Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Tools for Biogas Process Analysis, Diagnosis and Control Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Critical Assessment of Microbiological Biogas to Biomethane Upgrading Systems

verfasst von : Simon K.-M. R. Rittmann

Erschienen in: Biogas Science and Technology

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Microbiological biogas upgrading could become a promising technology for production of methane (CH4). This is, storage of irregular generated electricity results in a need to store electricity generated at peak times for use at non-peak times, which could be achieved in an intermediate step by electrolysis of water to molecular hydrogen (H2). Microbiological biogas upgrading can be performed by contacting carbon dioxide (CO2), H2 and hydrogenotrophic methanogenic Archaea either in situ in an anaerobic digester, or ex situ in a separate bioreactor. In situ microbiological biogas upgrading is indicated to require thorough bioprocess development, because only low volumetric CH4 production rates and low CH4 fermentation offgas content have been achieved. Higher volumetric production rates are shown for the ex situ microbiological biogas upgrading compared to in situ microbiological biogas upgrading. However, the ex situ microbiological biogas upgrading currently suffers from H2 gas liquid mass transfer limitation, which results in low volumetric CH4 productivity compared to pure H2/CO2 conversion to CH4. If waste gas utilization from biological and industrial sources can be shown without reduction in volumetric CH4 productivity, as well as if the aim of a single stage conversion to a CH4 fermentation offgas content exceeding 95 vol% can be demonstrated, ex situ microbiological biogas upgrading with pure or enrichment cultures of methanogens could become a promising future technology for almost CO2-neutral biomethane production.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Anaerobic Digestion: A Review
Nächstes Kapitel Influent Fractionation for Modeling Continuous Anaerobic Digestion Processes
Literatur
1.
Solomon S, Plattner G-K, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P (2009) Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(6):1704–1709CrossRef
2.
Howarth RW (2014) A bridge to nowhere: methane emissions and the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas. Energy Sci Eng 2(2):47–60CrossRef
3.
Marshall J, Armour KC, Scott JR, Kostov Y, Hausmann U, Ferreira D, Shepherd TG, Bitz CM (2014) The ocean’s role in polar climate change: asymmetric Arctic and Antarctic responses to greenhouse gas and ozone forcing. Philos Trans R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci 372(2019):20130040CrossRef
4.
Siegl S, Laaber M, Holubar P (2011) Green electricity from Biomass, part I: environmental impacts of direct life cycle emissions. Waste Biomass Valorization 2(3):267–284CrossRef
5.
Siegl S, Laaber M, Holubar P (2012) Green electricity from biomass, part II: environmental impacts considering avoided burdens from replacing the conventional provision of additional functions. Waste Biomass Valorization 3(1):1–21CrossRef
6.
Ryckebosch E, Drouillon M, Vervaeren H (2011) Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenergy 35(5):1633–1645CrossRef
7.
Luo G, Angelidaki I (2012) Integrated biogas upgrading and hydrogen utilization in an anaerobic reactor containing enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogenic culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(11):2729–2736CrossRef
8.
Yang L, Ge X, Wan C, Yu F, Li Y (2014) Progress and perspectives in converting biogas to transportation fuels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:1133–1152
9.
Rittmann S, Seifert A, Herwig C (2015) Essential prerequisites for successful bioprocess development of biological CH4 production from CO2 and H2. Crit Rev Biotechnol 35(2):141–151
10.
Bernacchi S, Seifert AH, Krajete A, Rittmann SK-MR (2013) Anwendungen der Methanogenese zur Biogasveredelung und Stromspeicherung presented at the biogas 13. St. Pölten, Austria, 04 Dec 2013
11.
Rittmann SK-MR, Seifert AH, Krajete A (2014) Biomethanisierung—ein Prozess zur Ermöglichung der Energiewende? BIOspektrum 20(7):816–817CrossRef
12.
Offre P, Spang A, Schleper C (2013) Archaea in biogeochemical cycles. Annu Rev Microbiol 67(1):437–457CrossRef
13.
Cavicchioli R (2011) Archaea–timeline of the third domain. Nat Rev Microbiol 9(1):51–61CrossRef
14.
Thauer RK, Kaster A-K, Seedorf H, Buckel W, Hedderich R (2008) Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat Rev Microbiol 6(8):579–591CrossRef
15.
Thauer RK, Kaster A-K, Goenrich M, Schick M, Hiromoto T, Shima S (2010) Hydrogenases from methanogenic archaea, nickel, a novel cofactor, and H2 storage. Annu Rev Biochem 79:507–536CrossRef
16.
Schönheit P, Moll J, Thauer RK (1980) Growth parameters (K s, μmax, Y s) of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Arch Microbiol 127(1):59–65CrossRef
17.
Rittmann SK-MR, Lee HS, Lim JK, Kim TW, Lee J-H, Kang SG (2015) One-carbon substrate-based biohydrogen production: Microbes, mechanism, and productivity. Biotechnol Adv 33(1):165–177CrossRef
18.
Rittmann S, Holubar P (2014) Rapid extraction of total RNA from an anaerobic sludge biocoenosis. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 59(2):127–132CrossRef
19.
Weiland P (2003) Production and energetic use of biogas from energy crops and wastes in Germany. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 109(1–3):263–274CrossRef
20.
Liu Y, Whitman WB (2008) Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1125:171–189CrossRef
21.
Rittmann S, Seifert A, Herwig C (2012) Quantitative analysis of media dilution rate effects on Methanothermobacter marburgensis grown in continuous culture on H2 and CO2. Biomass Bioenergy 36:293–301CrossRef
22.
Seifert AH, Rittmann S, Bernacchi S, Herwig C (2013) Method for assessing the impact of emission gasses on physiology and productivity in biological methanogenesis. Bioresour Technol 136:747–751CrossRef
23.
Seifert AH, Rittmann S, Herwig C (2014) Analysis of process related factors to increase volumetric productivity and quality of biomethane with Methanothermobacter marburgensis. Appl Energy 132:155–162CrossRef
24.
Nishimura N, Kitaura S, Mimura A, Takahara Y (1992) Cultivation of thermophilic methanogen KN-15 on H2-CO2 under pressurized conditions. J Ferment Bioeng 73(6):477–480CrossRef
25.
Luo G, Johansson S, Boe K, Xie L, Zhou Q, Angelidaki I (2012) Simultaneous hydrogen utilization and in situ biogas upgrading in an anaerobic reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(4):1088–1094CrossRef
26.
Drake HL, Daniel SL, Küsel K, Matthies C, Kuhner C, Braus-Stromeyer S (1997) Acetogenic bacteria: what are the in situ consequences of their diverse metabolic versatilities? BioFactors Oxf Engl 6(1):13–24CrossRef
27.
Luo G, Angelidaki I (2013) Co-digestion of manure and whey for in situ biogas upgrading by the addition of H2: process performance and microbial insights. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(3):1373–1381CrossRef
28.
Wise DL, Cooney CL, Augenstein DC (1978) Biomethanation: Anaerobic fermentation of CO2, H2 and CO to methane. Biotechnol Bioeng 20(8):1153–1172CrossRef
29.
Strevett KA, Vieth RF, Grasso D (1995) Chemo-autotrophic biogas purification for methane enrichment: mechanism and kinetics. Chem Eng J Biochem Eng J 58(1):71–79CrossRef
30.
Martin MR, Fornero JJ, Stark R, Mets L, Angenent LT (2013) A single-culture bioprocess of Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus to upgrade digester biogas by CO2-to-CH4 by conversion with H2. Archaea 2013:e157529CrossRef
31.
Pauss A, Andre G, Perrier M, Guiot SR (1990) Liquid-to-gas mass transfer in anaerobic processes: inevitable transfer limitations of methane and hydrogen in the biomethanation process. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(6):1636–1644
32.
Bensmann A, Hanke-Rauschenbach R, Heyer R, Kohrs F, Benndorf D, Reichl U, Sundmacher K (2104) Biological methanation of hydrogen within biogas plants: A model-based feasibility study. Appl Energy 134:413–425
33.
Sonesson M (2013) Methane yields from anaerobic digestion of food waste. Karlstad University, Sweden
34.
Spadiut O, Rittmann S, Dietzsch C, Herwig C (2013) Dynamic process conditions in bioprocess development. Eng Life Sci 13(1):88–101CrossRef
35.
Bernacchi S, Rittmann S, Seifert AH, Krajete A, Herwig C (2014) Experimental methods for screening parameters influencing the growth to product yield (Y(x/CH4)) of a biological methane production (BMP) process performed with Methanothermobacter marburgensis. AIMS Bioeng. 1(2):72–86CrossRef
36.
Martinez-Porqueras E, Rittmann S, Herwig C (2013) Analysis of H2 to CO2 yield and physiological key parameters of Enterobacter aerogenes and Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. Int J Hydrog Energy 38(25):10245–10251CrossRef
37.
Martinez-Porqueras E, Rittmann S, Herwig C (2012) Biofuels and CO2 neutrality: an opportunity. Biofuels 3(4):413–426CrossRef
38.
Rittmann S, Herwig C (2012) A comprehensive and quantitative review of dark fermentative biohydrogen production. Microb Cell Fact 11(1):115CrossRef
39.
Ahring BK, Westermann P (2007) Coproduction of bioethanol with other biofuels. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:289–302
40.
Antoni D, Zverlov VV, Schwarz WH (2007) Biofuels from microbes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77(1):23–35CrossRef
41.
Burkhardt M, Busch G (2013) Methanation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Appl Energy 111:74–79CrossRef
42.
Lee JC, Kim JH, Chang WS, Pak D (2012) Biological conversion of CO2 to CH4 using hydrogenotrophic methanogen in a fixed bed reactor. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87(6):844–847CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Critical Assessment of Microbiological Biogas to Biomethane Upgrading Systems
verfasst von
Simon K.-M. R. Rittmann
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Biogas Science and Technology

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21992-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-21993-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21993-6_5

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise