nach oben

Social Justice Research

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015

A Leader’s Procedural Justice, Respect and Extra-role Behaviour: The Roles of Leader In-group Prototypicality and Identification

verfasst von: Satu Koivisto, Jukka Lipponen

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The relational models of procedural justice suggest that a leader’s procedural justice indicates to group members whether they are respected members of the group or not and that feelings of respect induce subsequent group-serving behaviour. Importantly, these models also present, and previous empirical studies show, that a leader’s procedural justice conveys respect-related information most powerfully when the leader is in-group prototypical. The present study of 153 employees from 20 children’s day-care centres builds on these assumptions and develops them further. This study shows that leader in-group prototypicality moderates the relationship between the leader’s procedural justice and group members’ feelings of respect only when group members are highly identified with the group. In addition, our study reveals that feelings of respect mediate the relationship between the leader’s procedural justice and group members’ extra-role behaviour only if perceived leader in-group prototypicality and group identification are concurrently at a relatively high level. The paper discusses the implications of these findings.

Vorheriger Artikel Insidious Procedures: Diversity Awards Legitimize Unfair Organizational Practices

Nächster Artikel Forging Political Will from a Shared Vision: A Critical Social Justice Agenda Against Neoliberalism and Other Systems of Domination

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4278999.

Baron, K. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRef

Barry, H., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). The other side of injustice: When unfair procedures increase group-serving behavior. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1026–1032. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02404.x.PubMedCrossRef

Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria for fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (1st ed., pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). A Four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747–758. doi:10.1177/0146167203029006007.PubMedCrossRef

Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 445–464. doi:10.1037/a0013935.PubMedCrossRef

Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. J. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 400–417.CrossRef

Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., Pierro, A., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Employees’ work effort as a function of leader group prototypicality: The moderating role of team identification. Revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 58(2), 117–124. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2007.01.001.CrossRef

Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2958.CrossRef

Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, Christopher O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425.PubMedCrossRef

Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3–56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Effects of procedural fairness and leader support on interpersonal relationships among group members. Group Dynamics, 10(4), 309–328. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.309.CrossRef

Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2011). Birds of a feather: Leader-follower similarity and procedural fairness effects on cooperation. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 388–415. doi:10.1080/13594321003630055.CrossRef

De Cremer, D. (2002). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1335–1341. doi:10.1177/014616702236830.CrossRef

De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). Cooperating when “You” and “I” are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1121–1133. doi:10.1037/a0020419.PubMedCrossRef

Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 14–35. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.002.CrossRef

Hakonen, M., & Lipponen, J. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of identification with virtual teams: Structural characteristics and justice concerns. The Journal of E-working, 1, 137–153.

Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.

Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. S. (1995). Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate outgroup members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(5), 509–530. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250504.CrossRef

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership. Identity, influence and power. New York: Psychology Press.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.

Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184–200. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1.CrossRef

Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncracy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117–127.PubMedCrossRef

Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7(1), 40–45. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00664.x.CrossRef

Kausto, J., Elo, A.-L., Lipponen, J., & Elovainio, M. (2005). Moderating effects of job insecurity in the relationships between procedural justice and employee well-being: Gender differences. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(4), 431–452. doi:10.1080/13594320500349813.CrossRef

Koivisto, S., Lipponen, J., & Platow, M. (2013). Organizational and supervisory justice effects on experienced threat during change: The moderating role of leader in-group representativeness. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(4), 595–607. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.04.002.CrossRef

Koper, G., van Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1993). Procedural fairness and self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 313–325. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420230307.CrossRef

Lee, C., Pillutla, M., & Law, K. (2000). Power-distance, gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26, 685–704. doi:10.1177/014920630002600405.CrossRef

Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange theory (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum.CrossRef

Lind, E. A. (2001). Thinking critically about justice judgments. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 220–226. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1793.CrossRef

Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRef

Lipponen, J., Koivisto, S., & Olkkonen, M. E. (2005). Procedural justice and status judgements: The moderating role of leader in-group prototypicality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 517–528. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.004.CrossRef

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202.CrossRef

Michel, A., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2010). I scratch your back - you scratch mine. Do procedural justice and organizational identification matter for employees’ cooperation during change? Journal of Change Management, 10(1), 41–59. doi:10.1080/14697010903549432.CrossRef

Miller, B. K., Konopaske, R., & Byrne, Z. S. (2012). Dominance analysis of two measures of organizational justice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(3), 264–282. doi:10.1108/02683941211205817.CrossRef

Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845–855. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845.CrossRef

O´Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492.CrossRef

Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader in-group prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1508–1519. doi:10.1177/01461672012711011.CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.PubMedCrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00047-7.CrossRef

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553.CrossRef

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.PubMedCrossRef

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316.CrossRef

Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233. doi:10.1037/a0020141.PubMedCrossRef

Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 547–568. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007.CrossRef

Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 925–946. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00036-5.673.CrossRef

Seppälä, T., Lipponen, J., & Pirttilä-Backman, A. (2012). Leader fairness and employees’ trust in coworkers: The moderating role of leader group prototypicality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice, 16(1), 35–49. doi:10.1037/a0026970.CrossRef

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.PubMedCrossRef

Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476. doi:10.1177/1094428109351241.CrossRef

Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183–193. doi:10.1177/0146167202239043.PubMedCrossRef

Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2003). Interpersonal treatment, social identity and organizational behavior. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 155–171). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., et al. (2014). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 1001–1024. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002.CrossRef

Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83–98. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199701)18:1<83:AID-JOB779>3.0.CO;2-3.CrossRef

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worschel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Treviño, L. K., & Bies, R. J. (1997). Through the looking glass: A normative manifesto for organizational behavior. In C. L. Cooper & S. E. Jackson (Eds.), Creating tomorrow’s organizations: A handbook for future research in organizational behavior (pp. 439–452). London: Wiley.

Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 25–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice. A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830.CrossRef

Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, US: Psychology Press.

Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2001). Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(3), 207–226. doi:10.1177/1368430201004003003.CrossRef

Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2002). Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 813–838. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00031-6.CrossRef

Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07.CrossRef

Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 482–497. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.482.CrossRef

Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913–931. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.913.CrossRef

Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (25th ed., pp. 115–191). New York: Academic Press.

Ullrich, J., Christ, O., & van Dick, R. (2009). Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 235–244. doi:10.1037/a0012936.PubMedCrossRef

van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2008). How leader prototypicality affects followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 226–250. doi:10.1080/13594320701743491.CrossRef

van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 85–96. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004.CrossRef

van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Group norms, prototypicality, and persuasion. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 157–170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

van Knippenberg, D. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1078–1091. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.004.CrossRef

van Knippenberg, D., & De Cremer, D. (2008). Leadership and fairness: Taking stock and looking ahead. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 173–179. doi:10.1080/13594320801912137.CrossRef

van Knippenberg, D., De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, B. (2007). Leadership and fairness: The state of the art. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 16(2), 113–140. doi:10.1080/13594320701275833.CrossRef

van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243–295. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1.CrossRef

van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Leadership, identity and influence: Relational concerns in the use of influence tactics. In D. van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 123–137). London: Sage.CrossRef

Titel: A Leader’s Procedural Justice, Respect and Extra-role Behaviour: The Roles of Leader In-group Prototypicality and Identification
verfasst von: Satu Koivisto
Jukka Lipponen
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0243-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Insidious Procedures: Diversity Awards Legitimize Unfair Organizational Practices

Reality and Perception: Power and Paranoia Within the Political Sphere

Expanding the Horizons of Social Justice Research: Three Essays on Justice Theory

Forging Political Will from a Shared Vision: A Critical Social Justice Agenda Against Neoliberalism and Other Systems of Domination