Volker Wulf
Markus Rohde
- Boehm, B. W. 1976: Software Engineering, in: IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-25, 12, pp. 1216 - 1241Google Scholar
- Boehm, B. W. 1988: A Spiral Model of software development and enhancement, in: Computer, 5, pp. 61 -72 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Br6dner, P. 1993: Anthropocentric Production Systems- A European Response to Challenges of Global Markets, in: Salvendy, G., Smith, M.J. (eds): Human-Computer Interaction: Software and Hardware Interfaces, Amsterdam u. a., Elsevier 1993b, pp. 74 - 79Google Scholar
- Davidow, W. H.; Malone, M. S. 1993: The Virtual Corporation. New York: Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
- Dunckel, H., Volpert, W., Z61ch, M., Kreutner, U., Pleiss, C. and Hennes, K. 1993: Kontrastive Aufgabenanalyse im Btiro. Der KABA-Leitfaden - Grundlagen und Manual. Stuttgart: TeubnerGoogle Scholar
- Dzida, W. 1994: Bestimmung und Anwendung ergonomischer Gestaltungskriterien im ProzeB der Softwareentwicklung, in: Hartmann, Anja; Herrmann, Thomas; Rohde, Markus; Wulf, Volker (Hrsg.): Menschengerechte Groupware - Softwareergonomische Gestaltung und partizipative Umsetzung, Stuttgart: Teubner, pp. 285 302Google Scholar
- Falck, M. 1991: Information Systems, Work and Organizational Design - How to do it, in: Van den Besselaar, P.; Clement, A.; J~irvinen, P. (eds): Information Systems, Work and Organizational Design, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 307 - 315Google Scholar
- Fischer, G. and Girgensohn, A. 1990: End-User Modifiability in Design Environments. CHI "90, Computer Human Interaction, Conference Proceedings, Seattle, Washinton, pp. 183 - 191 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Floyd, Ch. 1984: A Systematic Look at Prototyping, in: Budde, R.; Kuhlenkamp, K.; Mathiassen, L.; Ztillighoven, R. (eds): Approaches to Prototyping, Springer, Berlin u.a., pp. 1 - 18Google Scholar
- Floyd, Ch. 1994: Evolution~ire Systementwicklung und Wandel in Organisationen, in: GMD-Spiegei, Vol. 24, 3, pp. 36 - 40Google Scholar
- Floyd, Ch; Reisin, F.-M. and Schmidt, G. 1989: STEPS to software development with users, in: Ghezzi, C.; McDermid, J.A. (eds.): ESEC'89 - 2nd European Software Engineering Conference, University of Warwick, Coventry. Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 387, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 48 - 64 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frei, F. 1981: Psychologische Arbeitsanalyse - Eine Einfiihrung zum Thema. In: Frei, F. and Ulich, E. (eds.): Beitrfige zur psychologischen Arbeitsanalyse. Bern, pp. 11-36Google Scholar
- French, W.L. and Bell, C. H. 1 990: Organisationsentwicklung, 3rd ed., UTB, Bern et al. (german translation of: French, W.L.; Bell, C. H. 1973: Organization Development, Englewood Cliffs)Google Scholar
- Hacker, W. 1986: Arbeitspsychologie. Psychische Regulation von Arbeitsttitigkeiten. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Hacker. W. and Richter, P. 1980: Psychologische Bewertung von ArbeitsgestaltungsmaBnahmen - Ziele und Bewertungsmal3stabe. Spezielle Arbeits und Ingenieurpsychologie in Einzeldarstellungen, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Hammer, M. and Champy, J. 1993: Reengeneering the Cooperation, New York: HarperGoogle Scholar
- Hartmann, A. 1994: Integrierte Organisations- und Technikentwicklung - ein Ansatz zur sach- und bedtirfnisgerechten Gestaltung der Arbeitswelt. In: Hartmann, A., Herrmann, Th., Rohde, M. and Wulf, V. (eds.), Menschengerechte Groupware - Software-ergonomische Gestaltung und partizipative Umsetzung. Stuttgart: Teubner, pp. 303-328.Google Scholar
- Henderson, A. and Kyng, M. 1991: There's No Place Like Home: Continuing Design in Use; in: Green baum, J.; Kyng, M.: Design at Work - Cooperative Design of Computer Artifacts, Hillsdale, pp. 219 - 240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henderson Sellers, B. and Edwards, J. M. 1990: The object-oriented System Life Cycle, in: Communications of the ACM, Vol. 33, 9, pp. 143 - 159 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huse, E.F. 1980: Organization Development, 2nd ed., St. Paul (Min)Google Scholar
- Leitner, K., Volpert, W., Greiner, B., Weber, W.G. and Hennes, K. (unter Mitarbeit von Oesterreich, R., Resch, M. and Krogoll, T.) 1987: Analyse psyclhischer Belastung in der Arbeit. Das RHIA- Verfahren, Handbuch, Manual und Antwortbl~itter, K61nGoogle Scholar
- Leontjew, A. N. 1974: The problem of activity in psychology. In: Soviet Psychology, 13, pp. 4-33Google ScholarCross Ref
- Likert, R. 196i: New patterns of management. New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Luhmann, N. 1986: Okologische Kommunikation. Kann die rnoderne Gesellschaft sich auf 6kologische Gef~ilu'dungen einstellen? Opladen: WestdeutscherGoogle Scholar
- Nardi, B. A. 1993: A Small Matter of Programming - Perspectives on end user computing, MIT-Press, Cambridge et al. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oberquelle, H. 1994: Situationsbedingte und benutzerorientierte Anpaf3barkeit von Groupware, in: Hartmann, Anja; Herrmann, Thomas; Rohde, Markus; Wulf, Volker (Hrsg.): Menschengerechte Groupware- Software-ergonomische Gestaltung und partizipative Umsetzung, Stuttgart: Teubner, pp. 31 - 50Google Scholar
- Oesterreich, R. and Volpert, W. (eds.) 1991: VERA- Version 2, Handbuch und Manual, TU Berlin.Google Scholar
- Pieper, R. 1988: Diskursive Organisationsentwicklung, de Gruyter, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
- Rudolph, E., Sch0nfelder, E. and Hacker, W. 1987: T~itigkeitsbewertungssystem - Geistige Arbeit, Psychodiagnostisches Zentrum, Sektion Psychologie der Humboldt-Universitat, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, K. 1994: The Organization of Cooperative Work: Beyond the "Levianthanian" Conception of the Organization of Cooperative Work, in: Proceedings of CSCW'94, ACM-Press, New York, pp. 101- 113 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sell, R. and Fuchs-Frohnhofen, P. 1994: Gestaltung von Arbeit und Technik durch Beteiligungsqualifizierung; Schriftenreihe Sozialvertr~igliche Technikgestaltung, Materialien und Berichte Band 39, Opladen: WestdeutscherGoogle Scholar
- Sievers, B. 1975: Theorie und Methoden der Organisa.tionsentwicklung in den USA, in: Gruppendynamik, 1/1975, S. 29 - 49Google Scholar
- Trigg, R. H.; Moran, T. P.and Halasz, F. G. 1987: Adaptability and tailorability in Note Cards, in: Bullinger, H.J., Shackel, B. (eds): Herman- Computer Interaction - INTERACT '87, Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp. 723 - 728Google Scholar
- Trigg, R. and Bc~dker, S. 1994: From Implementation to Design: Tailoring and the Emergence of Systematization in CSCW, in: Proceedings of CSCW'94, ACM-Press, New York, pp. 45 - 55 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ulich, E. 1983: Pr~iventive Intervention im Betrieb: Vorgehensweisen zur Vertinderung der Arbeitssituation. In: Psychosozial Jg. 6, Nr. 20, pp. 48-70Google Scholar
- Ulich, E. 1984; Arbeitspsychologische Konzepte und neue Technologien. In: Organisationsentwicklung, 3, pp. 53 - 65Google Scholar
- Volpert, W. et al. 1983: Verfahren zur Ermittlung yon Regulationserfordernissen in der Arbeitsttitigkeit (VERA), K61nGoogle Scholar
- Warnecke, Hans-Jtirgen 1993: Die Revolution in der Unternehmenskultur, Springer: Heidelberg u.a.Google Scholar
- Womack J. P., Jones D. T. and Roos, D. 1990: The machine that changed the world. New York: RawsonGoogle Scholar
- Wuif, V. 1994: Anpal3barkeit im Prozel3 evolutin~irer Systernentwicklung, in: GMD-Spiegel, 24. Vol., 3/1994, pp. 41 - 46Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Towards an integrated organization and technology development
Recommendations
Towards persuasive technology for software development environments: an empirical study
PERSUASIVE'12: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Persuasive Technology: design for health and safetyThis paper describes an empirical study of a developed persuasive software tool (PerSoDeMetrics) and its effects on the software engineering area. The duration of the study was ten months. The persuasive tool was introduced for a small development team ...
Examining the adoption of KMS in organizations from an integrated perspective of technology, individual, and organization
Knowledge management systems (KMS) have been implemented by many organizations to aid in the management of the intellectual property and the development of sustainable competitive advantages. However, despite the efforts of academics and practitioners ...
Assimilating new technology into the organization: an assessment of McFarlan and McKenney's model
Innovation is considered to be an important quality in many successful organizations. The nature of the innovation adaptation process within the organization, however, is not well understood. This article examines the efficacy of McFarlan and McKenney's ...
Comments