skip to main content
research-article

The Social Infrastructure of Co-spaces: Home, Work, and Sociable Places for Digital Nomads

Published:07 November 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The rise of co-working and co-living spaces, as well as related shared spaces such as makerspaces and hackerspaces-a group we refer to as various types of "co-spaces" - has helped facilitate a parallel expansion of the "digital nomad (DN)" lifestyle. Digital nomads, colloquially, are those individuals that leverage digital infrastructures and sociotechnical systems to live location-independent lives. In this paper, we use Oldenburg's framework of a first (home), second (work), and third (social) place as an analytical lens to investigate how digital nomads understand the affordance of these different types of spaces. We present an analysis of posts and comments on the '/r/digitalnomad' subreddit, a vibrant online community where DNs ask questions and share advice about the different types of places and amenities that are necessary to pursue their digital nomad lifestyle. We found that places are often assessed positively or negatively relative to one primary characteristic: either they provide a means for nomads to maintain a clear separation between the social and professional aspects of their lives, or they provide a means to merge these aspects together. Digital nomads that favor the first type of place tend to focus on searching for factors that they feel will promote their own work productivity, whereas DNs that favor the second type of place tend to focus on factors that they feel will allow them to balance their work and social lives. We also build on linkages between the notion of a third place and the more recent theoretical construct of social infrastructure. Ultimately, we demonstrate how DNs' interests in co-spaces provide a kind of edge-case for CSCW and HCI scholars to explore how sociotechnical systems, such as variants of co-spaces, inform one another as well as signify important details regarding new ways of living and engaging with technology.

References

  1. Mark Bilandzic, Ronald Schroeter, and Marcus Foth. 2013. Gelatine: making co-working places gel for better collaboration and social learning. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration. ACM, 427--436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ricarda B Bouncken and Andreas J Reuschl. 2018. Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of managerial science12, 1 (2018), 317--334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3,2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry Brown and Kenton O'Hara. 2003. Place as a practical concern of mobile workers. Environment and planning A35, 9 (2003), 1565--1587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Julie Brown. 2017. Curating the "Third Place"? Coworking and the mediation of creativity. Geoforum 82 (2017).http://search.proquest.com/docview/1933261519/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Gordon Brown. 2008. Proximity and collaboration: measuring workplace configuration. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 10, 1 (2008), 5--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Monika Büscher. 2014. Nomadic work: Romance and reality. A response to Barbara Czarniawska's 'nomadic work as life-story plot'. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)23, 2 (2014), 223--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Roberto Calderon, Michael Blackstock, Rodger Lea, Sidney Fels, Andre O Bueno, and Junia Anacleto. 2014. Supporting Conversation and Community Interaction With A Table-Top Community Garden Application. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM, 190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Luigina Ciolfi and Eleanor Lockley. 2018. From Work to Life and back again: Examining the digitally-mediated work/life practices of a group of knowledge workers. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)27, 3--6 (2018), 803--839.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Co-Liv. 2017. A Co-living Brainstorming Session at Sun and Co. Retrieved Mar 26, 2019 from https://medium.com/coliv/a-co-living-brainstorming-session-at-sun-and-co-4d1f4ca8811fGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Filippo Dal Fiore, Patricia L Mokhtarian, Ilan Salomon, and Matan E Singer. 2014. "Nomads at last"? A set of perspectives on how mobile technology may affect travel. Journal of Transport Geography41 (2014), 97--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Aparecido Fabiano Pinatti de Carvalho, Luigina Ciolfi, and Breda Gray. 2017. Detailing a Spectrum of Motivational Forces Shaping Nomadic Practices. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 962--977. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shelly D. Farnham and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2011. Faceted Identity, Faceted Lives: Social and Technical Issues with Being Yourself Online. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 359--368. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958880Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Shelly D. Farnham, Joseph F. McCarthy, Yagnesh Patel, Sameer Ahuja, Daniel Norman, William R. Hazlewood, and Josh Lind. 2009. Measuring the Impact of Third Place Attachment on the Adoption of a Place-based Community Technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2153--2156. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alessandro Gandini. 2015. The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. ephemera 15, 1 (2015), 193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lyndon E Garrett, Gretchen M Spreitzer, and Peter A Bacevice. 2017. Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in co-working spaces. Organization Studies 38, 6 (2017), 821--842.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Julia Haking. 2018. Digital Nomad Lifestyle: A field study in Bali.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. William A. Hamilton, Oliver Garretson, and Andruid Kerne. 2014. Streaming on Twitch: Fostering Participatory Communities of Play Within Live Mixed Media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1315--1324. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Steve Harrison and Paul Dourish. 1996. Replaceing Space: The Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '96). ACM, New York, NY,USA, 67--76. https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240193Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. L. H. Jackson. 2017. The importance of social interaction in the co-working spaces of Boston USA and London UK.London South Bank University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Leo W Jeffres, Cheryl C Bracken, Guowei Jian, and Mary F Casey. 2009. The impact of third places on community quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life 4, 4 (2009), 333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mayur Karnik. 2011. Social Aspects of Music and Interactive Technologies in Facilitating Face-to-face Interactions in Third Places. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (DESIRE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 431--432. https://doi.org/10.1145/2079216.2079278Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Eric Klinenberg. 2018.Palaces for the people: how social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Crown.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Barbara Korth. 2003. A critical reconstruction of care-in-action.The Qualitative Report 8, 3 (2003), 487--512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ahreum Lee, Austin L. Toombs, and Ingrid Erickson. 2019. Infrastructure vs. Community: Co-spaces Confront Digital Nomads' Paradoxical Needs. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article LBW2419, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313064Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Michael Liegl. 2014. Nomadicity and the care of place-on the aesthetic and affective organization of space in freelance creative work.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 23, 2 (2014), 163--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsugio Makimoto and David Manners. 1997. Digital nomad. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Nemanja Memarovic, Sidney Fels, Junia Anacleto, Roberto Calderon, Federico Gobbo, John M Carroll, et al. 2014. Rethinking third places: contemporary design with technology. The Journal of Community Informatics 10, 3 (2014),1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Arnault Morisson. 2018. A Typology of Places in the Knowledge Economy: Towards the Fourth Place. In International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives. Springer, 444--451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jay P Mulki, Fleura Bardhi, Felicia G Lassk, and Jayne Nanavaty-Dahl. 2009. Set up remote workers to thrive. MITS loan Management Review 51, 1 (2009), 63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Annika Múller. 2016. The digital nomad: Buzzword or research category? Transnational Social Review 6, 3 (2016),344--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Caleece Nash, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Will Sutherland, and Gabriela Phillips. 2018. Digital nomads beyond the buzzword: Defining digital nomadic work and use of digital technologies. In International Conference on Information. Springer, 207--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Kimberly A Neuendorf. 2016. The content analysis guidebook. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ray Oldenburg. 1989.The great good place: Café, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars,hangouts, and how they get you through the day. Paragon House Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Lucia Parrino. 2015. Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange.Knowledge Management Research & Practice 13, 3 (2015), 261--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. MBO partners. 2018. The State of Independence in America. Technical Report. Herndon, VA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Elaine Pofeldt. 2018. Digital Nomadism Goes Mainstream. Retrieved Mar 30, 2019 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/elainepofeldt/2018/08/30/digital-nomadism-goes-mainstream/#1a18a9bc4553Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin Porcheron, Joel Fischer, and Sarah Sharples. 2016. Using Mobile Phones in Pub Talk. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '16), Vol. 27. ACM, 1649--1661.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. PRAW 2017. PRAW: The Python Reddit API Wrapper. Retrieved Apr 2, 2019 from https://praw.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Ina Reichenberger. 2018. Digital nomads--a quest for holistic freedom in work and leisure.Annals of Leisure Research 21, 3 (2018), 364--380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Norman Makoto Su and Gloria Mark. 2008. Designing for Nomadic Work. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305--314. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394478Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Norman Makoto Su and Lulu Wang. 2015. From Third to Surveilled Place: The Mobile in Irish Pubs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA,1659--1668. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702574Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Emily Sun, Ross McLachlan, and Mor Naaman. 2017. MoveMeant: Anonymously Building Community Through Shared Location Histories. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM,New York, NY, USA, 4284--4289. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Will Sutherland and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2017. The gig economy and information infrastructure: The case of the digital nomad community. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Nick Taylor, Ursula Hurley, and Philip Connolly. 2016. Making Community: The Wider Role of Makerspaces in Public Life. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY,USA, 1415--1425. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858073Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Michael Thomas. 2016. Ditching the office to work in paradise as a "digital nomad" has a hidden darkside. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://qz.com/775751/digital-nomad-problems-nomadlist-and-remoteok-founder-pieter-levels-explains-why-he-has-quit-the-nomadic-lifestyleGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Beverly Yuen Thompson. 2018. Digital nomads: Employment in the online gig economy. Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation 1 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Austin L. Toombs. 2017. Hackerspace Tropes, Identities, and Community Values. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1079--1091. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064760Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Austin L Toombs, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2015. The proper care and feeding of hacker spaces: Careethics and cultures of making. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 629--638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Yi-Fu Tuan. 1979. Space and place: humanistic perspective. In Philosophy in geography. Springer, 387--427.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Minou Weijs-Perrée, Jasper van de Koevering, Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek, and Theo Arentze. 2019. Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Building Research & Information 47, 5 (2019), 534--548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The Social Infrastructure of Co-spaces: Home, Work, and Sociable Places for Digital Nomads

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 3, Issue CSCW
        November 2019
        5026 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3371885
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 November 2019
        Published in pacmhci Volume 3, Issue CSCW

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader