Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Assurance is becoming increasingly popular as a way to enhance the confidence of sustainability reports. But what does assurance of sustainability reports mean? To answer this question, the chapter treats assurance as a word with a regulatory and etymological history, which prescribes a specific and particular interpretation of the term assurance. It is observed that sustainability assurance inherits a specific theory with a particular form of evaluating and making authoritative statements on sustainability practice from (financial) auditing. The theory it draws on is agency theory, and the form of evaluation is the indirect evaluation of statements of compliance with standards instead of a direct assessment of sustainability performance or quality. The chapter suggests that this may be problematic since, although assurance may add credibility and confidence to sustainability reporting it does not challenge the perspectives taken by the company, which, it is argued, was the problem in the first place, as suggested by the Brundtland report. This theory of the practice is, however, not the only interpretation of the word audit. Drawing on alternative historical and etymological meanings of the word audit, the possibilities of other forms of sustainability audit are advanced.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
American Accounting Association. (1973). Studies in accounting research No. 6: Statement of basic auditing concepts. Sarasota, FL: Author.
Bovens, M. (1998). The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: “Our common future”, United Nations.
Carrington, T. (2007). Framing audit failure: Four studies on audit quality discomforts. Stockholm University School of Business.
Carrington, T. (2011). Ansvarsfullhet är viktigare än att följa regler. Balans, 37(1), 42–43.
Carrington, T. (2014). Revision. Stockholm: Liber.
Farooq, M. B., & de Villiers, C. (2017). The market for sustainability assurance services. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(1), 79–106. CrossRef
Fuhrmann, S., Ott, C., Looks, E., & Guenther, T. W. (2016). The contents of assurance statements for sustainability reports and information asymmetry. Accounting and Business Research, 47(4), 369–400. CrossRef
Global Reporting Initiative. (2013a). GRI G4 reporting principles and standard disclosures.
Global Reporting Initiative. (2013b). GRI G4 reporting principles and implementation manual.
Hodge, K., Subramaniam, N., & Stewart, J. (2009). Assurance of sustainability reports: Impact on report users’ confidence and perceptions of information credibility. Australian Accounting Review, 19(3), 178–194. CrossRef
Humphrey, C., Moizer, P., & Turley, S. (1992). The audit expectations gap—Plus ca change, plus vest la meme chose? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 3(2), 137–161. CrossRef
IAASB. (2017). Handbook of international auditing, assurance, and ethics pronouncements. New York: International Federation of Accountants.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. CrossRef
KPMG. (2017). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from kpmg.com/crreporting.
O’Dwyer, B. (2011). The case of sustainability assurance: Constructing a new assurance service. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 28(4), 1230–1266.
O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. (2007). Seeking stakeholder-centric sustainability assurance. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25(Spring), 77–94. CrossRef
O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2016). Fostering rigour in accounting for social sustainability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 49, 32–40. CrossRef
Pentland, B. (2000). Will auditors take over the world? Program, technique and the verification of everything. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(3), 307–312. CrossRef
Power, M. (1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2), 289–315. CrossRef
Power, M. (1999). The audit society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Power, M. (2011). Assurance worlds: Consumers, experts and independence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(4–5), 324–326. CrossRef
Rao, S. (2017, July). Current state of assurance on sustainability reports. CPA Journal, 52–57.
Roberts, J. (2005). Agency theory, ethics and corporate governance. In C. R. Lehman (Ed.), Corporate governance: Does any sixe fit? Advances in public interest accounting (pp. 249–270). Amsterdan: Elsevier. CrossRef
Roberts, J., & Ng, W. (2012). Against economic (mis)conceptions of the individual: Constructing financial agency in the credit crisis. Culture and Organization, 18(2), 91–105. CrossRef
Shearer, T. (2002). Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 541–573. CrossRef
Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967. CrossRef
Wallace, W. (1980). The economic role of the audit in free and regulated markets. Open Educational Resources. 2. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/oer/2.
- A Critical Perspective on Sustainability Assurance
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia