Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction and Context: The State of the World Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. A Conceptual Architecture for Stewarding Sustainability Transformations

verfasst von : Petra Kuenkel

Erschienen in: Stewarding Sustainability Transformations

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This Chapter takes the emerging conceptual architecture for stewarding sustainability transformations to the next level. It suggests that collaboration literacy enhances transformation literacy, which is defined as the capability to steward sustainability transformations collectively, across the boundaries of institutions, nations, sectors, and cultures. The chapter proposes four shifts in thinking toward a new way of approaching large-system change that consider the Patterns of Aliveness Theory with its six aliveness-enhancing principles. It summarizes the insights from 50 semi-structured research interviews with scholars and practitioners in the global sustainability arena and links these insights to the currently most discussed intervention approaches to sustainability transformations. The integration with the aliveness principles and the dimensions of the Collective Leadership Compass leads to the final level of the conceptual architecture for stewarding sustainability transformations. How this can be applied to enhance systems aliveness is illustrated by an example from the circular economy approach.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Stewarding Sustainability Transformations in Multi-stakeholder Collaboration
Nächstes Kapitel The Choreography of Stewarding Sustainability Transformations
Fußnoten
1
Personal interview with Humberto Maturana, August 2016, in Santiago de Chile.
 
2
The term everyday theory is taken from the German term „“Alltagstheorie“ which describes a mental construction of how things are hang together and have come into being which creates a basis for the actions of a person in the world.
 
3
DIALogos: Unpublished fieldguide “Leadership for Collective Intelligence”; Course, 2001.
 
4
A list of relevant gatherings attended by the author as well as the summary of research inquiry conversations held can be found in Annex 2.
 
5
Source: Personal conversation with Hunter Lovins, President of Natural Capital Solutions (see also: https://​natcapsolutions.​org/​an-economy-in-service-to-life/​).
 
6
Source (Accessed on April 15, 2017): http://​bteam.​org/​
 
7
Source (Accessed on April 3, 2017): http://​unsdsn.​org/
 
8
Source (Accessed on April 3, 2017): http://​www.​afi-global.​org/
 
9
Source (Accessed on April 3, 2017): http://​www.​gwp.​org/
 
10
Lekgotla is in South Africa sometimes referred to as “Dialogue of Leaders” and regularly used, for example, for cabinet reviews also (De Liefde 2003, p. 56).
 
11
A more detailed description of the Roadmap can be found in Sect. 7.3.2.
 
12
Source (Accessed on April 5, 2017): https://​www.​unglobalcompact.​org
 
13
Quote retrieved on May 10, 2017, from http://​www.​oib-france.​com/​gross-domestic-product-in-1968-by-robert-f-kennedy/​, the full quote retrieved is: Too much and too long, we seem to have surrendered community excellence and community values in the mere accumulation of material things. Our gross national product … if we should judge America by that – counts air pollution and cigarette advertising, and ambulances to clear our highways of carnage. It counts special locks for our doors and the jails for those who break them. (…)
Yet the gross national product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education, or the joy of their play. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages; the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. It measures neither our wit nor our courage; neither our wisdom nor our learning; neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country; it measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile. And it tells us everything about America except why we are proud that we are Americans.
 
14
For more details, see the following source (Accessed on May 3, 2017): http://​www.​grossnationalhap​piness.​com/​nine-domains/​
 
15
For more details see the following source (Accessed on May 3, 2017): http://​hdr.​undp.​org/​en/​content/​human-development-index-hdi
 
16
For more details see the following source (Accessed on May 3, 2017): https://​2030-watch.​de/​
 
19
See, for example (Accessed on May 6, 2017): https://​www.​co2.​earth/​global-co2-emissions
 
20
See the information on the Planetary Boundaries Conference in Berlin April 2017: https://​pb-conference2017.​de/
 
22
Source: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/choreography. Accessed June 4, 2017.
 
23
The Finnish Innovation Fund (SITRA) is an independent public foundation. It is directly supervised by the Finnish Parliament. Source (Accessed on April 3, 2017): https://​www.​sitra.​fi/​en/​
 
Literatur
Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2010). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton: University Press.
Albrecht, J. (2006). The use of consumption taxes to re-launch green tax reforms. International Review of Law and Economics, 26(1), 88–103.CrossRef
Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, C. (2002). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book I – The phenomenon of life. Berkeley: The Center for Environmental Structure.
Alexander, C. (2005). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book III – A vision of a living world. Berkeley: The Center for Environmental Structure.
Alexander, C. (2004). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book IV – The luminous ground. Berkeley: The Center for Environmental Structure.
Anders, S. M., & Caswell, J. A. (2009). Standards as barriers versus standards as catalysts: Assessing the impact of HACCP implementation on US seafood imports. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 310–321.CrossRef
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2012). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.CrossRef
Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. Houghton: Mifflin Harcourt.
Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., & McConney, P. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(2), 95–102.CrossRef
Astleithner, F., & Hamedinger, A. (2003). The analysis of sustainability indicators as socially constructed policy instruments: Benefits and challenges of ‘interactive research’. Local Environment, 8(6), 627–640.CrossRef
Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., O’Riordan, T., Haxeltine, A., Weaver, P., Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2014). Gamechangers and transformative social innovation. The case of the economic crisis and tranformative social innovation. TRANSIT Working Paper, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16(5), 290–306.CrossRef
Bason, C. (2011). Leading public sector innovation. Bristol: Public Policy Press.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin Books.
Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the anthropocene. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRef
Biermann, F., Man-san Chan, A. M., & Pattberg, P. (2007). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Does the promise hold? In P. Glasbergen, F. Biermann, & A. Mol (Eds.), Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Blackett, A. (2001). Global governance, legal pluralism and the decentered state: A labor law critique of codes of corporate conduct. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 8, 401–447.
Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2012). The wealth of the commons: A world beyond market and state. Amherst: Levellers Press.
Boone, C., & Hendricks, W. (2009). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Moderators of functional-background and locus-of-control diversity. Management Science, 55(2), 165–180.CrossRef
Boström, M., Jönsson, A. M., Lockie, S., Mol, A. P., & Oosterveer, P. (2015). Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 1–7.CrossRef
Brest, P. (2010). The power of theories of change. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(2), 47–51.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.
Burke, S. C., Wilson, K. A., & Salas, E. (2005). The use of a team-based strategy for organizational transformation: Guidance for moving toward a high reliability organization. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(6), 509–530.CrossRef
Burns, D. (2015). Navigating complexity in international development: Facilitating sustainable change at scale. Rugby: Practical Action.CrossRef
Chabay, I., Frick, M., & Helgeson, J. (Eds.). (2016). Land restoration: Reclaiming landscapes for a sustainable future. Waltham: Elsevier Academic Press.
Chan, E. A., Cheung, K., Mok, E., Cheung, S., & Tong, E. (2006). A narrative inquiry into the Hong Kong Chinese adults’ concepts of health through their cultural stories. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 301–309.CrossRef
Cornell, S. (2012). On the system properties of the planetary boundaries. Ecology and Society, 17(1), r2.CrossRef
Crowards, T. M. (1998). Safe minimum standards. Costs and opportunities. Ecological Economics, 25(3), 303–314.CrossRef
Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind: The anthropocene. Nature, 415(6867), 23–23.CrossRef
Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science. London: Sage Publications.CrossRef
Czarniawska, B., & Gagliari, P. (2003). Narratives we organize by. Philadelphis: John Benjamins.
Daily, G. (Ed.). (1997). Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1992). Population, sustainability, and earth‘s carrying capacity. Bioscience, 42(10), 761–771.CrossRef
De Liefde, H. J. W. (2003). Lekgotla, the art of leadership through dialogue. Houghton: Jacana.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.CrossRef
Dombrowski, K. (2010). Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations responses to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance. International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics, 10(4), 397–416.CrossRef
Doz, Y., Hellström, E., Kosonen, M., Lähdemäki, J., & Wilson, K. (2017). Reflections on the “leadership under complexity” workshop, SITRA working papers. Finland: The Finnish Innovation Fund Sitra.
Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dürr, H. P., Dahm, D., & zur Lippe, R. (2005). Potsdam Manifesto 2005. We have to learn to think in a new way, Federation of German Scientists – Vereinigung Deutscher Wissenschaftler VDW e.V. München.
Dutilleul, B., Birrer, A. J., & Mensink, W. (2010). Unpacking European living labs: Analysing innovation’s social dimensions. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 60–85.
Ernstson, H., Leeuw, S. E. V. D., Redman, C. L., Meffert, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., & Elmqvist, T. (2010). Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 39(8), 531–545.CrossRef
Feola, G. (2015). Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: A review of emerging concepts. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 44(5), 376–390.CrossRef
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.CrossRef
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20.CrossRef
Franz, H. W., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge social innovation: And introduction. In H. W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge social innovation, potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society. Heidelberg: Springer.
Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Havinga, T. (2011). Actors in private food governance: The legitimacy of retail standards and multi-stakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 353–367.CrossRef
Gadinger, F., Jarzebski, S., & Yildiz, T. (2014). Politische Narrative. Konturen einer politikwissenschaftlichen Erzähltheorie. In F. Gadinger, S. Jarzebski, & T. Yildiz (Eds.), Politische Narrative: Konzepte, Analysen – Forschungspraxis (pp. 3–38). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.CrossRef
Goepel, M. (2016). The great mindshift. How a new economic paradigm and sustainability transformations go hand in hand. New York: Springer International Publishing.
Gonzalez-Gaudiano, E., & Meira-Cartea, P. (2009). Climate change education and communication: A critical perspective on obstacles and resistances. In D. Selby & F. Kagawa (Eds.), Education and climate change. Living and learning in interesting times (pp. 13–34). New York: Routledge.
Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T., & Redman, C. L. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience, 50, 571–584.CrossRef
Guth, W. D., & MacMillan, I. C. (1986). Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest. Strategic Management Journal, 7(4), 313–327.CrossRef
Hanjra, M. A., & Qureshi, M. E. (2010). Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy, 35(5), 365–377.CrossRef
Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2012). Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 1–8.
Hayward, R., Lee, J., Keeble, J., McNamara, R., Hall, C., Cruse, S., & Robinson, E. (2013). The UN global compact-accenture CEO study on sustainability 2013. UN Global Compact Reports, 5(3), 1–60.CrossRef
Hellström, E., & Kosonen, M. (2016). Governing the welfare state and beyond: Solutions for a complex world and uncertain future. Sitra Studies, 107.
Henderson, H. (1995). Paradigms in progress. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Henderson, H. (1997). Building a win-win world: Life beyond global economic warfare. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.
Henderson, R., Locke, R. M., Liddy, C., & Reavis, C. (2009). Nike considered: Getting traction on sustainability. In MIS Sloan Management School of Management Paper # 08–077. Cambridge: MIT Sloan School of Management.
Hezri, A. A., & Dovers, S. R. (2006). Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 86–99.CrossRef
Higman, S. (2013). The sustainable forestry handbook: A practical guide for tropical forest managers on implementing new standards. Washington, DC: Earthscan.
Hilborn, R. C. (2000). Chaos and nonlinear dynamics: An introduction for scientists and engineers. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Hinrichs, K., & Kangas, O. (2003). When is a change big enough to be a system shift? Small system-shifting changes in German and Finnish pension policies. Social Policy, & Administration, 37(6), 573–591.CrossRef
von Hippel, E. (2010). Comment on ‘Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development?’. Technovation, 30(11–12), 555–555.CrossRef
Hulme, M. (2008). The conquering of climate: Discourses of fear and their dissolution. The Geographical Journal, 174(1), 5–16.CrossRef
IPCC (2014). Climate change 2014. Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Ison, R. L. (2014). What is systemic about innovation systems? The implications for policies, governance and institutionalisation. In J. Francis & A. van Huis (Eds.), Innovation systems: Towards effective strategies in support of smallholder farmers. Wageningen: CTA/WUR.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8–21.
Kjaer, A. M. (2004). Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SME: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75.CrossRef
Korten, D. C. (2007). The great turning: From empire to earth community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Korten, D. C. (2015). Change the story, change the future: A living economy for a living earth. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
KPMG International, De Boer, Y., & van Bergen, B. (2012). Expect the unexpected: Building business value in a changing world. Amsterdam: KPMG International.
Kuenkel, P. (2008). Mind and heart: Mapping your personal journey towards leadership for sustainability. Potsdam: Collective Leadership Institute.
Kuenkel, P. (2016). The art of leading collectively: How we can co-create a sustainable, socially just future. Claremont: Chelsea Green.
Kuenkel, P. (2017). A pattern approach to sustainability transformation – How the 17 SDG can become a starting point for systemic change, Collective leadership studies Vol. 5; Collective Leadership Institute: Potsdam/Germany. ISSN 2569–1171.
Kuenkel, P., Fricke, V., & Cholakova, S. (2009). The common code for the coffee community. In D. Volmer (Ed.), Enhancing the effectiveness of sustainability partnerships. Washington: National Academies Press.
Kuenkel, P. & Schaefer, K. (2013). Shifting the way we co-create: How we can turn the challenges of sustainability into opportunities. Collective Leadership Studies No 1. Potsdam, Germany: The Collective Leadership Institute.
Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations. Brussels: Nelson Parker.
Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. G. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6–11.CrossRef
Levett, R. (1998). Sustainability indicators: Integrating quality of life and environmental protection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 161(3), 291–302.CrossRef
Lewin, K. (1963). Feldtheorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Bern: Huber.
Lewin, R. (1999). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lichtenstein, B. B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J. D., & Schreiber, C. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. In E. J. K. Hazy, J. A. Goldstein, & B. B. Lichtenstein (Eds.), Complex systems leadership theory: New perspectives from complexity science and organizational effectiveness (pp. 129–144). Mansfield: ISCE Publushing.
Lobel, O. (2007). The paradox of extralegal activism: Critical legal consciousness and transformative politics. Harvard Law Review, 120, 937–988.
Lodge, M. (2007). Comparing non-hierarchical governance in action: The open method of co-ordination in pensions and information society. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 343–365.
Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. Doctoral Dissertation. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1991). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (Vol. 42). New York: Springer.
Meadows, D. (1994). Envisioning a sustainable world. In R. Constanza, O. Segura, & J. Martinez-Alier (Eds.), Getting down to earth: Practical applications of ecologial economics (pp. 117–126). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene into a system. Hartland: Sustainability Institute.
Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. London: Earth Island Limited.
Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. White River Junction: Chelsea Green.
Moldan, B., Janouskova, S., & Hak, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13.CrossRef
Niestroy, I., & Meuleman, L. (2015). Common but differentiated governance: Making the SDGs work. Sustainability, 7(9), 12295–12321.CrossRef
O'Malley, R., Cavender-Bares, K., & Clark, W. C. (2003). “Better” data: Not as simple as it might seem. Environment, 45(1), 8–18.
Pask, G. (1992). Different kinds of cybernetics. In G. Van de Vijver (Ed.), New perspectives on cybernetics (pp. 11–31). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
Pauli, G. A. (2010). The blue economy: 10 years, 100 innovations, 100 million jobs. Brookline: Paradigm Publications.
Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Stahl, G. K. (2011). Developing responsible global leaders through international service-learning programs: The Ulysses experience. Academy of Management Learning, & Education, 10(2), 237–260.
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Ponte, S., & Cheyns, E. (2013). Voluntary standards, expert knowledge and the governance of sustainability networks. Global Networks, 13(4), 459–477.CrossRef
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
Prádanos, L. I. (2016). The pedagogy of degrowth: Teaching Hispanic studies in the age of social inequality and ecological collapse. Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies, 19(1), 153–168.CrossRef
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.CrossRef
Rickels, W., Dovern, J., Hoffmann, J., Quaas, M. F., Schmidt, J. O., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Indicators for monitoring sustainable development goals: An application to oceanic development in the European Union. Earth’s Future, 4(5), 252–267. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​2016EF000353.CrossRef
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E., & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32.CrossRef
Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRef
Sahtouris, E., & Lovelock, J. E. (2000). Earthdance: Living systems in evolution. San Jose: iUniverse.
Scharmer, O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-System to ecosystem economies. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
Schneidewind, U. (2013). Transformative literacy: Understanding and shaping societal transformations. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 22(2), 82–86.CrossRef
Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Senge, P., Hamilton, H., & Kania, J. (2015). The dawn of system leadership. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13, 27–33.
Snowden, D. (2015). Propensities and dispositions. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 41–44.CrossRef
Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76.
von Stamm, B. (2008). Managing innovation design and creativity (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
von Stamm, B., & Trifilova, A. (2009). The future of innovation. Surrey: Cower Publishing Limited.
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015a). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.CrossRef
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., & Sörlin, S. (2015b). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855–1259855.CrossRef
Stern, N. (2015). Why are we waiting? The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sternin, J., & Choo, R. (2000). The power of positive deviance. Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 14–15.
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.CrossRef
Taplin, D. H., Clark, H., Collins, E., & Colby, D. C. (2013). Theory of change technical papers: A series of papers to support development of theories of change based on practice in the field. New York: ActKnowledge and the Rockefeller Foundation.
Termeer, C. J., Dewulf, A., Breeman, G., & Stiller, S. J. (2013). Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration, & Society, 47(6), 680–710.CrossRef
UNEP. (2012). GEO5 global environmental outlook 5: Environment for the future we want. Valletta: Progress Press.
Vörösmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., & Lammers, R. B. (2000). Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289(5477), 284–288.CrossRef
Waddell, S. (2011). Global action networks: Creating our future together. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Waddell, S. (2016). Change for the audacious: A doers' guide to large systems change for a flourishing future. Boston: NetworkingAction.
Waddell, S., Waddock, S., Cornell, S., Dentoni, D., McLachlan, M., & Meszoely, G. (2015). Large systems change: An emerging field of transformation and transitions. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 5–30.CrossRef
WBGU (2011a). World in transition: A social contract for sustainability. Flagship Report. Berlin, Germany: WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change).
WBGU (2016). Entwicklung und Gerechtigkeit durch Transformation: Die vier großen I. Sondergutachten. Berlin, Germany: WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change).
Weber, A. (2013). Enlivenment. Towards a fundamental shift in the concepts of nature, culture and politics. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.
Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–19.
Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Homer-Dixon, T., Vredenburg, H., Loorbach, D., Thompson, J., Nilsson, M., Lambin, E., Senzimir, J., Banerjee, B., Galaz, V., & van der Leeuw, S. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio, 40(7), 762–780.CrossRef
Wright, C., & Rwabizambuga, A. (2006). Institutional pressures, corporate reputation, and voluntary codes of conduct: An examination of the equator principles. Business and Society Review, 111(1), 89–117.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Conceptual Architecture for Stewarding Sustainability Transformations
verfasst von
Petra Kuenkel
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
Stewarding Sustainability Transformations

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03690-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-03691-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03691-1_7