Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

01.06.2015 | Original Article | Ausgabe 12/2015

Environmental Earth Sciences 12/2015

A model for prioritizing sites and reclamation methods at abandoned mines

Zeitschrift:
Environmental Earth Sciences > Ausgabe 12/2015
Autoren:
Owen E. Kubit, Christopher J. Pluhar, Jerome V. De Graff
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s12665-014-3949-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Abandoned mines present numerous safety and environmental problems due to altered topography and poor management of mine waste. Few guidelines are available for selecting reclamation methods to address these problems, and many existing decision models lack transparency, leave out important parameters and reclamation methods, and/or lack model calibration. Consequently, a decision model was developed that includes: (1) a mine hazard index for prioritizing sites for reclamation, (2) a reclamation method screening table for narrowing viable reclamation methods, and (3) a reclamation method ranking matrix for ranking the applicability of reclamation methods at a site. These three processes form the abandoned mine decision model, optimized for topographic reconstruction and waste disposal at abandoned mines. The hazard index quantifies geologic and hydrologic hazards using measurable parameters, sub-parameters, and a range of sub-parameter conditions. Main and sub-parameter weighting factors were determined using the analytic hierarchy process and Delphi method. Reconciling differences between initial parameter weighting factors for the two methods resulted in an improved decision-making technique. The decision model was calibrated with 25 abandoned metal mines in the western USA. Mine hazard index thresholds were determined for mines having low, medium, and high priority. The screening table and ranking matrix were effective at narrowing the number of viable reclamation methods. Further validation of the decision model was evident by the implemented reclamation method being among the four highest scoring alternatives 80 % of the time. This model provides a quantitative and transparent process that overcomes the deficiencies found in many existing mine reclamation decision models.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Umwelt
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 50.000 Bücher
  • über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Umwelt
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Zusatzmaterial
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2015

Environmental Earth Sciences 12/2015 Zur Ausgabe