Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2/2017

07.04.2017

A Constructive Solution to the Ranking Problem in Partial Order Optimality Theory

verfasst von: Alex J. Djalali

Erschienen in: Journal of Logic, Language and Information | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Partial order optimality theory (PoOT) (Anttila and Cho in Lingua 104:31–56, 1998) is a conservative generalization of classical optimality theory (COT) (Prince and Smolensky in Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, 1993/2004) that makes possible the modeling of free variation and quantitative regularities without any numerical parameters. Solving the ranking problem for PoOT has so far remained an outstanding problem: allowing for free variation, given a finite set of input/output pairs, i.e., a dataset, \(\Delta \) that a speaker S knows to be part of some language L, how can S learn the set of all grammars G under some constraint set C compatible with \(\Delta \)?. Here, allowing for free variation, given the set of all PoOT grammars GPoOT over a constraint set C , for an arbitrary \(\Delta \), I provide set-theoretic means for constructing the actual set G compatible with \(\Delta \). Specifically, I determine the set of all STRICT ORDERS of C that are compatible with \(\Delta \). As every strict total order is a strict order, our solution is applicable in both PoOT and COT, showing that the ranking problem in COT is a special instance of a more general one in PoOT.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The standard notational convention in the literature for the dominance relation ‘\(>>\)’ and ‘\(C>> C'\)’ is read as, ‘\(C\) dominates \(C'\)’. I break with standard tradition to maintain internal conceptual clarity, particularly with respect to Theorem 3.
 
2
Each node in Fig. 3 should be understood as a set of grammars. For example, ‘\(C_{1}C_{2}, C_1C_3\)’ is an abbreviation for ‘\(\{C_{1} \prec C_{2}, C_{1} \prec C_3 \}\)’, and ‘\(C_{1}C_{2}C_{3}\)’ would be shorthand for ‘\(\{C_{1} \prec C_{2}, C_{1} \prec C_{3}, C_{2} \prec C_{3}\}\)’.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anttila, A. (1997). Deriving variation from grammar. In R. van Hout, F. Hinskens, & L. Wetzels (Eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory (pp. 35–68). Anttila, A. (1997). Deriving variation from grammar. In R. van Hout, F. Hinskens, & L. Wetzels (Eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory (pp. 35–68).
Zurück zum Zitat Anttila, A. (2009). Derived environment effects in colloquial helsinki finnish. In K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (Eds.), The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky (pp. 433–460). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Anttila, A. (2009). Derived environment effects in colloquial helsinki finnish. In K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (Eds.), The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky (pp. 433–460). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Anttila, A., & Andrus, C. (2006). T-Orders. Stanford: Stanford University. Anttila, A., & Andrus, C. (2006). T-Orders. Stanford: Stanford University.
Zurück zum Zitat Anttila, A., & Cho, Y. Y. (1998). Variation and change in optimality theory. Lingua, 104, 31–56.CrossRef Anttila, A., & Cho, Y. Y. (1998). Variation and change in optimality theory. Lingua, 104, 31–56.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blutner, R. (1999). Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. In H. de Hoop & H. de Swart (Eds.), Papers on optimality theoretic semantics (pp. 1–21). Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS. Blutner, R. (1999). Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. In H. de Hoop & H. de Swart (Eds.), Papers on optimality theoretic semantics (pp. 1–21). Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.
Zurück zum Zitat Boersma, P. (1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. IFA Proceedings, 21, 43–58. Boersma, P. (1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. IFA Proceedings, 21, 43–58.
Zurück zum Zitat Brasoveanu, A., & Prince, A. (2005). Ranking and necessity. In Part I. Rutgers Optimality Archive-794. Brasoveanu, A., & Prince, A. (2005). Ranking and necessity. In Part I. Rutgers Optimality Archive-794.
Zurück zum Zitat Brasoveanu, A., & Prince, A. (2011). Ranking and necessity: The fusional reduction algorithm. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 3–70.CrossRef Brasoveanu, A., & Prince, A. (2011). Ranking and necessity: The fusional reduction algorithm. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 3–70.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davey, B. A., & Priestley, H. A. (2002). Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Davey, B. A., & Priestley, H. A. (2002). Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jäger, G. (2003). Gradient constraints in finite state OT: The unidirectional and the bidirectional case. Natural Language Engineering, 9(1), 21–38.CrossRef Jäger, G. (2003). Gradient constraints in finite state OT: The unidirectional and the bidirectional case. Natural Language Engineering, 9(1), 21–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Legendre, G. (2001). Optimality theoretic syntax. An introduction to optimality theory in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Legendre, G. (2001). Optimality theoretic syntax. An introduction to optimality theory in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy, J. J. (2008). Doing optimality theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRef McCarthy, J. J. (2008). Doing optimality theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prince, A. (2002). Entailed ranking arguments. Rutgers Optimality Archive-500. Prince, A. (2002). Entailed ranking arguments. Rutgers Optimality Archive-500.
Zurück zum Zitat Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993/2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993/2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Tesar, B. (1995). Computational optimality theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder. Tesar, B. (1995). Computational optimality theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Zurück zum Zitat Tesar, B., & Paul, S. (1993). The learnability of optimality theory: An algorithm and some basic complexity results. Rutgers Optimality Archive-2. Tesar, B., & Paul, S. (1993). The learnability of optimality theory: An algorithm and some basic complexity results. Rutgers Optimality Archive-2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeevat, H. (2001). The asymmetry of optimality theoretic syntax and semantics. Journal of Semantics, 17(3), 243–262.CrossRef Zeevat, H. (2001). The asymmetry of optimality theoretic syntax and semantics. Journal of Semantics, 17(3), 243–262.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zwarts, J. (2004). Competition between word meanings: The polysemy of (A)round. In C. Meier & M. Weisgerber (Eds.), Proceedings of SuB8. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, Linguistics Working Papers. Zwarts, J. (2004). Competition between word meanings: The polysemy of (A)round. In C. Meier & M. Weisgerber (Eds.), Proceedings of SuB8. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, Linguistics Working Papers.
Metadaten
Titel
A Constructive Solution to the Ranking Problem in Partial Order Optimality Theory
verfasst von
Alex J. Djalali
Publikationsdatum
07.04.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Logic, Language and Information / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0925-8531
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9583
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-017-9248-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

BookReview

Book Review