Abstract
Trade Regimes and Spillover Effects of FDI: Evidence from Uruguay. — This paper examines differences in the character and impact of FDI entering Uruguay during import substitution, pursued until 1973, and the subsequent more outwardoriented trade regime. Regression analysis shows that the labor productivity of local firms is positively related to the presence of older import-substituting MNCs in their industry. The presence of foreign affiliates established after 1973 has no apparent impact on local productivity, but seems to raise the likelihood that local firms engage in exporting. This may be a sign of export spillovers, indicating that local firms may pick up some exportrelated skills from the operations of outward-oriented foreign MNCs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken, B. J., and A. E. Harrison (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from Venezuela.American Economic Review 89 (3): 605–618.
Aitken, B. J., G. Hansen, and A. E. Harrison (1997). Spillovers, Foreign Investment, and Export Behavior.Journal of International Economics 43 (1/2): 103–132.
Athukorala, P., S. Jayasuriya, and E. Oczkowski (1995). Multinational Firms and Export Performance in Developing Countries: Some Analytical Issues and New Empirical Evidence.Journal of Development Economics 46 (1): 109–122.
Auquier, A. A. (1980). Sizes of Firms, Exporting Behavior and the Structure of French Industry.Journal of Industrial Economics 29 (2): 203–218.
Aw, B.-Y., and A. R. Hwang (1995). Productivity and the Export Market: A Firm Level Analysis.Journal of Development Economics 47 (2): 313–332.
Balasubramanyam, V. N., and M. A. Salisu (1991). EP, IS and Direct Foreign Investment. In LDC's. In A. Koekkok and L. B. Mennes (eds.),International Trade and Global Development. London: Routledge.
Balasubramanyam, V. N., M. A. Salisu, and D. Sapsford (1996). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in EP and IS Countries.The Economic Journal 106 (January): 92–105.
Bernard, A. B., and J. B. Jensen (1995). Why Some Firms Export: Experience, Entry Costs, Spillovers, and Subsidies. M.I.T. Cambridge, Mass. Mimeo.
— (1999). Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect or Both?Journal of International Economics 47 (1): 1–25.
Bernard, A. B. and J. Wagner (1997). Exports and Success in German Manufacturing.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133 (1): 134–157.
Bhagwati, J. (1978).Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes. Studies in International Economic Relations 10. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
— (1988). Export Promoting Trade Strategy: Issues and Evidence.World Bank Research Observer 3 (1): 27–58.
Bleaney, M., and K. Wakelin (1999). Sectoral and Firm-Specific Determinants of Export Performance: Evidence from the United Kingdom. GLM Research Paper 99/12, University of Nottingham.
Blomström, M. (1989).Foreign Investment and Spillovers. London: Routledge.
Blomström, M., and H. Persson (1983). Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in an Underdeveloped Economy: Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry.World Development 11 (6): 493–501.
Blomström, M., and A. Kokko (1998). Multinational Corporations and Spillovers.Journal of Economic Surveys 12 (3): 247–277.
Caves, R. E. (1974). Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host Country Markets.Economica 41 (162): 176–193.
Chow, P. C. Y. (1987). Causality Between Export Growth and Industrial Development: Empirical Evidence from the NICs.Journal of Development Economics 26 (1): 55–63.
Clerides, S. K., S. Lach, and J. R. Tybout (1998). Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco.Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3): 903–947.
Conolly, M., and J. de Melo (eds.) (1994).The Effects of Protectionism on a Small Country. The Case of Uruguay. Washington: The World Bank.
Dollar, D. (1992). Outward-oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs 1976–1985.Economic Development and Cultural Change 40 (3): 523–544.
Favaro, E., and P. T. Spiller (1991). Uruguay. In D. Papageorgiou, M. Michaely, and A. M. Choksi (eds.),Liberalizing Foreign Trade. The Experience of Argentina, Chile and Uruguay. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.
Fontes, W. G., R. Tansini, and M. Vaillant (1995). Cross Industry Entry: The Case of a Small Developing Economy. Working Paper 4/95, Department of Economics, University of Uruguay, Montevideo.
Glejser, H., A. Jacquemin, and J. Petit (1980). Exports in an Imperfect Competition Framework: An Analysis of 1446 Exporters.Quarterly Journal of Economics 94 (3): 507–524.
Globerman, S. (1979). Foreign Direct Investment and ‘Spillover’ Efficiency Benefits in Canadian Manufacturing Industries.Canadian Journal of Economics 12 (1): 42–56.
Harrison, A. E. (1996). Openness and Growth: A Time Series, Cross Country Analysis for Developing Countries.Journal of Development Economics 48 (2): 419–447.
Hirsch, S., and Z. Adar (1974). Firm Size and Export Performance.World Development 2 (7): 41–46.
Hsiao, M. W. (1987). Tests of Causality and Exogeneity Between Exports and Economic Growth: The Case of Asian NICs.Journal of Economic Development 12 (2): 143–159.
Kokko, A. (1994). Technology, Market Characteristics and Spillovers.Journal of Development Economics 43 (2): 279–293.
Kokko, A., R. Tansini, and M. Zejan (1996). Local Technological Capability and Productivity Spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan Manufacturing Sector.Journal of Development Studies 32 (4): 602–611.
Lall, S., and R. Kumar (1981). Firm-Level Export Performance in an Inward-Looking Economy: The Indian Engineering Industry.World Development 9 (5): 453–463.
Lipsey, R. E., and M. Blomström (1993). Foreign Firms and Structural Adjustment in Latin America. Lessons from the Debt Crisis. In G. Hansson (ed.),Trade, Growth and Development. London: Routledge.
Pack, H. (1989). Industrialization and Trade. In H. Chenery and T. N. Srinivasan (eds.),Handbook of Development Economics. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Roberts, M. J., and J. R. Tybout (1991). Size Rationalization and Trade Exposure in Developing Countries. In R. E. Baldwin (ed.),Empirical Studies of Commercial Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
— (1997). The Decision to Export in Colombia: An Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Cost.American Economic Review 87 (4): 545–564.
Stopford, J., S. Strange, and J. Henley (1991).Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willmore, L. (1992). Transnational and Foreign Trade: Evidence from Brazil.The Journal of Development Studies 28 (2): 314–335.