skip to main content
10.1145/3193965.3193970acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Protocol and tools for conducting agile software engineering research in an industrial-academic setting: a preliminary study

Published:28 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Conducting empirical research in software engineering industry is a process, and as such, it should be generalizable. The aim of this paper is to discuss how academic researchers may address some of the challenges they encounter during conducting empirical research in the software industry by means of a systematic and structured approach. The protocol developed in this paper should serve as a practical guide for researchers and help them with conducting empirical research in this complex environment.

References

  1. Samuel Ankrah and Omar Al-Tabbaa. 2015. Universities-Industry Collaboration: A Systematic Review. Scandinavian Journal of Management 31, 3 (2015), 387 -- 408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Richard L. Baskerville and Trevor Wood-Harper. 1996. A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research. Journal of Information Technology 11, 3 (1996), 235--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Richard L. Baskerville and Trevor Wood-Harper. 1998. Diversity in Information Systems Action Research Methods. European Journal of Information Systems 7, 2 (June 1998), 90--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Melvin E. Conway. 1968. How do Committees Invent? Datamation Journal (April 1968), 28--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Vahid Garousi, Kai Petersen, and Baris Ozkan. 2016. Challenges and Best Practices in Industry-Academia Collaborations in Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology 79 (2016), 106 -- 127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tony Gorschek, Per Garre, Stig Larsson, and Claes Wohlin. 2006. A Model for Technology Transfer in Practice. IEEE Software 23, 6 (Nov 2006), 88--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Alan Hevner and Samir Chatterjee. 2010. Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gerald I. Susman and Roger D. Evered. 1978. An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. 23 (12 1978).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Janne Järvinen, Tua Huomo, and Tommi Mikkonen. 2017. Running Software Research Programs: An Agile Approach. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C '17). IEEE Press, 314--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Pertti Järvinen. 2007. Action Research is Similar to Design Science. Quality & Quantity 41, 1 (01 Feb 2007), 37--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Richard Lambert. 2003. Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Silverio Martínez-Fernández and Helena Martins Marques. 2014. Practical Experiences in Designing and Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry-Academia Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry (CESI'14). ACM, 15--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kai Petersen, Cigdem Gencel, Negin Asghari, Dejan Baca, and Stefanie Betz. 2014. Action Research As a Model for Industry-Academia Collaboration in the Software Engineering Context. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Long-term Industrial Collaboration on Software Engineering (WISE '14). ACM, 55--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shari Lawrence Pfleeger. 1999. Understanding and Improving Technology Transfer in Software Engineering. Journal of Systems and Software 47, 2--3 (1999), 111--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pilar Rodríguez, Pasi Kuvaja, and Markku Oivo. 2014. Lessons learned on applying design science for bridging the collaboration gap between industry and academia in empirical software engineering. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry (CESI'14). ACM, 9--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dieter Rombach and Reinhold Achatz. 2007. Research Collaborations Between Academia and Industry. In 2007 Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07). IEEE Computer Society, 29--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Per Runeson and Sten Minör. 2014. The 4+1 view model of industry-academia collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Workshop on Long-term Industrial Collaboration on Software Engineering (WISE '14). ACM, 21--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Anna Sandberg, Lars Pareto, and Thomas Arts. 2011. Agile Collaborative Research: Action Principles for Industry-Academia Collaboration. IEEE Software 28, 4 (2011), 74--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Christian Staudter, Jens-Peter Mollenhauer, Renata Meran, Olin Roenpage, Clemens von Hugo, and Alexis Hamalides. 2009. Design for Six Sigma + Lean-Toolset. Implementing Innovations Successfully. Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. P. Kettunen P. Kuvaja A. Koivisto C. Lassenius P. Lehtovuori S. Lilja S. Miettinen T. Mikkonen J. Munch T. Mannisto M. Oivo J. Partanen I. Porres J. Still T. Huomo, J. Jarvinen and P. Tyrvainen. 2015. Strategic Research Agenda for Need for Speed (N4S). http://n4s.fi/articles/SRIA_Need4Speed_V5_0_April_2015.pdf. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Antonio Vetrò, Saahil Ognawala, Daniel Méndez Fernández, and Stefan Wagner. 2015. Fast Feedback Cycles in Empirical Software Engineering Research. In Proceedings of the 37th. IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Vol. 2. IEEE, 583--586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Claes Wohlin. 2013. Empirical Software Engineering Research with Industry: Top 10 Challenges. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry (CESI'13). IEEE, 43--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Protocol and tools for conducting agile software engineering research in an industrial-academic setting: a preliminary study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader