Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
A Method for Systematic Adaptation and Synchronization of Healthcare Processes Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Monitoring Infrastructure for the Quality Assessment of Cloud Services

verfasst von : Priscila Cedillo, Javier Gonzalez-Huerta, Silvia Abrahao, Emilio Insfran

Erschienen in: Transforming Healthcare Through Information Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Service Level Agreements (SLAs) specify the strict terms under which cloud services must be provided. The assessment of the quality of services being provided is critical for both clients and service providers. In this context, stakeholders must be capable of monitoring services delivered as Software as a Service (SaaS) at runtime and of reporting any eventual non-compliance with SLAs in a comprehensive and flexible manner. In this paper, we present the definition of an SLA compliance monitoring infrastructure, which is based on the use of models@run.time, its main components and artifacts, and the interactions among them. We place emphasis on the configuration of the artifacts that will enable the monitoring, and we present a prototype that can be used to perform this monitoring. The feasibility of our proposal is illustrated by means of a case study, which shows the use of the components and artifacts in the infrastructure and the configuration of a specific plan with which to monitor the services deployed on the Microsoft Azure© platform.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Method for Systematic Adaptation and Synchronization of Healthcare Processes
Nächstes Kapitel A Motivation-Oriented Architecture Modelling for e-Healthcare Prosumption
Fußnoten
1
Operationalizing a measure consists of establishing a mapping between its generic description and the concepts represented in the software artifacts to be measured [30].
 
Literatur
1.
Sriram, I., Khajeh-Hosseini, A.: Research agenda in cloud technologies. In: 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, SOCC, pp. 1–11 (2010)
2.
Song, J., Han, F., Yan, Z., Liu, G., Zhu, Z.: A SaaSify tool for converting traditional web-based apps to SaaS application. In: 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing, CLOUD, pp. 396–403 (2011)
3.
Baset, S.A.: Cloud SLAs: present and future. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. 46, 57–66 (2012)CrossRef
4.
Hassan, M., Song, B., Huh, E.-N.: A market-oriented dynamic collaborative cloud services platform. Ann. Telecommun. 65, 669–688 (2010)CrossRef
5.
Aceto, G., Botta, A., de Donato, W., Pescapè, A.: Cloud monitoring: a survey. Comput. Netw. 57, 2093–2115 (2013)CrossRef
6.
Shao, J., Wei, H., Wang, Q., Mei, H.: A runtime model based monitoring approach for cloud. In: International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), pp. 313–320 (2010)
7.
Foster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., Lu, S.: Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. In: Grid Computing Environments Workshop (GCE 08), pp. 1–10 (2008)
8.
Muller, C., Oriol, M., Franch, X., Marco, J., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortes, A., Rodriguez, M.: Comprehensive explanation of SLA violations at runtime. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 7, 168–183 (2014)CrossRef
9.
Baresi, L., Ghezzi, C.: The disappearing boundary between development-time and run-time. In: Workshop on the Future of Software Engineering Research FSE/SDP, pp. 17–22. ACM, USA (2010)
10.
11.
Cedillo, P., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., Insfrán, E., Abrahao, S.: Towards monitoring cloud services using Models@run.time. In: Workshop on Models@run.time, MODELS, pp. 31–40, Spain (2014)
12.
Fatema, K., Emeakaroha, V.C., Healy, P.D., Morrison, J.P., Lynn, T.: A survey of cloud monitoring tools: taxonomy, capabilities and objectives (2014)
13.
Alhamazani, K., Ranjan, R., Mitra, K., Rabhi, F., Jayaraman, P.P., Khan, S.U., Guabtni, A., Bhatnagar, V.: An overview of the commercial cloud monitoring tools: research dimensions, design issues, and state-of-the-art. Computing, pp. 1–21 (2014)
14.
Emeakaroha, V.C., Ferreto, T.C., Netto, M.A.S., Brandic, I., De Rose, C.A.F.: CASViD: application level monitoring for SLA violation detection in clouds. In: Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), pp. 499–508 (2012)
15.
Katsaros, G., Kousiouris, G., Gogouvitis, S.V., Kyriazis, D., Menychtas, A., Varvarigou, T.: A self-adaptive hierarchical monitoring mechanism for Clouds. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 1029–1041 (2012)CrossRef
16.
Smit, M., Simmons, B., Litoiu, M.: Distributed, application-level monitoring for heterogeneous clouds using stream processing. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 2103–2114 (2013)CrossRef
17.
Montes, J., Sánchez, A., Memishi, B., Pérez, M.S., Antoniu, G.: GMonE: a complete approach to cloud monitoring. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 2026–2040 (2013)CrossRef
18.
Povedano-Molina, J., Lopez-Vega, J.M., Lopez-Soler, J.M., Corradi, A., Foschini, L.: DARGOS: a highly adaptable and scalable monitoring architecture for multi-tenant Clouds. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 2041–2056 (2013)CrossRef
19.
Cedillo, P., Jimenez-Gomez, J., Abrahao, S., Insfran, E.: Towards a monitoring middleware for Cloud services. In: International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), NY, USA (2015)
20.
Ludwig, H., Keller, A.: Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) Language Specification, pp. 1–110 (2003)
21.
ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 25010 Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)—System and software quality models (2011)
22.
Lehmann, G., Blumendorf, M., Trollmann, F., Albayrak, S.: Meta-modeling runtime models. In: International Conference on Models in Software Engineering, pp. 209–223. Springer, Berlin (2010)
23.
García, F., Bertoa, M.F., Calero, C., Vallecillo, A., Ruíz, F., Piattini, M., Genero, M.: Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement (2006)
24.
Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng. 14, 131–164 (2009)CrossRef
25.
Lethbridge, T.C., Sim, S.E., Singer, J.: Studying software engineers: data collection techniques for software field studies. Empirical Softw. Eng. 10, 311–341 (2005)CrossRef
26.
Herold, S., Klus, H., Welsch, Y., Deiters, C., Rausch, A., Reussner, R., Krogmann, K., Koziolek, H., Mirandola, R., Hummel, B., Meisinger, M., Pfaller, C.: CoCoMe—the common component modeling example. Presented at the (2008)
27.
Wieder, P., Butler, J.M., Theilmann, W., Yahyapour, R. (eds.): SLAs for Cloud Computing. Springer, New York (2011)
28.
Quality Excellence for Suppliers of Telecommunications Forum (Quest Forum), TL 9000 Quality Management System Measurements Handbook 5.0 (2012)
29.
Bauer, E., Adams, R.: Service Quality of Cloud-Based Applications. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)CrossRef
30.
Fernandez, A., Abrahão, S., Insfran, E.: A web usability evaluation process for model-driven web development. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 108–122 (2011)
Metadaten
Titel
A Monitoring Infrastructure for the Quality Assessment of Cloud Services
verfasst von
Priscila Cedillo
Javier Gonzalez-Huerta
Silvia Abrahao
Emilio Insfran
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Transforming Healthcare Through Information Systems

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30132-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-30133-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30133-4_2