Skip to main content
Log in

The evolutionary view of the MNE and the future of internalization theory

  • Decade Award Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kogut and Zander's 1993 JIBS article, which developed an evolutionary perspective on the multinational enterprise (MNE), has had three critical impacts on MNE research. First, it has stimulated scholars to conduct more eclectic, empirical analyses, which should include both transaction cost related parameters, and broader learning/competence related variables. Second, it has usefully argued that the rigorous study of MNE behavior does not need to reply upon the Williamsonian, behavioral assumption of opportunism. Third, it has (implicitly) suggested a new path to be followed by internalization theory scholars, in order to remain relevant to the field of international business. The transaction cost economics lens adopted in internalization theory clearly remains critical to any analysis of MNE strategy with impacts on the boundaries of the firm. In addition, the co-evolution of the MNE's governance structure and its technological competences determines present and future strategy choices. Here, both transaction cost considerations and learning effects influence strategy selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belderbos, R. (2003) ‘Entry mode, organizational learning, and R&D in foreign affiliates: evidence from Japanese firms’, Strategic Management Journal 24(3): 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Nobel, R. and Ridderstrale, J. (2002) ‘Knowledge as a contingency variable: do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure?’, Organization Science 13(3): 274–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, Macmillan: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (1998) ‘Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: extending the internalization approach’, Journal of International Business Studies 29(3): 539–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and Chapman, M. (1997) ‘The perception and measurement of transaction costs’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 21: 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Nordberg, M. and Verbeke, A. (1996) ‘Can market based contracts substitute for alliances in high technology markets’, Journal of International Business Studies 27: 963–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, K. and March, J. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A. and Beamish, P.W. (1999) ‘Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: transactional, institutional, and experience influences’, Strategic Management Journal 20(10): 915–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A. and Beamish, P.W. (2001) ‘Survival and profitability: the roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance’, Academy of Management Journal 44(5): 1028–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. and Rugman, A.M. (1985) ‘The influence of Hymer's dissertation on the theory of foreign direct investment’, American Economic Review 75(2): 228–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, T.S., Birkinshaw, J.M. and Ensign, P.C. (2002) ‘Centers of excellence in multinational corporations’, Strategic Management Journal 23(11): 997–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and Moran, P. (1996) ‘Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory’, The Academy of Management Review 21(1): 13–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., Moran, P. and AlmeidaCosta, L. (1995) ‘The essence of the megacorporation: shared context, not structural hierarchy’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 151(4): 748–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. (1982) A Theory of Multinational Enterprise, University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. (1994) ‘The ‘comparative institutional’ theory of the firm: some implications for corporate strategy’, Journal of Management Studies 31(2): 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C.W. (1990) ‘Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: implications for transaction cost theory’, Academy of Management Review 15(3): 500–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) ‘Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology’, Organization Science 3: 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993) ‘Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies 4: 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1995) ‘Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: a reply’, Journal of International Business Studies 2: 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1996) ‘What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning’, Organization Science 7: 502–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, J.H. (1995) ‘Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise – a theoretical note’, Journal of International Business Studies 26(2): 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (1997) ‘Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction and the firm’, Strategic Management Journal 18(1): 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (2002) ‘Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production’, Strategic Management Journal 23: 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makino, S., Lau, C.M. and Yeh, R.S. (2002) ‘Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies’, Journal of International Business Studies 33(3): 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFetridge, D.G. (1995) ‘Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: a comment’, Journal of International Business Studies 26(2): 409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. and Ghoshal, S. (1996) ‘Theories of economic organization: the case for realism and balance’, The Academy of Management Review 21(1): 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordberg, M. and Verbeke, A. (1999) The Strategic Management of High Technology Contracts: The Case of CERN, Pergamon, Elsevier Science: London, New York, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.G. (1980) ‘Markets, bureaucracies and clans’, Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Basil Blackwell: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, M. and Williamson, O. (1985) ‘Asset specificity and economic organization’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 3: 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. (1980) ‘Internalization as a general theory of foreign direct investment: a re-appraisal of the literature’, Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 116: 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. (1981) Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets, Columbia University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2001) ‘Subsidiary specific advantages in multinational enterprises’, Strategic Management Journal 22(3): 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2002) ‘Edith Penrose's contribution to the rersource-based view of strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2003) ‘Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: internalization and strategic management perspectives’, Journal of International Business Studies 34(2): 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2004) A ‘final word on Edith Penrose’, Journal of Management Studies 41(1): 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M. and Venkatraman, N. (2001) ‘Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge’, Strategic Management Journal 22(4): 359–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F. and Barkema, H. (2002) ‘Pace, rhythm, and scope: process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation’, Strategic Management Journal 23(7): 637–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1993) ‘Opportunism and its critics’, Managerial and Decision Economics 14: 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1996a) The Mechanisms of Governance, Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1996b) ‘Economic organization: the case for Candor’, The Academy of Management Review 21(1): 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1999) ‘Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives’, Strategic Management Journal 20: 1087–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Verbeke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verbeke, A. The evolutionary view of the MNE and the future of internalization theory. J Int Bus Stud 34, 498–504 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400062

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400062

Keywords

Navigation