back to reference Margerum, R. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. MIT Press.CrossRef Margerum, R. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. MIT Press.CrossRef
go back to reference McClosky, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in America. America Political Science Review, 58, 361–382.CrossRef McClosky, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in America. America Political Science Review, 58, 361–382.CrossRef
go back to reference Metze, T., & Levelt, M. (2012). Barriers to credible innovations: Collaborative regional governance in The Netherlands. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1–15. Metze, T., & Levelt, M. (2012). Barriers to credible innovations: Collaborative regional governance in The Netherlands. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1–15.
go back to reference Mischen, P. A. (2015). Collaborative network capacity. Public Management Review, 17(3), 380–403.CrossRef Mischen, P. A. (2015). Collaborative network capacity. Public Management Review, 17(3), 380–403.CrossRef
go back to reference Moore, C. J. (1996). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. Jossey-Bass. Moore, C. J. (1996). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Morrison, N., & Van Den Nouwelant, R. (2020). Western Sydney’s urban transformation: Examining the governance arrangements driving forward the growth vision. Australian Planner, 56(2), 73–82.CrossRef Morrison, N., & Van Den Nouwelant, R. (2020). Western Sydney’s urban transformation: Examining the governance arrangements driving forward the growth vision. Australian Planner, 56(2), 73–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Otter, K., & Paxton, D. (2017). A journey into collaborative leadership: Moving toward innovation and adaptability. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2017(156), 33–42.CrossRef Otter, K., & Paxton, D. (2017). A journey into collaborative leadership: Moving toward innovation and adaptability. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2017(156), 33–42.CrossRef
go back to reference Popp, J., MacKean, G. L., Casebeer, A., Milward, H. B., & Lindstrom, R. R. (2014). Inter-organizational networks: A review of the literature to inform practice. IBM Center for the Business of Government. Popp, J., MacKean, G. L., Casebeer, A., Milward, H. B., & Lindstrom, R. R. (2014). Inter-organizational networks: A review of the literature to inform practice. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
go back to reference Prothro, J. W., & Griggs, C. W. (1960). Fundamental principles of democracy: Bases of agreement and disagreement. Journal of Politics, 22, 276–294.CrossRef Prothro, J. W., & Griggs, C. W. (1960). Fundamental principles of democracy: Bases of agreement and disagreement. Journal of Politics, 22, 276–294.CrossRef
go back to reference Rapp, C. (2020). Hypothesis and theory: Collaborative governance, natural resource management, and the trust environment. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 28.CrossRef Rapp, C. (2020). Hypothesis and theory: Collaborative governance, natural resource management, and the trust environment. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 28.CrossRef
go back to reference Saarikoski, H., Raitio, K., & Barry, J. (2013). Understanding ‘successful’ conflict resolution: Policy regime changes and new interactive arenas in the Great Bear Rainforest. Land Use Policy, 32, 271–280.CrossRef Saarikoski, H., Raitio, K., & Barry, J. (2013). Understanding ‘successful’ conflict resolution: Policy regime changes and new interactive arenas in the Great Bear Rainforest. Land Use Policy, 32, 271–280.CrossRef
go back to reference Sandström, A., Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2014). Legitimacy in co-management: The impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governance strategies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), 60–76.CrossRef Sandström, A., Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2014). Legitimacy in co-management: The impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governance strategies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), 60–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, J., & Yen, M. Y. (2017). Toward a collaborative model of pandemic preparedness and response: Taiwan’s changing approach to pandemics. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 50(2), 125–132.CrossRef Schwartz, J., & Yen, M. Y. (2017). Toward a collaborative model of pandemic preparedness and response: Taiwan’s changing approach to pandemics. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 50(2), 125–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Shie, Y. (2012). The emergence of collaborative environmental governance in Taiwan: A changing landscape of environmental politics. Doctoral dissertation, University College London (UCL). Shie, Y. (2012). The emergence of collaborative environmental governance in Taiwan: A changing landscape of environmental politics. Doctoral dissertation, University College London (UCL).
go back to reference Smedby, N., & Neij, L. (2013). Experiences in urban governance for sustainability: The constructive dialogue in Swedish municipalities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 148–158.CrossRef Smedby, N., & Neij, L. (2013). Experiences in urban governance for sustainability: The constructive dialogue in Swedish municipalities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 148–158.CrossRef
go back to reference Tang, P. C., Ash, J. S., Bates, D. W., Overhage, J. M., & Sands, D. Z. (2006). Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 121–126.CrossRef Tang, P. C., Ash, J. S., Bates, D. W., Overhage, J. M., & Sands, D. Z. (2006). Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 121–126.CrossRef
go back to reference Ulibarri, N. (2015). Tracing process to performance of collaborative governance: A comparative case study of federal hydropower licensing. Policy Studies Journal, 43(2), 283–308.CrossRef Ulibarri, N. (2015). Tracing process to performance of collaborative governance: A comparative case study of federal hydropower licensing. Policy Studies Journal, 43(2), 283–308.CrossRef
go back to reference van den Belt, M., & Blake, D. (2015). Mediated modeling in water resource dialogues connecting multiple scales. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51(6), 1581–1599.CrossRef van den Belt, M., & Blake, D. (2015). Mediated modeling in water resource dialogues connecting multiple scales. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51(6), 1581–1599.CrossRef
go back to reference Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2012). The tangled web: Unraveling the principle of common goals in collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 731–760.CrossRef Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2012). The tangled web: Unraveling the principle of common goals in collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 731–760.CrossRef
go back to reference Verbrugge, L. N., Ganzevoort, W., Fliervoet, J. M., Panten, K., & van den Born, R. J. (2017). Implementing participatory monitoring in river management: The role of stakeholders’ perspectives and incentives. Journal of Environmental Management, 195, 62–69.CrossRef Verbrugge, L. N., Ganzevoort, W., Fliervoet, J. M., Panten, K., & van den Born, R. J. (2017). Implementing participatory monitoring in river management: The role of stakeholders’ perspectives and incentives. Journal of Environmental Management, 195, 62–69.CrossRef
go back to reference Woldesenbet, W. G. (2020). Analyzing multi-stakeholder collaborative governance practices in urban water projects in Addis Ababa City: Procedures, priorities, and structures. Applied Water Science, 10(1), 44.CrossRef Woldesenbet, W. G. (2020). Analyzing multi-stakeholder collaborative governance practices in urban water projects in Addis Ababa City: Procedures, priorities, and structures. Applied Water Science, 10(1), 44.CrossRef
go back to reference Zellen, B. S. (2020). Tribe-state collaboration and the future of arctic cooperation: Moderating inter-state competition through collaborative multilevel governance, from yesterday’s trading posts to today’s arctic council, ‘Arctic Exceptionalism’ is here to stay. The Polar Journal, 10(1), 113–129.CrossRef Zellen, B. S. (2020). Tribe-state collaboration and the future of arctic cooperation: Moderating inter-state competition through collaborative multilevel governance, from yesterday’s trading posts to today’s arctic council, ‘Arctic Exceptionalism’ is here to stay. The Polar Journal, 10(1), 113–129.CrossRef
go back to reference Zurba, M. (2014). Leveling the playing field: Fostering collaborative governance towards on-going reconciliation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24, 134–146.CrossRef Zurba, M. (2014). Leveling the playing field: Fostering collaborative governance towards on-going reconciliation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24, 134–146.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Consensus in Collaborative Governance
Author
James Agbodzakey
Copyright Year
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57373-6_9

Premium Partner