nach oben

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment

Erschienen in:

20.02.2021 | Original Paper

A new analytical method for determination of discharge duration in tunnels subjected to groundwater inrush

verfasst von: Mohsen Golian, Ebrahim Sharifi Teshnizi, Mario Parise, Josip Terzić, Sasa Milanović, Vesna Ristić Vakanjac, Masoud Mahdad, Mehdi Abbasi, Hossein Taghikhani, Habib Saadat

Erschienen in: Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Unexpected water inrush to tunnels is one of the most hazardous events, especially in karst terrains that could take place during mechanized shield tunneling mostly due to inappropriate site investigations. When water inrushes to tunnel front, actions like pumping out the water or grouting, for impeding or reducing the inrush and alleviating related damages, are often time-consuming, uneconomical, difficult, or sometimes even impossible. In most cases, it is sometimes necessary to wait for lowering groundwater within the tunnel to have again the possibility to excavate. Therefore, determination of the required time for the groundwater inrush to decrease to a certain level is extremely important for tunneling management plans and plays a significant role in decision-making for project managers. In this study, an assessment of the discharge time after water inrush to tunnel using the new proposed analytical approach is argued. This method is developed based on recession analysis and hydrodynamic of open channels. For this purpose, inrush rate to tunnel front and groundwater level should be measured on at least a daily basis, a feasible and practical action to be carried out on tunnel construction sites. The method is validated with available data from three tunnels with water inrush experiences. The results show that the analytically determined water inrush regime is in good accordance with the observed ones.

Vorheriger Artikel Loess collapsibility characteristics of railway engineering sites using large-scale trial immersion pit experiments

Nächster Artikel Physical modeling of the dynamics of a revetment breakwater built on reclaimed coral calcareous sand foundation in the South China Sea—tsunami wave

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Andriani GF, Parise M (2015) On the applicability of geomechanical models for carbonate rock masses interested by karst processes. Environ Earth Sci 74(12):7813–7821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4596-zCrossRef

Andriani GF, Parise M (2017) Applying rock mass classifications to carbonate rocks for engineering purposes with a new approach using the rock engineering system. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9(2):364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.12.001CrossRef

Bakalowicz M (2005) Karst groundwater: a challenge for new resources. Hydrogeol J 13(1):148–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0402-9CrossRef

Bonetto S, Fiorucci A, Fornaro M, Vigna B (2008) Subsidence hazards connected to quarrying activities in a karst area: the case of the Moncalvo sinkhole event (Piedmont, NW Italy). Estonian J Earth Sci 57(3):125–134. https://doi.org/10.3176/earth.2008.3.01CrossRef

Boussinesq J (1904) Recherche theoruques sur l’ écoulement des nappes d’eau infiltrées dans le sol et sur le débit des sources. J Math Pures Appl Fr 10(5):5–78 363-394

Clay RB, Takacs AP (1997) Anticipating the unexpected Flood, fire over-break, inrush, collapse. In: Tunneling Under Difficult Conditions and Rock Mass Classification, Proceedings of One Day Seminar and International Conference, Basel, Switzerland.

Day MJ (2004) Karstic problems in the construction of Milwaukee's Deep Tunnels. Environ Geol 45(6):859–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0945-4CrossRef

De Waele J, Gutierrez F, Parise M, Plan L (2011) Geomorphology and natural hazards in karst areas: a review. Geomorphology 134(1–2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.08.001CrossRef

Degallier R (1966) Interpretation de Courbes exponentielles de tarissement. Memories de AIH Beograd:171–172

Dewandel B, Lachassagne P, Bakalowicz M, Weng P, Al-Malki A (2003) Evaluation of aquifer thickness by analysing recession hydrographs. Application to the Oman ophiolite hard-rock aquifer. J Hydrol 274(1-4):248–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00418-3CrossRef

Fanchi JR (2002) Shared Earth Modeling: Methodologies for Integrated Reservoir Simulations. Gulf Prof Publ. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067522-2/50000-8

Fiorillo F (2014) The recession of spring hydrographs, focused on karst aquifers. Water Resour Manag 28(7):1781–1805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0597-zCrossRef

Ford DC, Williams P (2007) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterCrossRef

Giese M, Reimann T, Bailly-Comte V, Maréchal JC, Sauter M, Geyer T (2018) Turbulent and laminar flow in karst conduits under unsteady flow conditions: interpretation of pumping tests by discrete conduit-continuum modeling. Water Resour Res 54(3):1918–1933. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020658CrossRef

Golian M, Katibeh H, Singh VP, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Tavasoli Rostami H (2019) Prediction of tunneling impact on flow rates of adjacent extraction water wells. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 53(2):236–251. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2019-055CrossRef

Golian M, Sharifi Teshnizi E, Tavasoli Rostami H, Katibeh H, Parise M, Mahdad M, Saadat H, Abbasi M, Ebad Ardestani M (2021a) Advantages of employing multilevel monitoring wells for design of tunnels subjected to multi-aquifer alluvial. J Mt Sci 18(1):219–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6293-yCrossRef

Golian M, Abolghasemi M, Hosseini A, Abbasi M (2021b) Restoring groundwater levels after tunneling: a numerical simulation approach to tunnel sealing decision making. Hydrogeol J. Advance online publication.

Gutiérrez F, Parise M, De Waele J, Jourde H (2014) A review on natural and human-induced geohazards and impacts in karst. Earth Sci Rev 138:61–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.08.002CrossRef

Harmon RS, Wicks CM (2006) Perspectives on Karst Geomorphology, Hydrology, and Geochemistry - A Tribute Volume to Derek C. Ford and William B. White. Geol Soc Am. https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE404

Hou T, Yang X, Xing H, Huang K, Zhou J (2016) Forecasting and prevention of water inrush during the excavation process of diversion tunnel at the Jinping II Hydropower Station, China. Springer Plus 5:700. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2336-9CrossRef

Ismail A (2017) Uma Oya Development Project: Multi-purpose or multi-destructive? Daily Mirror online, [online] Available at: http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Uma-Oya-Development-Project-Multi-purpose-or-multidestructive%2D%2D121570.html [Accessed 3 January 2017]

Knightes CD, Cyterski M (2005) Evaluating predictive errors of a complex environmental model using a general linear model and least square means. Ecol Model 186(3):366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.034CrossRef

Kobayashi K, Salam MU (2000) Comparing simulated and measured values using mean squared deviation and its components. Agron J 92(2):345–352. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.922345xCrossRef

Li L, Tu W, Shi S, Chen J, Zhang Y (2016) Mechanism of water inrush in tunnel construction in the karst area. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 7(sup1):35–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1181342CrossRef

Li XH, Zhang QS, Zhang X, LAN XD, DUAN CH, LIU JG (2018) Detection and treatment of water inflow in karst tunnel: A case study in Daba tunnel. J Mt Sci 15(7):1585–1596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4919-0CrossRef

Maillet E (1905) Essais d'hydraulique souterraine & fluviale (Hydraulic tests in the subsurface and in rivers). Hermann, Paris

Mangin A (1975) Contribution à l’étude hydodynamique des aquifères karstique. Doctorale thése, Univ. Dijon ; Annales de Speléologie, 30 (1), 21-124.

McCallum J, Simmons C, Mallants D, Batelaan O (2016) Simulating the groundwater flow dynamics of fault zones; MODFLOW Un-Structured Grid: A comparison of methods for representing fault properties and a regional implementation. Techn Rep: The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24875.34085

McCormack T, O’Connella E, Daly Y, Gill LW, Henry T, Perriquetc M (2017) Characterization of karst hydrogeology in Western Ireland using geophysical and hydraulic modeling techniques. J Hydrol: Regional Studies 10:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.12.083CrossRef

Milanović PT (2000) Geological Engineering in Karst: dams, reservoirs, grouting, groundwater protection, water tapping, tunneling: with 190 figures. Zebra, Belgrade, p 347

Milanović P (2002) The environmental impacts of human activities and engineering constructions in karst regions. Episodes 25(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2002/v25i1/002CrossRef

Milanović S (2016) 3D Spatial modeling of karst channels– The Beljanica karst massif. Karst without Boundaries, edt. Z. Stevanović, N. Krešić, N. Kukurić, CRC Press/Balkema, Taylor & Francis Group, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21380-15

Milanović S, Vasić LJ (2016) 3D Conduit modeling of leakage below a dam situated in highly karstified rocks. Karst without Boundaries, edt. Z. Stevanović, N. Krešić, N. Kukurić, CRC Press/Balkema, Taylor & Francis Group, 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21380-27

Mitchell PL (1997) Misuse of regression for empirical validation of models. Agric Syst 54(3):313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(96)00077-7CrossRef

Palma B, Ruocco A, Lollino P, Parise M (2012) Analysis of the behavior of a carbonate rock mass due to tunneling in a karst setting. In: Han KC, Park C, Kim JD, Jeon S, Song JJ (Eds), The present and future of rock engineering. Proceedings of 7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Seoul, 772–781.

Parise M (2019) Sinkholes. In: White W.B., Culver D.C. & Pipan T. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Caves. Academic Press, Elsevier, 3rd edition, 934-942.

Parise M, Closson D, Gutierrez F, Stevanović Z (2015a) Anticipating and managing engineering problems in the complex karst environment. Environ Earth Sci 74(12):7823–7835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4647-5CrossRef

Parise M, Ravbar N, Živanović V, Mikszewski A, Kresić N, Mádl-Szonyi J, Kukurić N (2015b) Hazards in Karst and Managing Water Resources Quality. Chapter 17 in Z. Stevanović (ed.), Karst Aquifers- Characterization and Engineering. Professional Practice in Earth Sciences, Springer, 601-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12850-4_17

Parise M, Gabrovsek F, Kaufmann G, Ravbar N (2018) Recent advances in karst research: from theory to fieldwork and applications. In: Parise M, Gabrovsek F, Kaufmann G, Ravbar N (Eds.), Advances in Karst Research: Theory, Fieldwork, and Applications. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 466, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP466.26

Parshall R (1928) The improved venture flume. Colorado Agric Coll Bull 336:87

Perriquet M (2014) Characterization of the Hydrodynamics and Saltwater Wedge Variations in a Coastal Karst Aquifer in Response to Tide and Precipitation Events (Bell Harbour Catchment Co. Clare, Ireland). National University of Ireland, Galway (Doctoral dissertation, Montpellier 2).

Qiang Q, Rong X (2008) State, issues, and relevant recommendations for security risk management of China's underground engineering. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27(4):649–655 (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2008.04.001CrossRef

Rathnayake B (2016) Sri-Lanka flood management and social impacts. Water New Zealand Tech J:44–47

Sadeghi S, Sharifi Teshnizi E, Ghoreishi B (2020) Correlations between various rock mass classification / characterization systems for the Zagros tunnel–W Iran. J Mt Sci 17:1790–1806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5665-7CrossRef

Sauter M (1992) Quantification and forecasting of regional groundwater flow and transport in a karst aquifer (Gallusquelle, Malm, SW Germany). Tubinger Geowissenschaftliche Arbeiten, Part C 13:151

Shayib MA (2013) Applied Statistics. 1st edition, 300 p. ISBN: 978-87-403-0493-0

Shi S, Bu L, Li S, Xiong Z, Xie X, Li L, Zhou Z, Xu Z, Ma D (2017) Application of comprehensive prediction method of water inrush hazards induced by unfavorable geological body in high risk karst tunnel: a case study. Geomatics, Nat Hazards Risk 8(2):1407–1423. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1337656CrossRef

Stevanović Z (2015) Engineering regulation of karstic spring flow to improve water sources in critical dry periods. In: Stevanović Z (Ed) Karst aquifers– characterization and engineering. Series: Professional Practice in Earth Science. Springer Intern. Publ. Switzerland, 490–530.

Stevanović Z, Jemcov I, Milanović S (2007) Management of karst aquifers in Serbia for water supply. Environ Geol 51(5):743–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0393-zCrossRef

Stevanović Z, Milanović S, Ristić V (2010) Supportive methods for assessing effective porosity and regulating karst aquifers. Acta Carsol 39(2):313–329. https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v39i2.102CrossRef

Taneeb (2005) Hsuehshan Tunnel. Taiwan Area National Expressway Engineering Bureau, Taiwan

van Tongeren OF (1995) Data analysis or simulation model: a critical evaluation of some methods. Ecol Model 78(1-2):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(94)00117-ZCrossRef

Vigna B, Fioraso G, Banzato C, De Waele J (2010a) Evolution of karst in Messinian gypsum (Monferrato, Northern Italy). Geodin Acta 23(1–3):29–40. https://doi.org/10.3166/ga.23.29-40CrossRef

Vigna B, Fiorucci A, Banzato C, Forti P, De Waele J (2010b) Hypogene gypsum karst and sinkhole formation at Moncalvo (Asti, Italy). Z Geomorphol, Supplementary Issues 54(2):285–306. https://doi.org/10.1127/0372-8854/2010/0054S2-0015CrossRef

Waltham AC, Smart PL (1988) Civil engineering difficulties in the karst of China. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 21(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.qjeg.1988.021.01.01CrossRef

Wang G, You G, Xu Y (2008) Investigation on the Nanjing Gypsum Mine Flooding. In: Liu H, Deng A, Chu J (eds) Geotechnical Engineering for Disaster Mitigation and Rehabilitation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 920–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79846-0_121CrossRef

Wang Y, Yin X, Geng F, Jing H, Su H, Liu R (2017) Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels based on the efficacy coefficient method. Pol J Environ Stud 26(4):1765–1775. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/65839CrossRef

White WB (2002) Karst hydrology: recent developments and open questions. Eng Geol 65(2-3):85–105, Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00116-8CrossRef

Xu J, Huang S (1996) Mechanism of burst mud and spring water of the Dayaoshan tunnel. J Railway Eng Soc 2:83–89 (In Chinese)

Zhang N, Zheng Q, Elbaz K, Xu Y-S (2020) Water inrush hazards in the Chaoyang Tunnel, Guizhou, China: a preliminary investigation. Water 12(4):1083. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041083CrossRef

Zhao Y, Li P, Tian S (2013) Prevention and treatment technologies of railway tunnel water inrush and mud gushing in China. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5(6):468–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.07.009CrossRef

Zini L, Calligaris C, Cucchi F (2015) The challenge of tunneling through Mediterranean karst aquifers: The case study of Trieste (Italy). Environ Earth Sci 74(1):281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4165-5CrossRef

Titel: A new analytical method for determination of discharge duration in tunnels subjected to groundwater inrush
verfasst von: Mohsen Golian
Ebrahim Sharifi Teshnizi
Mario Parise
Josip Terzić
Sasa Milanović
Vesna Ristić Vakanjac
Masoud Mahdad
Mehdi Abbasi
Hossein Taghikhani
Habib Saadat
Publikationsdatum: 20.02.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1435-9529
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-9537
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02140-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Experimental investigation on seepage erosion of the soil–rock interface

Comparison between baseline technique design and partial factor design in slope engineering

Cumulative permanent strain and critical dynamic stress of silty filler for subgrade subjected to intermittent cyclic loading of trains

Atmospheric and anthropogenic deterioration of the İvriz rock monument: Ereğli-Konya, Central Anatolia, Turkey

Characterization and correlation of engineering properties of basalts

Shear properties and pore structure characteristics of soil–rock mixture under freeze–thaw cycles