Skip to main content

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Republican Defense of Anarchism

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Republicanism is a political philosophy that defines freedom as non-domination, which could presumably only be achieved within a political community characterized by citizen participation and oriented toward the pursuit of the common good. Our aim in this chapter is to demonstrate why republican freedom is not attainable through the republican institutional framework and why, instead, we could only approach it through an anarchist institutional framework in which the individual right to political secession is tolerated. But an anarchist institutional framework where individual secession is allowed is an institutional framework compatible with the libertarian notion of freedom as non-interference, based on the sovereignty of the individual to associate and disassociate with other individuals. Consequently, republican freedom ends up converging institutionally with libertarian freedom.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow, K. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley. Arrow, K. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, A. J. (2000). Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Asocialism. Journal of Value Inquiry, 34(2/3), 249–261.CrossRef Cohen, A. J. (2000). Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Asocialism. Journal of Value Inquiry, 34(2/3), 249–261.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gaus, G. (1997). On the Difficult Virtue of Minding One’s Own Business: Towards the Political Rehabilitation of Ebenezer Scrooge. The Philosopher, 5, 24–28. Gaus, G. (1997). On the Difficult Virtue of Minding One’s Own Business: Towards the Political Rehabilitation of Ebenezer Scrooge. The Philosopher, 5, 24–28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Harvard University Press. Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Huemer, M. (2012). The Problem of Political Authority. Palgrave Macmillan. Huemer, M. (2012). The Problem of Political Authority. Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Huerta de Soto, J. (1994). Teoría del nacionalismo liberal. In J. Huerta de Soto (Ed.), Estudios de Economía Política. Unión Editorial. Huerta de Soto, J. (1994). Teoría del nacionalismo liberal. In J. Huerta de Soto (Ed.), Estudios de Economía Política. Unión Editorial.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasay, A. [1985] (1998). The State. Liberty Fund. Jasay, A. [1985] (1998). The State. Liberty Fund.
Zurück zum Zitat Kukathas, C. (2003). The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. Oxford University Press.CrossRef Kukathas, C. (2003). The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lomasky, L., & Brennan, G. (2006). Against Reviving Republicanism. Politics Philosophy Economics, 5(2), 221–252.CrossRef Lomasky, L., & Brennan, G. (2006). Against Reviving Republicanism. Politics Philosophy Economics, 5(2), 221–252.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lovett, F. (2010). A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford University Press.CrossRef Lovett, F. (2010). A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Munger, M., & Munger, K. (2015). Choosing in Groups. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Munger, M., & Munger, K. (2015). Choosing in Groups. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press. Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettit, P. (1999). Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratization. In I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Cordon (Eds.), Democracy’s Value. Cambridge University Press. Pettit, P. (1999). Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratization. In I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Cordon (Eds.), Democracy’s Value. Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettit, P. (2012). On the People’s Terms. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Pettit, P. (2012). On the People’s Terms. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pincione, G., & Tesón, F. R. (2006). Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Pincione, G., & Tesón, F. R. (2006). Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rallo, J. R. (2019). Liberalismo: los diez principios del orden político liberal. Deusto. Rallo, J. R. (2019). Liberalismo: los diez principios del orden político liberal. Deusto.
Zurück zum Zitat Raventós, D., & Cassasas, D. (2004). Republicanism and Basic Income: The Articulation of the Public Sphere from the Repoliticization of the Private Sphere. In G. Standing (Ed.), Promoting Income Security as a Right (pp. 229–251). Anthem Press. Raventós, D., & Cassasas, D. (2004). Republicanism and Basic Income: The Articulation of the Public Sphere from the Repoliticization of the Private Sphere. In G. Standing (Ed.), Promoting Income Security as a Right (pp. 229–251). Anthem Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson, H. S. (2003). Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about Ends of Policy. Oxford University Press. Richardson, H. S. (2003). Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about Ends of Policy. Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Harvard University Press. Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuppert, F. (2014). Freedom, Recognition and Non-Domination: A Republican Theory of (Global) Justice. Springer.CrossRef Schuppert, F. (2014). Freedom, Recognition and Non-Domination: A Republican Theory of (Global) Justice. Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson, T. (2017). The Impossibility of Republican Freedom. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 45(1), 27–53.CrossRef Simpson, T. (2017). The Impossibility of Republican Freedom. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 45(1), 27–53.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Republican Defense of Anarchism
verfasst von
Juan Ramón Rallo
Copyright-Jahr
2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17418-6_20

Premium Partner