Skip to main content
Top

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Outputs and Outcomes in Collaborative Governance

Author : James Agbodzakey

Published in: Collaborative Governance Primer

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Outputs and outcomes reflect cross-sector stakeholders’ purpose and attendant efforts in tackling complex public problems for society through collaborative governance. The challenges that complex problems present in the various areas, such as health and human services, environment, climate change, crime, water crisis, economic development, national security, and terrorism, demand intentional collective decisions and actions through collaborative governance to enable constructive and sustainable solutions. The convergence of public, private, nonprofit, and civic sectors and stakeholders in collaborative governance coupled with regular engagement in result-oriented collaborative forums usually culminates in outputs that translate into categories of services or actions with associated tangible and intangible outcomes for the greater good. Thus, whether the outputs are decisions such as allocation priorities, strategic or comprehensive plans, number of clients served, collaborative forum engagement-related committee tasks, or evaluation results, the outcomes could be reflected in health, community wellbeing, responsive public service delivery, resiliency, sound natural resources management, effective climate action, continuous improvement, and others. The reality of collaborative governance, though, especially the complications of the collaborative process, could somewhat negate or delay prompt stakeholders’ efforts. However, their collective resolve helps to work toward outputs and outcomes with extensive benefits. This chapter relates the concepts of outputs and outcomes in a collaborative governance context while referencing the elements, a health service case, and a proposed intervention case as essential additions to promote relevant competencies.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Agbodzakey, J. (2012). Collaborative governance of HIV health services planning councils in Broward and Palm Beach Counties of South Florida. Public Organization Review, 12, 107–126.CrossRef Agbodzakey, J. (2012). Collaborative governance of HIV health services planning councils in Broward and Palm Beach Counties of South Florida. Public Organization Review, 12, 107–126.CrossRef
go back to reference Agbodzakey, J. K. (2017). Ryan white CARE act and collaborative governance re-examined: The South Florida experience. Public Organization Review, 17(2), 293–314.CrossRef Agbodzakey, J. K. (2017). Ryan white CARE act and collaborative governance re-examined: The South Florida experience. Public Organization Review, 17(2), 293–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Agbodzakey, J. K. (2021). Leadership in collaborative governance: The case of HIV/AIDS health services planning council in South Florida. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(13), 1051–1064.CrossRef Agbodzakey, J. K. (2021). Leadership in collaborative governance: The case of HIV/AIDS health services planning council in South Florida. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(13), 1051–1064.CrossRef
go back to reference Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2018). Managing collaborative innovation in public bureaucracies. Planning Theory, 17(1), 53–73.CrossRef Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2018). Managing collaborative innovation in public bureaucracies. Planning Theory, 17(1), 53–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Alkaraan, F. (2018). Public financial management reform: An ongoing journey towards good governance. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 16(4), 585–609.CrossRef Alkaraan, F. (2018). Public financial management reform: An ongoing journey towards good governance. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 16(4), 585–609.CrossRef
go back to reference Amirkhanyan, A. A. (2009). Collaborative performance measurement: Examining and explaining the prevalence of collaboration in state and local government contracts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 523–554.CrossRef Amirkhanyan, A. A. (2009). Collaborative performance measurement: Examining and explaining the prevalence of collaboration in state and local government contracts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 523–554.CrossRef
go back to reference Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.CrossRef Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.CrossRef
go back to reference Ayres, S. (2019). How can network leaders promote public value through soft metagovernance? Public Administration, 97(2), 279–295.CrossRef Ayres, S. (2019). How can network leaders promote public value through soft metagovernance? Public Administration, 97(2), 279–295.CrossRef
go back to reference Bednar, D., Henstra, D., & McBean, G. (2019). The governance of climate change adaptation: Are networks to blame for the implementation deficit? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), 702–717.CrossRef Bednar, D., Henstra, D., & McBean, G. (2019). The governance of climate change adaptation: Are networks to blame for the implementation deficit? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), 702–717.CrossRef
go back to reference Beer, A., & Clower, T. (2014). Mobilizing leadership in cities and regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 5–20.CrossRef Beer, A., & Clower, T. (2014). Mobilizing leadership in cities and regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 5–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Bixler, R. P. (2014). Is there an heir apparent to the crown? A more informed understanding of connectivity and networked environmental governance in the Crown of the Continent. Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University. Bixler, R. P. (2014). Is there an heir apparent to the crown? A more informed understanding of connectivity and networked environmental governance in the Crown of the Continent. Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University.
go back to reference Bonilla-Chacín, M. E. (Ed.). (2013). Promoting healthy living in Latin America and the Caribbean: Governance of multisectoral activities to prevent risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. World Bank Publications. Bonilla-Chacín, M. E. (Ed.). (2013). Promoting healthy living in Latin America and the Caribbean: Governance of multisectoral activities to prevent risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. World Bank Publications.
go back to reference Bretton, R. J., Gottsmann, J., & Christie, R. (2018). Hazard communication by volcanologists: Part 1-Framing the case for contextualisation and related quality standards in volcanic hazard assessments. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 7(1), 1–20. Bretton, R. J., Gottsmann, J., & Christie, R. (2018). Hazard communication by volcanologists: Part 1-Framing the case for contextualisation and related quality standards in volcanic hazard assessments. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 7(1), 1–20.
go back to reference Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Seo, D. (2020). Using a design approach to create collaborative governance. Policy & Politics, 48(1), 167–189.CrossRef Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Seo, D. (2020). Using a design approach to create collaborative governance. Policy & Politics, 48(1), 167–189.CrossRef
go back to reference Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.CrossRef Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.CrossRef
go back to reference Bussu, S., & Tullia Galanti, M. (2018). Facilitating coproduction: The role of leadership in coproduction initiatives in the UK. Policy and Society, 37(3), 347–367.CrossRef Bussu, S., & Tullia Galanti, M. (2018). Facilitating coproduction: The role of leadership in coproduction initiatives in the UK. Policy and Society, 37(3), 347–367.CrossRef
go back to reference Capano, G. (2018). Policy design spaces in reforming governance in higher education: The dynamics in Italy and the Netherlands. Higher Education, 75(4), 675–694.CrossRef Capano, G. (2018). Policy design spaces in reforming governance in higher education: The dynamics in Italy and the Netherlands. Higher Education, 75(4), 675–694.CrossRef
go back to reference Castillo, E. A. (2016). Spinning straw into gold: A study of resource creation, flow, and conversion in a nonprofit collaboration. University of San Diego. Castillo, E. A. (2016). Spinning straw into gold: A study of resource creation, flow, and conversion in a nonprofit collaboration. University of San Diego.
go back to reference Cheng, S. M., & Catallo, C. (2020). Conceptual framework: Factors enabling collaborative healthcare and social services integration. Journal of Integrated Care, 28(3), 215–229.CrossRef Cheng, S. M., & Catallo, C. (2020). Conceptual framework: Factors enabling collaborative healthcare and social services integration. Journal of Integrated Care, 28(3), 215–229.CrossRef
go back to reference Cheung, P. T. (2015). Toward collaborative governance between Hong Kong and Mainland China. Urban Studies, 52(10), 1915–1933.CrossRef Cheung, P. T. (2015). Toward collaborative governance between Hong Kong and Mainland China. Urban Studies, 52(10), 1915–1933.CrossRef
go back to reference Collins, B. K., & Gerber, B. J. (2008). Taken for granted? Managing for social equity in grant programs. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1128–1141.CrossRef Collins, B. K., & Gerber, B. J. (2008). Taken for granted? Managing for social equity in grant programs. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1128–1141.CrossRef
go back to reference DeGroff, A. S. (2009). New public management and governance collide: Federal-level performance measurement in networked public management environments. Georgia Institute of Technology and Georgia State University. DeGroff, A. S. (2009). New public management and governance collide: Federal-level performance measurement in networked public management environments. Georgia Institute of Technology and Georgia State University.
go back to reference Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29.
go back to reference Feist, A., Plummer, R., & Baird, J. (2020). The inner-workings of collaboration in environmental management and governance: A systematic mapping review. Environmental Management, 66(5), 801–815.CrossRef Feist, A., Plummer, R., & Baird, J. (2020). The inner-workings of collaboration in environmental management and governance: A systematic mapping review. Environmental Management, 66(5), 801–815.CrossRef
go back to reference Fernandes, M. E., Lopes, A. S., & Sargento, A. L. (2021). Improving stakeholder engagement in local strategic planning–experience sharing based on Portuguese examples. Policy Studies, 42(4), 381–396.CrossRef Fernandes, M. E., Lopes, A. S., & Sargento, A. L. (2021). Improving stakeholder engagement in local strategic planning–experience sharing based on Portuguese examples. Policy Studies, 42(4), 381–396.CrossRef
go back to reference Foster, N., Collins, K., Ison, R., & Blackmore, C. (2016). Water governance in England: Improving understandings and practices through systemic co-inquiry. Water, 8(11), 540.CrossRef Foster, N., Collins, K., Ison, R., & Blackmore, C. (2016). Water governance in England: Improving understandings and practices through systemic co-inquiry. Water, 8(11), 540.CrossRef
go back to reference Gilfillan, D. (2018). Regional organisations supporting health sector responses to climate change in Southeast Asia. Globalization and Health, 14, 1–13.CrossRef Gilfillan, D. (2018). Regional organisations supporting health sector responses to climate change in Southeast Asia. Globalization and Health, 14, 1–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Harmon, S. H., Faour, D. E., & MacDonald, N. E. (2021). Mandatory immunization and vaccine injury support programs: A survey of 28 GNN countries. Vaccine, 39(49), 7153–7157.CrossRef Harmon, S. H., Faour, D. E., & MacDonald, N. E. (2021). Mandatory immunization and vaccine injury support programs: A survey of 28 GNN countries. Vaccine, 39(49), 7153–7157.CrossRef
go back to reference Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34. Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34.
go back to reference Hassenforder, E., Smajgl, A., & Ward, J. (2015). Towards understanding participatory processes: Framework, application and results. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 84–95.CrossRef Hassenforder, E., Smajgl, A., & Ward, J. (2015). Towards understanding participatory processes: Framework, application and results. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 84–95.CrossRef
go back to reference Hill, R., Williams, K. J., Pert, P. L., Robinson, C. J., Dale, A. P., Westcott, D. A., et al. (2010). Adaptive community-based biodiversity conservation in Australia’s tropical rainforests. Environmental Conservation, 37(1), 73–82.CrossRef Hill, R., Williams, K. J., Pert, P. L., Robinson, C. J., Dale, A. P., Westcott, D. A., et al. (2010). Adaptive community-based biodiversity conservation in Australia’s tropical rainforests. Environmental Conservation, 37(1), 73–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Holt, J., & Manning, N. (2014). Fukuyama is right about measuring state quality: Now what? Governance, 27(4), 717–728.CrossRef Holt, J., & Manning, N. (2014). Fukuyama is right about measuring state quality: Now what? Governance, 27(4), 717–728.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoppe, R. (2011). Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy & Politics, 39(2), 163–186.CrossRef Hoppe, R. (2011). Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy & Politics, 39(2), 163–186.CrossRef
go back to reference Jagosh, J., Bush, P. L., Salsberg, J., Macaulay, A. C., Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., et al. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: Partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1–11.CrossRef Jagosh, J., Bush, P. L., Salsberg, J., Macaulay, A. C., Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., et al. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: Partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1–11.CrossRef
go back to reference John, P. (2009). Can citizen governance redress the representative bias of political participation? Public Administration Review, 69(3), 494–503.CrossRef John, P. (2009). Can citizen governance redress the representative bias of political participation? Public Administration Review, 69(3), 494–503.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnston, E. W., Hicks, D., Nan, N., & Auer, J. C. (2011). Managing the inclusion process in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 699–721.CrossRef Johnston, E. W., Hicks, D., Nan, N., & Auer, J. C. (2011). Managing the inclusion process in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 699–721.CrossRef
go back to reference Jørgensen, A., Fallov, M. A., Casado-Diaz, M., & Atkinson, R. (2020). Rural cohesion: Collective efficacy and leadership in the territorial governance of inclusion. Social Inclusion, 8(4). Jørgensen, A., Fallov, M. A., Casado-Diaz, M., & Atkinson, R. (2020). Rural cohesion: Collective efficacy and leadership in the territorial governance of inclusion. Social Inclusion, 8(4).
go back to reference Kalesnikaite, V. (2018). Facing the rising tide: How local governments in the United States collaborate to adapt to sea level rise. FIU electronic theses and dissertations, Florida International University Kalesnikaite, V. (2018). Facing the rising tide: How local governments in the United States collaborate to adapt to sea level rise. FIU electronic theses and dissertations, Florida International University
go back to reference Kelley, Z. J. (2015). Collaborative governance as a precursor to sustained participation in antlerless deer hunting on the Kinzua Quality Deer Cooperative. Michigan State University. Kelley, Z. J. (2015). Collaborative governance as a precursor to sustained participation in antlerless deer hunting on the Kinzua Quality Deer Cooperative. Michigan State University.
go back to reference Kim, P. S. (2007). Emerging challenges to the public capacity in the era of evolving public administration: Toward collaborative public management. Asian Journal of Political Science, 15(3), 282–302.CrossRef Kim, P. S. (2007). Emerging challenges to the public capacity in the era of evolving public administration: Toward collaborative public management. Asian Journal of Political Science, 15(3), 282–302.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, S. W. (2010). Managerial coaching behavior and employee outcomes: A structural equation modeling analysis. Texas A&M University. Kim, S. W. (2010). Managerial coaching behavior and employee outcomes: A structural equation modeling analysis. Texas A&M University.
go back to reference Koebele, E. A. (2015). Assessing outputs, outcomes, and barriers in collaborative water governance: A case study. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 155(1), 63–72.CrossRef Koebele, E. A. (2015). Assessing outputs, outcomes, and barriers in collaborative water governance: A case study. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 155(1), 63–72.CrossRef
go back to reference Koebele, E. A. (2017). Collaborative water governance in the Colorado River Basin: Understanding coalition dynamics and processes of policy change. Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder. Koebele, E. A. (2017). Collaborative water governance in the Colorado River Basin: Understanding coalition dynamics and processes of policy change. Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.
go back to reference Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66, 111–121.CrossRef Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66, 111–121.CrossRef
go back to reference Kusters, K., De Graaf, M., Buck, L., Galido, K., Maindo, A., Mendoza, H., et al. (2020). Inclusive landscape governance for sustainable development: Assessment methodology and lessons for civil society organizations. Land, 9(4), 128.CrossRef Kusters, K., De Graaf, M., Buck, L., Galido, K., Maindo, A., Mendoza, H., et al. (2020). Inclusive landscape governance for sustainable development: Assessment methodology and lessons for civil society organizations. Land, 9(4), 128.CrossRef
go back to reference Lawrence, R. (2011). Deriving collaborative aims and outcomes: A case-study of cross-border cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe. Evaluation, 17(4), 365–382.CrossRef Lawrence, R. (2011). Deriving collaborative aims and outcomes: A case-study of cross-border cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe. Evaluation, 17(4), 365–382.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, J., Chae, J. H., & Lim, S. H. (2016). Governing a welfare mix: Operation of long-term care policies in England and South Korea. Korea Observer, 47(1). Lee, J., Chae, J. H., & Lim, S. H. (2016). Governing a welfare mix: Operation of long-term care policies in England and South Korea. Korea Observer, 47(1).
go back to reference Maginn, P. J. (2007). Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration: The potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography. Qualitative Research, 7, 25–43.CrossRef Maginn, P. J. (2007). Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration: The potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography. Qualitative Research, 7, 25–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Mähönen, J. (2020). Comprehensive approach to relevant and reliable reporting in Europe: A dream impossible? Sustainability, 12(13), 5277.CrossRef Mähönen, J. (2020). Comprehensive approach to relevant and reliable reporting in Europe: A dream impossible? Sustainability, 12(13), 5277.CrossRef
go back to reference Mattor, K. M. D. (2013). Evolving institutions of environmental governance: The collaborative implementation of stewardship contracts by the USDA Forest Service. Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University. Mattor, K. M. D. (2013). Evolving institutions of environmental governance: The collaborative implementation of stewardship contracts by the USDA Forest Service. Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University.
go back to reference Melnychuk, N., & de Loë, R. (2020). Legitimacy assessment throughout the life of collaborative water governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 30(1), 14–28.CrossRef Melnychuk, N., & de Loë, R. (2020). Legitimacy assessment throughout the life of collaborative water governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 30(1), 14–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Muir, J., & Mullins, D. (2015). The governance of mandated partnerships: The case of social housing procurement. Housing Studies, 30(6), 967–986.CrossRef Muir, J., & Mullins, D. (2015). The governance of mandated partnerships: The case of social housing procurement. Housing Studies, 30(6), 967–986.CrossRef
go back to reference Nakashima, M. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of performance information use in collaborative networks. State University of New York at Albany. Nakashima, M. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of performance information use in collaborative networks. State University of New York at Albany.
go back to reference Newig, J., Kochskämper, E., Challies, E., & Jager, N. W. (2016). Exploring governance learning: How policymakers draw on evidence, experience and intuition in designing participatory flood risk planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 353–360. Newig, J., Kochskämper, E., Challies, E., & Jager, N. W. (2016). Exploring governance learning: How policymakers draw on evidence, experience and intuition in designing participatory flood risk planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 353–360.
go back to reference Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269–297.CrossRef Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269–297.CrossRef
go back to reference Nolte, I. M., & Boenigk, S. (2011). Public–nonprofit partnership performance in a disaster context: The case of Haiti. Public Administration, 89(4), 1385–1402.CrossRef Nolte, I. M., & Boenigk, S. (2011). Public–nonprofit partnership performance in a disaster context: The case of Haiti. Public Administration, 89(4), 1385–1402.CrossRef
go back to reference Nyangaga, J., Smutylo, T., Romney, D., & Kristjanson, P. (2010). Research that matters: Outcome mapping for linking knowledge to poverty-reduction actions. Development in Practice, 20(8), 972–984.CrossRef Nyangaga, J., Smutylo, T., Romney, D., & Kristjanson, P. (2010). Research that matters: Outcome mapping for linking knowledge to poverty-reduction actions. Development in Practice, 20(8), 972–984.CrossRef
go back to reference Page, S. B. (2013). Theories of governance: Comparative perspectives on Seattle’s light rail project. Policy Studies Journal, 41(4), 583–607.CrossRef Page, S. B. (2013). Theories of governance: Comparative perspectives on Seattle’s light rail project. Policy Studies Journal, 41(4), 583–607.CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, C. F., Nohrstedt, D., Baird, J., Hermansson, H., Rubin, O., & Baekkeskov, E. (2020). Collaborative crisis management: A plausibility probe of core assumptions. Policy and Society, 39(4), 510–529.CrossRef Parker, C. F., Nohrstedt, D., Baird, J., Hermansson, H., Rubin, O., & Baekkeskov, E. (2020). Collaborative crisis management: A plausibility probe of core assumptions. Policy and Society, 39(4), 510–529.CrossRef
go back to reference Pitt, D., & Bassett, E. (2014). Innovation and the role of collaborative planning in local clean energy policy. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(6), 377–390.CrossRef Pitt, D., & Bassett, E. (2014). Innovation and the role of collaborative planning in local clean energy policy. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(6), 377–390.CrossRef
go back to reference Pratama, P. Y., & Nurmandi, A. (2020). Collaborating network in managing post the Mount Merapi’s disruption, Indonesia. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 12(1), 1–10.CrossRef Pratama, P. Y., & Nurmandi, A. (2020). Collaborating network in managing post the Mount Merapi’s disruption, Indonesia. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 12(1), 1–10.CrossRef
go back to reference Prehoda, E., Winkler, R., & Schelly, C. (2019). Putting research to action: Integrating collaborative governance and community-engaged research for community solar. Social Sciences, 8(1), 11.CrossRef Prehoda, E., Winkler, R., & Schelly, C. (2019). Putting research to action: Integrating collaborative governance and community-engaged research for community solar. Social Sciences, 8(1), 11.CrossRef
go back to reference Rambaka, D. (2012). Policy reform and research performance in countries in transition: A comparative case study of Latvia and Estonia. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom). Rambaka, D. (2012). Policy reform and research performance in countries in transition: A comparative case study of Latvia and Estonia. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom).
go back to reference Schiff, J. S. (2017). The evolution of Rhine river governance: Historical lessons for modern transboundary water management. Water History, 9, 279–294.CrossRef Schiff, J. S. (2017). The evolution of Rhine river governance: Historical lessons for modern transboundary water management. Water History, 9, 279–294.CrossRef
go back to reference Segura, M., Maroto, C., Belton, V., & Ginestar, C. (2015). A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services. Forests, 6(5), 1696–1720.CrossRef Segura, M., Maroto, C., Belton, V., & Ginestar, C. (2015). A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services. Forests, 6(5), 1696–1720.CrossRef
go back to reference Shreck, B. (2015). Better the devil you know: A new theory of negotiation in collaborative governance and evidence from endangered species management. Doctoral dissertation. Shreck, B. (2015). Better the devil you know: A new theory of negotiation in collaborative governance and evidence from endangered species management. Doctoral dissertation.
go back to reference Siddiki, S., Kim, J., & Leach, W. D. (2017). Diversity, trust, and social learning in collaborative governance. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 863–874.CrossRef Siddiki, S., Kim, J., & Leach, W. D. (2017). Diversity, trust, and social learning in collaborative governance. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 863–874.CrossRef
go back to reference Skelcher, C., & Torfing, J. (2010). Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe. Regulation & Governance, 4(1), 71–91.CrossRef Skelcher, C., & Torfing, J. (2010). Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe. Regulation & Governance, 4(1), 71–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Sotarauta, M., & Beer, A. (2017). Governance, agency and place leadership: Lessons from a cross-national analysis. Regional Studies, 51(2), 210–223.CrossRef Sotarauta, M., & Beer, A. (2017). Governance, agency and place leadership: Lessons from a cross-national analysis. Regional Studies, 51(2), 210–223.CrossRef
go back to reference Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Smith, S., Panopoulou, E., Tarabanis, K., & Millard, J. (2012). Understanding eParticipation state of play in Europe. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 321–330.CrossRef Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Smith, S., Panopoulou, E., Tarabanis, K., & Millard, J. (2012). Understanding eParticipation state of play in Europe. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 321–330.CrossRef
go back to reference Thynne, I. (2013). Governance and organizational eclecticism in the public arena: Introductory perspectives. Public Organization Review, 13, 107–116.CrossRef Thynne, I. (2013). Governance and organizational eclecticism in the public arena: Introductory perspectives. Public Organization Review, 13, 107–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Torfing, J., Cristofoli, D., Gloor, P. A., Meijer, A. J., & Trivellato, B. (2020). Taming the snake in paradise: Combining institutional design and leadership to enhance collaborative innovation. Policy and Society, 39(4), 592–616.CrossRef Torfing, J., Cristofoli, D., Gloor, P. A., Meijer, A. J., & Trivellato, B. (2020). Taming the snake in paradise: Combining institutional design and leadership to enhance collaborative innovation. Policy and Society, 39(4), 592–616.CrossRef
go back to reference Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825.CrossRef Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825.CrossRef
go back to reference Trankle, S. A., & Reath, J. (2019). Partners in recovery: An early phase evaluation of an Australian mental health initiative using program logic and thematic analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 19, 1–18.CrossRef Trankle, S. A., & Reath, J. (2019). Partners in recovery: An early phase evaluation of an Australian mental health initiative using program logic and thematic analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 19, 1–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships: Four impact loops for channeling partnership studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 1–17.CrossRef Van Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships: Four impact loops for channeling partnership studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Tulder, R., & Keen, N. (2018). Capturing collaborative challenges: Designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 315–332. Van Tulder, R., & Keen, N. (2018). Capturing collaborative challenges: Designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 315–332.
go back to reference Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS One, 10(7), e0131816.CrossRef Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS One, 10(7), e0131816.CrossRef
go back to reference Wall, T. U., McNie, E., & Garfin, G. M. (2017). Use-inspired science: Making science usable by and useful to decision makers. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(10), 551–559.CrossRef Wall, T. U., McNie, E., & Garfin, G. M. (2017). Use-inspired science: Making science usable by and useful to decision makers. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(10), 551–559.CrossRef
go back to reference Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland innovation lab. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 290–299.CrossRef Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland innovation lab. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 290–299.CrossRef
go back to reference Widerberg, O. (2017). The ‘Black Box’problem of orchestration: How to evaluate the performance of the Lima-Paris Action Agenda. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 715–737.CrossRef Widerberg, O. (2017). The ‘Black Box’problem of orchestration: How to evaluate the performance of the Lima-Paris Action Agenda. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 715–737.CrossRef
go back to reference Yuldashev, F. (2018). Natural disasters and governance systems: The sociotechnical foundations of post-disaster governance reforms in Nepal. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. Yuldashev, F. (2018). Natural disasters and governance systems: The sociotechnical foundations of post-disaster governance reforms in Nepal. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
go back to reference Zator, R. (2011). Exploring collaborative governance: Case studies of disruptions in coastal zone management collaborations and resulting effects upon the collaborations and outcomes. Western Michigan University. Zator, R. (2011). Exploring collaborative governance: Case studies of disruptions in coastal zone management collaborations and resulting effects upon the collaborations and outcomes. Western Michigan University.
Metadata
Title
Outputs and Outcomes in Collaborative Governance
Author
James Agbodzakey
Copyright Year
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57373-6_13

Premium Partner