Skip to main content
Registrieren
Springer Professional
SUCHE
MENÜ 1 2 3 4
nach oben

Tipp

Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in:
Improving Scholarly Knowledge Representation: Evaluating BERT-Based Models for Scientific Relation Classification Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Predictive Model for Citizens’ Utilization of Open Government Data Portals

verfasst von : Di Wang, Deborah Richards, Ayse Aysin Bilgin, Chuanfu Chen

Erschienen in: Digital Libraries at Times of Massive Societal Transition

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
share
TEILEN

Abstract

Open government data (OGD) initiatives for building OGD portals have not yet delivered the expected benefits of OGD to the whole of society. Although citizens’ reluctance to use OGD has become a key problem in the present OGD development, limited studies have been carried out to investigate citizens’ actual usage of OGD and OGD portals. In order to fill this research gap, this study primarily focuses on predicting citizens’ actual utilization of OGD portals. To find features influencing citizens’ utilization of OGD portals and to predict their actual usage of OGD portals, an experiment was designed and carried out in China. A predictive model was built with C5.0 algorithm based on data collected through the experiment, with a predictive accuracy rate of 84.81%. Citizens’ monthly income, the compatibility of OGD portals, and citizens’ attentiveness regarding their interactions with OGD portals are found to be the most important factors influencing citizens’ actual utilization of OGD portals. Positive effects of compatibility, attentiveness, and perceived usefulness on citizens’ usage of OGD portals are noticed.
Vorheriges Kapitel Identification of Research Data References Based on Citation Contexts
Nächstes Kapitel Extracting User Interests from Operation Logs on Museum Devices for Post-Learning
Literatur
1.
Attard, J., et al.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 399–418 (2015) CrossRef
2.
Graves-Fuenzalida, A.: Improving the use of open government data using visualizations, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (2013)
3.
4.
Cranefield, J., Robertson, O., Oliver, G.: Value in the mash: Exploring the benefits, barriers and enablers of open data apps (2014)
5.
Horrigan, J.B., Rainie, L., Page, D.: Americans’ views on open government data. Pew Research Center (2015)
6.
OpenDataBarometer: Open Data Barometer Leaders Edition: From Promise to Progress (2018)
7.
Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., Horsburgh, S.: Do they want it? Do they use it? The ‘demand-side’of e-government in Australia and New Zealand. Gov. Inf. Q. 27(2), 177–186 (2010) CrossRef
8.
9.
Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Meijer, A.: Open data for democracy: developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Gov. Inf. Q. 34(1), 45–52 (2017) CrossRef
10.
Safarov, I., Meijer, A., Grimmelikhuijsen, S.: Utilization of open government data: a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Inf. Polity 22, 1–24 (2017) CrossRef
11.
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manage. 29(4), 258–268 (2012) CrossRef
12.
Ubaldi, B.: Open government data: towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, no. 22, p. 1 (2013)
13.
Kassen, M.: A promising phenomenon of open data: a case study of the Chicago open data project. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 508–513 (2013) CrossRef
14.
15.
16.
Huang, Z., Benyoucef, M.: Usability and credibility of e-government websites. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(4), 584–595 (2014) CrossRef
17.
Ruijer, E., et al.: Connecting societal issues, users and data scenario-based design of open data platforms. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 470–480 (2017) CrossRef
18.
Wang, H.-J., Lo, J.: Adoption of open government data among government agencies. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(1), 80–88 (2016) CrossRef
19.
Carter, L., Belanger, F.: Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004). IEEE
20.
Chuttur, M.Y.: Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Working Papers Inf. Syst. 9(37): 9–37 (2009)
21.
Zhang, S., et al.: A predictive model for assistive technology adoption for people with dementia. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 18(1), 375–383 (2013) CrossRef
22.
King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43(6), 740–755 (2006) CrossRef
23.
Parycek, P., Hochtl, J., Ginner, M.: Open government data implementation evaluation. J. Theoret. Appl. Electron. Commerce Res. 9(2), 80–99 (2014) CrossRef
24.
Power, R., et al.: Scenario planning case studies using open government data. In: ISESS (2015)
25.
Magalhaes, G., Roseira, C., Manley, L.: Business models for open government data. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (2014). ACM
26.
Susha, I., Grönlund, Å., Janssen, M.: Driving factors of service innovation using open government data: an exploratory study of entrepreneurs in two countries. Inf. Polity 20(1), 19–34 (2015) CrossRef
27.
Gonzalez-Zapata, F., Heeks, R.: The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 441–452 (2015) CrossRef
28.
Whitmore, A.: Using open government data to predict war: a case study of data and systems challenges. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(4), 622–630 (2014) CrossRef
29.
Veeckman, C., van der Graaf, S.: The city as living laboratory: empowering citizens with the citadel toolkit. Technol. Innovation Manage. Rev. 5(3) (2015)
30.
Heise, A., Naumann, F.: Integrating open government data with stratosphere for more transparency. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 14, 45–56 (2012) CrossRef
31.
Murillo, M.J.: Evaluating the role of online data availability: the case of economic and institutional transparency in sixteen Latin American nations. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 36(1), 42–59 (2015) CrossRef
32.
Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, M.D.: Demographic influence on UK citizens’e-government adoption. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 5(3), 261–274 (2008)
33.
Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T.A., Venkatraman, S.: Understanding e-Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics. Inf. Syst. J. 24(3), 249–269 (2014) CrossRef
34.
Venkatesh, V., et al.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003) CrossRef
35.
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York (2010)
36.
Carter, L., Bélanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf. Syst. J. 15(1), 5–25 (2005) CrossRef
37.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000) CrossRef
38.
Wu, P.F.: User acceptance of emergency alert technology: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference (2009)
39.
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989) CrossRef
40.
Sang, S., Lee, J.-D., Lee, J.: E-government adoption in ASEAN: the case of Cambodia. Internet Research 19(5), 517–534 (2009) CrossRef
41.
Taherdoost, H.: A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufact. 22, 960–967 (2018) CrossRef
42.
Belanger, F., Hiller, J.S., Smith, W.J.: Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 11(3–4), 245–270 (2002) CrossRef
43.
Lim, E.T., et al.: Advancing public trust relationships in electronic government: the Singapore e-filing journey. Inf. Syst. Res. 23(4), 1110–1130 (2012) CrossRef
44.
Venkatesh, V., et al.: Managing citizens’ uncertainty in e-government services: the mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Inf. Syst. Res. 27(1), 87–111 (2016) CrossRef
45.
McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., Kacmar, C.: Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(3), 334–359 (2002) CrossRef
46.
Cassell, J.: Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT press, Cambridge (2000) CrossRef
47.
Tickle-Degnen, L., Rosenthal, R.: The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychol. Inq. 1(4), 285–293 (1990) CrossRef
48.
Wei-Ern, J.W.: Establishing Rapport with Conversational Agents: Comparing the Effect of Envelope and Emotional Feedback (2012)
49.
50.
Atkinson, N.L.: Developing a questionnaire to measure perceived attributes of eHealth innovations. Am. J. Health Behav. 31(6), 612–621 (2007) CrossRef
51.
Fajar Marta, R.: Open Government Data Portal Design Principles: Implementing Transparency, Privacy, and Information Quality Assurance by Design (2016)
52.
SunlightFoundation: Ten Principles for Opening Up Government Information (2010)
53.
Thorsby, J., et al.: Understanding the content and features of open data portals in American cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 34(1), 53–61 (2017) CrossRef
54.
55.
Ranjbartabar, H.: A virtual emotional freedom practitioner to deliver physical and emotional therapy (2016)
56.
57.
Jiawei Han, M., Pei, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques: Concepts and Techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011) MATH
58.
CNNIC: The 45th China Statistical Report on Internet Development (2020). CNNIC
59.
60.
Tavakol, M., Dennick, R.: Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2, 53 (2011) CrossRef
61.
62.
Metadaten
Titel
A Predictive Model for Citizens’ Utilization of Open Government Data Portals
verfasst von
Di Wang
Deborah Richards
Ayse Aysin Bilgin
Chuanfu Chen
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Digital Libraries at Times of Massive Societal Transition

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64451-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-64452-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_14

Premium Partner