Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing the Black–Litterman and related approaches: Views and stress-test on risk factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Asset Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Black–Litterman and related approaches modify the return distribution of a normally distributed market according to views or stress-test scenarios. We discuss how to broaden the range of applications of these approaches significantly by letting them act on the risk factors underlying the market, instead of the returns of the securities. Code implementing the models discussed here can be found at www.symmys.com>Teaching>MATLAB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black, F. and Litterman, R. (1990) Asset allocation: Combining investors' views with market equilibrium. Goldman Sachs Fixed Income Research.

  • Cheung, W. (2007) The Black–Litterman Model: Augmented for Factor-based Portfolio Construction. Lehman Brothers Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malz, A. M. (1997) Option-implied Probability Distributions and Currency Excess Returns. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports.

  • Meucci, A. (2005) Risk and Asset Allocation, Springer.

  • Meucci, A. (2008) The Black Litterman approach: Original model and extensions. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, Extended version available at symmys.com>research>Working Papers%3Eresearch%3EWorkingPapers.

  • Meucci, A. (2009) Normal and elliptical simulations with exact mean and covariance. Working paper available at ssm.com.

  • Mina, J. and Xiao, J. Y. (2001) Return to RiskMetrics: The evolution of a Standard. RiskMetrics Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, E. and Gorman, S. (2001) Conditional distribution in portfolio theory. Financial Analyst Journal 57: 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledge the helpful feedback from Bob Litterman.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attilio Meucci.

Additional information

1leads the research effort of the portfolio analytics group at Bloomberg L.P. Concurrently he is Adjunct Professor at the graduate programme in Mathematical Finance of the Courant Institute – NYU. Previously, Attilio was a researcher at Lehman Brothers, a trader at the hedge fund Relative Value International, and a consultant at Bain & Co. He is the author of Risk and Asset Allocation – Springer and several other publications. He teaches for charity graduate courses on quantitative risk- and portfolio-management worldwide and he is frequently invited as a speaker to conferences, financial institutions and universities. He holds a BA summa cum laude in Physics from the University of Milan, an MA in Economics from Bocconi University, a PhD in Mathematics from the University of Milan and he is CFA chartholder. He is fluent in six languages and loves physical activity in the outdoors.

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

Estimation/Calibration of the Reference Model

In general, the prior market model f X is determined by a combination of econometric estimation and ad-hoc market-implied parameterisation. To imply the parameters, first a parametric model f X θ is chosen for the prior, where θ is a vector of parameters that fully determine the distribution of X. The dimension of θ can be very large, as this framework also includes non-parametric approaches.

Next, by time series analysis, some parameters are estimated, and θ is thereby bound to a given subspace Θ.

Other parameters in θ are then implied from a preferred reference book , which can be a benchmark in standard asset management or a general-equilibrium portfolio as in BL or the current book in a trading environment. The parameters are implied as follows:

where L is a non-negative loss such as the norm

and S and C are defined in (14).

Finally, in case (A.1), has multiple solutions, then can be picked by symmetry principles such as entropy maximisation.

Once all the parameters are determined, the reference model is set as

For instance, consider the normal assumption

The parameters θ are in this case the expectation μ and the covariance Σ. To determine these parameters, first we specialise (14) by choosing an index of satisfaction. Here we choose the classical mean-variance trade-off. For alternative specifications such as mean-VaR, mean-CVaR, certainty-equivalent or spectral measures, see Meucci (2005). Accordingly, the book w* is optimal if it satisfies

In this expression, E(μ, Σ) is the vector of the expectations of the p&1 of each security in the book, fully determined by (A.3) through the securities pricing functions Pt+τ=P(X, I t ); S(μ, Σ) is the covariance matrix of the p&1 of all securities; δ is a risk-aversion coefficient and B, and determine a set of linear constraints.

We then estimate the covariance Σ̂ from time series analysis of the market X. Next, we compute the implied expected values μ̂, defined in such a way that

where is preferred as a benchmark, or a general-equilibrium portfolio, or the current book. If the number of parameters in μ̂ exceeds those in , as is often the case, we pin down some values in μ̂ based on historical estimates. This is (A.1) in the current context. More in general, we might impose structure on the covariance and imply terms in the covariance as well.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meucci, A. Enhancing the Black–Litterman and related approaches: Views and stress-test on risk factors. J Asset Manag 10, 89–96 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2008.42

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2008.42

Keywords

Navigation