Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

03.01.2020 | Ausgabe 1/2020

Water Resources Management 1/2020

A Scenario-Driven Assessment of the Economic Feasibility of Rainwater Harvesting Using Optimized Storage

Zeitschrift:
Water Resources Management > Ausgabe 1/2020
Autoren:
Chidozie Charles Nnaji, Clinton Aigbavboa
Wichtige Hinweise
A correction to this article is available online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11269-020-02494-8.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Regional water scarcity has given rise to the search for sustainable means of water supply. Rainwater harvesting (RWH) has been receiving unprecedented attention as low-cost and eco-friendly option. Given the conflicting nature of research findings with respect to the feasibility of RWH and the belief that such results have sometimes been unreasonably generalized, this study was undertaken to ascertain the feasibility of RWH under very specific climatic and socio-economic conditions. This study investigated the economic feasibility of RWH in a sub-Saharan African city (Enugu, Nigeria), considering eight dwelling categories. Life cycle cost analysis was performed for RWH system in each of the categories for specified levels of water consumption namely: basic water need (50 litres per capita per day, lpcd), pour flush (75 lpcd) and full plumbing connection (150 lpcd) and for two energy options namely: fuel generator and the national power supply grid. Capital cost ranged from 47 to 95% of the net present value (NPV), maintenance cost ranged from 4 to 40% and running cost ranged from 1 to 27% of NPV. The percentage cost contribution of underground tank to NPV ranged from 60.4–82%, 66.9–86% and 77.3–89% for basic water need, pour flush and full plumbing connection options respectively, using the national electricity grid as source of power for pumping water to the overhead tank. The corresponding cost contributions for the use of petrol generator as source of power for pumping are 56.5–75.9%, 63–81% and 73.9–85%. The unit cost of water ranged from 0.07–0.25 N/litres, 0.09–0.34 N/litres and 0.22–0.54 N/litres for basic water need, pour flush and full plumbing connection, using the national grid for pumping water. The corresponding unit costs for generator are 0.09–0.3 N/litres, 0.11–0.4 N/litres and 0.28–0.64 N/litres. Comparison of these costs with the costs of other sources of water supply shows that RWH is a cheaper source of water.
1$ = N360.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 50.000 Bücher
  • über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Umwelt
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Umwelt
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Water Resources Management 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe