Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Although pipeline development is an important first step for accelerators, entrepreneur selection is perhaps the most controversial aspect of their work. From the most practical perspective, selecting promising but overlooked entrepreneurs is a cornerstone of any successful accelerator. Most program managers believe that the best way to ensure maximum return on their human, social, and financial capital investments is to ensure that these resources are directed toward ventures with the best chance of delivering and scaling impact. Therefore, they invest an immense amount of thought and effort selecting the most promising entrepreneurs into their cohorts. On the other hand, accelerators that end up delivering excellent results are often accused of simply cherry-picking entrepreneurs and ventures that would have succeeded any way. This accusation matters when presenting evidence to potential funders and supporters. If left unchallenged, the push to interpret accelerator effects solely through the lens of randomized or pseudo-randomized experimentation discounts this critical aspect of accelerator work. Rather than considering selection as a problematic confound in assessments of program efficacy, this chapter frames it as one of three core domains of work and examines several of the choices made by high-NFF and low-NFF programs to see which of them produce better accelerator outcomes.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Michael Leatherbee & Juanita Gonzalez-Uribe. 2018. ‘Selection issues.’ Accelerators: Successful Venture Creation and Growth.
Laurens Vandeweghe & Jyun-Ying (Trent) Fu. 2018. ‘Business accelerator governance.’ Accelerators: Successful Venture Creation and Growth.
William A. Sahlman. 2010. ‘Endeavor: Creating a Global Movement for High-Impact Entrepreneurship.’ Harvard Business School Case #9-810-049.
Katherine Phillips & Charles A. O’Reilly. 1998. ‘Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research.’ In Research in Organizational Behavior. JAI Press.
Clearly, all of the programs in the EDP sample also build written applications into their selection processes. This is the only way to get applicants to complete the EDP application surveys.
Steven N. Kaplan, Berk A. Sensoy, & Per Strömberg. 2009. ‘Should investors bet on the jockey or the horse? Evidence from the evolution of firms from early business plans to public companies.’ The Journal of Finance, 64(1): 75–115.
Nicky Khaki. Ease Off on the Accelerators: Why GALI’s Latest Study on Accelerator Programs May Be Overstating Their Impact. NextBillion (July 2018).
Andrew Leigh. 2018. Randomistas: How Radical Researchers Are Changing Our World. Yale University Press.
- A Closer Look at Entrepreneur Selection
Peter W. Roberts
Saurabh A. Lall
ec4u, Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Rombach Rechtsanwälte/© Rombach Rechtsanwälte