J. F. Nunamaker
- 1 Ackoff R,,{ gupta, s.k. and Minas. j.s. scientific method, john wiley & sons, 1962.Google Scholar
- 2 Albanese, R. and Van Fleet, D.D. Rational behavior in group,: The free riding tendency. Academ,; o)~ Management Review, 10 (1985), 244 255.Google Scholar
- 3 Connotly, T., Jessup, L.M. and Valacich, J.S. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer, mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 6 (1990), 689-703. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Daft, R.t. and Lengel, R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 554-571. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5 Dennis, A.R., George, J.F., Jessup, L.M., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. and Vogel, D.R. Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly 12, 4 (1988), 591- 624. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 Dennis, A.R., Heminger, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. and Vogel, D.R. Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr~Brown Experience. InfoT~nation and Management, 18, 3 (1990), 111-12 I. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7 Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. and Paranka, D. Supporting the search for competitive advantage. Journal of MIS, forthcoming. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8 Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. and Vogel, D.R. A comparison of laboratory experiments and field studies in the study of electronic meeting systems. Journal of MIS, 7, 2 (1991), 107-I35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9 Dennis, A.R., Tyran, C.K., Vogel, D.R. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. An evaluation of electronic meeting support for strategic management. In Proceedings oflCIS (1990), 37-52.Google Scholar
- 10 Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. An experimental investigation of group size in an electronic meeting system environment. IEEE Transactions on System. s, Man, and Cybernetic.~, 20, 5 (1990), 1049-1057.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 11 Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Group, Subgroup and Nominal Group Idea Generation in an Electronic Meeting Environment, HICSS-24, 1991, III: 573-579.Google Scholar
- 12 DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, R.B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 5 (1987), 589-609. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13 Diehl, M. and Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 3 (1987), 497-509.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14 Easton, A.C., Vogel, D.R. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Stakeh~lder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups: An experimental study. HICSS-22, 1989, IIl 344-352.Google Scholar
- 15 Easton, G., George, J.F., Nunsmaker Jr., J.F. and Pendergast; M.O. Using two different electronic meeting system tools for the same task: An experimental comparison. J. of MIS, 7, I (1990), 85-100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16 Fellers, J.W. The effect of group size and computer support on group idea generation for creativity tasks: An experimental evaluation using a repeated measures design. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17 Gatlupe, R.B., Cooper, W. and Bastianutti, L. Why is electronic brainstorming more productive than traditional brainstorming. Adminis~ trative Sciences Association of Canada Conference Proceedings, Information Systems Division (Whistler, Canada, 1990), 82-92.Google Scholar
- 18 Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., and Bastianutti, L. Group size and electronic brainstorming. Queen's University Working Paper, 1991.Google Scholar
- 19 George, J.F., Easton, G.K., Nunsmaker Jr., J.F. and Northcraft, G.B. A study of collaborative group work with and without computer based support. Inf. Syst. Res., t, 4 (1990), 394-415.Google Scholar
- 20 Grohowski, R.B., McGoff, C., Vogel, D.R., Martz, W.B. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Implementation of electronic meeting systems at IBM. MIS Quarterly, 14, 4 (1990), 369-383. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21 Hackman, J.R. and Kaplan, R.E. Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups. Decision Sci- ~ces, 5 (1974), 459-480.Google Scholar
- 22 Hill, G.W. Group versus individual performance: Are N + I heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3 (1982), 517-539.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 23 Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Commun. ACM, 28, 7 (1985), 680-689. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24 Hirokawa, R.Y. and Pace, R. A descriptive investigation of the possible communication based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making. Commun. Mono- ~ffraphs, 50 (1983), 363-379.Google Scholar
- 25 }tuber, G.P. Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Qm, rterly, (1984), 195-204.Google Scholar
- 26 Huber, G.P. A theory of the effects of advanced information technology on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Acad. o/ Manag. Rev., 15, 1 (1990), 47-71Google Scholar
- 27 Jabtin, F.M. and Seibold, D.R. Implications fbr problem solving groups of empirical research on 'brainstorming': A critical review of the literature. The Southern States Speech Commun. J., 43 (Summer 1978), 327-356.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 28 Jessup, L.M., Connolly, T. and Galegher, J. The effects of anonymity on group process in automated group problem solving. MIS Quarterly, 14, 3 (1990), 313-321. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 29 Jessup, L.M. Tansik, D.A. and Lasse, 'F.D. Group problem solving in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity on group process and outcome with a GDSS. Decision Sciences, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- 30 Lamm, H. and Trommsdorff, G. Group versus individual perfor. mance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. EuropeanJ. of Soc. Psy., (1973), 361-387.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 31 Maidique, M.A. Entrepreneurs, champions, and technological innovations. Slosh Manag. Rev., 21, 2 (1980), 59-76.Google Scholar
- 32 Mason, R.O. and Mitrof{, t.t.C.hat~ &ng'ing St~ate,45c Planning A.ssump tion~s:,John Wiley & Sons. New York. 198I~.Google Scholar
- 33 Milter, J.C. Information input overload and psychopathology. J2 of Psy. chiatry, (Feb. 1960), 696-704.Google Scholar
- 34 Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Theoret, A. The structure of 'unstructured' decision processes. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 2I (1976), 246-275.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 35 Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Applegate, L.M., and Konsynski, B.R. Facilitating group creativity with GDSS.J. o} MI.~, 3, 4 (1987), 5-19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 36 Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Applegate, L.M. and Konsynski, B.R. Com~ puter-aided deliberation: Model management and group decision support. J. of Operations Res., 36, 6 (1988), 826-848. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 37 Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Vogel, D., Heminger, A., Martz, B.~ Grohowski, R. and McGoff, C. Experiences at IBM with group support systems. A field study Decision support systems, 5,2 (1989), 183- 196.Google Scholar
- 38 Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination. principles and procedures of Creative Thinking, 2nd edition, Scribners, New York. 1957.Google Scholar
- 39 Pinsonnault, A. and Kraemar, K.I., The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Syst., 5,2 (1989). 197-216.Google Scholar
- 40 Poole, M.S. Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences of decision making. Communication Monographs, 50 (1983), 206-232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 41 Schweiger, D.M., Sandberg, W.R., and REchner, P.I., Experimental effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making, Academy of Management Review, 32, 4 (1989), 745-772.Google Scholar
- 42 Shaw, M. Group Dynamics: The Psy chology of Small Group behavior. 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill, New york, 1981.Google Scholar
- 43 Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V. Kiesler, S. and McGuire, T.W. Group processes in computer mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37 (1986), 157-187.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 44 Silver. M.S. Decision support systems: Directed and non-directed change. information Systems Research. 1, I (1990), 47-70.Google Scholar
- 45 Simon. H.A. Administrative behavior 3rd edition, Free press, 1976.Google Scholar
- 46 Stefik. M., Foster, G., bobrow, D.G., Khan, K., Lanning, S., and Suchman, L Beyond the chalkboard: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings. Commun. ACM, 30, 1 (1987), 33-47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 47 Steiner, I.D. Group Process and productivity. Academic press, new York, 1972.Google Scholar
- 48 Valacich, J.S. Group size and proximity effects on computer mediated generation: A laboratory investigation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona. 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 49 Valacich, J.S., Dennis. A.R., George. J.F. and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Electronic support for group idea generation: Shifitin the balance of process gains and losses. Arizona working paper, 1991.Google Scholar
- 50 Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Anonymity and group size effects on computer mediated idea generation. proceedings of Academy of management meeting, 1991, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- 51 Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R. and Nunamaker Jr., J.f. Electonic Meeting Support; The Group- Systems concept. Intern. J. of man machine Studiesl, Forth coming. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 52 Vogel, D.R., Martz. W.B., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. Grohowski, R.b. and McGoff, C. Electronic meeting system experience at IBM J. of MIS. 6. 3 (1990), 25-43. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 53 Vogel, D.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., George, J.F. and Dennis, A.R. Group decision support systems: Evolution and status at the university of Arizona. In R.M. Leee, A.M. McCosh, and P. Migliarese Eds. organizational Decision Support Systems, proceedings of IFIP WG 8.3 Working Conference on organizational DSS, North Holland. 1988. 287- 305.Google Scholar
- 54 Williams, E. 1977, Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and medidated communication: A review. Psychol. Bull., 84. 5, 963-976.Google Scholar
- 55 Winniford, M.A. The effect of eletronic meeting support on large and small decision-making groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 56 Zack. M.H. and McKenney, J.I., Characteristics of organizational information domain; An organizational information processing perspective. Harvard Business School Working Paper 89-027, 1989.Google Scholar
- 57 Zajonc. R.B. Socaial facilitation. Science, 149 (1965), 269-274.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Electronic meeting systems
Recommendations
Maintaining electronic commerce systems: the legal issues
Electronic commerce over the Internet is growing at an increasing pace worldwide. Maintenance of electronic commerce systems is thus becoming an increasingly important IT activity. In this paper the legal issues concerned with the maintenance of ...
Work environments in electronic meeting systems
CHI EA '01: CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper, we describe different work environments for the Electronic Meeting System designed at CICESE Research Center.
Supporting inspections with an electronic meeting system
Fagan inspections are a structured review of development documents that consists of individual preparation, a meeting, and rework by the author of the document. The meeting is used to log the defects found in preparation and to search for more defects. ...
Reviews
Deborah A. Kirkman
One of the newer areas of research in networking services is supporting group interactions and decision making. The University of Arizona is active in this area, and has developed a meeting environment called the Electronic Meeting System (EMS). Their efforts have included both developing tools to support an EMS and analyzing the effects of these tools in different kinds of meetings. The work has included meetings that have all participants together and those that have participants distributed in different locations. This paper is aimed at a general audience, and lays out the overall model of group interactions and the types of meetings that are held. The paper is written and organized well; the authors explain the different factors that were evaluated in their research. Factors include the activity type (exploration and idea generation, idea organization, prioritizing, and policy development and evaluation), the mechanisms of EMS (process support, process structure, task structure, and task support), and the types of group process gains and losses, such as increases in information and overall group knowledge (a gain), synergy of ideas (a gain), or socializing (a loss). The authors are careful not to overgeneralize the results of their research. Instead, they present the gains and losses of EMS in the context of its use, such as the activity type. For those wishing to understand the issues in computer support of group activities, this paper provides an excellent way to understand the analysis of group behavior in an electronic setting.
Access critical reviews of Computing literature here
Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.
Comments