Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Theory and Decision 2/2017

25.07.2016

A simple framework for the axiomatization of exponential and quasi-hyperbolic discounting

verfasst von: Nina Anchugina

Erschienen in: Theory and Decision | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to investigate which normative requirements, or axioms, lead to exponential and quasi-hyperbolic forms of discounting. Exponential discounting has a well-established axiomatic foundation originally developed by Koopmans (Econometrica 28(2):287–309, 1960, 1972) and Koopmans et al. (Econometrica 32(1/2):82–100, 1964) with subsequent contributions by several other authors, including Bleichrodt et al. (J Math Psychol 52(6):341–347, 2008). The papers by Hayashi (J Econ Theory 112(2):343–352, 2003) and Olea and Strzalecki (Q J Econ 129(3):1449–1499, 2014) axiomatize quasi-hyperbolic discounting. The main contribution of this paper is to provide an alternative foundation for exponential and quasi-hyperbolic discounting, with simple, transparent axioms and relatively straightforward proofs. Using techniques by Fishburn (The foundations of expected utility. Reidel Publishing Co, Dordrecht, 1982) and Harvey (Manag Sci 32(9):1123–1139, 1986), we show that Anscombe and Aumann’s (Ann Math Stat 34(1):199–205, 1963) version of Subjective Expected Utility theory can be readily adapted to axiomatize the aforementioned types of discounting, in both finite and infinite horizon settings.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Pan et al. (2015) have recently provided a generalization of quasi-hyperbolic discounting to continuous time. The proposed generalization is called two-stage exponential discounting. An axiomatic foundation for this discount function is given for single dated outcomes.
 
2
It should also be mentioned that our setting considers a discrete time space. A continuous time framework can be found, for example, in the above-mentioned paper by Fishburn and Rubinstein (1982) and in a generalized model of hyperbolic discounting introduced by Loewenstein and Prelec (1992). Harvey (1986) analyses discrete sequences of timed outcomes with a continuous time space.
 
3
It is worth mentioning that Fishburn’s motivation for the convergence axiom B6 looks somewhat contrived in the context of acts (Fishburn 1982, p. 113). However, it becomes very natural in the context where states of the world are re-interpreted as periods of time.
 
4
As pointed out above, mixture independence stated for n periods implies joint independence for n periods. Hence, this raises the obvious question of whether it is possible to use an n-period version of the subjective mixture independence axiom to obtain a time separable discounted utility representation without the need for the Debreu-type independence conditions.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anscombe, F. J., & Aumann, R. J. (1963). A definition of subjective probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1), 199–205.CrossRef Anscombe, F. J., & Aumann, R. J. (1963). A definition of subjective probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1), 199–205.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bleichrodt, H., Rohde, K. I. M., & Wakker, P. P. (2008). Koopmans constant discounting for intertemporal choice: a simplification and a generalization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(6), 341–347.CrossRef Bleichrodt, H., Rohde, K. I. M., & Wakker, P. P. (2008). Koopmans constant discounting for intertemporal choice: a simplification and a generalization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(6), 341–347.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chark, R., Chew, S. H., & Zhong, S. (2015). Extended present bias: a direct experimental test. Theory and Decision, 79(1), 151–165.CrossRef Chark, R., Chew, S. H., & Zhong, S. (2015). Extended present bias: a direct experimental test. Theory and Decision, 79(1), 151–165.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Debreu, G. (1960). Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in the social sciences (pp. 16–26). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Debreu, G. (1960). Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in the social sciences (pp. 16–26). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein, L. G. (1983). Stationary cardinal utility and optimal growth under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 31(1), 133–152.CrossRef Epstein, L. G. (1983). Stationary cardinal utility and optimal growth under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 31(1), 133–152.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Utility theory for decision making. New York: Wiley. Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Utility theory for decision making. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C. (1982). The foundations of expected utility. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1982). The foundations of expected utility. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fishburn, P. C., & Rubinstein, A. (1982). Time preference. International Economic Review, 23(3), 677–694.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C., & Rubinstein, A. (1982). Time preference. International Economic Review, 23(3), 677–694.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2), 141–153.CrossRef Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2), 141–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gorman, W. M. (1968). The structure of utility functions. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(4), 367–390.CrossRef Gorman, W. M. (1968). The structure of utility functions. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(4), 367–390.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grandmont, J.-M. (1972). Continuity properties of a von Neumann–Morgenstern utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(1), 45–57.CrossRef Grandmont, J.-M. (1972). Continuity properties of a von Neumann–Morgenstern utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(1), 45–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grant, S., & Van Zandt, T. (2009). Expected utility theory. In P. Anand, P. Pattanaik, & C. Puppe (Eds.), The handbook of rational and social choice (pp. 21–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Grant, S., & Van Zandt, T. (2009). Expected utility theory. In P. Anand, P. Pattanaik, & C. Puppe (Eds.), The handbook of rational and social choice (pp. 21–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gul, F. (1992). Savage’s theorem with a finite number of states. Journal of Economic Theory, 57(1), 99–110.CrossRef Gul, F. (1992). Savage’s theorem with a finite number of states. Journal of Economic Theory, 57(1), 99–110.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey, C. M. (1986). Value functions for infinite-period planning. Management Science, 32(9), 1123–1139.CrossRef Harvey, C. M. (1986). Value functions for infinite-period planning. Management Science, 32(9), 1123–1139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hayashi, T. (2003). Quasi-stationary cardinal utility and present bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 112(2), 343–352.CrossRef Hayashi, T. (2003). Quasi-stationary cardinal utility and present bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 112(2), 343–352.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koopmans, T. C. (1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica, 28(2), 287–309.CrossRef Koopmans, T. C. (1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica, 28(2), 287–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koopmans, T. C. (1972). Representations of preference orderings over time. In C. B. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and organization (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: North Holland. Koopmans, T. C. (1972). Representations of preference orderings over time. In C. B. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and organization (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Zurück zum Zitat Koopmans, T. C., Diamond, P. A., & Williamson, R. E. (1964). Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica, 32(1/2), 82–100.CrossRef Koopmans, T. C., Diamond, P. A., & Williamson, R. E. (1964). Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica, 32(1/2), 82–100.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443–477.CrossRef Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443–477.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–597.CrossRef Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–597.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olea, J. L. M., & Strzalecki, T. (2014). Axiomatization and measurement of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), 1449–1499.CrossRef Olea, J. L. M., & Strzalecki, T. (2014). Axiomatization and measurement of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), 1449–1499.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pan, J., Webb, C. S., & Zank, H. (2015). An extension of quasi-hyperbolic discounting to continuous time. Games and Economic Behavior, 89, 43–55.CrossRef Pan, J., Webb, C. S., & Zank, H. (2015). An extension of quasi-hyperbolic discounting to continuous time. Games and Economic Behavior, 89, 43–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Phelps, E. S., & Pollak, R. A. (1968). On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(2), 185–199.CrossRef Phelps, E. S., & Pollak, R. A. (1968). On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(2), 185–199.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan, M. J. (2009). Generalizations of SEU: A geometric tour of some non-standard models. Oxford Economic Papers, 61(2), 327–354.CrossRef Ryan, M. J. (2009). Generalizations of SEU: A geometric tour of some non-standard models. Oxford Economic Papers, 61(2), 327–354.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155–161.CrossRef Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155–161.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakai, K. (2009). A model of utility smoothing. Econometrica, 76(1), 137–153.CrossRef Wakai, K. (2009). A model of utility smoothing. Econometrica, 76(1), 137–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Young, E. R. (2007). Generalized quasi-geometric discounting. Economics Letters, 96(3), 343–350.CrossRef Young, E. R. (2007). Generalized quasi-geometric discounting. Economics Letters, 96(3), 343–350.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A simple framework for the axiomatization of exponential and quasi-hyperbolic discounting
verfasst von
Nina Anchugina
Publikationsdatum
25.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Theory and Decision / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0040-5833
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7187
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-016-9566-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Theory and Decision 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe