Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0657-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Using the IPUMS-USA data for the years 1960–2015, this study examines trends in the effect of occupational feminization on occupational pay in the U.S. labor market and explores some of the mechanisms underlying these trends. The findings show that the (negative) association between occupational feminization and occupational pay level has declined, becoming insignificent in 2015. This trend, however, is reversed after education is controlled for at the individual as well as the occupational level. The two opposite trends are discussed in light of the twofold effect of education: (1) the entry of women into occupations requiring high education, and (2) the growing returns to education and to occupations with higher educational requirements. These two processes have concealed the deterioration in occupational pay following feminization. The findings underscore the significance of structural forms of gender inequality in general, and occupational devaluation in particular.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
ESM 1 (DOCX 85.3 kb)13524_2018_657_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Acker, J. (1988). Class, gender, and the relations of distribution. Signs, 13, 473–497. CrossRef
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158. CrossRef
Andes, N. (1992). Social-class and gender: An empirical evaluation of occupational stratification. Gender & Society, 6, 231–251. CrossRef
Baron, J., & Newman, A. (1989). Pay the man: Effects of demographic composition on prescribed wage rates in the California civil service. In R. Michael, H. Hartmann, & B. O’Farrell (Eds.), Pay equity: Empirical inquiries (pp. 107–130). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Blau, F. D., Brinton, M. C., & Grusky, D. B. (2006). The declining significance of gender? New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Blau, F. D., Brummund, P., & Liu, A. Y.-H. (2013). Trends in occupational segregation by gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the impact of changes in the occupational coding system. Demography, 50, 471–492. CrossRef
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (1997). Swimming upstream: Trends in the gender wage differential in the 1980s. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 1–42. CrossRef
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (1999). Analyzing the gender pay gap. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 39, 625–646. CrossRef
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 7–23. CrossRef
Catanzarite, L. (2003). Race-gender composition and occupational pay degradation. Social Problems, 50, 14–37. CrossRef
Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. (2004). Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cohen, P. N., & Huffman, M. L. (2003). Individuals, jobs, and labor markets: The devaluation of women’s work. American Sociological Review, 68, 443–463. CrossRef
Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., & Vanneman, R. (2004). Gender inequality at work. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Crompton, R. (1989). Class theory and gender. British Journal of Sociology, 40, 565–587. CrossRef
Crompton, R. (2001). Social class and gender. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 14233–14238). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. CrossRef
DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
England, P. (1992). Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
England, P. (2006). Toward gender equality: Progress and bottlenecks. In F. D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), The declining significance of gender? (pp. 245–264). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24, 149–166. CrossRef
England, P., Allison, P., & Wu, Y. (2007). Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize, does feminization reduce pay, and how can we tell with longitudinal data? Social Science Research, 36, 1237–1256. CrossRef
Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. CrossRef
Goldin, C. (2002). A pollution theory of discrimination: Male and female differences in occupations and earnings (NBER Working Paper No. 8985). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. CrossRef
Jacobs, J. A. (1989). Long-term trends in occupational segregation by sex. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 160–173. CrossRef
Jacobs, J. A. (1992). Women’s entry into management: Trends in earnings, authority, and values among salaried managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 282–301. CrossRef
Karlin, C. A., England, P., & Richardson, M. (2002). Why do “women’s jobs” have low pay for their educational level? Gender Issues, 20(4), 3–22. CrossRef
Katz, L. F., & Autor, D. H. (1999). Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3A, pp. 1463–1555). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
Keele, L., & Kelly, N. J. (2006). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 14, 186–205. CrossRef
Kreft, I. G. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage. CrossRef
Levanon, A., England, P., & Allison, P. (2009). Occupational feminization and pay: Assessing causal dynamics using 1950–2000 U.S. census data. Social Forces, 88, 865–892. CrossRef
Mandel, H. (2012). Occupational mobility of American women: Compositional and structural changes, 1980–2007. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30, 5–16. CrossRef
Mandel, H. (2013). Up the down staircase: Women’s upward mobility and the wage penalty for occupational feminization, 1970–2007. Social Forces, 91, 1183–1207. CrossRef
Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2014). Gender pay gap and employment sector: Sources of earnings disparities in the United States, 1970–2010. Demography, 51, 1597–1618.
Mann, M. (1986). A crisis in stratification theory? Persons, households/families/lineages, genders, classes and nations. In R. Crompton & M. Mann (Eds.), Gender and stratification (pp. 40–56). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
McCall, L. (2007). Increasing class disparities among women and the politics of gender equity. In D. S. Cobble (Ed.), The sex of class: Women transforming American labor (pp. 15–34). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Morris, M., & Western, B. (1999). Inequality in earnings at the close of the twentieth century. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 623–657. CrossRef
Petersen, T., & Saporta, I. (2004). The opportunity structure for discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 852–901. CrossRef
Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, A. (1987). The effect of the proportion of women on salaries: The case of college administrators. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 1–24. CrossRef
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218–235.
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531. CrossRef
Ruggles, S., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., & Sobek, M. (2017). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 7.0 [Data set]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V7.0
Semyonov, M., & Lewin-Epstein, N. (1989). Segregation and competition in occupational labor-markets. Social Forces, 68, 379–396. CrossRef
Snyder, D., & Hudis, P. M. (1976). Occupational income and effects of minority competition and segregation: Reanalysis and some new evidence. American Sociological Review, 41, 209–234. CrossRef
Steinberg, R. J. (1990). Social construction of skill: Gender, power, and comparable worth. Work and Occupations, 17, 449–482. CrossRef
Weeden, K. A. (2004). Profiles of change: Sex segregation in the United States, 1910–2000. In M. Charles & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men (pp. 131–178). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- A Second Look at the Process of Occupational Feminization and Pay Reduction in Occupations
- Springer US