Abstract
Kogut and Zander's 1993 JIBS article, which developed an evolutionary perspective on the multinational enterprise (MNE), has had three critical impacts on MNE research. First, it has stimulated scholars to conduct more eclectic, empirical analyses, which should include both transaction cost related parameters, and broader learning/competence related variables. Second, it has usefully argued that the rigorous study of MNE behavior does not need to reply upon the Williamsonian, behavioral assumption of opportunism. Third, it has (implicitly) suggested a new path to be followed by internalization theory scholars, in order to remain relevant to the field of international business. The transaction cost economics lens adopted in internalization theory clearly remains critical to any analysis of MNE strategy with impacts on the boundaries of the firm. In addition, the co-evolution of the MNE's governance structure and its technological competences determines present and future strategy choices. Here, both transaction cost considerations and learning effects influence strategy selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belderbos, R. (2003) ‘Entry mode, organizational learning, and R&D in foreign affiliates: evidence from Japanese firms’, Strategic Management Journal 24(3): 235–259.
Birkinshaw, J., Nobel, R. and Ridderstrale, J. (2002) ‘Knowledge as a contingency variable: do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure?’, Organization Science 13(3): 274–289.
Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, Macmillan: London.
Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (1998) ‘Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: extending the internalization approach’, Journal of International Business Studies 29(3): 539–562.
Buckley, P.J. and Chapman, M. (1997) ‘The perception and measurement of transaction costs’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 21: 127–145.
Campbell, A., Nordberg, M. and Verbeke, A. (1996) ‘Can market based contracts substitute for alliances in high technology markets’, Journal of International Business Studies 27: 963–979.
Cyert, K. and March, J. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Delios, A. and Beamish, P.W. (1999) ‘Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: transactional, institutional, and experience influences’, Strategic Management Journal 20(10): 915–933.
Delios, A. and Beamish, P.W. (2001) ‘Survival and profitability: the roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance’, Academy of Management Journal 44(5): 1028–1038.
Dunning, J.H. and Rugman, A.M. (1985) ‘The influence of Hymer's dissertation on the theory of foreign direct investment’, American Economic Review 75(2): 228–236.
Frost, T.S., Birkinshaw, J.M. and Ensign, P.C. (2002) ‘Centers of excellence in multinational corporations’, Strategic Management Journal 23(11): 997–1018.
Ghoshal, S. and Moran, P. (1996) ‘Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory’, The Academy of Management Review 21(1): 13–47.
Ghoshal, S., Moran, P. and AlmeidaCosta, L. (1995) ‘The essence of the megacorporation: shared context, not structural hierarchy’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 151(4): 748–759.
Hennart, J. (1982) A Theory of Multinational Enterprise, University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.
Hennart, J. (1994) ‘The ‘comparative institutional’ theory of the firm: some implications for corporate strategy’, Journal of Management Studies 31(2): 193–207.
Hill, C.W. (1990) ‘Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: implications for transaction cost theory’, Academy of Management Review 15(3): 500–513.
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) ‘Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology’, Organization Science 3: 383–397.
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993) ‘Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies 4: 625–645.
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1995) ‘Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: a reply’, Journal of International Business Studies 2: 417–426.
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1996) ‘What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning’, Organization Science 7: 502–517.
Love, J.H. (1995) ‘Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise – a theoretical note’, Journal of International Business Studies 26(2): 399–407.
Madhok, A. (1997) ‘Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction and the firm’, Strategic Management Journal 18(1): 39–62.
Madhok, A. (2002) ‘Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production’, Strategic Management Journal 23: 535–550.
Makino, S., Lau, C.M. and Yeh, R.S. (2002) ‘Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies’, Journal of International Business Studies 33(3): 403–421.
McFetridge, D.G. (1995) ‘Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: a comment’, Journal of International Business Studies 26(2): 409–415.
Moran, P. and Ghoshal, S. (1996) ‘Theories of economic organization: the case for realism and balance’, The Academy of Management Review 21(1): 58–72.
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Nordberg, M. and Verbeke, A. (1999) The Strategic Management of High Technology Contracts: The Case of CERN, Pergamon, Elsevier Science: London, New York, Tokyo.
Ouchi, W.G. (1980) ‘Markets, bureaucracies and clans’, Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 129–142.
Penrose, E. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Basil Blackwell: Oxford.
Riordan, M. and Williamson, O. (1985) ‘Asset specificity and economic organization’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 3: 365–378.
Rugman, A.M. (1980) ‘Internalization as a general theory of foreign direct investment: a re-appraisal of the literature’, Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 116: 365–379.
Rugman, A.M. (1981) Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets, Columbia University Press: New York.
Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2001) ‘Subsidiary specific advantages in multinational enterprises’, Strategic Management Journal 22(3): 237–250.
Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2002) ‘Edith Penrose's contribution to the rersource-based view of strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 769–780.
Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2003) ‘Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: internalization and strategic management perspectives’, Journal of International Business Studies 34(2): 125–137.
Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2004) A ‘final word on Edith Penrose’, Journal of Management Studies 41(1): 205–217.
Subramaniam, M. and Venkatraman, N. (2001) ‘Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge’, Strategic Management Journal 22(4): 359–378.
Vermeulen, F. and Barkema, H. (2002) ‘Pace, rhythm, and scope: process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation’, Strategic Management Journal 23(7): 637–653.
Williamson, O.E. (1993) ‘Opportunism and its critics’, Managerial and Decision Economics 14: 97–107.
Williamson, O.E. (1996a) The Mechanisms of Governance, Oxford University Press: New York.
Williamson, O.E. (1996b) ‘Economic organization: the case for Candor’, The Academy of Management Review 21(1): 48–57.
Williamson, O.E. (1999) ‘Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives’, Strategic Management Journal 20: 1087–1108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verbeke, A. The evolutionary view of the MNE and the future of internalization theory. J Int Bus Stud 34, 498–504 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400062
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400062