nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

15.01.2021

A new model for the factors that affect interactive whiteboard usage of teachers and its effect on performance

verfasst von: Şule Betül Tosuntaş, Zühal Çubukçu, Gary Beauchamp

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to investigate teachers’ acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard (IWB), technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), transition to use IWB effects on teacher performance. A causal pattern was used based on the structural equation model established the causal relationship between the factors in the study. The study group of the study consisted of 305 teachers who worked in primary, secondary and high school in Turkey. Data were collected via 4 scales as Acceptance and Use of IWB Scale, TPACK Practical Scale, IWB Transition Framework Scale, and Teacher Performance Scale. In the analysis of the data were used simple linear regression analysis, multiple regression analysis and structural equation model was tested with path analysis. TPACK has positive effects on acceptance and use of IWB and teacher performance; acceptance and use of IWB has positive effects on IWB transition and teacher performance; IWB transition has a positive effect on teacher performance. These findings showed that a model based on the relationship between teacher performance and teachers’ acceptance and use of IWB, TPACK, IWB transition can be created. In the context of technology integration, it is concluded that teacher performance is related to TPACK, acceptance and use of IWB, IWB transition. In this respect, it can be said that the TPACK and IWB usage are positively reflected on their performance. From these results, may conjecture that is important to have TPACK and use IWB in the development of teacher performance.

Vorheriger Artikel Assistive technology in large-scale assessments for students with visual impairments: A systematic review and recommendations based on the Brazilian reality

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670.CrossRef

Albaaly, E., & Higgins, S. (2012). The impact of IWB technology on medical students’ achievement in ESL essay writing: An early study in Egypt. The Language Learning Journal, 40(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2010.543953.CrossRef

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170.CrossRef

Ay, Y. (2015). Evaluation of teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) within the framework of practical model (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Eskişehir: Eskişehir Osmangazi University.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn't happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ723724.

Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboards in primary schools: Towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390400200186.CrossRef

Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: Developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86(316), 97–103 http://www.ase.org.uk/journals/school-science-review/2005/03/316/?

Behrend, T. S., Wiebe, E. N., London, J. E., & Johnson, E. C. (2011). Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2010.489118.CrossRef

Belland, B. R. (2009). Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration. Computers & Education, 52, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.004.CrossRef

Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., & Gao, P. (2009). Student teachers’ intentions and actions on integrating technology into their classrooms during student teaching: A Singapore study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 175–195 https://www.learntechlib.org/p/108580/.CrossRef

Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004813.CrossRef

Eğitimi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi (EARGED). (2006). Okulda performans yönetimi modeli. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi Müdürlüğü.

Erbas, A. K., Ince, M., & Kaya, S. (2015). Learning mathematics with interactive whiteboards and computer-based graphing utility. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 299–312 https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.2.299.

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.CrossRef

Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00118.x.CrossRef

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5.CrossRef

Hsu, H. H. (2012). The acceptance of moodle: An empirical study based on UTAUT. Creative Education, 3, 44–46. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38b010.CrossRef

Hur, J. W., Shannon, D., & Wolf, S. (2016). An investigation of relationships between internal and external factors affecting technology integration in classrooms. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(3), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1169959.CrossRef

Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.004.CrossRef

Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y.CrossRef

Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (2013). Model Core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0: A resource for ongoing teacher development. Council of Chief State Schools Officers, 4(18), Washington, DC. http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Programs/Interstate_Teacher_Assessment_Consortium_(InTASC).html.

Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55, 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022.CrossRef

Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.

Jones, A., & Vincent, J. (2010). Collegial mentoring for effective whole school professional development in the use of IWB technologies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.1066.CrossRef

Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51. Mooresville: Scientific Software.

Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005.CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.MATH

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2005.10784518.CrossRef

Kopcha, T. J., & Sullivan, H. (2007). Self-presentation bias in surveys of teachers’ educational technology practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 627–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9011-8.CrossRef

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921.CrossRef

Lim, C. P. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9025-2.CrossRef

Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer mediated classroom lesson. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00774.x.CrossRef

Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1012–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.001.CrossRef

Marzano, R. J. (2009). Teaching with interactive whiteboards. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 80–82 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED577573.pdf.

Ministry of National Education. (2008). Teacher competencies. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.

Ministry of National Education. (2017). Ministry of National Education FATİH Project. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.CrossRef

Neuman, L, W. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Essex: Pearson.

Pamuk, S., Çakır, R., Ergun, M., Yılmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). The use of tablet PC and interactive board from the perspectives of teachers and students: Evaluation of the FATIH project. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1799–1822. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1734.CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.CrossRef

Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C. E., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.024.CrossRef

Sidik, D., & Syafar, F. (2020). Exploring the factors influencing student’s intention to use mobile learning in Indonesia higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4781–4796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10018-0.

Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x.CrossRef

Sweeney, T. (2008). Transforming learning with interactiue whiteboards: Towards a developmental framework. Australian Educational Computing, 23(2), 24–31 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ898053.

Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers' computer attitudes: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00247.x.CrossRef

Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Karadağ, E., & Orhan, S. (2015). The factors affecting acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard within the scope of FATIH project: A structural equation model based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Computers & Education, 81, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.009.CrossRef

Van Laer, S., Beauchamp, G., & Colpaert, J. (2014). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboards in Flemish secondary education—Mapping against a transition framework. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9228-6.CrossRef

Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001.CrossRef

Vanderlinde, R., & Van Braak, J. (2010). The e-capacity of primary schools: Development of a conceptual model and scale construction from a school improvement perspective. Computers & Education, 55(2), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.016.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M, G., Davis, G, B., & Davis, F, D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.

Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2017). TPACK in teacher education: Are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730.CrossRef

Whyte, S., & Alexander, J. (2014). Implementing tasks with interactive technologies in classroom computer assisted language learning (CALL): Towards a developmental framework. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 40(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2TG6J.CrossRef

Yeh, Y., Hsu, Y., Wu, H., Hwang, F., & Lin, T. (2013). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078.CrossRef

Titel: A new model for the factors that affect interactive whiteboard usage of teachers and its effect on performance
verfasst von: Şule Betül Tosuntaş
Zühal Çubukçu
Gary Beauchamp
Publikationsdatum: 15.01.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10428-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Are teachers techno-optimists or techno-pessimists? A pilot comparative among teachers in Bolivia, Brazil, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Finland, Poland, Turkey, and Uruguay

Self-regulated learning and satisfaction: A key determinants of MOOC success

Pre-service teacher’s self-perception of digital literacy: The case of Israel

Effective measures to foster girls’ interest in secondary computer science education

Implementing dynamicity in research designs for collaborative digital writing

Correction to: Problem-based gaming via an augmented reality mobile game and a printed game in foreign language education