Top

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

22-04-2024 | Original Paper

Environmental regulations and government support drive green innovation performance: role of competitive pressure and digital transformation

Authors: Shamim Akhtar, Hongyun Tian, Shuja Iqbal, Rana Yassir Hussain

Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are facing a critical moment in the face of growing global environmental concerns, which are fueled by rapid economic growth and industrialization. Environmental problems, from overuse of resources to air and water pollution, have worsened. Environmental degradation emphasizes companies, particularly SMEs, through environmental regulations to manage their environmental impact. Therefore, there is an urgent need to focus on the green innovation performance of SMEs. Hence, this study examines the multifaceted relationships (considering government support, competitive pressure, and digital transformation) between environmental regulations and the performance of green innovation, with a particular emphasis on SMEs. Data were collected from 217 SMEs in Jiangsu province, China, through an online survey and analyzed using partial least square structured equation modeling in SmartPLS (version 4.0) to provide outcomes concerning environmental sustainability. The findings obtained through structured equation modeling acknowledge that environmental regulations (flexible and non-flexible) play a significant role in influencing the development of green innovation performance. However, the green innovation of SMEs increases when government support is provided in the form of finances, technological aid, and market information. Moreover, managers’ focus on competitive pressure and digital transformation positively increases green innovation performance. The conclusions of this study fall under the viewpoint of the “contingency theory of management" and fill the gaps in the literature through novel relationships and theoretical framework. The study provides ways for managers of SEMs to handle environmental regulations and green innovation performance.

Graphical abstract

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Aguilera-Caracuel J, Ortiz-de-Mandojana N (2013) Green innovation and financial performance: an institutional approach. Organ Environ 26(4):365–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026613507931CrossRef

Aithal A, Aithal PS (2020) Development and validation of survey questionnaire & experimental data–a systematical review-based statistical approach. Int J Manag Technol Soc Sci 5(2):233–251. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724105CrossRef

Albort-Morant G, Leal-Millán A, Cepeda-Carrión G (2016) The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. J Bus Res 69(11):4912–4917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.052CrossRef

Allet M (2014) Why do microfinance institutions go green? An exploratory study. J Bus Ethics 122:405–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1767-2CrossRef

Andrade C (2020) The limitations of online surveys. Indian J Psychol Med 42(6):575–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620957496CrossRef

Antoine D, Misato S (2018) Green policies and firms’competitiveness. GGKP6 Annual Conference. file:///E:/Postdoc%20Papers/Jan%20Paper/Gap%20Environmental.pdf

Arshad M, Chen Kun Yu, Qadir A, Ahmad W, Rafique M (2022) The impact of big data analytics on organizational sustainability: the influencing factors of autonomous research and development and absorptive capacity. Int J Eng Bus Manag 14:18479790221141536. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790221141537CrossRef

Ávila MM (2022) Competitive advantage and knowledge absorptive capacity: the mediating role of innovative capability. J Knowl Econ 13(1):185–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00708-3CrossRef

Bai Yu, Song S, Jiao J, Yang R (2019) The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms. J Clean Prod 233:819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.107CrossRef

Bhatia MS, Kumar S (2022) Linking stakeholder and competitive pressure to Industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating effect of environmental commitment and green process innovation. Bus Strateg Environ 31(5):1905–1918CrossRef

Borsatto JM, Silva L, Bazani CL (2021) Green innovation and environmental regulations: a systematic review of international academic works. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11379-7CrossRef

Cai X, Zhu B, Zhang H, Li L, Xie M (2020) Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sci Total Environ 746:140810CrossRef

Cantele S, Zardini A (2020) What drives small and medium enterprises towards sustainability? Role of interactions between pressures, barriers, and benefits. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27(1):126–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1778CrossRef

Chatterjee T (2019) What is environmental regulation. In: Economic and political implications of green trading and energy use. IGI Global Publishing House

Chin WW (2010) How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi Vincenzo E, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook of partial least squares. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 655–690CrossRef

Chi C, Ngo Q, FengSheng C, Li Li, Muhammad M (2021) Evaluating green innovation and performance of financial development: mediating concerns of environmental regulation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(40):57386–57397CrossRef

Cruz-Jesus F, Pinheiro A, Oliveira T (2019) Understanding CRM adoption stages: empirical analysis building on the TOE framework. Comput Ind 109:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.03.007CrossRef

Dai J, Cantor DE, Montabon FL (2015) How environmental management competitive pressure affects a focal firm’s environmental innovation activities: a green supply chain perspective. J Bus Logist 36(3):242–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12094CrossRef

Dangelico RM (2016) Green product innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Bus Strateg Environ 25(8):560–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1886CrossRef

Dasanayaka CH, Gunarathne N, Murphy DF, Nagirikandalage P (2022) Triggers for and barriers to the adoption of environmental management practices by small and medium-sized enterprises: a critical review. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 29(4):749–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2244CrossRef

Davari A, Rezazadeh A (2013) Structural equation modeling with PLS. Tehran Jahad Univ 215(2):224

Du K, Cheng Y, Yao X (2021) Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: the road to the green transformation of Chinese cities. Energy Econ 98:105247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105247CrossRef

Dupire M, M’Zali B (2018) CSR strategies in response to competitive pressures. J Bus Ethics 148:603–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2981-xCrossRef

Errassafi M, Abbar H, Benabbou Z (2019) The mediating effect of internal integration on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance: evidence from Moroccan manufacturing companies. J Ind Eng Manag 12(2):254–273. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2794CrossRef

Fachrunnisa O, Adhiatma A, Lukman N, Majid MNA (2020) Towards SMEs’ digital transformation: the role of agile leadership and strategic flexibility. J Small Bus Strateg 30(3):65–85

Gomez-Trujillo AM, Gonzalez-Perez MA (2021) Digital transformation as a strategy to reach sustainability. Smart Sustain Built Environ 11(4):1137–1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-01-2021-0011/full/full/html

Gregori P, Holzmann P (2020) Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: a business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. J Clean Prod 272:122817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817CrossRef

Guo R, Yuan Y (2020) Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on energy efficiency in the industrial sector: evidence from Chinese provincial data. Energy Policy 145:111747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111747CrossRef

Hair GT, Hult M, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Thiele KO (2017) Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. J Acad Mark Sci 45(5):616–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-xCrossRef

Hair JJ, Risher MS, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31(1):2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203CrossRef

Haochang LL, Liu Y (2022) The effect of manufacturing intelligence on green innovation performance in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 178:121569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121569CrossRef

Haochang Y, Zhu Xuan (2022) Research on green innovation performance of manufacturing industry and its improvement path in China. Sustainability 14(13):8000CrossRef

He L, Chen L (2021) The incentive effects of different government subsidy policies on green buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 135:110123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110123CrossRef

Heale R, Twycross A (2015) Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs 18(3):66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129CrossRef

Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R (2018) Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective. Inf Organ 28(1):52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004CrossRef

Hong Z, Guo X (2019) Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities. Omega 83:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.02.010CrossRef

Hoogendoorn B, Guerra D, Van der Zwan P (2015) What drives environmental practices of SMEs? Small Bus Econ 44:759–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9618-9CrossRef

Hoosain MS, Paul BS, Ramakrishna S (2020) The impact of 4IR digital technologies and circular thinking on the United Nations sustainable development goals. Sustainability 12(23):10143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310143CrossRef

Hou B, Hong J, Zhu R (2019) Exploration/exploitation innovation and firm performance: the mediation of entrepreneurial orientation and moderation of competitive intensity. J Asia Bus Stud 13(4):489–506. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-11-2017-0206CrossRef

Hsu C-C, Tan K-C, Zailani SHM (2016) Strategic orientations, sustainable supply chain initiatives, and reverse logistics: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Int J Oper Prod Manag 36(1):86–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2014-0252CrossRef

Hsu C-C, Quang-Thanh N, Chien FengSheng, Li Li, Mohsin M (2021) Evaluating green innovation and performance of financial development: mediating concerns of environmental regulation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(40):57386–57397CrossRef

Huang X-X, Zhen-peng Hu, Liu C-S, Da-jin Yu, Liu-fang Yu (2016) The relationships between regulatory and customer pressure, green organizational responses, and green innovation performance. J Clean Prod 112:3423–3433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.106CrossRef

Iqbal S, Akhtar S, Anwar F, Kayani AJ, Sohu JM, Khan AS (2021) Linking green innovation performance and green innovative human resource practices in SMEs; a moderation and mediation analysis using PLS-SEM. Curr Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02403-1CrossRef

Jahanger A, Usman M, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022) The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: the moderating role of technological innovations. Resour Policy 76:102569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102569CrossRef

Jiawei Xu, Yubing Yu, Zhang M, Zhang JZ (2023) Impacts of digital transformation on eco-innovation and sustainable performance: evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies. J Clean Prod 393:136278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136278CrossRef

Jin W, Zhang H-Q, Liu S-S, Zhang H-b (2019) Technological innovation, environmental regulation, and green total factor efficiency of industrial water resources. J Clean Prod 211:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.172CrossRef

Jingjing L, Zhao M, Wang Y (2020) Impacts of government subsidies and environmental regulations on green process innovation: a nonlinear approach. Technol Soc 63:101417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101417CrossRef

Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling fourth edition (methodology in the social sciences). The Guilford Press, New York

Legate AE, Hair Jr JF, Chretien JL, Risher JJ (2023) PLS-SEM: Prediction-oriented solutions for HRD researchers. Hum Resour Dev Q 34(1):91–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21466CrossRef

Lestari ER, Dania WAP, Indriani C, Firdausyi IA (2021) The impact of customer pressure and the environmental regulation on green innovation performance. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 733(1):012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/733/1/012048CrossRef

Li H, Tang H, Zhou W, Wan X (2022) Impact of enterprise digitalization on green innovation performance under the perspective of production and operation. Front Public Health 10:971971. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.971971CrossRef

Liang T-P, Lin Y-L, Shiau W-L, Chen S-F (2021) Investigating common method bias via an EEG study of the flow experience in website design. J Electron Comm Res 22(4):305–321

Lin H, Zeng SX, Ma HY, Chen HQ (2015) How political connections affect corporate environmental performance: The mediating role of green subsidies. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 21(8):2192–2212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2015.1044937CrossRef

Ling G, Ying Qu, Tseng Ming-Lang (2017) The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. J Clean Prod 162:894–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.210CrossRef

Liu X (2023) Enterprise digital transformation and green innovation. Ind Eng Innov Manag 6(2):8–17. https://doi.org/10.23977/ieim.2023.060202CrossRef

Luo Y, Jie X, Li X (2020) The organic joint point of new kinetic energy and green development in Chinese manufacturing SMEs. Int J Prod Res 58(23):7269–7291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1777341CrossRef

Lv C, Shao C, Lee C-C (2021) Green technology innovation and financial development: Do environmental regulation and innovation output matter? Energy Econ 98:105237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105237CrossRef

Makhloufi L, Djermani F, Meirun T (2024) Mediation-moderation model of green absorptive capacity and green entrepreneurship orientation for corporate environmental performance. Manag Environ Quality Int J 35(1):139–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2023-0164CrossRef

Makhloufi L, Laghouag AA, Meirun T, Belaid F (2022) Impact of green entrepreneurship orientation on environmental performance: the natural resource-based view and environmental policy perspective. Bus Strateg Environ 31(1):425–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2902CrossRef

Makhloufi L, Zhou J, Siddik AB (2023) Why green absorptive capacity and managerial environmental concerns matter for corporate environmental entrepreneurship? Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(46):102295–102312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29583-6CrossRef

Murray A, Skene K, Haynes K (2017) The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. J Bus Ethics 140:369–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2CrossRef

Nadkarni S, Prügl R (2021) Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Manag Rev Q 71:233–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7CrossRef

Nanath K, Pillai RR (2017) The influence of green is practices on competitive advantage: mediation role of green innovation performance. Inf Syst Manag 34(1):3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2017.1254436CrossRef

Gamage N, Sisira Kumara EMS, Ekanayake GAKNJA, Prasanna RPIR, Jayasundara JMSB, Rajapakshe PSK (2020) A review of global challenges and survival strategies of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Economies 8(4):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8040079CrossRef

Otley D (2016) The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014. Manag Account Res 31:45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001CrossRef

Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol 63:539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452CrossRef

Purwandani JA, Michaud G (2021) What are the drivers and barriers for green business practice adoption for SMEs? Environ Syst Decis 41(4):577–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-021-09821-3CrossRef

Qiong Wu, Wang S, Zhou A, Xia B, Abruquah LA, Chen Z (2023) Effects of digital transformation and environmental resource integration capability on medical equipment suppliers’ green innovation performance. Sci Rep 13(1):17559. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44274-5CrossRef

Ramanathan R, Ramanathan U, Bentley Y (2018) The debate on flexibility of environmental regulations, innovation capabilities and financial performance—a novel use of DEA. Omega 75:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.02.006CrossRef

Rehman SU, Kraus S, Shah SA, Khanin D, Mahto RV (2021) Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms. Technol Forec Soc Chang 163:120481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120481CrossRef

Roh T, Lee K, Yang JY (2021) How do intellectual property rights and government support drive a firm’s green innovation? The mediating role of open innovation. J Clean Prod 317:128422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128422CrossRef

Saengchai S, Sawasdee A, Jermsittiparsert K (2019) The knowledge management, product innovation, and process innovation as antecedents of sports manufacturing firms of Thailand. J Hum Sport Exerc 14(5):S2217–S2231. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc5.40CrossRef

Safari A, Saleh AS (2020) Key determinants of SMEs’ export performance: a resource-based view and contingency theory approach using potential mediators. J Bus Ind Mark 35(4):635–654. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-11-2018-0324CrossRef

Schwertner K (2017) Digital transformation of business. Trakia J Sci 15(1):388–393. https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2017.s.01.065CrossRef

Shahbaz M, Raghutla C, Song M, Zameer H, Jiao Z (2020) Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: the role of technological innovations in China. Energy Econ 86:104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104664CrossRef

Shahzad MA, Jianguo Du, Junaid M (2023) Impact of green HRM practices on sustainable performance: mediating role of green innovation, green culture, and green employees’ behavior. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(38):88524–88547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28498-6CrossRef

Shang L, Tan D, Feng S, Zhou W (2022) Environmental regulation, import trade, and green technology innovation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(9):12864–12874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13490-9CrossRef

Sharma C, Ojha CSP (2020) Statistical parameters of hydrometeorological variables: standard deviation, SNR, skewness and kurtosis. Advances in water resources engineering and management: select proceedings of TRACE 2018

Shela V, Ramayah T, Aravindan KL, Ahmad NH, Alzahrani AI (2023) Run! This road has no ending! a systematic review of PLS-SEM application in strategic management research among developing nations. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22476CrossRef

Shen N, Liao H, Deng R, Wang Q (2019) Different types of environmental regulations and the heterogeneous influence on the environmental total factor productivity: empirical analysis of China’s industry. J Clean Prod 211:171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.170CrossRef

Sheng S, Zhou KZ, Li JJ (2011) The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. J Mark 75(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.75.1.1CrossRef

Shrestha N (2021) Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. Am J Appl Math Stat 9(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2CrossRef

Shu C, Zhou KZ, Xiao Y, Gao S (2016) How green management influences product innovation in China: the role of institutional benefits. J Bus Ethics 133:471–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2401-7CrossRef

Singh SK, Del Giudice M, Jabbour CJC, Latan H, Sohal AS (2022) Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Bus Strateg Environ 31(1):500–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2906CrossRef

Sui Bo, Yao L (2023) The impact of digital transformation on corporate financialization: the mediating effect of green technology innovation. Innov Green Dev 2(1):100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2022.100032CrossRef

Sun X, Ping Z-B, Dong Z-F, Chen K-L, Xiao-Dong Zhu B, Li L, Tan X-Y, Zhu B-K, Liu X, Zhou C-C (2021) Resources and environmental costs of China’s rapid economic growth: from the latest theoretic SEEA framework to modeling practice. J Clean Prod 315:128126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102569CrossRef

Tanaka S (2015) Environmental regulations on air pollution in China and their impact on infant mortality. J Health Econ 42:90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.02.004CrossRef

Tang K, Qiu Y, Zhou Di (2020) Does command-and-control regulation promote green innovation performance? Evidence from China’s industrial enterprises. Sci Total Environ 712:136362CrossRef

Tariq A, Badir Y, Chonglerttham S (2019) Green innovation and performance: moderation analyses from Thailand. Eur J Innov Manag 22(3):446–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2018-0148CrossRef

Tehseen S, Qureshi ZH, Johara F, Ramayah T (2020) Assessing dimensions of entrepreneurial competencies: a type ii (reflective-formative) measurement approach using pls-sem. J Sustain Sci Manag 15(2):108–145

TPBO (2020) Countries leading in environmental performance: EPI 2020 Insights and Highlights. https://placebrandobserver.com/countries-leading-in-environmental-performance-2020

Triguero A, Moreno-Mondéjar L, Davia MA (2016) Leaders and laggards in environmental innovation: an empirical analysis of SMEs in Europe. Bus Strateg Environ 25(1):28–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1854CrossRef

Tsai K-H, Liao Y-C (2017) Innovation capacity and the implementation of eco-innovation: toward a contingency perspective. Bus Strateg Environ 26(7):1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1963CrossRef

Tu Yu, Weiku Wu (2021) How does green innovation improve enterprises’ competitive advantage? The role of organizational learning. Sustain Prod Consum 26:504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.031CrossRef

Turulja L, Bajgoric N (2019) Innovation, firms’ performance and environmental turbulence: is there a moderator or mediator? Eur J Innov Manag 22(1):213–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2018-0064CrossRef

Tyler B, Lahneman B, Beukel K, Cerrato D, Minciullo M, Spielmann N, Cruz AD (2020) SME managers’ perceptions of competitive pressure and the adoption of environmental practices in fragmented industries: a multi-country study in the wine industry. Organ Environ 33(3):437–463CrossRef

Ullah R, Ahmad H, Rehman FU, Fawad A (2023) Green innovation and Sustainable development goals in SMEs: the moderating role of government incentives. J Econ Administrative Sci 39(4):830–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-07-2021-0122CrossRef

Van Veldhoven Z, Vanthienen Jan (2022) Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Electron Mark 32(2):629–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00464-5CrossRef

Viswanathan L, Varghese G (2018) Greening of business: a step towards sustainability. J Public Aff 18(2):e1705. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1705CrossRef

Wang C, Chen P, Hao Y, Dagestani AA (2022) Tax incentives and green innovation—the mediating role of financing constraints and the moderating role of subsidies. Front Environ Sci 10:1067534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1067534CrossRef

Wei Z, Guoxiang Li Md, Uddin K, Guo S (2020) Environmental regulation, foreign investment behavior, and carbon emissions for 30 provinces in China. J Clean Prod 248:119208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119208CrossRef

Weng H-H, Chen J-S, Chen P-C (2015) Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: a stakeholder perspective. Sustainability 7(5):4997–5026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7054997CrossRef

Wu S, Li Y (2023) A study on the impact of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance: the mediating role of green innovation. Sustainability 15(8):6568CrossRef

Wugan C, Li G (2018) The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 176:110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109CrossRef

Xie R-H, Yuan Y-J, Huang J-J (2017) Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: evidence from China. Ecol Econ 132:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.019CrossRef

Xu M (2022) Research on the relationship between fiscal decentralization and environmental management efficiency under competitive pressure: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(16):23392–23406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17426-1CrossRef

Xue L, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Li C (2022) Can digital transformation promote green technology innovation? Sustainability 14(12):7497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127497CrossRef

Yang R, Tang W, Zhang J (2021) Technology improvement strategy for green products under competition: the role of government subsidy. Eur J Oper Res 289(2):553–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.07.030CrossRef

Yang X, He L, Xia Y, Chen Y (2019) Effect of government subsidies on renewable energy investments: the threshold effect. Energy Policy 132:156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.039CrossRef

Ye F-F, Wang Y-M (2019) The effects of two types of environmental regulations on economic efficiency: an analysis of Chinese industries. Energy Environ 30(5):898–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X18813690CrossRef

Yi M, Wang Y, Yan M, Lina Fu, Zhang Y (2020) Government R&D subsidies, environmental regulations, and their effect on green innovation efficiency of manufacturing industry: evidence from the Yangtze River economic belt of China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(4):1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041330CrossRef

Yingyuan G, Xia X, Zhang S, Zhang D (2018) Environmental regulation, government R&D funding and green technology innovation: evidence from China provincial data. Sustainability 10(4):940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040940CrossRef

Yu C-H, Xiuqin Wu, Zhang D, Chen S, Zhao J (2021) Demand for green finance: resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy 153:112255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255CrossRef

Yuan B, Zhang Y (2020) Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: the moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement. J Clean Prod 243:118543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118543CrossRef

Zhang J, Zhang J, Feng Z, Guo Xu (2020) Residuals based Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises tests for varying coefficient models. Commun Stat Simul Comput 49(7):1798–1814. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1506031CrossRef

Zheng W, Walsh PP (2019) Economic growth, urbanization and energy consumption—a provincial level analysis of China. Energy Econ 80:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.01.004CrossRef

Title: Environmental regulations and government support drive green innovation performance: role of competitive pressure and digital transformation
Authors: Shamim Akhtar
Hongyun Tian
Shuja Iqbal
Rana Yassir Hussain
Publication date: 22-04-2024
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Electronic ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02857-4