Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Statistical Shape Modeling of Musculoskeletal Structures and Its Applications Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2D-3D Reconstruction-Based Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasty

verfasst von : Guoyan Zheng, Steffen Schumann, Steven Balestra, Benedikt Thelen, Lutz-P. Nolte

Erschienen in: Computational Radiology for Orthopaedic Interventions

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter proposed a personalized X-ray reconstruction-based planning and post-operative treatment evaluation framework called iJoint for advancing modern Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Based on a mobile X-ray image calibration phantom and a unique 2D-3D reconstruction technique, iJoint can generate patient-specific models of hip joint by non-rigidly matching statistical shape models to the X-ray radiographs. Such a reconstruction enables a true 3D planning and treatment evaluation of hip arthroplasty from just 2D X-ray radiographs whose acquisition is part of the standard diagnostic and treatment loop. As part of the system, a 3D model-based planning environment provides surgeons with hip arthroplasty related parameters such as implant type, size, position, offset and leg length equalization. With this newly developed system, we are able to provide true 3D solutions for computer assisted planning of THA using only 2D X-ray radiographs, which is not only innovative but also cost-effective.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Computer Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment Planning of Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI)
Nächstes Kapitel Image Fusion for Computer-Assisted Bone Tumor Surgery
Literatur
1.
Kiefer H (2007) Differences and opportunities of THA in the USA, Asia and Europe. In: Chang J-D, Billau K (eds) Ceramics in orthopaedics. Proceedings of the 12th BIOLOX® symposium on bioceramics and alternative bearings in joint arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–8
2.
Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Springer, Berlin
3.
Müller ME (1992) Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:12–21
4.
Gonzalez Della Valle A, Slullitel G, Piccaluga F, Salvati EA (2005) The precision and usefulness of pre-operative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:51–58
5.
Eggli S, Pisan M, Mueller M (1998) The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:382–390CrossRef
6.
Carter LW, Stovall DO, Young TR (1995) Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral prostheses. J Arthroplasty 10:507–513
7.
Unnanuntana A, Wagner D, Goodman SB (2009) The accuracy of peroperative templating in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:180–186
8.
Viceconti M, Lattanzi R, Antonietti B, Paderni S, Olmi R, Sudanese A, Toni A (2003) CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Med Eng Phys 25:371–377CrossRef
9.
Huppertz A, Radmer S, Wagner M, Roessler T, Hamm B, Sparmann M (2014) Computed tomography for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty: what radiologists need to know. Skeletal Radiol 43:1041–1051CrossRef
10.
Sariali E, Mauprivez R, Khiami H, Pascal-Mousselard H, Catonne Y (2012) Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:151–158CrossRef
11.
Huppertz A, Radmer S, Asbach P, Juran R, Schwenke C, Diederichs G, Hamm B, Sparmann M (2011) Computed tomography for preoperative planning in minimal-invasive total hip arthroplasty: radiation exposure and cost analysis. Eur J Radiol 78:406–413CrossRef
12.
Otomaru I, Nakamoto M, Kagiyama Y, Takao M, Sugano N, Tomiyama N, Tada Y, Sato Y (2012) Automated preoperative planning of femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty from 3D CT data: Atlas-based approach and comparative study. Med Image Anal 16:415–426CrossRef
13.
Hassani H, CheriX S, Ek ET, Ruediger HA (2014) Comparisons of preoperative three-dimensional planning and surgical reconstruction in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:1273–1277CrossRef
14.
Dubousset J, Charpak G, Skalli W, Deguise J, Kalifa G (2010) EOS: a new imaging system with low dose radiation in standing position for spine and bone & joint disorders. J Musculoskelet Res 13:1–12CrossRef
15.
Wybier M, Bossard P (2013) Musculoskeletal imaging in progress: the EOS imaging system. Joint Bone Spine 80:238–243CrossRef
16.
Illes T, Somoskeoy S (2012) The EOS imaging system and its use in daily orthopaedic practice. Int. Orthop 36:1325–1331
17.
Wade R, Yang H, McKenna C, Faria R, Gummerson N, Woolacott N (2013) A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system. Eur Spine J 22:296–304
18.
Deschenes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G, Labelle H, Dubois J, Miron MC, Parent S (2010) Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities—reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine 35:989–994
19.
Glaser DA, Doan J, Newton PO (2012) Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy. Spine 37:1391–1397
20.
Lazennec JV, Rousseau MA, Rangel A, Gorin M, Belicourt C, Brusson A, Catonne Y (2011) Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: Measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:373–380CrossRef
21.
Lazennec JV, Brusson A, Dominique F, Rousseau MA, Pour AE (2014) Offset and anteversion reconstruction after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: an evaluation with the low-cost EOS system comparing two- and three-dimensional imaging. Int Orthop. 39(7):1259–1267 Jul 2015, 10.​1007/​s00264-014-2616-3
22.
Folinais D, Thelen P, Delin C, Radier C, Catonne Y, Lazennec JY (2011) Measuring femoral and rotational alignment: EOS system versus computed tomography. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:509–516CrossRef
23.
Blendea S, Eckman K, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ, DiGioia III AM (2005) Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching. Comput Aided Surg 10:37–43
24.
Penney GP, Edwards PJ, Hipwell JH, Slomczykowski M, Revie I, Hawkes DJ (2007) Postoperative calculation of acetabular cup position using 2D–3D registration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54:1342–1348
25.
Zheng G, Zhang X, Steppacher S, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M (2009) HipMatch: an object-oriented cross-platform program for accurate determination of cup orientation using 2D-3D registration of single standard X-ray radiograph and a CT volume. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 95:236–248
26.
Steffen S, Thelen B, Ballestra S, Nolte L-P, Buechler P, Zheng G (2014) X-ray image calibration and its application to clinical orthopedics. Med Eng Phys 36(7):968–974CrossRef
27.
Hartley R, Zisserman A (2004) Multiple view geometry in computer vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28.
Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, Graham J (1995) Active shape models-their training and application. Comput Vis Image Underst 61:38–59
29.
Vercauteren T, Pennec X, Perchant A, Ayache N (2009) Diffeomorphic demons: efficient non-parametric image registration. Neuroimage 45(1 Suppl):S61–S72CrossRef
30.
Lamecker H, Wenckebach TH, Hege H-C (2006) Atlas-based 3D-shape reconstruction from X-ray images. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on pattern recognition 2006 (ICPR 2006). IEEE Computer Society, pp 371–374
31.
Mitton D, Deschenes S, Laporte S, Godbout B, Bertrand S, de Guise JA, Skalli W (2006) 3D reconstruction of the pelvis from bi-planar radiography. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 9:1–5
32.
Kadoury S, Cheriet F, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2007) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine and pelvis from uncalibrated biplanar X-ray images. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:160–167
33.
Zheng G, Gollmer S, Schumann S, Dong X, Feilkas T, and Gonzalez Ballester MA (2009) A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X-ray images. Med. Image Anal. 13:883–899
34.
Schumann S, Liu L, Tannast M, Bergmann M, Nolte LP, Zheng G (2013) An integrated system for 3D hip joint reconstruction from 2D X-rays: a preliminary validation study. Annals of Biomecial Engineering 41:2077–2087
35.
Balestra S (2013) Statistical shape model-based articulated 2D-3D reconstruction. Master thesis, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland
Metadaten
Titel
2D-3D Reconstruction-Based Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasty
verfasst von
Guoyan Zheng
Steffen Schumann
Steven Balestra
Benedikt Thelen
Lutz-P. Nolte
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Computational Radiology for Orthopaedic Interventions

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23481-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-23482-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23482-3_10

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise