Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Neural Processing Letters
Erschienen in: Neural Processing Letters 3/2017

25.10.2016

A Neural Network Approach for Solving Optimal Control Problems with Inequality Constraints and Some Applications

verfasst von: Alireza Nazemi, Rezvan Karami

Erschienen in: Neural Processing Letters | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, a class of nonlinear optimal control problems with inequality constraints is considered. Based on Karush–Kuhn–Tucker optimality conditions of nonlinear optimization problems and by constructing an error function, we define an unconstrained minimization problem. In the minimization problem, we use trial solutions for the state, Lagrange multipliers, and control functions where these trial solutions are constructed by using two-layered perceptron. We then minimize the error function using a dynamic optimization method where weights and biases associated with all neurons are unknown. The stability and convergence analysis of the dynamic optimization scheme is also studied. Substituting the optimal values of the weights and biases in the trial solutions, we obtain the optimal solution of the original problem. Several examples are given to show the efficiency of the method. We also provide two applicable examples in robotic engineering.
Vorheriger Artikel Existence and Global Exponential Stability of Periodic Solution for a Class of Neutral-Type Neural Networks with Time Delays
Nächster Artikel Supervised Local High-Order Differential Channel Feature Learning for Pedestrian Detection

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Betts JT (2001) Practical methods for optimal control using nonlinear programming. SIAM, PhiladelphiaMATH
2.
3.
Ascher UM, Mattheij RMM, Russel RD (1995) Numerical solution of boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRef
4.
5.
Shamsyeh Zahedi M, Saberi Nik H (2013) On homotopy analysis method applied to linear optimal control problems. Appl Math Model 37:9617–9629MathSciNetCrossRef
6.
Tohidi E, SaberiNik H (2015) A bessel collocation method for solving fractional optimal control problems. Appl Math Modell 5:455–465MathSciNetCrossRef
7.
Jajarmi A, Pariz N, Vahidian A, Effati S (2011) A novel modal series representation approach to solve a class of nonlinear optimal control problems. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 7:1413–1425
8.
9.
Yousefi SA, Dehghan M, Lotfi A (2010) Finding the optimal control of linear systems via Hes variational iteration method. Int J Comput Math 87:1042–1050MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
10.
ElKady M, Elbarbary EME (2002) A Chebyshev expansion method for solving optimal control problems. Appl Math Comput 129:171–182MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
11.
Elnagar GN (1997) State-control spectral Chebyshev parameterization for linearly constrained quadratic optimal control problems. J Comput Appl Math 79:19–40MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
12.
Hsu NS, Chang B (1989) Analysis and optimal control of time-varying linear systems via block-pulse functions. Int J Control 33:1107–1122MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
14.
Hosseinpour S, Nazemi AR (2016) Solving fractional optimal control problems with fixed or free final states by Haar wavelet collocation method. IMA J Math Control Inf 33:543–561
15.
Mansoori M, Nazemi AR (2016) Solving infinite-horizon optimal control problems of the time-delayed systems by Haar wavelet collocation method. Comput Appl Math 35:97–117
16.
Nazemi AR, Mahmoudy N (2014) Solving infinite-horizon optimal control problems using Haar wavelet collocation method. ANZIAM J (formerly: J Aust Math Soc Ser B ) 56:179–191
17.
Nazemi AR, Mansoori M (2016) Optimal control problems of the time-delayed systems by Haar wavelet. J Vib Control 22:2657–2670
18.
Nazemi AR, Shabani MM (2015) Numerical solution of the time-delayed optimal control problems with hybrid functions. IMA J Math 32: 623–638
19.
Pontryagin LS, Boltyanskii V, Gamkrelidze R, Mischenko E (1962) The mathematical theory of optimal processes. Wiley Interscience, New York
20.
Schalkoff RJ (1997) Artificial neural networks. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH
21.
Picton P (2000) Neural networks, 2nd edn. Palgrave, Basingstoke
22.
Minsky M, Papert S (1969) Perceptrons. MIT Press, CambridgeMATH
23.
Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverMATH
24.
Khanna T (1990) Foundations of neural networks. Addison-Wesley, ReadingMATH
25.
Stanley J (1990) Introduction to neural networks, 3rd edn. California Scientific Software, Sierra Mardre
26.
Lippmann RP (1987) ) An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Mag 4(2):4–22CrossRef
27.
Hornick K, Stinchcombe M, white H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2(5):359–366CrossRef
28.
Lapedes A, Farber R (1988) How neural nets work. In: Anderson DZ (ed) Neural information processing systems. AIP, New York
29.
Mckeown JJ, Stella F, Hall G (1997) Some numerical aspects of the training problem for feed-forward neural nets. Neural Netw 10(8):1455–1463CrossRef
30.
Haykin S (2007) Neural networks : a comprehensive foundation, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverMATH
31.
Graupe D (2007) Principles of artificial neural networks, 2nd edn. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefMATH
32.
Tang H, Tan KC, Yi Z (2007) Neural networks: computational models and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATH
33.
Muller B, Reinhardt J, Strickland MT (2002) Neural networks: an introduction, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, BerlinMATH
34.
Picton P (2000) Neural networks, 2nd edn. Palgrave, Basingstoke
35.
Fine TL (1999) Feed forward neural network methodology. Springer-Verlag, New York
36.
Schalkoff RJ (1997) Artificial neural networks. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH
37.
Ellacott SW (1997) Mathematics of neural networks: models, algorithms and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonCrossRef
38.
Lagaris IE, Likas A, Fotiadis DI (1998) Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9:987–1000CrossRef
39.
Malek A, Shekari Beidokhti R (2006) Numerical solution for high order differential equations using a hybrid neural networkOptimization method. Appl Math Comput 183:260–271MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
40.
Shekari Beidokhti R, Malek A (2009) Solving initial-boundary value problems for systems of partial differential equations using neural networks and optimization techniques. J Franklin Inst 346:898–913MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
41.
Tsoulos IG, Gavrilis D, Glavas E (2009) Solving differential equations with constructed neural networks. Neurocomputing 72:2385–2391CrossRef
42.
Kumar M, Yadav N (2011) Multilayer perceptrons and radial basis function neural network methods for the solution of differential equations: A survey. Comput Math Appl 62:3796–3811MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
43.
Dua V (2011) An artificial neural network approximation based decomposition approach for parameter estimation of system of ordinary differential equations. Comput Chem Eng 35:545–553CrossRef
44.
Shirvany Y, Hayati M, Moradian R (2008) Numerical solution of the nonlinear Schrodinger equation by feedforward neural networks. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 13:2132–2145MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
45.
Shirvany Y, Hayati M, Moradian R (2009) Multilayer perceptron neural networks with novel unsupervised train ing method for numerical solution of the partial differential equations. Appl Soft Comput 9:20–29CrossRef
46.
Balasubramaniam P, Kumaresan N (2008) Solution of generalized matrix Riccati differential equation for indefinite stochastic linear quadratic singular system using neural networks. Appl Math Comput 204:671–679MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
47.
Becerikli Y, Konarm AF, Samad T (2003) Intelligent optimal control with dynamic neural networks. Neural Netw 16:251–259CrossRef
48.
Sarangapani J (2006) Neural network control of nonlinear discrete-time systems. Taylor & Francis, Boca RatonCrossRef
49.
Kutz M, Lewis FL, Ge SS (2006) Neural networks in feedback control systems. In: Kutz M (ed) Mechanical engineers’ handbook: instrumentation, systems, controls, and MEMS, chap. 19, vol 2, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
50.
Gnecco G, Sanguineti M (2010) Suboptimal solutions to dynamic optimization problems via approximations of the policy functions. J Optim Theory Appl 146(2010):764–794MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
51.
Gaggero M, Gnecco G, Sanguineti M (2014) Approximate dynamic programming for stochastic N-stage optimization with application to optimal consumption under uncertainty. Comput Optim Appl 58:31–85MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
52.
Liu L, Wang ZS, Zhang HG (2016) Adaptive fault-tolerant tracking control for MIMO discrete-time systems via reinforcement learning algorithm with less learning parameters. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. doi:10.​1109/​TASE.​2016.​2517155
53.
Wang Z, Liu L, Shan Q, Zhang H (2015) Stability criteria for recurrent neural networks with time-varying delay based on secondary delay partitioning method. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26:2589–2595MathSciNetCrossRef
54.
Wang ZS, Liu L, Zhang HG, Xiao GY (2016) Fault-tolerant controller design for a class of nonlinear MIMO discrete-time systems via online reinforcement learning algorithm. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 46:611–622CrossRef
55.
Vrabie D, Lewis F (2009) Neural network approach to continuous-time direct adaptive optimal control for partially unknown nonlinear systems. Neural Netw 22:237–246CrossRefMATH
56.
Vrabie D, Lewis F, Levine D (2008) Neural network-based adaptive optimal controller A continuous-time formulation. Commun Comput Inf Sci 15:276–285MATH
57.
Cheng T, Lewis FL, Abu-Khalaf M (2007) Fixed-final-time-constrained optimal control of nonlinear systems using neural network HJB approach. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 18:1725–1737CrossRef
58.
Effati S, Pakdaman M (2013) Optimal control problem via neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 23:2093–2100CrossRef
59.
Nazemi AR (2011) A dynamical model for solving degenerate quadratic minimax problems with constraints. J Comput Appl Math 236:1282–1295MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
60.
Nazemi AR (2012) A dynamic system model for solving convex nonlinear optimization problems. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17:1696–1705MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
61.
Nazemi AR (2013) Solving general convex nonlinear optimization problems by an efficient neurodynamic model. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26:685–696CrossRef
62.
Nazemi AR, Omidi F (2012) A capable neural network model for solving the maximum flow problem. J Comput Appl Math 236:3498–3513MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
63.
Nazemi AR (2014) A neural network model for solving convex quadratic programming problems with some applications. Eng Appl Artif Intell 32:54–62CrossRef
64.
Nazemi AR, Omidi F (2013) An efficient dynamic model for solving the shortest path problem. Transp Res Part C 26:1–19CrossRef
65.
Nazemi AR, Sharifi E (2013) Solving a class of geometric programming problems by an efficient dynamic model. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 18:692–709MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
66.
Nazemi AR, Effati S (2013) An application of a merit function for solving convex programming problems. Comput Ind Eng 66:212–221CrossRef
67.
Nazemi AR, Nazemi M (2014) A gradient-based neural network method for solving strictly convex quadratic programming problems. Cognit Comput 6:484–495CrossRef
68.
Pan S-H, Chen J-S (2010) A semismooth Newton method for the SOCCP based on a one-parametric class of SOC complementarity functions. Comput Optim Appl 45:59–88MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
69.
Sun D, Sun J (2005) Strong semismoothness of the Fischer–Burmeister SDC and SOC complementarity functions. Math Program 103(3):575–581MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
70.
Facchinei F, Jiang H, Qi L (1999) A smoothing method for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Math Program 35:107–134MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
71.
72.
Funahashi K (1989) On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks. Neural Netw 2:183–192CrossRef
73.
Hornik K, Stinchombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366CrossRef
74.
Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (2006) Nonlinear programming—theory and algorithms, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefMATH
75.
Zhang X-S (2000) Neural networks in optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefMATH
76.
Nocedal J, Wright S (2006) Numerical optimization, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, BerlinMATH
77.
Lee KY, El-Sharkawi MA (2008) Modern heuristic optimization techniques: theory and applications to power systems. Wiley-Interscience, PiscatawayCrossRef
78.
Miller RK, Michel AN (1982) Ordinary differential equations. Academic Press, New YorkMATH
79.
Sun J, Chen J-S, Ko C-H (2012) Neural networks for solving second-order cone constrained variational inequality problem. Comput Optim Appl 51:623–648MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
80.
Hale JK (1969) Ordinary differential equations. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkMATH
81.
82.
Annapragada M, Agrawal SK (1999) Design and experiments on a free-floating planar robot for optimal chase and capture operations in space. Robot Auton Syst 26:281–297CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Neural Network Approach for Solving Optimal Control Problems with Inequality Constraints and Some Applications
verfasst von
Alireza Nazemi
Rezvan Karami
Publikationsdatum
25.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Neural Processing Letters / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1370-4621
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-773X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-016-9562-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Neural Processing Letters 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Further Results on Dissipativity Criterion for Markovian Jump Discrete-Time Neural Networks with Two Delay Components Via Discrete Wirtinger Inequality Approach

OriginalPaper

Visual Saliency Using Binary Spectrum of Walsh–Hadamard Transform and Its Applications to Ship Detection in Multispectral Imagery

OriginalPaper

Properties of a Batch Training Algorithm for Feedforward Networks

OriginalPaper

Cross-Modal Saliency Correlation for Image Annotation

OriginalPaper

Directed Connectivity Analysis of Functional Brain Networks during Cognitive Activity Using Transfer Entropy

OriginalPaper

Passivity and Pinning Passivity of Coupled Delayed Reaction–Diffusion Neural Networks with Dirichlet Boundary Conditions

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise