nach oben

Soft Computing

Erschienen in:

18.05.2020 | Methodologies and Application

A random-fuzzy portfolio selection DEA model using value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk

verfasst von: Rashed Khanjani Shiraz, Madjid Tavana, Hirofumi Fukuyama

Erschienen in: Soft Computing | Ausgabe 22/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The complexity involved in portfolio selection has resulted in the development of a large number of methods to support ambiguous financial decision making. We consider portfolio selection problems where returns from investment securities are random variables with fuzzy information and propose a data envelopment analysis model for portfolio selection with downside risk criteria associated with value-at-risk (V@R) and conditional value-at-risk (CV@R). Both V@R and CV@R criteria are used to define possibility, necessity, and credibility measures, which are formulated as stochastic nonlinear programming programs with random-fuzzy variables. Our constructed stochastic nonlinear programs for analyzing portfolio selection are transformed into deterministic nonlinear programs. Moreover, we show an enumeration algorithm can solve the model without any mathematical programs. Finally, we demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework and the efficacy of the procedures with a numerical example.

Vorheriger Artikel Water management using genetic algorithm-based machine learning

Nächster Artikel On the weighted Gini–Simpson index: estimating feasible weights using the optimal point and discussing a link with possibility theory

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

If \( \varphi = Pos \) in Eq. (4), then a V@R-Possibility measure is described as

\( \hbox{min} \,\,f\,\;s.t.\quad Pos\left[ {V@R_{\alpha } \left[ {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{n} {x_{j} \tilde{r}_{j} } } \right] \le \,f} \right] \ge \beta \,,\,\;E\,\left[ {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{n} {x_{j} \tilde{r}_{j} } } \right] \ge \eta ,\;\;\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{n} {x_{j} } = 1,\quad \,x_{j} \ge 0,\,\,\,j = 1, \ldots ,n.\, \)

When we refer to a measure, we use V@R instead of \( V@R_{\alpha } \) for simplicity. This applies to the case of CV@R.

Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9:203–228MathSciNetMATH

Ayub U, Shah S, Abbas Q (2015) Robust analysis for downside risk in portfolio management for a volatile stock market. Econ Model 44:86–96

Branda M (2016) Mean-value at risk portfolio efficiency: approaches based on data envelopment analysis models with negative data and their empirical behaviour. Q J Oper Res 14(1):77–99MathSciNetMATH

Buckley JJ (2004) Uncertain probabilities III: the continuous case. Soft Comput 8(3):200–206MATH

Buckley JJ, Eslami E (2004) Uncertain probabilities II: the continuous case. Soft Comput 8(3):193–199MATH

Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444MathSciNetMATH

Chatterjee R (2014) Practical methods of financial engineering and risk management tools for modern financial professionals. Quantitative finance series. Apress, New York

Chen L, Peng J, Zhang B, Rosyida I (2017) Diversified models for portfolio selection based on uncertain semivariance. Int J Syst Sci 48(3):637–648MathSciNetMATH

Chen W, Gai Y, Gupta P (2018) Efficiency evaluation of fuzzy portfolio in different risk measures via DEA. Ann Oper Res 269(1–2):103–127MathSciNetMATH

Dubois D, Prade H (1978) Operations on fuzzy numbers. Int J Syst Sci 9(6):613–626MathSciNetMATH

Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Operations on fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy sets and system: Theory and applications. Academic Press, New YorkMATH

Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Possibility Theory. Plenum, New YorkMATH

Hasuike T, Katagiri H, Ishii H (2009) Portfolio selection problems with random fuzzy variable returns. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160(18):2579–2596MathSciNetMATH

Hirota K (1981) Concepts of probabilistic sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 5:31–46MathSciNetMATH

Huang X (2008) Mean-semivariance models for fuzzy portfolio selection. J Comput Appl Math 217:1–8MathSciNetMATH

Joro T, Na P (2006) Portfolio performance evaluation in a mean-variance-skewness framework. Eur J Oper Res 175:446–461MATH

Kerstens K, Van de Woestyne I (2018) Enumeration algorithms for FDH directional distance functions under different returns to scale assumptions. Ann Oper Res (forthcoming) 271:1067–1078

Khanjani Shiraz R, Charles V, Jalalzadeh L (2014) Fuzzy rough DEA model: a possibility and expected value approaches. Expert Syst Appl 41(2):434–444

Konno H, Yamazaki H (1991) Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market. Manag Sci 37:519–531

Kwakernaak H (1978) Fuzzy random variables. Part I: definitions and theorems. Inf Sci 15(1):1–29MATH

Kwakernaak H (1979) Fuzzy random variables Part II: Algorithms and examples for the discrete case. Inf Sci 17(3):253–278MATH

Li X, Qin Z, Kar S (2010) Mean–Variance-skewness model for portfolio selection with fuzzy returns. Eur J Oper Res 202:239–247MATH

Liu B (2002) Theory and practice of uncertain programming. Physica Verlag, New YorkMATH

Liu B (2007) Uncertainty theory: an introduction to its axiomatic foundations, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

Liu B, Liu YK (2002) Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(4):445–450

Liu WB, Zhou ZB, Liu DB, Xiao HL (2015) Estimation of portfolio efficiency. Omega 52:107–118

Ma X, Zhao Q, Liu F (2015) Fuzzy risk measures and application to portfolio optimization. J Appl Math Inform 27(3):843–856

Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7:77–91

Markowitz H (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investment. Wiley, New York, p 1959

Markowitz H, Todd P, Xu GL, Yamane Y (1993) Computation of mean-semivariance efficient sets by the Critical Line Algorithm. Ann Oper Res 45:307–317MathSciNetMATH

Morey MR, Morey RC (1999) Mutual fund performance appraisals: a multi-horizon perspective with endogenous bench marking. Omega 127:241–258

Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–41

Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Finance 26(7):1443–1471

Seiford LM, Zhu J (1998) Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 108(I 998):I27–I39MATH

Tavana M, Khanjani Shiraz R, Hatami-Marbini A, Agrell P, Paryab K (2012) Fuzzy stochastic data envelopment analysis with application to base realignment and closure (BRAC). Expert Syst Appl 39(15):12247–12259

Tavana M, Khanjani Shiraz R, Hatami-Marbini A, Agrell P, Paryab K (2013) Chance-constrained DEA models with random fuzzy inputs and outputs. Knowl-Based Syst 52(2013):32–52

Tavana M, Khanjani Shiraz R, Di Caprio D (2019) A chance-constrained portfolio selection model with random-rough variables. Neural Comput Appl 31:931–945

Vercher E, Bermúdez JD (2015) Portfolio optimization using a credibility mean-absolute semi-deviation model. Expert Syst Appl 42:7121–7131

Wang B, Wang S, Watada J (2011) Fuzzy-portfolio-selection models with value-at-risk. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19(4):758–769

Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):3–28MathSciNetMATH

Liu Y-J, Zhang W-G (2013) Fuzzy portfolio optimization model under real constraints. Insur Math Econ 53(3):704–711MathSciNetMATH

Zhongfeng Q, Kar S, Zheng H (2018) Uncertain portfolio adjusting model using semiabsolute deviation. Soft Comput 20(2):717–725MATH

Zimmermann HJ (1996) Fuzzy set theory and its applications, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtMATH

Titel: A random-fuzzy portfolio selection DEA model using value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk
verfasst von: Rashed Khanjani Shiraz
Madjid Tavana
Hirofumi Fukuyama
Publikationsdatum: 18.05.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Soft Computing / Ausgabe 22/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-7643
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7479
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05010-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 22/2020

Multiple attribute group decision making based on 2-dimension linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators

Shadowed sets with higher approximation regions

Uncertain nonlinear system identification using Jaya-based adaptive neural network

Soft computing-based fuzzy time series model for dynamic vehicle routing problem

Multimodal human eye blink recognition method using feature level fusion for exigency detection

Optimal design for SCAP/battery power management applied in electric vehicle (EV) applications: a KHO–RDF technique