Zum Inhalt

A Personal Journey in Decision Sciences and Engineering Systems

  • Open Access
  • 14.09.2025
  • Original Article
Erschienen in:

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Dieser Artikel geht auf eine persönliche Reise durch Entscheidungswissenschaften und Ingenieursysteme ein und beleuchtet wichtige Meilensteine im Bildungsbereich, eine herausragende Karriere und strategische Investitionen. Der Autor teilt seine Erfahrungen mit renommierten Institutionen wie dem MIT und dem RPI, seine Rollen bei führenden Unternehmen und seine bedeutenden Beiträge zur akademischen Welt. Der Text untersucht die Konvergenz von Datenanalyse, Modellierung, Betriebsforschung und technischen Systemen, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf der Entscheidungsfindung in Echtzeit und der Integration von IoT, KI und autonomen Fahrzeugen liegt. Es bietet auch Einblicke in erfolgreiche Investitionen in Technologiegiganten wie Microsoft, Apple und NVIDIA und diskutiert die Zukunftsaussichten in großen Rechenzentren und effizienten Energiequellen. Der Artikel schließt mit einer zukunftsorientierten Perspektive auf die Herausforderungen und Chancen beim Management von KI-Anwendungen und betont die Notwendigkeit von Betriebs-, Energie-, Leistungs- und Skaleneffizienz.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The author was born on March 27, 1945, in the City of New York where his China-born parents were sent by the then nationalist Chiang Kai-Shek government to negotiate with the United States government for a post-World War II Marshall Plan for China; the Plan was a generous American initiative enacted in 1948 to provide U. S. financial aid to the war-torn allies of World War II. Although it was agreed that China would be a part of the Marshall Plan, unfortunately it was not to be since China’s communist party, under the leadership of Mao Zedong, defeated Chiang’s government in 1949. Later, the author’s parents, together with his four siblings and two grandparents, emigrated to Sao Paulo, Brasil, in 1950, followed by a subsequent emigration to New York in 1959.
As indicated in Table 1, the author began his formal education at two English boarding schools; first at Escola Britannica in Sao Paulo, Brasil, and then at the Stony Brook School in Stony Brook, New York, USA. He then enrolled in electrical engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in 1966. He subsequently expanded his engineering systems focus to encompass decision making with a 1972 doctoral degree in operations research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Table 1
DSES-Related Education (27 Years)
Focus
Period
Location
Institution/Degree
Birth Date
March 27, 1945
New York, USA
-
Pre-K
1946-1949
Jilin, China
-
Elementary
1950-1959
Sao Paulo, Brasil
Escola Britannica
Secondary
1959-1962
Stony Brook, USA
Stony Brook School for Boys
Bachelor
1962-1966
Troy, New York, USA
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute/BSEE’66
Master
1966-1967
Cambridge, MA, USA
Massachusetts Institute of Technology/MSEE’67
Doctoral
1969-1972
Cambridge, MA, USA
Massachusetts Institute of Technology/PhD OR’72
Coincident with his educational endeavors, the author obtained employment at four decision sciences and engineering systems (DSES) related companies - Bell Telephone Laboratories, The Rand Corporation, Urban Systems Research and Engineering, and Structured Decisions Corporation. These four early jobs helped sharpen his academic interests in research and education, after which he sought and obtained 48 years of employment at two well-regarded universities: 30 years at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and 18 years at the University of Miami. Moreover, his tenure at these academies were, at RPI, as 1) the founding chair of a nationally-ranked department of decision sciences and engineering systems (alternatively - and sometimes - referred to as department of industrial and systems engineering); and 2) Yamada Professor, named after the founder of Yamada Corporation; and then, at UM, as 3) Distinguished Professor; 4) Dean of Engineering; and 5) University Ombudsperson.
In parallel with the two professorial positions, the author was elected to the covetous US National Academy of Engineering (NAE) in 2001 and later served as Chair of NAE Section 8 and as the NAE International Secretary. (Table 2)
Table 2
DSES-Related Employment (53 Years)
Employer
Period
Location
Rank
Bell Telephone Laboratories
1966-1969
Holmdel, NJ
Member of Technical Staff
The Rand Corporation
1969-1972
New York, NY
Staff Scientist
Urban Systems Research
1972-1975
Cambridge, MA
Project Engineer
Structured Decisions Corporation
1975-2014
Cambridge, MA
Area Engineer; Program Engineer
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
1977-2007
Troy, NY
Founding DSES Department Chair 1988-2007; Yamada Professor
University of Miami
2007-2025
Coral Gables, FL
Distinguished Professor; Dean of Engineering; U Ombudsperson
National Academy of Engineering
Elected 2001
Washington, DC
NAE Section 8 Chair; NAE International Secretary
Section 3 identifies the DSES-related pragmatic attributes that have combined to provide the author with a valuable education and a productive employment. Data analysis, data modeling, operations research [4, 5], optimization and risk, and big data analytics are decision sciences related attributes, while software systems, hardware systems, communication systems, internet of things [13], and intelligent systems are engineering systems related attributes.
Thus, a Covid-19 analysis ranging from the epidemic, pandemic, and endemic phases is considered; the fourth industrial revolution focusing on real-time customization is considered; and the application of technology to healthcare is likewise considered. Additionally, the convergence to real-time decision making; the integration of internet of things, real-time decision making, and artificial intelligence is considered in a combined manner; and autonomous vehicles are regarded as the sputnik of servgoods (which is a combination of a service and a good). (Table 3)
Table 3
DSES-Related Attributes
Decision Sciences (DS) Attributes
Engineering Systems (ES) Attributes
Data Analysis: arithmetic manipulations; algebraic manipulations
Software Systems: architecture; design; symbolic manipulations
Data Modeling: basic analysis; predictive analysis and modeling
Hardware Systems: architecture; design; physical devices/memories
Operations Research: integer programming; linear programming; stochastic programming
Communication Systems: First Generation (1G); Fifth Generation (5G)
Optimization & Risk: application of mathematics to improve portfolio performance and minimize risk
Internet of Things: devices; goods; systems; internet protocols
Big Data Analytics: examining diverse data sets to extract meaningful information
Intelligent Systems: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI); Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)
In regard to investments, the author has likewise employed his DSES-related skills to make DSES-related investments or stock purchases; the purchases have not only been profitable but have also contributed to the author’s personal wealth. While some of his stocks have yielded minimal growth or have sometimes regressed to a zero value, it should be noted that three of his DSES-related investments - namely, in MSFT, AAPL and NVDA - have yielded high positive returns. Indeed, the three stocks identified in Table 4 are now the author’s highest valued technology investments, each is currently market valued at over a three trillion dollars! To be truthful, although the author was able to accumulate a significant amount of MSFT and AAPL in the 1990s, he was initially too stretched (i.e., too over-committed) to purchase more shares of both MSFT and AAPL. On the other hand, because he had early focus on NVDA, starting in 2018 and at an initial cost of $3.18 a share, he was able to accumulate a larger amount of NVDA shares.
Prospectively, the author foresees a continuation of DSES-related investments. However, in the next phase of such investments, there must be larger data centers with perhaps novel processing units, or a combination of processing units, including central processing units (CPUs), intelligence processing units (IPUs) and graphical processing units (GPUs). More importantly, the large AI data centers must be powered by more efficient and effective energy sources, including wind, solar, ocean waves, and perhaps even nuclear fusion or enhanced geothermal systems (EGS).
There are a range of challenges in the management of AI applications. First, there is concern about data quality. How can we ensure that the volume and variety of data feeding AI are accurate, so that the AI-provided answers are also accurate? Security challenges arise when applying governance practices to large amounts of data, including maintaining a clear “chain of custody and compliance”. Training performance and inference performance are related concerns; to return accurate results. AI models require training, which in turn requires fast and accurate processing for large data sets. Performance for inference means getting outputs as efficiently as possible to applications and users. Inference performance is especially critical for real-time situations, like self-driving vehicles. Indeed, the sheer volume, velocity and variety of data consumed and created by AI will always present problems of scale.
In particular, four areas are ripe for efficiency improvements. First, operational efficiency, implying that fewer people must manage larger amounts of data. Second, energy efficiency, allowing for storage growth within an existing power footprint and at a reduced operating cost. Third, performance efficiency, implying high throughput and low latency for both training and inference of AI applications. Fourth, scale efficiency, allowing organizations to quickly and non-disruptively scale up, adding storage devices to existing arrays, or scale out, adding networked storage nodes, to meet the growing demands of AI data and workloads. Efficient scaling must occur in a transparent manner, eliminating any costly downtime or performance impact.
As a consequence, modern storage platforms seamlessly tie storage systems together to provide scale efficiency while increasing operational, energy and performance efficiency.
Table 4
DSES-Related Investments
Stock
Founded
Founders
Technical Focus
2025 Valuation
MSFT
1975
Bill Gates; Paul Allen
Central Processing Units
$ 3.189 T
AAPL
1976
Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, Ronald Wayne
Intelligence Processing Units
$ 3.458 T
NVDA
2018
Jensen Huang, Curtis Priem (RPI BSEE‘82), Chris Malachowsky
Graphical Processing Units
$ 3.373 T
Future
2030s
Large Data Centers with possibly novel processing units
Efficient/effective energy sources
???

Declarations

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest in the manuscript.

Ethical Approval

This study does not involve ethical considerations and does not require ethical approval.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Titel
A Personal Journey in Decision Sciences and Engineering Systems
Verfasst von
James M. Tien
Publikationsdatum
14.09.2025
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Annals of Data Science / Ausgabe 6/2025
Print ISSN: 2198-5804
Elektronische ISSN: 2198-5812
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-025-00639-3
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien JM (2017) Internet of things, real-time decision making, and artificial intelligence. Annals of Data Science 4:149–178CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien JM (2017) The sputnik of servgoods: Autonomous vehicles. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 26:133–162CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien JM (2020) Convergence to real-time decision making. Frontiers of Engineering Management 7(2):204–222CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien JM (2020) Toward the fourth industrial revolution on real-time customization. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 29(2):127–142CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien JM (2024) Decisions related to covid-19 epidemic, pandemic, and endemic phases. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 23(01):5–15. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622023400011CrossRef
Bildnachweise
Schmalkalden/© Schmalkalden, NTT Data/© NTT Data, Verlagsgruppe Beltz/© Verlagsgruppe Beltz, EGYM Wellpass GmbH/© EGYM Wellpass GmbH, rku.it GmbH/© rku.it GmbH, zfm/© zfm, ibo Software GmbH/© ibo Software GmbH, Lorenz GmbH/© Lorenz GmbH, Axians Infoma GmbH/© Axians Infoma GmbH, genua GmbH/© genua GmbH, Prosoz Herten GmbH/© Prosoz Herten GmbH, Stormshield/© Stormshield, MACH AG/© MACH AG, OEDIV KG/© OEDIV KG, Rundstedt & Partner GmbH/© Rundstedt & Partner GmbH, Doxee AT GmbH/© Doxee AT GmbH