Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Archive of Applied Mechanics
Erschienen in: Archive of Applied Mechanics 12/2018

06.08.2018 | Original

A comparative study of the principal methods for the analytical formulation and the numerical solution of the equations of motion of rigid multibody systems

verfasst von: Carmine Maria Pappalardo, Domenico Guida

Erschienen in: Archive of Applied Mechanics | Ausgabe 12/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The goal of this investigation is to perform a comparative analysis of the principal methodologies employed for the analytical formulation and the numerical solution of the equations of motion of rigid multibody mechanical systems. In particular, three formulation approaches are considered in this work for the analytical formulation of the equations of motion. The multibody formulation strategies discussed in this paper are the Reference Point Coordinate Formulation with Euler Angles (RPCF-EA), the Reference Point Coordinate Formulation with Euler Parameters (RPCF-EP), and the Natural Absolute Coordinate Formulation (NACF). Moreover, five computational algorithms are considered in this investigation for the development of effective and efficient solution procedures suitable for the numerical solution of the equations of motion. The multibody computational algorithms discussed in this paper are the Augmented Formulation (AF), the Embedding Technique (ET), the Amalgamated Formulation (AMF), the Projection Method (PM), and the Udwadia-Kalaba Equations (UKE). The multibody formulation approaches and solution procedures analyzed in this work are compared in terms of generality, versatility, ease of implementation, accuracy, effectiveness, and efficiency. In order to perform a general comparative study, four benchmark multibody systems are considered as numerical examples. The comparative study carried out in this paper demonstrates that all the methodologies considered can handle general multibody problems, are computationally effective and efficient, and lead to consistent numerical solutions.
Vorheriger Artikel A computational homogenization approach for the study of localization of masonry structures using the XFEM
Nächster Artikel Dynamic analysis of partial-interaction Kant composite beams by weak-form quadrature element method

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Schiehlen, W.: Multibody system dynamics: roots and perspectives. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 1(2), 149–188 (1997)MathSciNetMATH
2.
Eberhard, P., Schiehlen, W.: Computational dynamics of multibody systems: history, formalisms, and applications. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 1(1), 3–12 (2006)
3.
Hu, W., Tian, Q., Hu, H.: Dynamic simulation of liquid-filled flexible multibody systems via absolute nodal coordinate formulation and SPH method. Nonlinear Dyn. 75(4), 653–671 (2014)MathSciNet
4.
Patel, M., Orzechowski, G., Tian, Q., Shabana, A.A.: A new multibody system approach for tire modeling using ANCF finite elements. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K: J. Multi-body Dyn. 230(1), 69–84 (2016)
5.
Cammarata, A., Angeles, J., Sinatra, R.: Kinetostatic and inertial conditioning of the McGill Schonflies-motion generator. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2, 186203 (2010)
6.
Concilio, A., De Simone, M.C., Rivera, Z.B., Guida, D.: A new semi-active suspension system for racing vehicles. FME Trans. 45(4), 578–584 (2017)
7.
De Simone, M.C., Russo, S., Rivera, Z.B., Guida, D.: Multibody model of a UAV in presence of wind fields. In: International Conference on Control, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Optimization (ICCAIRO), pp. 83–88. IEEE, Prague, Czech Republic, 20–22 May 2017 (2017)
8.
Ruggiero, A., Affatato, S., Merola, M., De Simone M.C.: FEM analysis of metal on UHMWPE total hip prosthesis during normal walking cycle. In: Programme and Proceedings of the XXIII Conference of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (AIMETA 2017), 4–7 Sep 2017, Salerno, Italy, 2017, pp. 1885–1892 (2017)
9.
Barbagallo, R., Sequenzia, G., Cammarata, A., Oliveri, S.M., Fatuzzo, G.: Redesign and multibody simulation of a motorcycle rear suspension with eccentric mechanism. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 12(2), 517–524 (2018)
10.
Barbagallo, R., Sequenzia, G., Oliveri, S.M., Cammarata, A.: Dynamics of a high-performance motorcycle by an advanced multibody/control co-simulation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K: J. Multi-body Dyn. 230(2), 207–221 (2016)
11.
Kulkarni, S., Pappalardo, C.M., Shabana, A.A.: Pantograph/catenary contact formulations. ASME J. Vib. Acoust. 139(1), 011010 (2017)
12.
Pappalardo, C.M., Patel, M.D., Tinsley, B., Shabana, A.A.: Contact force control in multibody pantograph/catenary systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K: J. Multibody Dyn. 230(4), 307–328 (2016)
13.
Marques, F., Souto, A.P., Flores, P.: On the constraints violation in forward dynamics of multibody systems. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 39(4), 385–419 (2017)MathSciNetMATH
14.
Marques, F., Isaac, F., Dourado, N., Flores, P.: An enhanced formulation to model spatial revolute joints with radial and axial clearances. Mech. Mach. Theory 116, 123–144 (2017)
15.
Marques, F., Flores, P., Claro, J.P., Lankarani, H.M.: A survey and comparison of several friction force models for dynamic analysis of multibody mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 86(3), 1407–1443 (2016)MathSciNet
16.
Tian, Q., Flores, P., Lankarani, H.M.: A comprehensive survey of the analytical, numerical and experimental methodologies for dynamics of multibody mechanical systems with clearance or imperfect joints. Mech. Mach. Theory 122, 1–57 (2018)
17.
Tian, Q., Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Flores, P.: Dynamics of spatial flexible multibody systems with clearance and lubricated spherical joints. Comput. Struct. 87(13–14), 913–929 (2009)
18.
Tian, Q., Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Yang, J.J.: Simulation of planar flexible multibody systems with clearance and lubricated revolute joints. Nonlinear Dyn. 60(4), 489–511 (2010)MATH
19.
Cammarata, A.: A novel method to determine position and orientation errors in clearance-affected overconstrained mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory 118, 247–264 (2017)
20.
De Simone, M.C., Guida, D.: On the development of a low cost device for retrofitting tracked vehicles for autonomous navigation. In: Programme and Proceedings of the XXIII Conference of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (AIMETA 2017), 4–7 Sep 2017, Salerno, Italy, 2017, pp. 71–82 (2017)
21.
Tian, Q., Sun, Y., Liu, C., Hu, H., Flores, P.: Elastohydrodynamic lubricated cylindrical joints for rigid-flexible multibody dynamics. Comput. Struct. 114, 106–120 (2013)
22.
Virlez, G., Bruls, O., Tromme, E., Duysinx, P.: Modeling joints with clearance and friction in multibody dynamic simulation of automotive differentials. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 3(1), 013003 (2013)MATH
23.
De Simone, M.C., Guida, D.: Dry friction influence on structure dynamics. In: COMPDYN 2015: 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, pp. 4483–4491 (2015)
24.
De Simone, M.C., Guida, D.: Modal coupling in presence of dry friction. Machines 6(1), 8 (2018)
25.
Villecco, F., Pellegrino, A.: Evaluation of uncertainties in the design process of complex mechanical systems. Entropy 19(9), 475 (2017)
26.
Villecco, F., Pellegrino, A.: Entropic measure of epistemic uncertainties in multibody system models by axiomatic design. Entropy 19(7), 291 (2017)
27.
Formato, A., Ianniello, D., Villecco, F., Lenza, T.L.L., Guida, D.: Design optimization of the plough working surface by computerized mathematical model. Emir. J. Food Agric. 29, 36–44 (2017)
28.
Lan, P., Liu, M.: Integration of computer aided design and analysis using the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), vol. 1, pp. 159–162 (2011)
29.
Mikkola, A., Shabana, A.A., Sanchez-Rebollo, C., Jimenez-Octavio, J.R.: Comparison between ANCF and B-spline surfaces. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 30(2), 119–138 (2013)MathSciNet
30.
Tian, Q., Chen, L.P., Zhang, Y.Q., Yang, J.: An efficient hybrid method for multibody dynamics simulation based on absolute nodal coordinate formulation. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 4(2), 021009 (2009)
31.
Liu, C., Tian, Q., Hu, H.: Dynamics and control of a spatial rigid-flexible multibody system with multiple cylindrical clearance joints. Mech. Mach. Theory 52, 106–129 (2012)
32.
Tian, Q., Zhang, Y., Chen, L.P., Yang, J.: Two-link flexible manipulator modelling and tip trajectory tracking based on the absolute nodal coordinate method. Int. J. Robot. Autom. 24(2), 103 (2009)
33.
Wang, Z., Tian, Q., Hu, H.: Dynamics of spatial rigid-flexible multibody systems with uncertain interval parameters. Nonlinear Dyn. 84(2), 527–548 (2016)MathSciNetMATH
34.
De Simone, M.C., Guida, D.: Identification and control of an unmanned ground vehicle by using Arduino. UPB Sci. Bull. Ser. D: Mech. Eng. 80(1), 141–154 (2018)
35.
Sharifzadeh, M., Timpone, F., Farnam, A., Senatore, A., Akbari, A.: Tyre-road adherence conditions estimation for intelligent vehicle safety applications. In: Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol. 47, pp. 389–398. Springer, Cham (2017)
36.
Sharifzadeh, M., Akbari, A., Timpone, F., Daryani, R.: Vehicle tyre/road interaction modeling and identification of its parameters using real-time trust-region methods. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(3), 111–116 (2016)MathSciNet
37.
Quatrano, A., De Simone, M.C., Rivera, Z.B., Guida, D.: Development and implementation of a control system for a retrofitted CNC machine by using Arduino. FME Trans. 45(4), 578–584 (2017)
38.
Ruggiero, A., De Simone, M.C., Russo, D., Guida, D.: Sound pressure measurement of orchestral instruments in the concert hall of a public school. Int. J. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 10, 75–812 (2016)
39.
Pappalardo, C.M., Guida, D.: Adjoint-based optimization procedure for active vibration control of nonlinear mechanical systems. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 139(8), 081010 (2017)
40.
Pappalardo, C.M., Guida, D.: Control of nonlinear vibrations using the adjoint method. Meccanica 52(11–12), 2503–2526 (2017)MathSciNetMATH
41.
Guida, D., Pappalardo, C.M.: A new control algorithm for active suspension systems featuring hysteresis. FME Trans. 41(4), 285–290 (2013)
42.
Guida, D., Pappalardo, C.M.: Control design of an active suspension system for a quarter-car model with hysteresis. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 3(3), 277–299 (2015)
43.
Strano, S., Terzo, M.: A SDRE-based tracking control for a hydraulic actuation system. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 60, 715–726 (2015)
44.
Strano, S., Terzo, M.: A first order model based control of a hydraulic seismic isolator test rig. Eng. Lett. 21(2), 52–60 (2013)
45.
Guida, D., Nilvetti, F., Pappalardo, C.M.: Parameter identification of a two degrees of freedom mechanical system. Int. J. Mech. 3(2), 23–30 (2009)
46.
Guida, D., Pappalardo, C.M.: Sommerfeld and mass parameter identification of lubricated journal bearing. WSEAS Trans. Appl. Theor. Mech. 4(4), 205–214 (2009)
47.
Pappalardo, C.M., Guida, D.: System identification and experimental modal analysis of a frame structure. Eng. Lett. 26(1), 56–68 (2018)
48.
Pappalardo, C.M., Guida, D.: System identification algorithm for computing the modal parameters of linear mechanical systems. Machines 6(2), 12 (2018)
49.
Strano, S., Terzo, M.: On the real-time estimation of the wheel-rail contact force by means of a new nonlinear estimator design model. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 105, 391–403 (2018)
50.
Palomba, I., Richiedei, D., Trevisani, A.: Kinematic state estimation for rigid-link multibody systems by means of nonlinear constraint equations. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 40(1), 1–22 (2017)MathSciNetMATH
51.
Palomba, I., Richiedei, D., Trevisani, A.: Two-stage approach to state and force estimation in rigid-link multibody systems. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 39(1–2), 115–134 (2017)MathSciNetMATH
52.
Sun, J., Tian, Q., Hu, H.: Structural optimization of flexible components in a flexible multibody system modeled via ANCF. Mech. Mach. Theory 104, 59–80 (2016)
53.
Tian, Q., Liu, C., Machado, M., Flores, P.: A new model for dry and lubricated cylindrical joints with clearance in spatial flexible multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 64(1–2), 25–47 (2011)MATH
54.
Guida, D., Nilvetti, F., Pappalardo, C.M.: Instability induced by dry friction. Int. J. Mech. 3(3), 44–51 (2009)
55.
Guida, D., Nilvetti, F., Pappalardo, C.M.: Dry friction influence on cart pendulum dynamics. Int. J. Mech. 3(2), 31–38 (2009)
56.
Shabana, A.A.: Comput. Contin. Mech., 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2018)
57.
Shabana, A.A.: Definition of ANCF finite elements. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 10(5), 054506 (2015)
58.
Nachbagauer, K.: State of the art of ANCF elements regarding geometric description, interpolation strategies, definition of elastic forces, validation and the locking phenomenon in comparison with proposed beam finite elements. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 21(3), 293–319 (2014)MathSciNetMATH
59.
Nachbagauer, K., Gruber, P., Gerstmayr, J.: Structural and continuum mechanics approaches for a 3D shear deformable ANCF beam finite element: application to static and linearized dynamic examples. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 8(2), 021004 (2013)
60.
De Simone, M.C., Rivera, Z.B., Guida, D.: Finite element analysis on squeal-noise in railway applications. FME Trans. 46(1), 93–100 (2018)
61.
Lan, P., Shabana, A.A.: Integration of B-spline geometry and ANCF finite element analysis. Nonlinear Dyn. 61(1–2), 193–206 (2010)MathSciNetMATH
62.
Pappalardo, C.M., Zhang, Z., Shabana, A.A.: Use of independent volume parameters in the development of new large displacement ANCF triangular plate/shell elements. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(4), 2171–2202 (2018)
63.
Pappalardo, C.M., Wang, T., Shabana, A.A.: Development of ANCF tetrahedral finite elements for the nonlinear dynamics of flexible structures. Nonlinear Dyn. 89(4), 2905–2932 (2017)MathSciNetMATH
64.
Pappalardo, C.M., Wang, T., Shabana, A.A.: On the formulation of the planar ANCF triangular finite elements. Nonlinear Dyn. 89(2), 1019–1045 (2017)MathSciNetMATH
65.
Nachbagauer, K., Pechstein, A.S., Irschik, H., Gerstmayr, J.: A mew locking-free formulation for planar, shear deformable, linear and quadratic beam finite elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 26(3), 245–263 (2011)MATH
66.
Pappalardo, C.M., Wallin, M., Shabana, A.A.: A new ANCF/CRBF fully parametrized plate finite element. ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 12(3), 031008 (2017)
67.
Pappalardo, C.M., Yu, Z., Zhang, X., Shabana, A.A.: Rational ANCF thin plate finite element. ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 11(5), 051009 (2016)
68.
Flores, P., Lankarani, H.M.: Multibody systems formulation. In: Solid Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 226, pp. 23–45. Springer, Berlin (2016)
69.
Nikravesh, P.E.: An overview of several formulations for multibody dynamics. In: Product Engineering: Eco-Design, Technologies and Green Energy, pp. 189–226. Springer (2005)
70.
Pappalardo, C.M.: A natural absolute coordinate formulation for the kinematic and dynamic analysis of rigid multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 81(4), 1841–1869 (2015)MathSciNetMATH
71.
Garcia De Jalon, J.G., Unda, J., Avello, A.: Natural coordinates for the computer analysis of multibody systems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 56(3), 309–327 (1986)MATH
72.
Garcia De Jalon, J.G.: Twenty-five years of natural coordinates. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 18(1), 15–33 (2007)MathSciNetMATH
73.
Udwadia, F.E., Schutte, A.D.: Equations of motion for general constrained systems in Lagrangian mechanics. Acta Mech. 213(1–2), 111–129 (2010)MATH
74.
Kalaba, R.E., Udwadia, F.E.: Equations of motion for nonholonomic, constrained dynamical systems via Gauss principle. J. Appl. Mech. 60(3), 662–668 (1993)MathSciNetMATH
75.
Udwadia, F.E., Phohomsiri, P.: Explicit equations of motion for constrained mechanical systems with singular mass matrices and applications to multi-body dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 462(2071), 2097–2117 (2006)MathSciNetMATH
76.
Udwadia, F.E., Koganti, P.B.: Dynamics and control of a multi-body planar pendulum. Nonlinear Dyn. 81(1–2), 845–866 (2015)MathSciNet
77.
Guida, D., Pappalardo, C.M.: Forward and inverse dynamics of nonholonomic mechanical systems. Meccanica 49(7), 1547–1559 (2014)MathSciNetMATH
78.
Pappalardo, C.M., Guida, D.: Dynamic analysis of planar rigid multibody systems modeled using natural absolute coordinates. Appl. Comput. Mech. 12, 73–110 (2018)
79.
Shampine, L.F.: Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations. CRC Press, Cambridge (1994)MATH
80.
Pappalardo, C.M., Guida, D.: On the Lagrange multipliers of the intrinsic constraint equations of rigid multibody mechanical systems. Arch. Appl. Mech. 88(3), 419–451 (2017)
81.
Shabana, A.A.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)MATH
82.
Shabana, A.A.: Computational Dynamics. Wiley, New York (2009)MATH
83.
Garcia De Jalon, J.G., Bayo, E.: Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real-time Challenge. Springer, New York (2012)
84.
Udwadia, F.E., Kalaba, R.E.: Analytical Dynamics: A New Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)MATH
85.
De Falco, D., Pennestrí, E., Vita, L.: Investigation of the influence of pseudoinverse matrix calculations on multibody dynamics simulations by means of the Udwadia–Kalaba formulation. J. Aerosp. Eng. 22(4), 365–372 (2009)
86.
Pappalardo, C.M., Guida, D.: On the use of two-dimensional Euler parameters for the dynamic simulation of planar rigid multibody systems. Arch. Appl. Mech. 87(10), 1647–1665 (2017)
87.
Wehage, R.A., Haug, E.: Generalized coordinate partitioning for dimension reduction in analysis of constrained dynamic systems. J. Mech. Des. 104(1), 247–255 (1982)
88.
Wehage, K.T., Wehage, R.A., Ravani, B.: Generalized coordinate partitioning for complex mechanisms based on kinematic substructuring. Mech. Mach. Theory 92, 464–483 (2015)
89.
Wehage, K., Ravani, B.: A computational method for formulation and solution of dynamical equations for complex mechanisms and multibody systems. In: ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, p. V05AT08A031 (2017)
90.
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A.: Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)MATH
Metadaten
Titel
A comparative study of the principal methods for the analytical formulation and the numerical solution of the equations of motion of rigid multibody systems
verfasst von
Carmine Maria Pappalardo
Domenico Guida
Publikationsdatum
06.08.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archive of Applied Mechanics / Ausgabe 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0939-1533
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-018-1441-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2018

Archive of Applied Mechanics 12/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original

Strips of localization of plastic deformation

Original

Electromechanical properties and actuation capability of an extension mode piezoelectric fiber composite actuator with cylindrically periodic microstructure

Original

The influences of force-limiting devices and high-stiffness cables on behavior of tensegrity structures

Original

Modeling of anisotropic remodeling of trabecular bone coupled to fracture

Original

Optimization of dynamic quantities of a four-bar mechanism using the Hybrid Cuckoo Search and Firefly Algorithm (H-CS-FA)

Original

Dynamic analysis of partial-interaction Kant composite beams by weak-form quadrature element method

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise