Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Neural Computing and Applications
Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications 9/2019

10.02.2018 | Original Article

A new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy pairwise comparison–compromise solution methodology: an application to cross-docking location planning

verfasst von: S. Meysam Mousavi

Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Cross-docking location-planning problem is recognized as one of the significant issues in logistics management. To address the issue, group decision-making methods are known as useful tools to evaluate the cross-docking location candidates under conflicted criteria regarding a group of logistics decision makers’ or experts’ judgments. In this respect, the decision can be appropriately made based on incomplete information within a framework of multi-attribute group decision analysis. Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets (IVHFSs) theory among new extensions of fuzzy sets theory is considered to assign some interval-valued membership degrees for cross-docking location candidates in terms of the selected criteria under a set to decrease the errors. Moreover, a new hierarchical decision methodology, namely IVHF-H-PC-CS, is designed under an uncertain environment by presenting an extended interval-valued hesitant fuzzy pairwise comparison (IVHF-PC) method for computing criteria’ weights and a new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy compromise solution (IVHF-CS) approach for ranking the cross-docking location candidates. Moreover, weights of logistics decision makers are calculated and considered in the procedure of proposed IVHF-H-PC-CS methodology to decrease the judgments’ errors. In addition, a hierarchical structure in defining the criteria could help the logistics experts to assess the cross-docking location-planning problem from many aspects. Also, the experts’ judgments are aggregated in the process of proposed interval-valued hesitant fuzzy decision methodology to avoid the data loss. Finally, a real application about the cross-docking location-planning problem is provided to show the suitability and feasibility of the proposed IVHF-H-PC-CS methodology. The obtained ranking results are compared with fuzzy decision-making methods from the recent literature to confirm the computational results of this study.
Vorheriger Artikel Removing ring artifacts in CBCT images via generative adversarial networks with unidirectional relative total variation loss
Nächster Artikel Rough set theory with Jaya optimization for acute lymphoblastic leukemia classification

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96CrossRef
2.
3.
4.
Boran FE, Akay D, Yager RR (2014) A probabilistic framework for interval type-2 fuzzy linguistic summarization. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:1640–1653CrossRef
5.
Çebi F, Otay İ (2015) Multi-criteria and multi-stage facility location selection under interval type-2 fuzzy environment: a case study for a cement factory. Int J Comput Intell Syst 8:330–344CrossRef
6.
Chen N, Zeshui X, Xia M (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 37:528–540CrossRef
7.
Devi K, Yadav SP (2013) A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for plant location selection with ELECTRE method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:1219–1229CrossRef
8.
Erdogan M (2015) An integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets for selection among energy alternatives in Turkey. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 12:1–25MathSciNet
9.
Farhadinia B (2013) Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 240:129–144MathSciNetCrossRef
10.
Fotea VL (2008) The direct and the inverse limit of hyperstructures associated with fuzzy sets of type 2. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 5:89–94MathSciNetMATH
11.
Gitinavard H, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B (2017) Soft computing-based new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group assessment method with last aggregation to industrial decision problems. Soft Comput 21(12):3247–3265CrossRef
12.
Gitinavard H, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B (2016) A new multi-criteria weighting and ranking model for group decision-making analysis based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets to selection problems. Neural Comput Appl 27:1593–1605CrossRef
13.
Gitinavard H, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B, Siadat A (2016) A distance-based decision model in interval-valued hesitant fuzzy setting for industrial selection problems. Sci Iran Trans E Ind Eng 23:1928–1940
14.
Gitinavard H, Makui A, Jabbarzadeh A (2016) Interval valued hesitant fuzzy method based on group decision analysis for estimating weights of decision makers. J Ind Syst Eng 9:96–110
15.
Gitinavard H, Zarandi MHF (2016) A mixed expert evaluation system and dynamic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy selection approach. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Math Comput Phys Electr Comput Eng 10:337–345
16.
Gümüş M, Bookbinder JH (2004) Cross-docking and its implications in location-distribution systems. J Bus Logist 25:199–228CrossRef
17.
Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Grover N (2016) Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making with an application to plant location selection based on a new extended VIKOR method. Inf Sci 370:184–203CrossRef
18.
Hao M, Mendel JM (2014) Similarity measures for general type-2 fuzzy sets based on the α-plane representation. Inf Sci 277:197–215MathSciNetCrossRef
19.
He Y, He Z, Shi L, Meng S (2016) Multiple attribute group decision making based on IVHFPBMs and a new ranking method for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information. Comput Ind Eng 99:63–77CrossRef
20.
Joshi D, Kumar S (2016) Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 248:183–191MathSciNetCrossRef
21.
22.
23.
Li X, Wei G (2014) GRA method for multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information under hesitant fuzzy setting. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:1095–1105MathSciNetMATH
24.
Liao H, Xu Z (2014) Some new hybrid weighted aggregation operators under hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making environment. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:1601–1617MathSciNetMATH
25.
Makui A, Haerian L, Eftekhar M (2006) Designing a multi-objective nonlinear cross-docking location allocation model using genetic algorithm. J Ind Eng Int 2:27–42
26.
Mendel JM (2015) On type-reduction versus direct defuzzification for type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In: Tamir D, Rishe N, Kandel A (eds) On type-reduction versus direct defuzzification for type-2 fuzzy logic systems, fifty years of fuzzy logic and its applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 387–399CrossRef
27.
28.
Meng F, Chen X (2014) An approach to interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making with incomplete weight information based on hybrid Shapley operators. Informatica 25:617–642CrossRef
29.
Miyamoto S (2000) Multisets and fuzzy multisets. In: Liu ZQ, Miyamoto S (eds) Multisets and fuzzy multisets, soft computing and human-centered machines. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–33CrossRef
30.
Mokhtarinejad M, Ahmadi A, Karimi B, Rahmati SHA (2015) A novel learning based approach for a new integrated location-routing and scheduling problem within cross-docking considering direct shipment. Appl Soft Comput 34:274–285CrossRef
31.
Mousavi M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2015) Group decision making based on a new evaluation method and hesitant fuzzy setting with an application to an energy planning problem. Int J Eng Trans C Asp 28(9):1303–1311
32.
Mousavi SM, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Jolai F (2013) A possibilistic programming approach for a location problem of multiple cross-docks and vehicle routing scheduling under uncertainty. Eng Optimi 45(10):1223–1249MathSciNetCrossRef
33.
Mousavi SM, Vahdani B (2016) Cross-docking location selection in distribution systems: a new intuitionistic fuzzy hierarchical decision model. Int J Comput Intell Syst 9:91–109CrossRef
34.
Nikravesh M, Zadeh LA (2004) Fuzzy partial differential equations and relational equations: reservoir characterization and modeling. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
35.
Quirós P, Alonso P, Bustince H, Díaz I, Montes S (2015) An entropy measure definition for finite interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Knowl Based Syst 84:121–133CrossRef
36.
Rajati MR, Mendel JM (2013) Modeling linguistic probabilities and linguistic quantifiers using interval type-2 fuzzy sets. In: IEEEI FSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), pp 327–332
37.
Ren Z, Zeshui X, Wang H (2017) Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method. Inf Sci 388:1–16CrossRef
38.
Rodríguez RM, Bedregal B, Bustince H, Dong YC, Farhadinia B, Kahraman C, Martínez L, Torra V, Xu YJ, Xu ZS (2016) A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making. Towards high quality progress. Inf Fusion 29:89–97CrossRef
39.
Sotudian S, Fazel Zarandi MH, Turksen IB (2016) From type-I to type-II fuzzy system modeling for diagnosis of hepatitis. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Comput Electr Autom Control Inf Eng 10:1280–1288
40.
Stephan K, Boysen N (2011) Cross-docking. J Manag Control 22:129–137CrossRef
41.
Tanaka H, Guo P, Zimmermann H-J (2000) Possibility distributions of fuzzy decision variables obtained from possibilistic linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 113:323–332MathSciNetCrossRef
42.
Temur GT, Kaya T, Kahraman C (2014) Facility location selection in reverse logistics using a type-2 fuzzy decision aid method. In: Kahraman C, Öztayşi B (eds) Supply chain management under fuzziness. Springer, Berlin, pp 591–606CrossRef
43.
Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539MATH
44.
Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 1378–1382
45.
46.
47.
48.
Vahdani B, Salimi M, Mousavi SM (2015) A compromise decision-making model based on VIKOR for multi-objective large-scale nonlinear programming problems with a block angular structure under uncertainty. Sci Iran E 22(6):2571–2584
49.
Vahdani B, Salimi M, Mousavi SM (2017) A new compromise solution model based on Dantzig–Wolf decomposition for solving belief multi-objective nonlinear programming problems with block angular structure. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 16(2):333–387CrossRef
50.
Wang J, Wang J, Zhang H, Chen X (2016) Multi-criteria group decision-making approach based on 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators with multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Fuzzy Syst 18(1):81–97MathSciNetCrossRef
51.
Wei G, Zhao X, Lin R (2013) Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl Based Syst 46:43–53CrossRef
52.
Wu D, Mendel JM (2007) Aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:1145–1161CrossRef
53.
Xia M, Xu Z (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52:395–407MathSciNetCrossRef
54.
Xia M, Zeshui X, Chen N (2013) Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Decis Negot 22:259–279CrossRef
55.
Xu Z, Yager RR (2008) Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Int J Approx Reason 48:246–262CrossRef
56.
Xu Z, Yager RR (2009) Intuitionistic and interval-valued intutionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 8:123–139MathSciNetCrossRef
57.
Xu Z, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35:417–433MathSciNetCrossRef
58.
Xu Z, Zhang X (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl Based Syst 52:53–64CrossRef
59.
Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18:183–190MathSciNetCrossRef
60.
Yager RR (2016) Multicriteria decision making with ordinal/linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets for mobile apps. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 24:590–599CrossRef
61.
62.
Zadeh LA, Yager R (1999) Development of fuzzy logic and soft computing methodologies. NASA Technical Report, NASA Ames Research Center
63.
Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Inf Sci 8:199–249MathSciNetCrossRef
64.
Zadeh LA (1994) Soft computing and fuzzy logic. IEEE Softw 11:48–56CrossRef
65.
Zadeh LA (1997) Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst 90:111–127MathSciNetCrossRef
66.
Zadeh LA (1999) A new direction in fuzzy logic-toward a computational theory of perceptions. In: Fuzzy information processing society, NAFIPS. 18th international conference of the North American, pp 1–4
67.
68.
Zarandi MF, Khadangi A, Karimi F, Turksen IB (2016) A computer-aided type-II fuzzy image processing for diagnosis of meniscus tear. J Digit Imaging 29:677–695CrossRef
69.
Zarandi MF, Rezaee B, Turksen IB, Neshat E (2009) A type-2 fuzzy rule-based expert system model for stock price analysis. Expert Syst Appl 36:139–154CrossRef
70.
Zarandi MF, Turksen IB, Torabi Kasbi O (2007) Type-2 fuzzy modeling for desulphurization of steel process. Expert Syst Appl 32:157–171CrossRef
71.
Zhang Z (2013) Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 234:150–181MathSciNetCrossRef
72.
Zhang Z (2017) Hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making with unknown weight information. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19(3):615–636MathSciNetCrossRef
73.
Zhang Z, Wang C, Tian D, Li K (2014) Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 67:116–138CrossRef
74.
Zimmermann H-J (1978) Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:45–55MathSciNetCrossRef
75.
76.
Zimmermann H-J (2011) Fuzzy set theory—and its applications. Springer, Berlin
77.
Zimmermann H-J (2012) Fuzzy sets, decision making, and expert systems. Springer, Berlin
Metadaten
Titel
A new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy pairwise comparison–compromise solution methodology: an application to cross-docking location planning
verfasst von
S. Meysam Mousavi
Publikationsdatum
10.02.2018
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Neural Computing and Applications / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3355-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

Neural Computing and Applications 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Three-operator splitting scheme with the reference image regularization for electrical capacitance tomography

S.I. : Emergence in Human-like Intelligence towards Cyber-Physical Systems

Open-circuit fault detection for three-phase inverter based on backpropagation neural network

S.I. : Emergence in Human-like Intelligence towards Cyber-Physical Systems

Forest fire forecasting using ensemble learning approaches

S.I. : Emergence in Human-like Intelligence towards Cyber-Physical Systems

Research on partial fingerprint recognition algorithm based on deep learning

Original Article

A neural network-based method for coverage measurement of shot-peened panels

Original Article

Frequency-constrained unit commitment problem with considering dynamic ramp rate limits in the presence of wind power generation