Use of the World Wide Web in the 1996 US election
References (25)
To libertarians everywhere
(1996)Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1980)- et al.
Quasi-experimentation
(1979) A republican view
American Behavioral Scientist
(1993)Top 50 House—disbursements through November 25, 1996
(1996)Electronic electioneers
Forbes
(1996)Communication research, the Rockefeller Foundation, and mobilization for the war on words, 1938–1944
Journal of Communication
(1996)Telecosm: the coming software shift
Forbes ASAP
(1995)- et al.
Small-sample properties of several two-stage regression methods in the context of autocorrelated errors
Journal of the American Statistical Association
(1969)
Pandora's box
Who's on-line
Inc. Technology
Cited by (68)
Which candidates benefit from social media? An analysis of the 2021 German federal election
2023, Electoral Studies“They bought it, therefore I will buy it”: The effects of peer users' conversion as sales performance and entrepreneurial sellers' number of followers as relationship performance in mobile social commerce
2022, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Vanity metrics is a terminology that “captures the measurement and display of how well one is doing in the success theater of social media” (Rogers, 2018, p. 450). In the age of Web 1.0, in which the major role of the web used to be an informational medium for publishing content (Song, 2010), the number of hits was deployed as one of the metrics to measure user engagement (D'Alessio, 1997; Gerlitz & Helmond, 2013). The evolution of the Internet-based applications from the “Web-as-information source” to the “Web-as-participation platform” (Song, 2010 p. 251–252) has been the impetus for examining the roles of various factors.
How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes
2014, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Political candidates that use Twitter to communicate with their electorate will receive more preferential votes than political candidates that do not use Twitter to communicate with their electorate. Although the studies by D’Alessio (1997), Gibson and McAllister (2006, 2011) and Wagner and Gainous (2009) compellingly link online campaigning and electoral support, they do not give insights into the specific underlying mechanisms that explain the association. An explanation, however, can be found in the interactivity literature.
A longitudinal study of online campaigning in the most digitally advanced society in the world
2022, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and PartiesMalaysian Politics in the New Media Age: Implications on the Political Communication Process
2019, Malaysian Politics in the New Media Age: Implications on the Political Communication Process