skip to main content
article
Free Access

Determinants of MIS employees' turnover intentions: a structural equation model

Published:01 February 1992Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 Alwin, D.E. and Hauser, R.M. Decoml>osition of effects in path analysis. Am. Soc. Rev. 40 (1975), 37-47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2 Arnold, H J. and Fetdman, D.C. A muttivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover. J. Applied Psych. 67 (t982), 350-360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Baroudi, J.J. The impact of role variables on iS personnel work attitudes and intentions. MtS Q~ 9, 4 (Dec. 1985), 34!-356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4 Bluedorn, A.C, A unified model of turnover from organizations. Hu-man Relations .35 (1982), 135- 153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Brooke, P.P., Russell, D.W~ and Price, J.L. Discriminant validation of' measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. J. Applied Psych. 73, 2 (1988), 139 145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6 Compton, T.R. Job satisfaction among systems personnel. J. Syst~ Manage. 38, 7 (July 1987), 28-31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 Connolly, j. Study: Crash hangover keeps turnover tow. Computerwortd (Aug. 8, 1988), 57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Cotton, J.L. and Tuttle, J.M. Employee turnover: A meta-anaiysis and review with implications for research. Acad. Manage. Rev. I !, ! (1986), 55-70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Couger, DJ. and Zawacki, R.A. Mo~ tivating aT-:~:. Managing Compu~ Personnet, Wiley, N.Y., N.Y., 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 Coverdale, S. and Terborg, J.R. A reexamination of the Mobley, Hornet and Hollingsworth model of turnover: A useful replication. Paper Presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (Detroit, Mich., Aug. 1980).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 Fletcher, J.D., Deringer, D. and Jacobstein, N. ACM Members Survey for Long Range Planning. ACM Special Report, N.Y., N.Y., 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Fornell, C.R., Ed., A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis: Methods. Praeger Publishers, N.Y., N.Y., 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 Fornell, C.R. A second generation of multivariate analysis: Classification of methods and implications for marketing research. Working Paper, University of Michigan, Apt. 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 Fornell, C.R. and Larcker~ D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Market. Res. 18 (Feb. 1981), 39-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. 16 Fornetl, C.R., Tellis, G.L., and Zinkhan, G.M. Validity assessment: A structural equation approach using partial least squares. In AMA Educators' Proceedings, American Marketing Association (Chicago, 1982), pp. 405-409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 George, W. and Barksdale. H. Marketing activities in the service industries. J. Market. 7 (1974), 65-70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 Goldstein, D.K. and Rockart, J.F. An examination of work-related correlates of job satisfaction in programmer/analysts. MIS Q. 8, 2 (June 1984), 103-i15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19 Grant, R.A. Building and testing a causal model of an information technology's impact. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems (Boston, Mass., Dec. 4-6, 1989), pp. 173-184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20 Greenhaus, J.H. Career Management. Dryden, Hinsdale, Ill., 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 Greenhaus, J.H~, Parasuraman, S. and Wormley, W.M. Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Acad. Manage. J. 33, I (Mar. i990), 64-86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 Hackman, J.R. and O!dham, G.R. Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Applied Psych. 60 (1975), 159-170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23 Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E. and Tat* ham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis. Second ed., Macmillan, N.Y., N.Y., 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24 Hall, D.T. Careers in Organizations~ Goodyear, Pacific Palisades, Calif., 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 Hall, D.T., and Isabella, L.A. Downward movement and career development. Org. Dynamics 14, 1 (1985), 5-23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. 26 Hartog, C. and Herbert, M. 1985 opinion survey of MIS managers: Key issues. MIS Q. t0, 4 (Dec. 1986), 351-361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27 Heise, D.R. Problems on path analysis and causal inference. In Sociological Methodology, B.F. Borgatta, Ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., I969, pp. 38-73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28 Igbaria, M., Greenhaus, j.H. and Parasuraman, S. Career orientations of MIS employees: An empirical analysis. MIS Q. 15, 2 (June 1991), 151-169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29 Jackson, S.E. and Schuler, R.S. A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organ. Behav. Human Dec. Proc. 36 (1985), 16-78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 Lockwood, D.L. and Sobol, M.G. IS spending survey: Communications technologies dominate growth areas. J. Syst. Manage. 40 (Dec. 1989), 31-37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31 Lohmoller, J.B. LVPLS 1.6: Latent Variable Path AnalysL~ with Partial Least Squares Estimation. University of the Federal Armed Forces, Munich, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32 Lucas, H.C. Jr. Managing Information Services. Macmillan, N.Y., N.Y., 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33 Ludlum, D.A. M IS pros a restless but happy crew. Computerwortd 22, 37 (Sept. 12, t988), 1, 108-109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34 Mobley, W~H., Griffeth, R.W., Hand, H.H., and Meglino, B.M. Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psych. Bull. 36 (1979), 493-522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. 35 Morrow, P. Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Acad. Manag. Rev. 8 (1983), 486-500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. 36 Mottaz, C.J. Determinants of organizational commitment. Human Relat. 41, 6 (1988), 467-482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. 37 Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. Second ed., McGraw Hi!l, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. 38 Parasuraman, S. Predicting turnover intentions and turnover behavior: A multivariate analysis. J. Vocational Behav. 21 (1982), 111- 121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. 39 Parasuraman, S., Drake, B.H. and Zammuto, R.E The effect of nursing care modalities and shift assignments on nurses work experiences and job attitudes. Nursing Res. 31 (1982), 364--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. 40 Parasuraman, S., and Greenhaus, J.H. Personal portrait: The life style of the woman manager. In Women and Work: An Annual Review, Vol. 4. E.A. Fagenson, Ed., Sage, Newbury Park, Calif. To be published.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. 41 Pedhazur, E. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction. Second ed~, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, N,Y., N.Y., 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. 42 Peters, L.H., Bhagat, R.S. and O,Connor, EJ. An examination of the independent and joint contribution of organizational commitment and job satisfaction on employee intentions to quit. Group and Organ. Stud. 6 ( 1981), 73-82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. 43 Porter, L.W., Crampon, w.J. and Smith, EJ. Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study~ Organ. Behav. and Human Performance 15 (1976), 87-98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. 44 Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T. and Boulian, P.V. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. J. Applied Psych. 59 (1974), 603-609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. 45 Price, J.L. and Bluedorn, A,C. Intent to leave as a measure of turnover. Paper presented at the 37th Ann. Meeting of the Academy of Management, (Orlando, Fla., Aug. 1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. 46 Rivard, S. and Huff, S. Factors of success for end-user computing. Commun. ACM 31, 5 (May 1988), 552-561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. 47 Rizzo, J.R. House, RJ. and Lirtzman, S.I. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 15 (1970), 150- 163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. 48 Romzek, B. Persnnai consequences of employee commitment. Acad. Manage. J. 32 (1989), 649-661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. 49 Saks, S. As new industries come online, MIS hiring will boom. MIS Week I0 (Sept. 25, 1989), 35-36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. 50 Steel, R.P. and Ovaile, N.K. A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behaw ioraI intentions and employee turnover. J~ Affptied Psyt:h. 69 (i984), 673-686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. 51 Tukey, J.W. Bias and confidence in not-quite large samples. Ann. Math. Star. 29 (June 1958), 614.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. 52 Van Sell, M., Brief, A.P. and Schuler, R.S. Role conflict and role ambiguity: Integration of the literature and directions for future research. Human Relat. 34, I (1981), 43-71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. 53 Wanous~ J.P. Organizational Entry: Recruitment, Selection and Sociali~l,~. tion of Newcomers, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.~ 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. 54 Watson, R.T. Influences on the IS manager's perceptions of key issues: Information scanning and the relationship with the CEO. MIS Q, 14, 2 (June 1990), 2t7-231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. 55 Wildt, A.R., Lambert, Z.V, and Durand, R.M. Applying the jackknife statistic in testing and interpreting canonical weights, loadings, and cross-ioadings. J. Marketing Rea. 19 (Feb. 1982), 99 107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. 56 Wold, H. Soft Modeling~The basic design and more extensions. In Systems Under Indirect Observation -Part K.G. Joreskog and H. Wold, Eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. t-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Determinants of MIS employees' turnover intentions: a structural equation model

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        David E. Ross

        The authors statistically studied why MIS professionals change jobs. Their analysis was based on an attitude survey of professionals currently working, focusing on the intent to change jobs rather than on actual job changes. They surveyed ACM members in the mid-Atlantic states; after responses from retirees and academics were eliminated, the remaining 464 responses reflected the general demographics of the ACM. (Had I been surveyed, my response would have been used although I work in software engineering on systems for space satellites and not in MIS. Either the declared subject area should have been broader, or the filtering of unsuitable responses should have been more discriminating than the paper indicates.) The authors developed six hypotheses regarding the relationships of 11 attitude variables to each other and to turnover intent. By acting on both each other and the intent, these variables have both direct or indirect effects on that intent. Half of the survey responses were used to validate the hypotheses. The result caused the authors to revise their hypotheses, which were then validated by the remaining responses. Both validations used the partial least squares (PLS) method of multivariate analysis, which this paper describes well while presenting minimal mathematics. The authors conclude that job satisfaction is the most significant variable directly affecting turnover intent, followed by the employee's commitment to the organization. The other variables—in the categories of demographics, role stressors, and career considerations—were found to operate more strongly on those two variables than directly on turnover intent. Recognizing that the model encompassed by their hypotheses is limited, they describe potential future studies. They finish with praise for PLS. T he paper is footnoted well, with 56 references on statistics, surveying, and employee attitudes. As noted above, the use of “MIS” to describe the subject career environment seems to be a misnomer. Another deficiency in the paper is the failure to consider such variables as the perceived commitment of the employer to its employees and economic and social trends external to the employer (both of which could affect employee fears of layoffs and motivate people to change jobs). I hope the authors address these deficiencies in their future studies. This paper may be valuable for both those concerned with personnel practices and those interested in statistical analyses of attitude surveys. When fully developed, the authors' techniques could be used in either area, well beyond studying the career environment of software professionals.

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Communications of the ACM
          Communications of the ACM  Volume 35, Issue 2
          Feb. 1992
          124 pages
          ISSN:0001-0782
          EISSN:1557-7317
          DOI:10.1145/129630
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1992 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 February 1992

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader