A dynamic simulation of the wheel–rail impact caused by a wheel flat using a 3-D rolling contact model

Figure 2 shows a typical vertical wheel–rail impact force versus time curve induced by a wheel flat for the 60-mm flat, 200 km/h train speed of and 17 t axle load case. It is found that, during the impact process of the flated wheel against the rail, the first peak vertical wheel–rail impact force occurs at 2.5 ms, and its amplitude is around 325 kN, which is approximately 3.46 times larger than the average static axle load of 93.99 kN. Beyond 2.5 ms, the impact force is reduced gradually to zero, since the vertical dynamic contact force is larger significantly than the sum of the axle load and gravity, resulting in a transient separation between the wheel and rail. Subsequently, the wheel falls back due to its gravity and impact against the rail again. However, the second peak of vertical impact force is caused by the intact wheel part impacting against the rail as the wheel has rolled out of the flat spot. Obviously, the second peak force appears at 8.3 ms and the magnitude is around 300 kN, which is around 0.923 times over that with a flat.

The typical von Mises equivalent stress and maximum shear stress responses of the element with the global maximum von Mises equivalent stress are presented in Fig. 3. It is shown that the von Mises equivalent stress and maximum shear stress are in a small fluctuations before 2.1 ms and then experience a sharp increase to the corresponding maximum values of 672 and 382 MPa at approximately 3.0 ms (the wheel impact against the rail), followed with great fluctuations. After 3.0 ms, the von Mises equivalent stress and maximum shear stress decrease rapidly and stabilize at the lower stress levels, respectively. It should be noted that the maximum von Mises equivalent stress (672 MPa) of the wheel rim is much larger than the yield stress of the wheel rim (561 MPa), which may cause the local plastic deformation of the wheel rim. Figure 4 provides the equivalent plastic strain versus time curve, where the maximum equivalent plastic strain of 0.013 is obtained.

Figure 5a, b shows the typical von Mises equivalent stress contours and equivalent plastic strain contours of the wheel/rail component along the rolling direction, respectively, where the train speed is set to be 200 km/h, the flat length is 60 mm and axle load is 17 t. It is obvious that both the maximum von Mises equivalent stress (667.6 MPa) and maximum equivalent plastic strain (0.013) occur on the wheel–rail contact surface.

To investigate the influence of train speed on the vertical wheel–rail impact response, six train speeds (i.e., 100, 150, 200, 250, 300 and 350 km/h) were selected. Figure 6a shows a typical set of the vertical wheel–rail impact force versus time curves induced by a 60-mm flat for a given axle load of 17 t. It is observed that the history curves of vertical force response at six different train speeds are similar, and the maximum vertical impact force has a non-monotonic change with train speed, i.e., it increases with the train speed up to the peak value of 325 kN for the speed less than or equal to 150 km/h and then decreases slowly with the speed up to 350 km/h. The maximum vertical wheel–rail impact forces induced by a wheel flat are plotted in Fig. 6b, which is a function of the train speed. The non-monotonic relationships between the maximum vertical impact force and train speed for all flat lengths are clearly presented, and the peak values of maximum vertical impact forces occur at train speed of 150 km/h for the flat length less than or equal to 60 mm, while the peak value induced by the wheel flat occurs at the train speed of 200 km/h for the 80-mm flat spot. This non-monotonic relationship between the peak vertical force and train speed may be related with the loss of contact under different speeds, and the reason that the peak contact force for the 80-mm flat occurs at a higher speed than those for other flats is related to the contact position of the flat with the rail. The closer the impact point and the flat tip are to each other. For the flat lengths of 20, 40 and 60 mm, the impact point locates next the flat tip at the train speed of 150 m/s, thus generating the peak value at this speed; however, for the flat length of 80 mm, it takes the more time for the impact point to close the flat tip; thus, a higher speed of 200 km/h is required.

Figures 7 and 8 show the global maximum von Mises equivalent stress and maximum equivalent plastic strain of the wheel as a function of train speed, respectively. It is shown from Fig. 7 that the maximum von Mises equivalent stress increases firstly with train speed and reaches a peak value and then decreases with the speed. When the flat length is less than or equal to 60 mm, the maximum von Mises equivalent stress peaks at the speed of 200 km/h; when the flat length is equal to 80 mm, it peaks at the speed of 150 km/h. It is also noted that the higher stress value induced by a wheel flat will cause the local plastic deformation of the wheel. It can be seen from Fig. 8 that the maximum equivalent plastic strain changes in a way similar to the maximum von Mises equivalent stress. The difference is that the peak value of maximum equivalent plastic strain occurs at the speed of 250 km/h for the 80-mm flat. The large plastic deformation may gradually cause the long local defect, eventually leading to the wheel polygonal wear.

Four different flat lengths (i.e., 20, 40, 60 and 80 mm) were selected to study the influence of flat length on the vertical wheel–rail impact response, where the axle load was fixed at 17 t. Typical vertical wheel–rail impact force history curves induced by different flat lengths at the train speed of 200 km/h are plotted in Fig. 9a. It is obvious that the maximum vertical impact force induced by wheel flat increases with the flat length, and the peak value of the maximum vertical impact force is 400 kN for the flat length of 80 mm. It should be noted that the second peak impact forces generated by the intact wheel dropping against the rail also increase with the flat length, this is because the drop distance and time during wheel flat impacting the rail are determined by the flat length, and the longer wheel flat length will cause the larger drop distance and the later impact occurring [13], resulting in the larger impact kinetic energy. This explanation is also validated the simulated second wheel–rail impact time, that is, the longer the flat length is, and the later the second impact occurs. Figure 9b illustrates the maximum vertical wheel–rail impact forces at different train speeds as a function of the flat length. The maximum vertical impact force nonlinearly increases with the flat length, and the influence of flat length on the maximum vertical impact force seems to be significant within the speed range from 150 to 250 km/h.

Figures 10 and 11 show the influences of the flat length on the maximum von Mises equivalent stress and maximum equivalent plastic strain of the wheel, respectively. It is shown from Fig. 10 that the maximum von Mises equivalent stress under different train speeds increase with flat length. The variation of the maximum von Mises equivalent stress is slight when the flat length is less than or equal to 60 mm, while this increase is relatively larger when the flat length is greater than 60 mm and train speed exceeds 100 km/h. Besides, it can be also found from Fig. 11 that the maximum equivalent plastic strain is relatively larger at the speed of 200 km/h for the flat length less than 80 mm than those under other speed conditions.

For a given flat length of 60 mm and train speed of 200 km/h, five different axle loads (i.e., 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 t) were selected to study the influence of axle load on the wheel–rail impact response. Typical vertical wheel–rail impact force versus time curves with a 60-mm flat under different axle loads are shown in Fig. 12a. The similar trend of the vertical wheel–rail impact force changing with time is observed for five different axle load cases, and the vertical impact force is increased with the axle load. The maximum vertical impact forces versus axle load with different flat lengths are plotted in Fig. 12b. It is shown that a linear increase relationship between the maximum vertical impact force and axle load is found for each flat length case.

Figures 13 and 14 show the maximum von Mises equivalent stress and maximum equivalent plastic strain versus axle load, respectively. As seen in Fig. 13, the maximum von Mises equivalent stress increases approximately linearly with the axle load for each flat length. Similarly, the large von Mises equivalent stress may cause the local plastic deformation of the wheel rim. Thus, the maximum equivalent plastic strain is also presented in Fig. 14, and an approximately linear relationship between the maximum equivalent plastic strain and axle load is observed for a given flat length.