Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 5/2017

26.07.2017

A Further Characterization of Empirical Research Related to Learning Outcome Achievement in Remote and Virtual Science Labs

verfasst von: James R. Brinson

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper further characterizes recently reviewed literature related to student learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) science labs, as well as factors to consider when evaluating the state and progress of research in this field as a whole. Current research is characterized according to (1) participant nationality and culture, (2) participant education level, (3) participant demography, (4) scientific discipline, and (5) research methodology, which could provide avenues for further research and useful dialog regarding the measurement and interpretation of data related to student learning outcome achievement in, and thus the efficacy of, non-traditional versus traditional science labs. Current research is also characterized by (6) research publication media and (7) availability of non-traditional labs used, which demonstrate some of the obstacles to progress and consensus in this research field.
Vorheriger Artikel Conceptualizing Student Affect for Science and Technology at the Middle School Level: Development and Implementation of a Measure of Affect in Science and Technology (MAST)

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Akpan J and Strayer J (2010) Which comes first: The use of computer simulation of frog dissection or conventional dissection as academic exercise? J Comput Math Sci Teach 29(2):113–138
Bakar N, Badioze Zaman H (2007) Development of VLAB-CHEM for chemistry subject based on constructivism-cognitivism-contextual approach. Proceedings of The International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, ICEEI 2007. School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Institute Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia, 568–571
Barbeau M L, Johnson M, Gibson C, and Rogers KA (2013) The development and assessment of an online microscopic anatomy laboratory course. Anat Sci Educ 6(4):246–256
Baser M and Durmus S (2010) The effectiveness of computer supported versus real laboratory inquiry learning environments on the understanding of direct current electricity among pre-service elementary school teachers. Eur J Math Sci Technol Educ 6(1):47–61
Braun MW and Kearns KD (2008) Improved learning efficiency and increased student collaboration through use of virtual microscopy in the teaching of human pathology. Anat Sci Educ 1(6):240–246
Brinson JR (2015) Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual, remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Comput Educ 87:218–237
Chan C and Fok W (2009) Evaluating learning experiences in virtual laboratory training through student perceptions: A case study in electrical and electronic engineering at the University of Hong Kong. Eng Educ 4(2):70–75
Chini JJ, Carmichael A, Rebello NS, Gire E (2010) Comparing students’ performance with physical and virtual manipulatives in a simple machines curriculum. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA): Understanding Complex Ecologies in a Changing World. Denver, Colorado, USA
Collier L, Dunham S, Braun MW, and O’Loughlin VD (2012) Optical versus virtual: Teaching assistant perceptions of the use of virtual microscopy in an undergraduate human anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ 5(1):10–19
Darrah M, Humbert R, Finstein J, Simon M, and Hopkins J (2014) Are virtual labs as effective as hands-on labs for undergraduate physics? A comparative study at two major universities. J Sci Educ Technol 23(6):803–814
DiLullo C, McGee P, and Kriebel RM (2011) Demystifying the millennial student: A reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education. Anat Sci Educ 4(4):214–226
Dobson J (2009) Evaluation of the Virtual Physiology of Exercise laboratory program. Adv Physiol Educ 33(4):335–342
Farrokhnia MR and Esmailpour A (2010) A study on the impact of real, virtual and comprehensive experimenting on students’ conceptual understanding of DC electric circuits and their skills in undergraduate electricity laboratory. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2(2):5474–5482
Finkelstein ND, Adams WK, Keller CJ, Kohl PB, Perkins KK, Podolefsky NS, Reid S, and Lemaster R (2005) When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Phys Rev Spec Top Phys Educ Res 1(1):010103
Finkelstein ND, Adams WK, Keller CJ, Perkins KK, Wieman C, and The Physics Education Technology Project Team (2006) High-tech tools for teaching physics: The physics education technology project. MERLOT J. Online Learn Teach 2(3):110–120
Flowers LO (2011) Investigating the effectiveness of virtual laboratories in an undergraduate biology course. J Hum Resour Adult Learn 7(2):110–116
Frederick MJM (2013) Comparison of student outcomes between computer-based simulated and hands-on lab environments. Int J Univ Teach Fac Dev 4(1):1–8
Gilman S (2006) Do online labs work? An assessment of an online lab on cell division. Am Biol Teach 68(9):131–134
Gröber S, Vetter M, Eckert B, and Jodl H (2007) Experimenting from a distance remotely controlled laboratory. Eur J Phys 28(3):S127–S141
Hawkins I and Phelps AJ (2013) Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry? Chem Educ Res Pract 14(4):516–523
Herga NR and Dinevski D (2012) Virtual laboratory in chemistry—experimental study of understanding, reproduction and application of acquired knowledge of subject's chemical content. Organizacija 45(3):108–116
Husmann P R, O’Loughlin VD, and Braun MW (2009) Quantitative and qualitative changes in teaching histology by means of virtual microscopy in an introductory course in human anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2(5):218–226
Jaakkola T, Nurmi, S, Lehtinen E (2005) In quest of understanding electricity—binding simulation and laboratory work together. Paper for AERA (American Educational Research Association) 2005 conference. Montreal, Canada. 11.-15.4.2005.
Josephsen J and Kristensen AK (2006) Simulation of laboratory assignments to support students’ learning of introductory inorganic chemistry. Chem Educ Res Pract 7(4):266–279
Klahr D, Triona LM, and Williams C (2007) Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. J Res Sci Teach 44(1):183–203
Krippendorf BB and Lough J (2005) Complete and rapid switch from light microscopy to virtual microscopy for teaching medical histology. Anat Rec B New Anat 285B(1):19–25
Lang D, Mengelkamp C, Jäger RS, Geoffroy D, Billaud M, and Zimmer T (2007) Pedagogical evaluation of remote laboratories in eMerge project. Eur J Eng Educ 32(1):57–72
Lang J (2012) Comparative study of hands-on and remote physics labs for first year university level physics students. Tranform Dialogues Teach Learn J 6(1):1–25
Ma J and Nickerson JV (2006) Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Comput Surv 38(3):1–24
Mangold K (2007) Educating a new generation: Teaching baby boomer faculty about millennial students. Nurs Educ 32(1):21–23
Morgil I, Gungor-Seyhan H, Ural-Alsan E, Temel S (2008) The effect of web-based project applications on students’ attitudes towards chemistry. Turk Online J Dist Educ 9(2):220–237
Myneni LS, Narayanan NH, Rebello S, Rouinfar A, and Pumtambekar S (2013) An interactive and intelligent learning system for physics education. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 6(3):228–239
Nickerson JV, Corter JE, Esche SK, and Chassapis C (2007) A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in education. Comput Educ 49(3):708–725
(NRC) National Research Council (2002) Scientific research in education. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Olympiou G and Zacharia ZC (2012) Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Sci Educ 96(1): 21–47
Olympiou G, Zacharia ZC, Papaevripidou M, and Constantinou CP (2008) Effects of physical and virtual experimentation on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. J Res Sci Teach 45(9):1021–1035
Parker NT and Zimmerman L (2011) Comparison of microbiological laboratory skills of students with online versus traditional preparatory laboratory experiences. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual American Society for Microbiology Conference for Undergraduate Educators. John Hopkins University, Baltimore, 38-B
Pyatt K and Sims R (2012) Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: Attitudes, performance, and access. J Sci Educ Technol 21(1):133–147
Rajendran L, Veilumuthu R, and Divya J (2010) A study on the effectiveness of virtual lab in e-learning. Int J Comput Sci Eng 2(6):2173–2175
Renken MD and Nunez N (2013) Computer simulations and clear observations do not guarantee conceptual understanding. Learn Instr 23(1):10–23
Scoville SA and Buskirk TD (2007) Traditional and virtual microscopy compared experimentally in a classroom setting. Clin Anat 20(5):565–570
Sicker DC, Lookabaugh T, Santos J, and Barnes F (2005) Assessing the effectiveness of remote networking laboratories. In: Proceedings of the 35th Frontiers in Education Conference. Indianapolis, IN, USA. S3F7–S3F12
Singer SR, Hilton ML, Schweingruber HA (eds) (2006) America's laboratory report: Investigations in high school science. National Research Council, Washington, DC
Srinivasan S, Perez LC, Palmer RD, Brooks DW, Wilson K, and Fowler D (2006) Reality versus simulation. J Sci Educ Technol 15(2):137–141
Stieff M (2005) Connected chemistry—a novel modeling environment for the chemistry classroom. J Chem Educ 82(3):489–493
Strauss W and Howe N (1991) Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow and Company, Inc., New York
Stuckey-Mickell TA and Stuckey-Danner BD (2007) Virtual labs in the online biology course: Student perceptions of effectiveness and usability. MERLOT J Online Learn Teach 3(2):105–111
Sun KT, Lin YC, Yu CJ (2008) A study on learning effect among different learning styles in web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Comput Educ 50(4):1411–1422
Taghavi SE and Colen C (2009) Computer simulation laboratory instruction vs. traditional laboratory instruction in digital electronics. J Inf Technol Impact 9(1):25–36
Tarekegn G (2009) Can computer simulations substitute real laboratory apparatus? Latin-American J Phys Educ 3(3):506–517
Tatli Z and Ayas A (2012) Virtual chemistry laboratory: Effect of constructivist learning environment. Turk Online J Dist Educ 13(1):183–199
Tatli Z and Ayas A (2013) Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students’ achievement. Educ Technol and Soc 16(1):159–170
Tuysuz C (2010) The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. Int Online J Educ Sci 2(1):37–53
Tylinski JD (1995) The effect of a computer simulation on junior high students’ understanding of the physiological systems of an earthworm dissection. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana
Tzafestas CS, Palaiologou N, and Alifragis M (2006) Virtual and remote robotic laboratory: Comparative experimental evaluation. IEEE Trans Educ 49(3):360–369
Winn W, Stahr F, Sarason C, Fruland R, Oppenheimer P and Lee YL (2006) Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea. J Res Sci Teach 43(1):25–42
Yang KY and Heh JS (2007) The impact of internet virtual physics laboratory instruction on the achievement in physics, science process skills and computer attitudes of 10th grade students. J Sci Educ Technol 16(5):451–461
Zacharia ZC (2007) Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: An effort to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. J Comput Assist Learn 23(2):120–132
Zacharia ZC and Constantinou CP (2008) Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the physics by inquiry curriculum: The case of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature. Am J Phys 76(4–5):425–430
Zacharia ZC, Loizou E, and Papaevripidou M (2012) Is physicality an important aspect of learning through science experimentation among kindergarten students? Early Child Res Q 27(3):447–457
Zacharia ZC and Olympiou G (2011) Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learn Instr 21(3):317–331
Metadaten
Titel
A Further Characterization of Empirical Research Related to Learning Outcome Achievement in Remote and Virtual Science Labs
verfasst von
James R. Brinson
Publikationsdatum
26.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9699-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Journal of Science Education and Technology 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

The Influence of Toy Design Activities on Middle School Students’ Understanding of the Engineering Design Processes

OriginalPaper

Conceptualizing Student Affect for Science and Technology at the Middle School Level: Development and Implementation of a Measure of Affect in Science and Technology (MAST)

OriginalPaper

Short Project-Based Learning with MATLAB Applications to Support the Learning of Video-Image Processing

OriginalPaper

The use of Museum Based Science Centres to Expose Primary School Students in Developing Countries to Abstract and Complex Concepts of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology

OriginalPaper

Cloud Pedagogy: Utilizing Web-Based Technologies for the Promotion of Social Constructivist Learning in Science Teacher Preparation Courses

OriginalPaper

Stitching Codeable Circuits: High School Students’ Learning About Circuitry and Coding with Electronic Textiles

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise