Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
In state legislative elections some candidates attract contributions from many donors whereas other candidates have much smaller donor pools. Why? What are the origins of these disparities? This paper conceptualizes contributions as a type of attachment between the donor and the state legislative candidate. To model the formation of these attachments, this paper proposes a variant of the Barabasi-Albert preferential attachment model. The theoretical model is tested with data on over one million contributions to state legislative candidates in 2008. The paper also derives implications for macro-level inequities across candidates which are tested by comparing the observed inequities to simulations of the preferential attachment model. The results provide strong support for the hypotheses and show that the preferential attachment model provides a parsimonious representation of contributions to state legislative candidates.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abbe, O. G., & Herrnson, P. S. (2003). Campaign professionalism in state legislative elections. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 3(3), 223–245. CrossRef
Apollonio, D. E., & La Raja, R. J. (2006). Term limits, campaign contributions, and the distribution of power in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 31(2), 259–281. CrossRef
Barber, D. R. (2010). An overview of state campaigns, 2007–2008. National Institute on Money in State Politics. http://www.followthemoney.org/press/ReportView.phtml?r=420&em=87. Accessed 2/24/2011.
Barabasi, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512. CrossRef
Biersack, R., Herrnson, P. S., & Wilcox, C. (1993). Seeds for success: early money in congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 18(4), 535–551. CrossRef
Breaux, D. A., & Gierzynski, A. (1991). “It’s money that matters”: campaign expenditures and state legislative primaries. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16(3), 429–443. CrossRef
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M. (1996). A dynamic analysis of the role of war chests in campaign strategy. American Journal of Political Science, 40(2), 352–371. CrossRef
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Dow, J. K. (1992). Campaign contributions in an unregulated setting: an analysis of the 1984 and 1986 California Assembly elections. The Western Political Quarterly, 45(3), 609–628. CrossRef
Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1999). Prospecting for participants: rational expectations and the recruitment of political activists. American Political Science Review, 93(1), 153–168. CrossRef
Carson, J. L. (2005). Strategy, selection, and candidate competition in U.S. House and Senate elections. The Journal of Politics, 67(1), 1–28. CrossRef
Cassie, W., & Thompson, J. A. (1998). Patterns of PAC contributions to state legislative candidates. In J. A. Thompson & G. F. Moncrief (Eds.), Campaign finance in state legislative elections. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Coate, S. (2004). Pareto-improving campaign finance policy. American Economic Review, 94(3), 628–655. CrossRef
Denzau, A. T., & Munger, M. C. (1986). Legislators and interest groups: how unorganized interests get represented. American Political Science Review, 80, 89–106. CrossRef
Dow, J. K., Endersby, J. W., & Menifield, C. E. (1998). The industrial structure of the California Assembly: committee assignments, economic interests, and campaign contributions. Public Choice, 94(1–2), 67–83. CrossRef
Engstrom, E. J., & Ewell, W. (2010). The impact of unified party government on campaign contributions. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 543–569. CrossRef
Erikson, R. S., & Palfrey, T. R. (1998). Campaign spending and incumbency: an alternative simultaneous equations approach. The Journal of Politics, 60(2), 355–373. CrossRef
Fox, J. (2008). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Gierzynski, A., & Breaux, D. A. (1991). Money and votes in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16(2), 203–217. CrossRef
Gimpel, J. G., Lee, F. E., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2008). The check is in the mail: interdistrict funding flows in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 373–394. CrossRef
Goldstein, K., & Freedman, P. (2000). New evidence for new arguments: money and advertising in the 1996 Senate elections. The Journal of Politics, 62(4), 1087–1108. CrossRef
Goodliffe, J. (2001). The effect of war chests on challenger entry in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 830–844. CrossRef
Grant, J. T., & Rudolph, T. J. (2002). To give or not to give: modeling individuals’ contribution decisions. Political Behavior, 24(1), 31–54. CrossRef
Hamm, K. E., & Hogan, R. E. (2008). Campaign finance laws and candidacy decisions in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly, 61(3), 458–467. CrossRef
Hogan, R. E. (2000). The costs of representation in state legislatures: explaining variations in campaign spending. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 941–956.
Hogan, R. E. (2001). Campaign war chests and challenger emergence in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly, 54(4), 815–830.
Hogan, R. E., & Hamm, K. E. (1998). Variations in district-level campaign spending in state legislatures. In J. A. Thompson & G. F. Moncrief (Eds.), Campaign finance in state legislative elections. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Hogan, R. E., Hamm, K. E., & Wrzenski, R. L. (2006). Factors affecting interest group contributions to candidates in state legislative elections. Paper prepared for the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, April 20–23rd, Chicago, IL.
Jacobson, G. C. (2006). Campaign spending effects in U.S. Senate elections: evidence from the National Annenberg Election Survey. Electoral Studies, 25(2), 195–226. CrossRef
Jacobson, G. C. (2009). Politics of congressional elections. New York: Pearson.
Joe, W. Y., Malbin, M. J., Wilcox, C., Brusoe, P. W., & Pimlott, J. P. (2008). Do small donors improve representation? Some answers from recent gubernatorial and state legislative elections. Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 28–31.
Johnson, N. L., Kemp, A. W., & Kotz, S. (2005). Univariate discrete distributions. Hoboken: Wiley. CrossRef
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Mahmoud, H. M. (2009). Polya urn models. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Malhotra, N. (2008). The impact of public financing on electoral competition: evidence from Arizona and Maine. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8(3), 263–281. CrossRef
Masket, S. E. (2009). No middle ground: how informal party organizations control nominations and polarize legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Moncrief, G. F. (1992). The increase in campaign expenditures in state legislative elections: a comparison of four northwestern states. The Western Political Quarterly, 45(2), 549–558. CrossRef
Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Prat, A. (2002). Campaign spending with office-seeking politicians, rational voters, and multiple lobbies. Journal of Economic Theory, 103(1), 162–189. CrossRef
Stone, W. J., Maisel, L. S., & Maestas, C. D. (2004). Quality counts: extending the strategic politician model of incumbent deterrence. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 479–495. CrossRef
Stratmann, T. (2009). How prices matter in politics: the returns to campaign advertising. Public Choice, 140, 357–377. CrossRef
Thompson, J. A., Cassie, W., & Jewell, M. E. (1994). A sacred cow or just a lot of bull? Party and PAC money in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly, 47(1), 223–237.
United Nations Development Programme (2010). Human development report 2010. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Complete_reprint.pdf.
Wilcox, C. (1988). I owe it all to me: candidates’ investments in their own campaigns. American Political Research, 16(3), 266–279. CrossRef
- A preferential attachment model of campaign contributions in state legislative elections
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta