Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal block designs for CDC experiments method (2)

  • Published:
METRON Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Incomplete block designs for a complete diallel cross (CDC) experiment known as method (2) of Griffing (1956) are proposed. These designs are derived by using mutually orthogonal Latin squares of order p, when p is a prime integer or power of a prime integer. With p inbred lines, the [p(p + 1)/2 − 1] degrees of freedom, for this method of Griffing, are partitioned into two orthogonal sets of (p − 1) and p(p − 1)/2 degrees of freedom the former for general combining ability (g c a) and the latter for specific combining ability (s c a) effects, respectively. These designs are optimal in the sense of Kempthorne (1956). The analysis includes the analysis of variance and the estimation of general combining ability and of specific combining ability. The analysis is illustrated numerically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, K. R. (1974) Analysis of Li(s) and triangular designs, Journal of the Indian Society for Agricultural Statistics, 26, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, S. C. and Das, M. N. (1987) A note on construction and application of balanced n-ary designs, Sankhya, Vol. 49, Ser. B, pt 2, 192–196.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, S. C. and Das, M. N. (1990) Use of n-ary block designs in diallel crosses evaluation, Journal of applied statistics, Vol. 17, n. 1, 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, R. C., Shrikahande, S. S. and Parker, E. T. (1960) Further results on the construction of mutually orthogonal Latin squares and falsity of Euler’s Conjecture, Can. J. Math., 12, 189.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baraaten, O. B. (1965) The union of partial diallel mating designs and incomplete block environmental designs, Dissertation, North Carolina State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceranka, B. and Mejza, S. (1988) Analysis of diallel table for experiments carried out in BIB design mixed model, Biometrical Journal, 30, 3–16.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, F. S. and Mukerjee, R. (1999) Optimal design for diallel crosses with specific combining abilities, Biometrika, 86(2), 453–458.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Dey, A. and Dean, A. (1998) Optimal design for diallel cross experiments, Statist., Prob. Letters, 36, 427–436.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, A. (1986) Theory of block designs, Wiley Eastern, New Delhi.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, A. and Midha, Chand, K. (1996) Optimal designs for diallel crosses, Biometrika, 83(2), 484–489.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Divecha, J. and Ghosh, D. K. (1994) Incomplete block designs for complete diallel crosses and their analysis, Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 21, n. 5, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. and Kageyama, S. (1994) Optimal complete diallel crosses, Biometrika, 81,420–424.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. and Yates, F. (1963) Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, B. (1956) Concept of general specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems, Aust. J. Biol. Sci, 9, 463–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A. R. and Miranda, J. B. (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, 2nd ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O. (1956) The theory of diallel crosses, Genetics, 41, 451–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthrone, O. and Curnow, R. N. (1961) The partial diallel cross, Biometrics, 17,229–250. [See also correction, Biometrics 18 (1962), 128].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee, R. (1997) Optimal partial diallel crosses, Biometrika, 84(4), 937–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsad, R., Gupta, V. K. and Srivastava, R. (1999) Optimal designs for diallel crosses, Jour. Soc. Stat., Comp. and Application, 1, 35–52.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavarao, D. (1971) Constuction and combinatorial problems in design of experiments, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1973) Linear statistical inference and its applications, 2nd edition.J.Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M. K. (1996) Blocking of complete diallel crossing plans using balanced lattice designs, Sankhya B., 58(3), 427–430.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M. K. (2004) Optimal complete diallel cross, advances in mating designs (Chapter 15), Dhanpat Rai &Co. (P)Ltd., N. Delhi.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M. K. and Fanta, Sileshi (2009) Incomplete block designs for CDC method I and III, Metron, Vol. LXVII, n.2, 209–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M. K. and Fanta, Sileshi (2010) Optimal block designs for diallel crosses, Metrika, 71, 361–372.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. J. (1998) Statistical and biometrical techniques inplant Breeding, New Age International Publication (p) Limited, Publishers, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. and Hinkelmann, K. (1998) analysis of partial diallel crosses in incomplete blocks, Biometrical Journal, 40, 165–181.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tocher, K. D. (1952) The design and analysis of block experiments (with discussion), J. Royal Statist. Soc., B, 14, 45–100.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahendra Kumar Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, M.K., Melesse, S.F. Optimal block designs for CDC experiments method (2). METRON 69, 297–307 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263563

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263563

Keywords

Navigation