Skip to main content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in: Society 4/2020

19.07.2020 | Social Science and Public Policy

A Darwinian Approach to Postmodern Critical Theory: Or, How Did Bad Ideas Colonise the Academy?

verfasst von: Alan Davison

Erschienen in: Society | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen

Abstract

This article proposes a Darwinian approach to examine the persistence and resilience of a peculiar set of misbeliefs that have flourished in intellectual circles over the last several decades. These misbeliefs, such as the prevailing antirational explanatory models within postmodern critical theory (PMCT), might be expected to perish under the weight of critical scrutiny; that is, selection pressures would tend to weed them out in a highly competitive and rigorous “marketplace of ideas” such as the academy. Given the flourishing of PMCT and its attendant communities of practice, political economies, tribalism and social signalling, it is suggested here that it should be approached in a new way: as a significant socio-cultural cluster of misbeliefs worthy of explanation with tools honed via evolutionary science. For example, the prominence of religious-like performativity and self-validating arguments associated with PMCT makes it suitable for study from perspectives such as memetics, evolutionary psychology (EP) and signalling theory, and Moral Foundations Theory (MFT). With these approaches, a hypothesis-driven research agenda could be developed to examine the deeply-rooted cognitive basis and adaptive socio-cultural drivers behind the spread of PMCT. It is proposed that formal and systematic programmes be established to research the phenomenon, and that – just as with the study of religion – we move beyond the now long-established emphasis on intellectual critique and instead establish a broad programme in the Evolutionary Studies of Postmodernism (ESPM).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Frederick Crews 1986: 173.
 
2
Joseph Bulbulia 2008: 79.
 
3
Some major texts include: Gross & Levitt (1994)1997; Koertge 1998; Sokal & Bricmont 1998; Hacking & Hacking 1999; Slingerland 2008; Sokal 2010. There are, of course, many more articles and commentaries that address these same threads. Of the major texts listed two are especially noteworthy: the collections of essays in Koertge (1998), while dated, are exemplary in their nuance and careful case-study examples; while Slingerland (2008) articulates and then links the flaws in postmodernism to its negative impact on science-humanities interdisciplinarity and consilience. A significant forthcoming contribution is Helen Pluckrose & James Lindsay’s 2020Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Has Made Everything About Race, Gender, and Identity – And Why this Harms Everybody, Pitchstone.
 
4
“A belief is a functional state of an organism that implements or embodies that organism’s endorsement of a particular state of affairs as actual. A misbelief, then, is a belief that to some degree departs from actuality – that is, it is a functional state endorsing a particular state of affairs that happens not to obtain.” McKay & Dennett 2009: 493.
 
5
NOMA proposes that religion and science are separate domains, including in the questions they address and the evidence they use. Articulated by Stephen Jay Gould in an essay in Natural History (March 1997: 16–22, and later reprinted in his 1999 book Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life, Ballantine.
 
6
Cosmides, Tooby, & Barkow, “Introduction: Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration,” in Barkow, Cosmides & Tooby 1992: 5.
 
7
Some other key memetic concepts might apply well to mapping or categorising how PMCT has spread through institutions and social media: vector, replication, transmission and the like.
 
8
Boudry & Braeckman 2012: 162–3.
 
9
Finkelstein 2008: 16.
 
10
From Heylighen & Chielens 2009: 3217.
 
11
Some hot topics that might attract analysis from the perspective of a meme’s eye view could include: “blank-slate”-ism & social determinism; biological sex and gender; the link between terrorism and belief systems; and “white fragility”.
 
12
For example: James Lindsay and Peter Boghossian’s “Privilege: The Left’s Original Sin” (quoted in “Is ‘privilege like Original Sin”’, https://​whyevolutionistr​ue.​wordpress.​com/​2016/​05/​24/​is-privilege-like-original-sin/​, originally posted May 242,016); Boghossian and Mike Nayna, “Postmodern Religion and the Faith of Social Justice”, Areo, December 18, 2018.
 
13
Lindsay and Boghossian, “Privilege: The Left’s Original Sin.”
 
14
Malhar Mali, “On Human Motivation, Ideological Bias, and Groupthink in Academia – An Interview with Clay Routledge”, Areo, 23 May 2017. https://​areomagazine.​com/​2017/​05/​23/​on-human-motivation-ideological-bias-and-groupthink-in-academia-an-interview-with-clay-routledge/​.
 
15
Routledge, “On Human Motivation”.
 
16
Barrett 2013: 409.
 
17
Barrett 2013: 410.
 
18
Shaver & Bulbulia 2017: 103.
 
19
Some recent promising scholarship has looked at the importance of signalling within religious contexts, highlighting its adaptive costs and benefits. As described by Shaver and Bulbulia (2016: 104): “The prevalence of religion across cultures and throughout human history suggests that religion is a product of evolutionary dynamics. Signaling theorists hypothesize that religious systems evolve to facilitate within-group cooperation because religious costs enable partners to reliably predict the cooperation of others”.
 
20
Graham, et al. 2013: 9.
 
21
Graham et al. 2013: 58.
 
22
For example, Stenner and Haidt, 2018: 175–220.
 
23
Graham et al. 2013: 11.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baehr, P. 2019. The Unmasking Style in Social Theory. New York: Routledge. CrossRef Baehr, P. 2019. The Unmasking Style in Social Theory. New York: Routledge. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barkow, J., Cosmides L, & Tooby J. (eds.) 1992. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press. Barkow, J., Cosmides L, & Tooby J. (eds.) 1992. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrett, J.L. 2013. “Cognitive Science of Religion.” Pp.409–414 in Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions, Runehov, A.L., Oviedo, L. and Azari, N.P. eds. Springer Netherlands. Barrett, J.L. 2013. “Cognitive Science of Religion.” Pp.409–414 in Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions, Runehov, A.L., Oviedo, L. and Azari, N.P. eds. Springer Netherlands.
Zurück zum Zitat Boudry, M. & Braeckman, J. 2012. “How Convenient! The Epistemic Rationale of Self-Validating Belief Systems.” Philosophical Psychology, 25(3), 341–364. CrossRef Boudry, M. & Braeckman, J. 2012. “How Convenient! The Epistemic Rationale of Self-Validating Belief Systems.” Philosophical Psychology, 25(3), 341–364. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boudry, M. & Hofhuis, S. 2018. “Parasites of the Mind. Why Cultural Theorists Need the Meme’s Eye View.” Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 155–167. CrossRef Boudry, M. & Hofhuis, S. 2018. “Parasites of the Mind. Why Cultural Theorists Need the Meme’s Eye View.” Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 155–167. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bulbulia, J. 2008. “Meme Infection or Religious Niche Construction? An Adaptationist Alternative to the Cultural Maladaptationist Hypothesis.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 20(1), 67–107. CrossRef Bulbulia, J. 2008. “Meme Infection or Religious Niche Construction? An Adaptationist Alternative to the Cultural Maladaptationist Hypothesis.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 20(1), 67–107. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bulbulia, J. & Sosis, R. 2011. “Signalling Theory and the Evolution of Religious Cooperation.” Religion, 41(3), 363–388. CrossRef Bulbulia, J. & Sosis, R. 2011. “Signalling Theory and the Evolution of Religious Cooperation.” Religion, 41(3), 363–388. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finkelstein, R. 2008. A Memetics Compendium, “Introduction.” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. University of Maryland University College. Finkelstein, R. 2008. A Memetics Compendium, “Introduction.” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. University of Maryland University College.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. & Barkow, J.H., 1992. “Introduction: Evolutionary Psychology and Conceptual Integration.” Pp 3–15 in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby eds. New York: Oxford University Press. Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. & Barkow, J.H., 1992. “Introduction: Evolutionary Psychology and Conceptual Integration.” Pp 3–15 in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawkins, R. 1976 2006 (1976). The Selfish Gene [30th Anniversary Edition]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dawkins, R. 1976 2006 (1976). The Selfish Gene [30th Anniversary Edition]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S.P. & Ditto, P.H. 2013. “Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 47, 55–130. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S.P. & Ditto, P.H. 2013. “Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 47, 55–130.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross, P.R. & Levitt, N. 1997. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. John Hopkins University Press. Gross, P.R. & Levitt, N. 1997. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. John Hopkins University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hacking, I. & Hacking, J. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press. Hacking, I. & Hacking, J. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Vintage. Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Vintage.
Zurück zum Zitat Heylighen, F. and Chielens, K. 2009. “Evolution of Culture, Memetics.” Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. 3205–3220. Heylighen, F. and Chielens, K. 2009. “Evolution of Culture, Memetics.” Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. 3205–3220.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitcher, P. 1998. “A Plea for Science Studies.” Pp. 32–56 in A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science. Noretta Koertge ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Kitcher, P. 1998. “A Plea for Science Studies.” Pp. 32–56 in A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science. Noretta Koertge ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Koertge, N. (ed.) 1998. A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science. New York: Oxford University Press. Koertge, N. (ed.) 1998. A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lahti, D.C. & Weinstein, B.S. 2005. “The Better Angels of Our Nature: Group Stability and the Evolution of Moral Tension.” Evolution and Human Behavior. 26(1), 47–63. CrossRef Lahti, D.C. & Weinstein, B.S. 2005. “The Better Angels of Our Nature: Group Stability and the Evolution of Moral Tension.” Evolution and Human Behavior. 26(1), 47–63. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKay, R.T. & Dennett, D.C. 2009. “The Evolution of Misbelief.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 32(6), 493–510. CrossRef McKay, R.T. & Dennett, D.C. 2009. “The Evolution of Misbelief.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 32(6), 493–510. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pluckrose H. & Lindsay J. 2020. Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Has Made Everything About Race, Gender, and Identity – And Why This Harms Everybody. USA: Pitchstone. Pluckrose H. & Lindsay J. 2020. Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Has Made Everything About Race, Gender, and Identity – And Why This Harms Everybody. USA: Pitchstone.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaver, J.H. and Bulbulia, J.A., 2016. “Signaling Theory and Religion.” Pp.101–117 in Religion: Mental Religion, Niki Clements ed. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan. Shaver, J.H. and Bulbulia, J.A., 2016. “Signaling Theory and Religion.” Pp.101–117 in Religion: Mental Religion, Niki Clements ed. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Shermer, M. 2011. The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies – How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths. New York: Macmillan. CrossRef Shermer, M. 2011. The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies – How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths. New York: Macmillan. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Slingerland, E. 2008. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Slingerland, E. 2008. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sokal, A. 2010. Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sokal, A. 2010. Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sokal, A. & Bricmont, J. 1998. Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers’ Abuse of Science. London: Profile Books. Sokal, A. & Bricmont, J. 1998. Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers’ Abuse of Science. London: Profile Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Stenner, K. & Haidt, J. 2018. “Authoritarianism is not a Momentary Madness, but an Eternal Dynamic within Liberal Democracies.” Pp. 175–220 in Can it Happen Here?: Authoritarianism in America. Cass Sunstein ed. New York: HarperCollins. Stenner, K. & Haidt, J. 2018. “Authoritarianism is not a Momentary Madness, but an Eternal Dynamic within Liberal Democracies.” Pp. 175–220 in Can it Happen Here?: Authoritarianism in America. Cass Sunstein ed. New York: HarperCollins.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood, C. 2018. “Why Postmodernism and Science Can’t Stand Each Other”, November 29 2018, patheos.com accessed 15 January 2020. Wood, C. 2018. “Why Postmodernism and Science Can’t Stand Each Other”, November 29 2018, patheos.com accessed 15 January 2020.
Metadaten
Titel
A Darwinian Approach to Postmodern Critical Theory: Or, How Did Bad Ideas Colonise the Academy?
verfasst von
Alan Davison
Publikationsdatum
19.07.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Society / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0147-2011
Elektronische ISSN: 1936-4725
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-020-00505-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Society 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: Reflections Before, During, and Beyond COVID-19

Immortality

Symposium: Reflections Before, During and Beyond COVID-19

Social Distancing, Safe Spaces and the Demand for Quarantine

Social Science and the Public Interest

Social Science and the Public Interest