Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Responsibilities and Challenges of Product Owners at Spotify - An Exploratory Case Study Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Core Ontology of Safety Risk Concepts

Reconciling Scientific Literature with Standards for Automotive and Railway

verfasst von : Hermann Kaindl, Thomas Rathfux, Bernhard Hulin, Roland Beckert, Edin Arnautovic, Roman Popp

Erschienen in: Human-Centered and Error-Resilient Systems Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Safety is a major concern for both automobiles and railway vehicles. The related standards provide definitions of the same concepts such as Risk, Harm, Hazard, etc., which we consider here as the core concepts. However, related conceptual models existing in the scientific literature either are inconsistent or do not cover the core concepts comprehensively.
We modeled the core of these safety concepts ourselves both in meetings and with tool support, based on the definitions given in the related standards. As a result, this paper presents a small core ontology of safety risk concepts for reconciling the scientific literature with standards. Since it matches the terminology of the related standards, it may serve as a reference model in the future. In fact, we already used it ourselves for systematically studying where human error may compromise safety.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Do You Own a Volkswagen? Values as Non-Functional Requirements
Nächstes Kapitel Complementary Tools and Techniques for Supporting Fitness-for-Purpose of Interactive Critical Systems
Literatur
1.
EN 50126-1, Railway applications – The specification and demonstration of reliability, availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS). Part 1: Basic requirements and generic process, September 1999
2.
CLC/TR 50126-2, Railway applications – The specification and demonstration of reliability, availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS). Part 2: Guide to the application of EN 50126-1 for safety, February 2007
3.
IEC 61508, Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems, May 2010
4.
ISO 26262, Road vehicles - Functional safety, November 2011
5.
ISO/IEC Guide 51 - Safety aspects - Guidelines for their inclusion in standards (2014)
6.
Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., Mladenić, D.: A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. In: Proceedings of 8th International Multi-conference Information Society, pp. 166–169 (2005)
7.
Casagrande, E., Arnautovic, E., Woon, W.L., Zeineldin, H.H., Svetinovic, D.: Semiautomatic system domain data analysis: a smart grid feasibility case study. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. PP(99), 1–11 (2016)CrossRef
8.
Fernandez-Lopez, M., Gomez-Perez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium, Stanford, USA, pp. 33–40, March 1997
9.
Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, New York Inc. (2007)
10.
11.
Herre, H.: General formal ontology (gfo): a foundational ontology for conceptual modelling. In: Poli, R., Obrst, L. (eds.) Theory and Applications of Ontology, vol. 2. Springer, Berlin (2010)
12.
13.
Hulin, B., Kaindl, H., Rathfux, T., Popp, R., Arnautovic, E., Beckert, R.: Towards a common safety ontology for automobiles and railway vehicles. In: European Dependable Computing Conference (2016, to appear)
14.
Hunter, J.: Enhancing the semantic interoperability of multimedia through a core ontology. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 13(1), 49–58 (2003)CrossRef
15.
Kaindl, H.: How to identify binary relations for domain models. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE-18), pp. 28–36. IEEE, Berlin, March 1996
16.
Kaindl, H.: A practical approach to combining requirements definition and object-oriented analysis. Ann. Softw. Eng. 3, 319–343 (1997)CrossRef
17.
Kaindl, H., Kramer, S., Diallo, P.S.N.: Semiautomatic generation of glossary links: a practical solution. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Hypertext 1999), Darmstadt, Germany, pp. 3–12, February 1999
18.
Kaindl, H., Popp, R., Raneburger, D.: Towards reuse in safety risk analysis based on product line requirements. In: 2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 241–246, August 2015
19.
20.
21.
Panesar-Walawege, R.K., Sabetzadeh, M., Briand, L., Coq, T.: Characterizing the chain of evidence for software safety cases: conceptual model based on the IEC 61508 standard. In: 2010 Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation, pp. 335–344, April 2010. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​ICST.​2010.​12
22.
Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)
23.
24.
25.
26.
Winston, M.E., Chaffin, R., Herrmann, D.: A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cogn. Sci. 11, 417–444 (1987)CrossRef
27.
28.
Metadaten
Titel
A Core Ontology of Safety Risk Concepts
verfasst von
Hermann Kaindl
Thomas Rathfux
Bernhard Hulin
Roland Beckert
Edin Arnautovic
Roman Popp
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Human-Centered and Error-Resilient Systems Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44901-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-44902-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44902-9_11