Abstract
The costs of inter- and intra-regional diversification have been widely discussed in the existing international business literature, but the findings are mixed. Explanations for the mixed findings have important managerial implications, because business managers have to estimate accurately the costs of doing business within and across regions before they make their internationalization decisions. To explain the existing mixed findings, this study differentiates between liabilities of foreignness at the country and regional levels, and explores the joint effects of liability of country foreignness (LCF) and liability of regional foreignness (LRF) on the performance of internationalizing firms. Using data from 167 Canadian firms, we find that LCF may not necessarily be negatively correlated with intra-regional diversification, but LRF is positively correlated with inter-regional diversification. LCF moderates the relationship between LRF and inter-regional diversification, and also mediates the relationship between intra-regional diversification and firm performance. LRF mediates the relationship between inter-regional diversification and firm performance. Missing one or more of these variables may result in different cost estimates. Identification of the relationships between these variables helps to improve the accuracy of estimating the costs of doing business aboard.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The names of sample firms were taken from the Canadian government website at http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ic-ic.nsf/eng/home. We chose Canadian firms because they had a high degree of internationalization (UNCTAD, 2008).
The accounting conventions used by non-manufacturing firms (e.g., banks, insurance companies, and oil companies) were significantly different from those used by manufacturing companies. In addition, there were substantial differences among service companies in their disaggregation of financial data by business activity (Grant et al., 1988).
The measure considers two levels of sales: the sales in countries within regions, and the sales across regions.
The definition and sources of regional economic indicators were derived from the annual World Bank's World Development Report and the annual United Nations’ World Investment Report.
There were seven industries: biotech products, chemical, food, forest products, industrial and farm, office equipment, and pharmaceuticals.
The precondition for a mediating effect to hold is that the independent variable is significantly correlated with the mediator variable. The result shows that intra-regional diversification has a positive effect on LCF (β=0.0896, p<0.05).
Inter-regional diversification is found to be positively correlated with LRF (β=0.1077, p<0.01).
References
Aguilera, R., Flores, R., & Vaaler, 2007. Is it all a matter of grouping? Examining the regional effect in global strategy research. In S. Tallman (Ed), International strategic management: A new generation: 209–228. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue): 155–165.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3): 411–423.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (11): 979–996.
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (5): 802–818.
Armstrong, D., & Overton, T. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396–402.
Arregle, J.-L., Beamish, P., & Hebert, L. 2009. The regional dimension of MNEs’ foreign subsidiary localization. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (1): 86–107.
Asmussen, C. G. 2009. Local, regional, or global? Quantifying MNE geographic scope. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (7): 1192–1205.
Banalieva, E., & Dhanaraj, 2013. Home-region orientation in international expansion strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (2): 89–116.
Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1): 7–26.
Bell, G., Filatotchev, I., & Rasheed, A. 2012. The liability of foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (2): 107–122.
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Maloney, M., & Manrakhan, S. 2007. Causes of the difficulties in internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (5): 709–725.
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2005. Regional and global strategies of Japanese firms. Management International Review, 45 (1): 19–36.
Dunning, J., Fujita, M., & Yakova, N. 2007. Some macro-data on the regionalisation/globalisation debate: A comment on the Rugman/Verbeke analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (1): 177–199.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1): 39–50.
Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P., & Thomas, H. 1988. Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1974–1984. Academy of Management Journal, 31 (4): 771–801.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. 1997. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (4): 767–798.
Li, L., Qian, G., & Qian, Z. 2012. The performance of small- and medium-sized technology-based enterprises: Do product diversity and international diversity matter? International Business Review, 21 (5): 941–956.
Ma, X., Tong, T., & Fitza, M. 2013. How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (1): 66–87.
Miller, S., & Richards, M. 2002. Liability of foreignness and membership in a regional economic group: Analysis of the European Union. Journal of International Management, 8 (3): 323–337.
Mudambi, R., & Zahra, S. A. 2007. The survival of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (2): 333–352.
Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Osegowitsch, T., & Sammartino, A. 2008. Reassessing (home-)regionalisation. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (2): 184–196.
Phene, A., & Almeida, P. 2008. Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (5): 901–919.
Qian, G. 2000. Performance of US FDI in different world regions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17 (1): 67–83.
Qian, G., Khoury, T. A., Peng, M. W., & Qian, Z. 2010. The performance implications of intra- and inter-regional geographic diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (9): 1018–1030.
Qian, G., Li, L., Li, J., & Qian, Z. 2008. Regional diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (2): 197–214.
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (1): 3–18.
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2007. Liabilities of regional foreignness and the use of firm-level versus country-level data: A response to Dunning et al. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (1): 200–205.
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, 2008. The theory and practice of regional strategy: A response to Osegowitsch and Sammartino. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (2): 326–332.
UNCTAD. 2008. World investment report: Transnational corporations and the infrastructure challenge. New York: United Nations.
Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 341–363.
Zaheer, S. 2002. The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary. Journal of International Management, 8 (3): 351–358.
Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. 1997. The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (6): 439–464.
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the International Opportunities Fund of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The authors thank Professor Ulf Andersson and three anonymous referees for their insightful and constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Ulf Andersson, Area Editor, 7 April 2013. This paper has been with the authors for three revisions.
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qian, G., Li, L. & Rugman, A. Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: Their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance. J Int Bus Stud 44, 635–647 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.21
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.21