Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Industry mimetic isomorphism and sustainable development based on the X-STATIS and HJ-biplot methods

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on both neo-institutional theory and comparative institutional analysis, this paper studies the role that mimetic forces play in the patterns and evolution of behavior concerning company sustainability. The panel data is composed of 6600 observations of 600 international large listed companies belonging to 39 different activity sectors for the period 2004–2014. Through employing the multivariate statistical methods HJ-biplot and X-STATIS, which provide a useful visualization of a complex data structure in a low-dimensional space, it can be observed that mimetic forces indicate that firms operating in high-impact sectors—sectors that operate under greater pressure from interest groups—face greater social and environmental risks and have higher corporate social responsibility (CSR) scores than companies from other sectors. The adoption or development of CSR practices depends largely on the type of industry in which the company operates, as stakeholder engagement in different industry sectors has different areas of concern. Therefore, companies operating in more polluting sectors, such as mining, paper, chemicals, or oil, give higher priority to environmental protection and defense of human rights, while other, less polluting companies involved in the communication sector are concerned to a greater extent by social issues, such as business ethics or the rights of their employees. Finally, this paper evidences that firms operating in similar contexts, in industries that face analogous risks and challenges, probably develop common policies and regulations with the aim of mitigating the pressures applied by their major stakeholder groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts W, Cormier D, Magnan M (2006) Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: an international perspective. J Account Public Policy 25:299–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amor-Esteban V, García-Sánchez I-M, Galindo-Villardón M-P (2017) Analysing the effect of legal system on corporate social responsibility (CSR) at the country level, from a multivariate perspective. Soc Indic Res:1–18

  • Antolín-López R, Céspedes-Lorente J, García-de-Frutos N, Martínez-del-Río J, Pérez-Valls M (2015) Fostering product innovation: differences between new ventures and established firms. Technovation 41:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayoud NS, Kavanagh M, Slaughter G (2012) Factors influencing levels of corporate social responsibility disclosure by Libyan firms: a mixed study. Int J Econ Finance 4. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n4p13

  • Belu C (2009) Ranking corporations based on sustainable and socially responsible practices. A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Sustain Dev 17:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral O, Gendron Y (2011) Sustainable development and certification practices: lessons learned and prospects. Bus Strateg Environ 20:331–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2008) Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. J Bus Ethics 83:685–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JL (2006) Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. Am Behav Sci 49:925–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32:946–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey RJ, Grenier JH (2014) Understanding and contributing to the enigma of corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance in the United States. Audit J Pract Theory 34:97–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Zhao X, Tang O, Price L, Zhang S, Zhu W (2017) Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: a literature review and future research agenda. Int J Prod Econ 194:73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell SR, Joshi AW (2013) Corporate ecological responsiveness: antecedent effects of institutional pressure and top management commitment and their impact on organizational performance. Bus Strateg Environ 22:73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag M, Wood G, Makhmadshoev D, Rymkevich O (2017) Varieties of CSR: institutions and socially responsible behaviour. Int Bus Rev 26(6):1064–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1991) The new institutionalism in organisational analysis. New Institutionalism Organ Anal (Vol. 17) Chicago, University of Chicago Press

  • Duran JJ, Bajo N (2014) Institutions as determinant factors of corporate responsibility strategies of multinational firms. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 21:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekelenburg MV (2016) Determinants of voluntary external assurance on corporate sustainability reports: a comparison between Europe and North America. Radboud University, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Escoufier Y (1976) Opérateur associé à un tableau de données, in: Annales de l’INSEE. JSTOR, pp 165–179

  • Gabriel KR (1971) The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58:453–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galindo MP (1986) Una alternativa de representacion simultanea: HJ-Biplot. Qüestiió 10(1):13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Álvarez I, Ortas E (2017) Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: a quantile regression approach. Int Bus Rev 26:337–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Sánchez I-M, García-Meca E (2017) CSR engagement and earnings quality in banks. The moderating role of institutional factors. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 24:145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Sánchez I-M, Rodríguez-Ariza L, Frías-Aceituno J-V (2013) The cultural system and integrated reporting. Int Bus Rev 22:828–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Sanchez I-M, Cuadrado-Ballesteros B, Frias-Aceituno J-V (2016) Impact of the institutional macro context on the voluntary disclosure of CSR information. Long Range Plan 49:15–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjølberg M (2009) Measuring the immeasurable? Scand J Manag 25:10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2008.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goll I, Rasheed AA (2004) The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. J Bus Ethics 49:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Rodríguez MR, Díaz-Fernández MC, Simonetti B (2015) The social, economic and environmental dimensions of corporate social responsibility: the role played by consumers and potential entrepreneurs. Int Bus Rev 24:836–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch A, Jonker J, Wegner M, Schmidpeter R (2005) Corporate social responsibility across Europe. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Halkos G, Skouloudis A (2016) National CSR and institutional conditions: an exploratory study. J Clean Prod 139:1150–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos G, Skouloudis A (2017) Revisiting the relationship between corporate social responsibility and national culture: a quantitative assessment. Manag Decis 55(3):595–613. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2016-0868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge K, Subramaniam N, Stewart J (2009) Assurance of sustainability reports: impact on report users’ confidence and perceptions of information credibility. Aust Account Rev 19:178–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (2001) Cultural consequences. Sage Publ, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Inselberg A (1992) The plane R2 with coordinate parallel. Comput Sci Appl Math Dep Tel Aviv, University Israel

  • Jackson G, Apostolakou A (2010) Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: an institutional mirror or substitute? J Bus Ethics 94:371–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0269-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffrenou P-A (1978) Sur l’analyse des familles finies de variables vectorielles: bases algébriques et application à la description statistique. The’se de Troisie’me Cycle, Universite´ de Lyon

  • Kolk A, Perego P (2010) Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: an international investigation. Bus Strateg Environ 19:182–198

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Hermier des Plantes, H (1976) Structuration des tableauya trois indices de la statistique. Thése de 3eme cycle, Université Montpellier II

  • Larrinaga C (2007) Sustainability reporting: insights from neo-institutional theory. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenssen G, Gasdparski W, Rok B, Lacy P, Midttun A, Gautesen K, Gjølberg M (2006) The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 6:369–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar Miras-Rodríguez M, Carrasco-Gallego A, Escobar-Pérez B (2015) Are socially responsible behaviors paid off equally? A cross-cultural analysis. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 22:237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Ferrero J, García-Sánchez I-M (2016) Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. Int Bus Rev 26(1):102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten D, Moon J (2004) Implicit and explicit CSR. A conceptual framework to understand CSR in Europe ICCSR Res Pap Ser 29

  • McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strateg Manag J 21:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Friesen PH (1983) Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strateg Manag J 4:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortas E, Álvarez I, Jaussaud J, Garayar A (2015) The impact of institutional and social context on corporate environmental, social and governance performance of companies committed to voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives. J Clean Prod 108:673–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park BI, Chidlow A, Choi J (2014) Corporate social responsibility: stakeholders influence on MNEs’ activities. Int Bus Rev 23:966–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsa S, Deng LX (2008) Capital markets’ reactions to social information announcements. Int J Account Finance 1:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten DM (1992) Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. J Account Public Policy 10:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perego P (2009) Causes and consequences of choosing different assurance providers: an international study of sustainability reporting. Int J Manag 26:412

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringov D, Zollo M (2007) The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc 7:476–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710820551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem MA, Shawtari F, Shamsudin MF, Hussain HBI (2017) The consequences of integrating stakeholder engagement in sustainable development (environmental perspectives). Sustain Dev 26:255–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreck P (2009) The business case for corporate social responsibility: understanding and measuring economic impacts of corporate social performance. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simnett R, Vanstraelen A, Chua WF (2009) Assurance on sustainability reports: an international comparison. Account Rev 84:937–967. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skouloudis A, Evangelinos K (2012) A research design for mapping national CSR terrains. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 19(2):130–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skouloudis A, Isaac D, Evaggelinos K (2016) Revisiting the national corporate social responsibility index. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 23(1):61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw BM, Szwajkowski E (1975) The scarcity-munificence component of organizational environments and the commission of illegal acts. Adm Sci Q 20(3):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Dole S, Olivier J-M (1997) ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat Comput 7:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tower G, Rusmin R (2012) Legitimising corporate sustainability reporting throughout the world. Australas Account Bus Finance J 6(2):19

    Google Scholar 

  • Venanzi D, Fidanza B (2006) Corporate social responsibility and value creation-determinants and mutual relationships in a sample of European listed firms. Social Science Research Network, Rochester. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.939710

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente-Villardón JL (2010) MULTBIPLOT: a package for multivariate analysis using biplots. Mathlab Softw Biplot Usal EsClassicalBiplotindex Html

  • Wanderley LSO, Lucian R, Farache F, de Sousa Filho JM (2008) CSR information disclosure on the web: a context-based approach analysing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. J Bus Ethics 82:369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber JL (2014) Corporate social responsibility disclosure level, external assurance and cost of equity capital. Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder

  • Welford R (2004) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and Asia: critical elements and best practice. J Corp Citizsh 13:31

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford R (2005) Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia: 2004 survey results. J Corp Citizsh 17:33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao JZ, Gao SS, Heravi S, Cheung YC (2005) The impact of social and economic development on corporate social and environmental disclosure in Hong Kong and the UK. Adv Int Account 18:219–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young S, Marais M (2012) A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: the implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corp Gov Int Rev 20:432–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Simnett R, Green W (2013) The effect of legal environment and corporate governance on the decision to assure and assurance provider choice: evidence from the GHG assurance market. UNSW Aust Sch Bus Res Pap A 5

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, c/ Alfonso X El Sabio s/n, 37007, Salamanca, Spain

    Víctor Amor-Esteban & Mª-Purificación Galindo-Villardón

  2. Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007, Salamanca, Spain

    Isabel-María García-Sánchez

Authors
  1. Víctor Amor-Esteban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mª-Purificación Galindo-Villardón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isabel-María García-Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Víctor Amor-Esteban.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Loubet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amor-Esteban, V., Galindo-Villardón, MP. & García-Sánchez, IM. Industry mimetic isomorphism and sustainable development based on the X-STATIS and HJ-biplot methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 26192–26208 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2663-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2663-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation