Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Business Economics
Published in: Journal of Business Economics 9/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Paper

Preventing unethical publication behavior of quantitative empirical research by changing editorial policies

Author: Sönke Albers

Published in: Journal of Business Economics | Issue 9/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Recent cases of unethical publication behavior have raised the question of how to address it. Because scientific misconduct (conduct inconsistent with accepted scientific standards) can occur on a continuum ranging from honest errors to outright fraud, there is a need to change editorial policies to reduce the existence of any gray areas. In the case of quantitative empirical research, misconduct begins with honorary and ghost authors, plagiarism and self-plagiarism, and extends to manipulation or even fabrication of data and the reporting of biased or false results. It is suggested that journals should retract articles, inform retraction watch more frequently, use plagiarism software, ask for better and more detailed documentation of procedures so that research can be replicated and potentially analysed as manipulation, and reveal possible affiliations that might lead to biases. These policies will also facilitate faster learning, which will be beneficial to society.
previous article Editorial
next article Scientific ethics and publishing conduct

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Journal of Business Economics

From January 2013, the Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (ZfB) is published in English under the title Journal of Business Economics (JBE). The Journal of Business Economics (JBE) aims at encouraging theoretical and applied research in the field of business economics and business administration, promoting the exchange of ideas between science and practice.

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
Albers S (2009) Editorial: well documented articles achieve more impact. BuR Bus Res 2(1):8–9CrossRef
Albers S (2012) Optimizable and implementable aggregate response modeling for marketing decision support. Int J Res Mark 29(2):111–122CrossRef
Albers S, André B (2012) Wovon hängt die Leistung in Forschung und Lehre ab? Eine Analyse deutscher betriebswirtschaftlicher Fachbereiche basierend auf den Daten des Centrums für Hochschulentwicklung und des Handelsblatts, Arbeitspapier, Kühne Logistics University, Hamburg
Anderson RG, Greene WH, McCullough BD, Vinod HD (2008) The role of data/code archives in the future of economic research. J Econ Methodol 15(1):99–119CrossRef
Auspurg K, Thomas H (2011) What fuels publication bias? Theoretical and empirical analyses of risk factors using the caliper test. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 231(5–6):636–660
Bauer J, Jochen G (2011) Difficulties detecting fraud? The use of Benford’s law on regression tables. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 231(5–6):733–748
Benford F (1938) The law of anomalous numbers. Proc Am Philos Soc 78(4):551–572
Cossette P (2004) Research integrity: an exploratory survey of administrative science faculties. J Bus Ethics 49:213–234CrossRef
Desai PS (2013) Editorial: marketing science replication and disclosure policy. Mark Sci 32(1):1–3CrossRef
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1998) Proposals for safeguarding good scientific practice. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Diekmann A (2011) Are most published research findings false? Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 231(5–6):628–635
Erasmus University (2012) Report by the committee for inquiry of scientific integrity. Inquiry into a possible violation by Dirk Smeesters, 28 June 2012
Evanschitzky H, Baumgarth C, Hubbard R, Scott Armstrong J (2007) Replication research’s disturbing trend. J Bus Res 60(4):411–415CrossRef
Fanelli D (2009) How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE 4(5):e5738CrossRef
Fanelli D (2012) Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics 90:891–904CrossRef
Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD, Rennie D (1998) Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. J Am Med Assoc 280(3):222–224CrossRef
Frenzen H, Hansen A, Krafft M, Mantrala MK, Schmidt S (2010) Delegation of pricing authority to the sales force: an agency-theoretic perspective of its determinants and impact on performance. Int J Res Mark 27(1):58–68CrossRef
Goodstein D (2010) On fact and fraud. Cautionary tales from the front lines of science. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Haucap J (2012) BWL: Kein Ranking ist auch keine Lösung. Ist die Wirkmächtigkeit des Handelsblatt-Rankings so groß, dass man es boykottieren muss? Handelsblatt
Honig B, Bedi A (2012) The fox in the hen house: a critical examination of plagiarism among members of the academy of management. Acad Manag Learn Educ 11(1):101–123CrossRef
Journal of Economic Perspectives (2011) Correspondence between editor autor and author Frey. J Econ Perspect 25(3):239–240CrossRef
Kieser A (2012) JOURQUAL-der Gebrauch, nicht der Missbrauch, ist das Problem. Oder: warum Wirtschaftsinformatik die beste deutschsprachige betriebswirtschaftliche Zeitschrift ist. Die Betriebswirtschaft 72(1):93–110
Koole SL, Daniël L (2012) Rewarding replications: a sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci
Kumar MN (2010) A theoretical comparison of the models of prevention of research misconduct. Account Res 17:51–66CrossRef
Lacetera N, Zirulia L (2011) The economics of scientific misconduct. J Law Econ Organ 27(3):568–603CrossRef
List CJ (1985) Scientific fraud: social deviance or the failure of virtue? Sci Technol Hum Values 10(4):27–36CrossRef
Luce MF, McGill MA, Peracchio L (2012) Promoting an environment of scientific integrity: individual and community responsibilities. J Consum Res 39(3):iii–viiiCrossRef
Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R (2005) Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435:737–738CrossRef
McCullough BD, McGeary KA, Harrison T (2006) Lessons from the JMCB archive. J Money Credit Bank 38(4):1093–1107CrossRef
McCullough BD, McGeary KA, Harrison TD (2008) Do economics journal archives promote replicable research? Can J Econ 41(4):1406–1420CrossRef
Nosek BA, Jeffrey RS, Matt M (2012) Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect Psychol Sci
Nylenna M, Sigmund S (2006) Scientific misconduct: a new approach to prevention. Lancet 367:1882–1884CrossRef
Resnik DB, Stewart CN (2012) Misconduct versus honest error and scientific disagreement. Account Res Polic Quality Assur 19(1):56–63
Schrader U, Hennig-Thurau T (2009) VHB-JOURQUAL2: method, results, and implications of the German academic association for business research’s journal ranking. BuR Bus Res 2(2):180–204CrossRef
Schräpfler J-P (2011) Benford’s law as an instrument for fraud detection in surveys using the data of the socio-economic panel (SOEP). Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 231(5–6):685–718
Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci XX:1–8
Storbeck O (2012) BWL-Professor gerät ins Zwielicht. Fehler und Ungereimtheiten—Zeitschriften ziehen Studien des Mannheimer Forschers Ulrich Lichtenthaler zurück, Handelsblatt
Tilburg University (2011) Interim report regarding the breach of scientific integrity committed by professor D. A. Stapel, Tilburg, 31 Oct 2011
Warnecke H-J (2000) Erklärung des Präsidenten der FhG, Forschung and Lehre, 2/2000, 90
Wondracek G, Holz T, Kirda E, Kruegel C (2011). A practical attack to de-anonymize social network users, technical report TR-iSecLab-0110-001
Woolf PK (1991) Accountability and responsibility in research. J Bus Ethics 10:595–600CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preventing unethical publication behavior of quantitative empirical research by changing editorial policies
Author
Sönke Albers
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Business Economics / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0044-2372
Electronic ISSN: 1861-8928
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0675-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

Journal of Business Economics 9/2014 Go to the issue

Erratum

Erratum to: Editorial

Original Paper

On self-interest and greed

Original Paper

Globalization, greed, and exploitation. How to break the baleful path?

Editorial

Editorial

Original Paper

Scientific ethics and publishing conduct

Original Paper

The power of “mapping the territory”. Why economists should become more aware of the performativity of their models

Premium Partner

    Image Credits