Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review on the Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Bead-Rod-Spring Models Encountered in Computational Rheology

  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kinetic theory is a mathematical framework intended to relate directly the most relevant characteristics of the molecular structure to the rheological behavior of the bulk system. In other words, kinetic theory is a micro-to-macro approach for solving the flow of complex fluids that circumvents the use of closure relations and offers a better physical description of the phenomena involved in the flow processes. Cornerstone models in kinetic theory employ beads, rods and springs for mimicking the molecular structure of the complex fluid. The generalized bead-rod-spring chain includes the most basic models in kinetic theory: the freely jointed bead-spring chain and the freely-jointed bead-rod chain. Configuration of simple coarse-grained models can be represented by an equivalent Fokker-Planck (FP) diffusion equation, which describes the evolution of the configuration distribution function in the physical and configurational spaces. FP equation can be a complex mathematical object, given its multidimensionality, and solving it explicitly can become a difficult task. Even more, in some cases, obtaining an equivalent FP equation is not possible given the complexity of the coarse-grained molecular model. Brownian dynamics can be employed as an alternative extensive numerical method for approaching the configuration distribution function of a given kinetic-theory model that avoid obtaining and/or resolving explicitly an equivalent FP equation. The validity of this discrete approach is based on the mathematical equivalence between a continuous diffusion equation and a stochastic differential equation as demonstrated by Itô in the 1940s. This paper presents a review of the fundamental issues in the BD simulation of the linear viscoelastic behavior of bead-rod-spring coarse grained models in dilute solution. In the first part of this work, the BD numerical technique is introduced. An overview of the mathematical framework of the BD and a review of the scope of applications are presented. Subsequently, the links between the rheology of complex fluids, the kinetic theory and the BD technique are established at the light of the stochastic nature of the bead-rod-spring models. Finally, the pertinence of the present state-of-the-art review is explained in terms of the increasing interest for the stochastic micro-to-macro approaches for solving complex fluids problems. In the second part of this paper, a detailed description of the BD algorithm used for simulating a small-amplitude oscillatory deformation test is given. Dynamic properties are employed throughout this work to characterise the linear viscoelastic behavior of bead-rod-spring models in dilute solution. In the third and fourth part of this article, an extensive discussion about the main issues of a BD simulation in linear viscoelasticity of diluted suspensions is tackled at the light of the classical multi-bead-spring chain model and the multi-bead-rod chain model, respectively. Kinematic formulations, integration schemes and expressions to calculate the stress tensor are revised for several classical models: Rouse and Zimm theories in the case of multi-bead-spring chains, and Kramers chain and semi-flexible filaments in the case of multi-bead-rod chains. The implemented BD technique is, on the one hand, validated in front of the analytical or exact numerical solutions known of the equivalent FP equations for those classic kinetic theory models; and, on the other hand, is control-set thanks to the analysis of the main numerical issues involved in a BD simulation. Finally, the review paper is closed by some concluding remarks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Central Processing Unit.

Abbreviations

Scalars:

Lightface

Vectors and Tensors:

Boldface

(A)ij :

Component ij of tensor A

(A) t :

Tensor or vector A at instant t

References

  1. Kröger M (2005) Models for polymeric and anisotropic liquids. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Langevin P (1908) Sur la théorie du mouvement Brownien. C R Acad Sci 146:530

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Öttinger HC (1996) Stochastic processes in polymeric fluids. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ermak DL, McCammon JA (1978) Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions. J Chem Phys 69(4):1352–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pear MR, Weiner JH (1980) Brownian dynamics study of a polymer chain of linked rigid bodies. II. Results for longer chains. J Chem Phys 72(7):3939–3947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hatzikiriakos SG, Vlassopoulos D (1996) Brownian dynamics simulations of shear-thickening in dilute polymer solutions. Rheol Acta 35(3):274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwal US, Bhargava R, Mashelkar RA (1998) Brownian dynamics simulation of a polymer molecule in solution under elongational flow. J Chem Phys 108(4):1610–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cass MJ, Heyes DM, English RJ (2007) Brownian dynamics simulations of associating diblock copolymers. Langmuir 23(12):6576–6587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jin S, Collins LR (2007) Dynamics of dissolved polymer chains in isotropic turbulence. New J Phys 9:360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Venkataramani V, Sureshkumar R, Khomami B (2008) Coarse-grained modeling of macromolecular solutions using a configuration-based approach. J Rheol 52(5):1143–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dwyer JD, Bloomfield VA (1993) Brownian dynamics simulations of probe and self-diffusion in concentrated protein and DNA solutions. Biophys J 65(5):1810–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merlitz H, Rippe K, Kienin KV, Langowski J (1998) Looping dynamics of linear DNA molecules and the effect of DNA curvature: a study by Brownian dynamics simulation. Biophys J 74(2I):773–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. García de la Torre J, Pérez Sánchez HE, Ortega A, Hernández JG, Fernandes MX, Díaz FG (2003) Calculation of the solution properties of flexible macromolecules: methods and applications. Eur Biophys J 32(5):477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenward M, Dorfman KD (2009) Coarse-grained Brownian dynamics simulations of the 10–23 DNAzyme. Biophys J 97(10):2785–2793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ansell GC, Dickinson E (1986) Brownian dynamics simulation of the fragmentation of a large colloidal floc in simple shear flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 110(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xue W, Grest GS (1989) Brownian dynamics simulations for interacting colloids in the presence of a shear flow. Phys Rev A 40(3):1709–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heyes DM, Branka AC (1994) Brownian dynamics simulations of self-diffusion and shear viscosity of near-hard-sphere colloids. Phys Rev E 50(3):2377–2380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bijsterbosch BH, Bos MTA, Dickinson E, Van Opheusden JHJ, Walstra P (1995) Brownian dynamics simulation of particle gel formation: from argon to yoghurt. Faraday Discuss 101:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tokuyama M (1999) Effective diffusion model on Brownian dynamics of hard-sphere colloidal suspensions. Physica A 265(3):333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miyahara M, Watanabe S, Higashitani K (2006) Modeling adsorption and order formation by colloidal particles on a solid surface: a Brownian dynamics study. Chem Eng Sci 61(7):2142–2149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt M, Patrick Royall C, Van Blaaderen A, Dzubiella J (2008) Non-equilibrium sedimentation of colloids: confocal microscopy and Brownian dynamics simulations. J Phys Condens Matter 20(49)

  22. Mori N, Fujioka H, Semura R, Nakamura K (2003) Brownian dynamics simulations for suspension of ellipsoids in liquid crystalline phase under simple shear flows. Rheol Acta 42(1):102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Siettos CI, Graham MD, Kevrekidis IG (2003) Coarse Brownian dynamics for nematic liquid crystals: bifurcation, projective integration, and control via stochastic simulation. J Chem Phys 118(22):10149–10156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song YS, Youn JR (2004) Modeling of rheological behavior of nanocomposites by Brownian dynamics simulation. Korea-Australia Rheol J 16(4):201–212

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mendes MJ, Schmidt HK, Pasquali M (2008) Brownian dynamics simulations of single-wall carbon nanotube separation by type using dielectrophoresis. J Phys Chem B 112(25):7467–7477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fakhri N, Tsyboulski DA, Cognet L, Weisman RB, Pasquali M (2009) Diameter-dependent bending dynamics of single-walled carbon nanotubes in liquids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(34):14219–14223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cruz C, Illoul L, Chinesta F, Régnier G (2010) Effects of a bent structure on the linear viscoelastic response of diluted carbon nanotube suspensions. Rheol Acta 49(11):1141–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bird RB, Curtiss CF, Amstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of polymer liquids. In: Kinetic theory, 2nd edn, vol 2. Wyley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Flory PJ (1969) Statistical mechanics of chain molecules. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kirkwood JG (1967) Macromolecules, J.G. Kirkwood collected works. Gordon and Breach, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Larson RG (1999) The structure and rheology of complex fluids. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nayac R (1998) Molecular simulation of liquid crystal polymer flow: a wavelet-finite element analysis. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA

  33. Lozinski A, Chauviere C (2003) A fast solver for Fokker-Planck equation applied to viscoelastic flows calculations: 2D FENE model. J Comput Phys 189(2):607–625

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Lozinski A, Chauviere C, Fang J, Owens RG (2003) Fokker-Planck simulations of fast flows of melts and concentrated polymer solutions in complex geometries. J Rheol 47(2):535–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chauviere C, Fang J, Lozinski A, Owens RG (2003) On the numerical simulation of flows of polymer solutions using high-order methods based on the Fokker-Planck equation. Int J Mod Phys B 17(1–2):9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Suen JK, Nayak R, Armstrong RC, Brown RA (2003) A wavelet-Galerkin method for simulating the doi model with orientation-dependent rotational diffusivity. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 114(2–3):197–228

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Chauviere C, Lozinski A (2004) Simulation of dilute polymer solutions using a Fokker-Planck equation. Comput Fluids 33(5–6):687–696

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Ammar A, Ryckelynck D, Chinesta F, Keunings R (2006) On the reduction of kinetic theory models related to finitely extensible dumbbells. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 134(1–3):136–147

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Ammar A, Mokdad B, Chinesta F, Keunings R (2006) A new family of solvers for some classes of multidimensional partial differential equations encountered in kinetic theory modeling of complex fluids. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 139(3):153–176

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Chinesta F, Ammar A, Falco A, Laso M (2007) On the reduction of stochastic kinetic theory models of complex fluids. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 15(6):639–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mokdad B, Pruliere E, Ammar A, Chinesta F (2007) On the simulation of kinetic theory models of complex fluids using the Fokker-Planck approach. Appl Rheol 17(2):26494-1–26494-14

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ammar A, Chinesta F, Joyot P (2008) The nanometric and micrometric scales of the structure and mechanics of materials revisited: an introduction to the challenges of fully deterministic numerical descriptions. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 6(3):191–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ammar A, Pruliere E, Chinesta F, Laso M (2009) Reduced numerical modeling of flows involving liquid-crystalline polymers. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 160(2–3):140–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pruliere E, Ammar A, El Kissi N, Chinesta F (2009) Recirculating flows involving short fiber suspensions: numerical difficulties and efficient advanced micro-macro solvers. Arch Comput Methods Eng 16(1):1–30

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Leonenko GM, Phillips TN (2009) On the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation using a high-order reduced basis approximation. Comput Methods Appl Math 199(1–4):158–168

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Ammar A, Normandin M, Daim F, Gonzalez D, Cueto E, Chinesta F (2010) Non-incremental strategies based on separated representations: applications in computational rheology. Commun Math Sci 8(3):671–695

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Ammar A, Normandin M, Chinesta F (2010) Solving parametric complex fluids models in rheometric flows. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 165(23–24):1588–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mokdad B, Ammar A, Normandin M, Chinesta F, Clermont JR (2010) A fully deterministic micro-macro simulation of complex flows involving reversible network fluid models. Math Comput Simul 80(9):1936–1961

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Chinesta F, Ammar A, Leygue A, Keunings R (2011) An overview of the proper generalized decomposition with applications in computational rheology. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 166(11):578–592

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Laso M, Öttinger HC (1993) Calculation of viscoelastic flow using molecular models: the connffessit approach. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 47(C):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Feigl K, Laso M, Öttinger HC (1995) Connffessit approach for solving a two-dimensional viscoelastic fluid problem. Macromolecules 28(9):3261–3274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hua CC, Schieber JD (1996) Application of kinetic theory models in spatiotemporal flows for polymer solutions, liquid crystals and polymer melts using the connffessit approach. Chem Eng Sci 51(9):1473–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Laso M, Picasso M, Öttinger HC (1997) 2-D time-dependent viscoelastic flow calculations using connffessit. AIChE J 43(4):877–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Huang ZP, Xu JW, Ren ZF, Wang JH, Siegal MP, Provencio PN (1998) Growth of highly oriented carbon nanotubes by plasma-enhanced hot filament chemical vapor deposition. Appl Phys Lett 73(26):3845–3847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Cormenzana J, Ledda A, Laso M, Debbaut B (2001) Calculation of free surface flows using connffessit. J Rheol 45(1):237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Keunings R (2004) Micro-macro methods for the multiscale simulation of viscoelastic flow using molecular models of kinetic theory. British Society of Rheology, Glasgow, pp 67–98

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rouse PE (1953) A theory of the linear viscoelastic properties of dilute solutions of coiling polymers. J Chem Phys 21(7):1272–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zimm B (1956) Dynamics of polymer molecules in dilute solution: viscoelasticity, flow birefringence and dielectric loss. J Chem Phys 24(2):269–278

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  59. Warner HR (1972) Kinetic theory and rheology of dilute suspensions of finitely extensible dumbbells. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 11(3):379–387

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. Treloar LRG (1975) The physics of rubber elasticity. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  61. Marko JF, Siggia ED (1995) Stretching DNA. Macromolecules 28(26):8759–8770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Higham DJ (2001) An algorithmic introduction to numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations. SIAM Rev 43(3):525–546

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Somasi M, Khomami B, Woo NJ, Hur JS, Shaqfeh ESG (2002) Brownian dynamics simulations of bead-rod and bead-spring chains: numerical algorithms and coarse-graining issues. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 108(1–3):227–255

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Atkinson J, Goh CJ, Phan-Thien N (1983) Bead-spring models for an adsorbed polymer molecule in a shear flow. J Chem Phys 80(12):6305–6317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Fetsko SW, Cummings PT (1995) Brownian dynamics simulation of bead-spring chain models for dilute polymer solutions in elongational flow. J Rheol 39(2):285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Fixman M (1986) Implicit algorithm for Brownian dynamics of polymers. Macromolecules 19(4):1195–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kramers HA (1946) The behavior of macromolecules in inhomogeneous flow. J Chem Phys 14(7):415–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bird RB, Warner HR, Evans DC (1971) Advances in polymer science, vol 8. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  69. Macosko CW (1994) Rheology. Principles, measurements and applications. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  70. Vattulainen I, Ala-Nissila T, Kankaala K (1994) Physical tests for random numbers in simulations. Phys Rev Lett 73(19):2513–2516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kirkwood JG, Riseman J (1948) The intrinsic viscosities and diffusion constants of flexible macromolecules in solution. J Chem Phys 16(6):465–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Thurston GB, Peterlin A (1967) Influence of finite number of chain segments, hydrodynamic interaction, and internal viscosity on intrinsic birefringence and viscosity of polymer solutions in an oscillating laminar flow field. J Chem Phys 46(12):4881–4885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Osaki K, Schrag JL, Ferry JD (1972) Infinite-dilution viscoelastic properties of poly(α-methylstyrene). Applications of Zimm theory with exact eigenvalues. Macromolecules 5(2):144–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Fixman M (1986) Construction of Langevin forces in the simulation of hydrodynamic interaction. Macromolecules 19(4):1204–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Ferry JD (1970) Viscoelastic properties of polymers, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  76. Liu TW (1989) Flexible polymer chain dynamics and rheological properties in steady flows. J Chem Phys 90(10):5826–5842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Hassager O (1974) Kinetic theory and rheology of bead-rod models for macromolecular solutions. J Chem Phys 60(5):2111–2124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Fan XJ, Liu TW (1986) Equilibrium and steady-state flow properties of a suspension of freely rotating chains. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 19(3):303–321

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. Fixman M (1978) Simulation of polymer dynamics. II. Relaxation rates and dynamic viscosity. J Chem Phys 69(4):1538–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Gottlieb M, Bird RB (1976) A molecular dynamics calculation to confirm the incorrectness of the random-walk distribution for describing the Kramers freely jointed bead-rod chain. J Chem Phys 65(6):2467–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Pear MR, Weiner JH (1979) Brownian dynamics study of a polymer chain of linked rigid bodies. J Chem Phys 71(1):212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Fixman M (1978) Simulation of polymer dynamics. I. General theory. J Chem Phys 69(4):1527–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Helfand E (1979) Flexible vs rigid constraints in statistical mechanics. J Chem Phys 71(12):5000–5007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Hinch EJ (1994) Brownian motion with stiff bonds and rigid constraints. J Fluid Mech 271:219–234

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. Grassia PS, Hinch EJ, Nitsche LC (1995) Computer simulations of Brownian motion of complex systems. J Fluid Mech 282:373–403

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Grassia P, Hinch EJ (1996) Computer simulations of polymer chain relaxation via Brownian motion. J Fluid Mech 308:255–288

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  87. Pasquali M, Morse DC (2002) An efficient algorithm for metric correction forces in simulations of linear polymers with constrained bond lengths. J Chem Phys 116(5):1834–1838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Shankar V, Pasquali M, Morse DC (2002) Theory of linear viscoelasticity of semiflexible rods in dilute solution. J Rheol 46(5):1111–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Montesi A, Morse DC, Pasquali M (2005) Brownian dynamics algorithm for bead-rod semiflexible chain with anisotropic friction. J Chem Phys 122:084903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Morse DC (1998) Viscoelasticity of concentrated isotropic solutions of semiflexible polymers. 1. Model and stress tensor. Macromolecules 31(20):7030–7043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Allison SA, McCammon JA (1984) Multistep Brownian dynamics: application to short wormlike chains. Biopolymers 23(2):363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Ermak DL, McCammon JA (1978) Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions. J Chem Phys 69(4):1352–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Doyle PS, Shaqfeh ESG, Gast AP (1997) Dynamic simulation of freely draining flexible polymers in steady linear flows. J Fluid Mech 334:251–291

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. Morse DC (2004) Theory of constrained Brownian motion. Adv Chem Phys 128:65–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Fixman M, Kovac J (1974) Dynamics of stiff chains. II. Freely jointed chain. J Chem Phys 61:4950–4955

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire des Procédés et Ingénierie en Mécanique et Matériaux (PIMM, UMR CNRS 8006), Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 151 bd de l’Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France

    C. Cruz & G. Régnier

  2. Corporate Foundation International Chair, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, 1 rue de la Noë, BP 92101, 44321, Nantes Cédex 3, Nantes, France

    F. Chinesta

Authors
  1. C. Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Chinesta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Régnier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Régnier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cruz, C., Chinesta, F. & Régnier, G. Review on the Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Bead-Rod-Spring Models Encountered in Computational Rheology. Arch Computat Methods Eng 19, 227–259 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-012-9072-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-012-9072-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation