Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
In the present times, due to increase in customer demands, products complexity is on the rise. This calls for the designers to strike a balance between a wide range of design alternatives and a large set of conflicting criteria. Hence, to take a sound decision by identifying a viable combination of customer requirements and satisfy the conflicting requirements is a difficult task for both the designer and the manufacturer. This work extends the axiomatic design theory to align the customer requirements (CRs) and design parameters (DPs) and generates multiple possible design alternatives based on the weightages of analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Such design alternatives are evaluated on the basis of their overall performance in line with the expected customer attributes, and the best design is identified by integrating the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution, a ranking multi-criteria decision-making method, with AHP. This work unfolds a support tool for decision makers to accurately and effectively select CRs by a useful aggregation of function requirements and DPs. An industrial example is produced to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method. This intelligent decision-making method is useful from the customers as well as the manufacturers’ perspective.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Albayrak, E., & Erensal, Y. C. (2004). Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 15(4), 491–503. CrossRef
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051–13069. CrossRef
Bhutia, P. W., & Phipon, R. (2012). Application of ahp and topsis method for supplier selection problem. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), 2, 43–50. CrossRef
Cui, A. S., & Wu, F. (2015). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: Antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 1–23.
Dağdeviren, M. (2008). Decision making in equipment selection: An integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(4), 397–406. CrossRef
Do, S. H., & Park, G. J. (2001). Application of design axioms for glass bulb design and software development for design automation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 123(3), 322–329. CrossRef
Gu, P., Rao, H. A., & Tseng, M. M. (2001). Systematic design of manufacturing systems based on axiomatic design approach. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 50(1), 299–304.
Guan, X., Wang, Y., & Tao, L. (2009). Machining scheme selection of digital manufacturing based on genetic algorithm and AHP. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20(6), 661–669. CrossRef
Han, W. J., & Tsay, W. D. (1998). Formulation of quality strategy using analytic hierarchy process. In Twenty seven annual meeting of the western decision science institute, University of Northern Colorado, USA, pp. 580–583.
Harding, J. A., Popplewell, K., Fung, R. Y., & Omar, A. R. (2001). An intelligent information framework relating customer requirements and product characteristics. Computers in Industry, 44(1), 51–65. CrossRef
Hirani, H., & Suh, N. P. (2005). Journal bearing design using multiobjective genetic algorithm and axiomatic design approaches. Tribology International, 38(5), 481–491. CrossRef
Hua Lu, M., Madu, C. N., Kuei, C. H., & Winokur, D. (1994). Integrating QFD, AHP and benchmarking in strategic marketing. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 9(1), 41–50. CrossRef
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (Vol. 186, pp. 58–191). Springer, Berlin.
Junior, F. R. L., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194–209. CrossRef
Kim, G., Park, C. S., & Yoon, K. P. (1997). Identifying investment opportunities for advanced manufacturing systems with comparative-integrated performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 50(1), 23–33. CrossRef
Kremer, G. O., Chiu, M. C., Lin, C. Y., Gupta, S., Claudio, D., & Thevenot, H. (2012). Application of axiomatic design, TRIZ, and mixed integer programming to develop innovative designs: A locomotive ballast arrangement case study. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 61(5–8), 827–842. CrossRef
Krishnapillai, R., & Zeid, A. (2006). Mapping product design specification for mass customization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(1), 29–43. CrossRef
Kumar, A., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega, 42(1), 109–123. CrossRef
Kusiak, A. (1999). Engineering design: Products, processes, and systems. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lin, M. C., Wang, C. C., Chen, M. S., & Chang, C. A. (2008). Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Computers in Industry, 59(1), 17–31. CrossRef
Park, K., Kang, B., Song, K., & Park, G. (2003). Design of a spacer grid using axiomatic design. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 40(12), 989–997. CrossRef
Saaty, L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. CrossRef
Sharma, S., & Balan, S. (2013). An integrative supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS and multi criteria goal programming. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(6), 1123–1130. CrossRef
Shih, H. S., Shyur, H. J., & Lee, E. S. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7), 801–813. CrossRef
Shirwaiker, R. A., & Okudan, G. E. (2008). Triz and axiomatic design: A review of case-studies and a proposed synergistic use. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(1), 33–47. CrossRef
Suh, N. P. (1990). The principles of design (Vol. 990). New York: Oxford University Press.
Suh, N. P. (2005). Complexity: Theory and applications. New York: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Lee, C. K., & Li, D. (2015). A hierarchical model for eco-design of consumer electronic products. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21(1), 48–64. CrossRef
Yang, K., & Zhang, H. (2000). Compatibility analysis and case studies of axiomatic design and TRIZ. The TRIZ Journal. http://www.triz-journal.com.
- A paradigm for customer-driven product design approach using extended axiomatic design
- Springer US
- Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Print ISSN: 0956-5515
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8145
in-adhesives, MKVS, Neuer Inhalt/© Zühlke, Künstliche Intelligenz und die Potenziale des maschinellen Lernens für die Industrie/© zapp2photo / stock.adobe.com