skip to main content
research-article

Service Providers of the Sharing Economy: Who Joins and Who Benefits?

Published:06 December 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Many "sharing economy" platforms, such as Uber and Airbnb, have become increasingly popular, providing consumers with more choices and suppliers a chance to make profit. They, however, have also brought about emerging issues regarding regulation, tax obligation, and impact on urban environment, and have generated heated debates from various interest groups. Empirical studies regarding these issues are limited, partly due to the unavailability of relevant data. Here we aim to understand service providers of the sharing economy, investigating who joins and who benefits, using the Airbnb market in the United States as a case study. We link more than 211 thousand Airbnb listings owned by 188 thousand hosts with demographic, socio-economic status (SES), housing, and tourism characteristics. We show that income and education are consistently the two most influential factors that are linked to the joining of Airbnb, regardless of the form of participation or year. Areas with lower median household income, or higher fraction of residents who have Bachelor's and higher degrees, tend to have more hosts. However, when considering the performance of listings, as measured by number of newly received reviews, we find that income has a positive effect for entire-home listings; listings located in areas with higher median household income tend to have more new reviews. Our findings demonstrate empirically that the disadvantage of SES-disadvantaged areas and the advantage of SES-advantaged areas may be present in the sharing economy.

References

  1. Eduardo M. Azevedo and E. Glen Weyl. 2016. Matching markets in the digital age. Science Vol. 352 (2016), 1056--1057. Issue 6289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jason Chan and Anindya Ghose. 2014. Internet's Dirty Secret: Assessing the Impact of Online Intermediaries on HIV Transmission. MIS Quarterly Vol. 38 (2014), 955--976. Issue 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jason Chan, Anindya Ghose, and Robert Seamans. 2016. The Internet and Racial Hate Crime: Offline Spillovers from Online Access. MIS Quarterly Vol. 40 (2016), 381--403. Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2015. Peeking Beneath the Hood of Uber. In Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference. 495--508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Keith Chen, Judith A. Chevalier, Peter E. Rossi, and Emily Oehlsen. 2017. The Value of Flexible Work: Evidence from Uber Drivers. (2017). NBER Working Paper No. 23296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Judd Cramer and Alan B. Krueger. 2016. Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber. American Economic Review Vol. 106, 5 (2016), 177--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Michael A. Cusumano. 2015. How Traditional Firms Must Compete in the Sharing Economy. Commun. ACM Vol. 58, 1 (2015), 32--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tawanna Dillahunt, Airi Lampinen, Jacki O'Neill, Loren Terveen, and Cory Kendrick. 2016. Does the Sharing Economy Do Any Good?. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing Companion. 197--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tawanna R. Dillahunt and Amelia R. Malone. 2015. The Promise of the Sharing Economy Among Disadvantaged Communities Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2285--2294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Benjamin G. Edelman and Michael Luca. 2014. Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com. (2014). Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 14--054.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Benjamin G. Edelman, Michael Luca, and Dan Svirsky. 2017. Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 9, 2 (2017), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Liran Einav, Chiara Farronato, and Jonathan D. Levin. 2016. Peer-to-Peer Markets. Annual Review of Economics Vol. 8, 1 (2016), 615--635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Daniel Guttentag. 2015. Airbnb: disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current Issues in Tourism Vol. 18, 12 (2015), 1192--1217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jonathan V. Hall and Alan B. Krueger. 2016. An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber's Driver-Partners in the United States. (2016). NBER Working Paper No. 22843.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Anikó Hannák, Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Alan Mislove, Markus Strohmaier, and Christo Wilson. 2017. Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1914--1933. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tapio Ikkala and Airi Lampinen. 2015. Monetizing Network Hospitality: Hospitality and Sociability in the Context of Airbnb Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1033--1044. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Qing Ke. 2017. Sharing Means Renting?: An Entire-marketplace Analysis of Airbnb Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference. 131--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Farshad Kooti, Mihajlo Grbovic, Luca Maria Aiello, Nemanja Djuric, Vladan Radosavljevic, and Kristina Lerman. 2017. Analyzing Uber's Ride-sharing Economy. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. 574--582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tamar Kricheli-Katz and Tali Regev. 2016. How many cents on the dollar? Women and men in product markets. Science Advances, Vol. 2, 2 (2016), e1500599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Airi Lampinen and Coye Cheshire. 2016. Hosting via Airbnb: Motivations and Financial Assurances in Monetized Network Hospitality Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1669--1680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, and Laura Dabbish. 2015. Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1603--1612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Michael Luca. 2016. Designing Online Marketplaces: Trust and Reputation Mechanisms. (2016). NBER Working Paper No. 22616.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Xiao Ma, Jeffery T. Hancock, Kenneth Lim Mingjie, and Mor Naaman. 2017. Self-Disclosure and Perceived Trustworthiness of Airbnb Host Profiles Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 2397--2409. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Arvind Malhotra and Marshall Van Alstyne. 2014. The Dark Side of the Sharing Economy. . . and How to Lighten It. Commun. ACM Vol. 57, 11 (2014), 24--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Giovanni Quattrone, Davide Proserpio, Daniele Quercia, Licia Capra, and Mirco Musolesi. 2016. Who Benefits from the "Sharing" Economy of Airbnb? Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 1385--1394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rannie Teodoro, Pinar Ozturk, Mor Naaman, Winter Mason, and Janne Lindqvist. 2014. The Motivations and Experiences of the On-demand Mobile Workforce Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 236--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Loren G. Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2015. Avoiding the South Side and the Suburbs: The Geography of Mobile Crowdsourcing Markets Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 265--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Service Providers of the Sharing Economy: Who Joins and Who Benefits?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
          Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 1, Issue CSCW
          November 2017
          2095 pages
          EISSN:2573-0142
          DOI:10.1145/3171581
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 December 2017
          Published in pacmhci Volume 1, Issue CSCW

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader