Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 5/2018

23.01.2018 | Original Paper

A smoothed finite element approach for computational fluid dynamics: applications to incompressible flows and fluid–structure interaction

verfasst von: Tao He, Hexin Zhang, Kai Zhang

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper the cell-based smoothed finite element method (CS-FEM) is introduced into two mainstream aspects of computational fluid dynamics: incompressible flows and fluid–structure interaction (FSI). The emphasis is placed on the fluid gradient smoothing which simply requires equal numbers of Gaussian points and smoothing cells in each four-node quadrilateral element. The second-order, smoothed characteristic-based split scheme in conjunction with a pressure stabilization is then presented to settle the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. As for FSI, CS-FEM is applied to the geometrically nonlinear solid as usual. Following an efficient mesh deformation strategy, block-Gauss–Seidel procedure is adopted to couple all individual fields under the arbitrary Lagriangian–Eulerian description. The proposed solvers are carefully validated against the previously published data for several benchmarks, revealing visible improvements in computed results.
Vorheriger Artikel An uncertainty model of acoustic metamaterials with random parameters
Nächster Artikel Lattice Boltzmann simulation of antiplane shear loading of a stationary crack

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Bao Y, Zhou D, Huang C (2010) Numerical simulation of flow over three circular cylinders in equilateral arrangements at low Reynolds number by a second-order characteristic-based split finite element method. Comput Fluids 39(5):882–899CrossRef
2.
Bathe KJ, Ramm E, Wilson EL (1975) Finite element formulations for large deformation dynamic analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 9(2):353–386CrossRef
3.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43(1):3–37MathSciNetCrossRef
4.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
5.
Behr M, Hastreiter D, Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Incompressible flow past a circular cylinder: dependence of the computed flow field on the location of the lateral boundaries. Comput Methods Appl Mechods Eng 123(1–4):309–316CrossRef
6.
Bevan RLT, Boileau E, van Loon R, Lewis RW, Nithiarasu P (2016) A comparative study of fractional step method in its quasi-implicit, semi-implicit and fully-explicit forms for incompressible flows. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 26(3/4):595–623MathSciNetCrossRef
7.
Braun AL, Awruch AM (2009) A partitioned model for fluid–structure interaction problems using hexahedral finite elements with one-point quadrature. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79(5):505–549MathSciNetCrossRef
8.
Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov–Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32(1–3):199–259MathSciNetCrossRef
9.
Chen JS, Wu CT, Yoon S, You Y (2001) A stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh-free methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(2):435–466CrossRef
10.
11.
Chung J, Hulbert GM (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-\(\alpha \) method. J Appl Mech ASME 60(2):371–375MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
Codina R (2001) Pressure stability in fractional step finite element methods for incompressible flows. J Comput Phys 170(1):112–140MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
Cui XY, Liu GR, Li GY, Zhao X, Nguyen TT, Sun GY (2008) A smoothed finite element method (SFEM) for linear and geometrically nonlinear analysis of plates and shells. Comput Model Eng Sci (CMES) 28(2):109–126MathSciNetMATH
14.
Dai KY, Liu GR (2007) Free and forced vibration analysis using the smoothed finite element method (SFEM). J Sound Vib 301(3):803–820CrossRef
15.
De Rosis A, Falcucci G, Ubertini S, Ubertini F (2013) A coupled lattice Boltzmann-finite element approach for two-dimensional fluid–structure interaction. Comput Fluids 86:558–568MathSciNetCrossRef
16.
Dettmer W, Perić D (2006) A computational framework for fluid-rigid body interaction: finite element formulation and applications. Comput Methods Appl Methods Eng 195(13):1633–1666MathSciNetCrossRef
17.
Dettmer W, Perić D (2006) A computational framework for fluid–structure interaction: finite element formulation and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(41–43):5754–5779CrossRef
18.
Donea J (1984) A Taylor–Galerkin method for convective transport problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 20(1):101–119MathSciNetCrossRef
19.
Förster C, Wall WA, Ramm E (2007) Artificial added mass instabilities in sequential staggered coupling of nonlinear structures and incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(7):1278–1293MathSciNetCrossRef
20.
Froehle B, Persson PO (2014) A high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for fluid–structure interaction with efficient implicit–explicit time stepping. J Comput Phys 272(9):455–470MathSciNetCrossRef
21.
Ghia U, Ghia KN, Shin CT (1982) High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier–Stokes equations and a multigrid method. J Comput Phys 48(3):387–411CrossRef
22.
Graham JMR (1992) Report on the session comparing computation of flow past circular cylinders with experimental data. In: IUTAM symposium: bluff-body wakes, dynamics and instabilities. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Göttingen, Germany, pp 317–323CrossRef
23.
Habchi C, Russeil S, Bougeard D, Harion JL, Lemenand T, Ghanem A, Valle DD, Peerhossaini H (2013) Partitioned solver for strongly coupled fluid–structure interaction. Comput Fluids 71:306–319MathSciNetCrossRef
24.
He T (2015) On a partitioned strong coupling algorithm for modeling fluid–structure interaction. Int J Appl Mech 7(2):1550,021CrossRef
25.
He T (2015) Partitioned coupling strategies for fluid–structure interaction with large displacement: explicit, implicit and semi-implicit schemes. Wind Struct 20(3):423–448MathSciNetCrossRef
26.
He T (2015) A partitioned implicit coupling strategy for incompressible flow past an oscillating cylinder. Int J Comput Methods 12(2):1550,012MathSciNetCrossRef
27.
He T (2015) Semi-implicit coupling of CS-FEM and FEM for the interaction between a geometrically nonlinear solid and an incompressible fluid. Int J Comput Methods 12(5):1550,025MathSciNetCrossRef
28.
He T (2016) A CBS-based partitioned semi-implicit coupling algorithm for fluid–structure interaction using MCIBC method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 298:252–278MathSciNetCrossRef
29.
He T, Zhang K (2015) Combined interface boundary condition method for fluid–structure interaction: some improvements and extensions. Ocean Eng 109:243–255CrossRef
30.
He T, Zhang K (2017) An overview of the combined interface boundary condition method for fluid–structure interaction. Arch Comput Methods Eng 24(4):891–934MathSciNetCrossRef
31.
He T, Zhang K, Wang T (2017) AC-CBS-based partitioned semi-implicit coupling algorithm for fluid–structure interaction using stabilized second-order pressure scheme. Commun Comput Phys 21(5):1449–1474MathSciNetCrossRef
32.
He T, Zhou D, Bao Y (2012) Combined interface boundary condition method for fluid-rigid body interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 223:81–102MathSciNetCrossRef
33.
He T, Zhou D, Han Z, Tu J, Ma J (2014) Partitioned subiterative coupling schemes for aeroelasticity using combined interface boundary condition method. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 28(6–10):272–300MathSciNetCrossRef
34.
Hirt CW, Amsden AA, Cook JL (1974) An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J Comput Phys 14(3):227–253CrossRef
35.
Hughes TJR, Franca LP, Hulbert GM (1989) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: VIII. The Galerkin/least-squares method for advective–diffusive equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 73(2):173–189MathSciNetCrossRef
36.
Jaiman R, Geubelle P, Loth E, Jiao X (2011) Combined interface boundary condition method for unsteady fluid–structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(1):27–39MathSciNetCrossRef
37.
Jaiman RK, Pillalamarri NR, Guan MZ (2016) A stable second-order partitioned iterative scheme for freely vibrating low-mass bluff bodies in a uniform flow. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 301:187–215MathSciNetCrossRef
38.
Jiang C, Zhang ZQ, Han X, Liu GR, Lin T (2018) A cell-based smoothed finite element method with semi-implicit CBS procedures for incompressible laminar viscous flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 86(1):20–45MathSciNetCrossRef
39.
Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119(1):73–94CrossRef
40.
Kaneko S, Hong G, Mitsume N, Yamada T, Yoshimura S (2017) Partitioned-coupling FSI analysis with active control. Comput Mech 60(4):549–558MathSciNetCrossRef
41.
Kassiotis C, Ibrahimbegovic A, Niekamp R, Matthies HG (2011) Nonlinear fluid–structure interaction problem. Part I: implicit partitioned algorithm, nonlinear stability proof and validation examples. Comput Mech 47(3):305–323MathSciNetCrossRef
42.
Kjellgren P (1997) A semi-implicit fractional step finite element method for viscous incompressible flows. Comput Mech 20(6):541–550MathSciNetCrossRef
43.
Kuhl D, Crisfield MA (1999) Energy-conserving and decaying algorithms in non-linear structural dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45(5):569–599MathSciNetCrossRef
44.
Küttler U, Wall WA (2008) Fixed-point fluid–structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation. Comput Mech 43(1):61–72CrossRef
45.
Lefrançois E (2008) A simple mesh deformation technique for fluid–structure interaction based on a submesh approach. Int J Numer Methods Eng 75(9):1085–1101MathSciNetCrossRef
46.
Lesoinne M, Farhat C (1996) Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes, and their impact on aeroelastic computations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 134(1):71–90CrossRef
47.
Liew KM, Wang WQ, Zhang LX, He XQ (2007) A computational approach for predicting the hydroelasticity of flexible structures based on the pressure Poisson equation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72(13):1560–1583MathSciNetCrossRef
48.
Liu GR, Dai KY, Nguyen TT (2007) A smoothed finite element method for mechanics problems. Comput Mech 39(6):859–877CrossRef
49.
Liu GR, Nguyen TT (2010) Smoothed finite element methods. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRef
50.
Löhner R, Morgan K, Zienkiewicz OC (1984) The solution of non-linear hyperbolic equation systems by the finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 4(11):1043–1063CrossRef
51.
Markou GA, Mouroutis ZS, Charmpis DC, Papadrakakis M (2007) The ortho-semi-torsional (OST) spring analogy method for 3D mesh moving boundary problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(4):747–765CrossRef
52.
Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech ASCE 85(3):67–94
53.
Nithiarasu P, Codina R, Zienkiewicz OC (2006) The characteristic-based split (CBS) scheme-a unified approach to fluid dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 66(10):1514–1546MathSciNetCrossRef
54.
Nithiarasu P, Zienkiewicz OC (2006) Analysis of an explicit and matrix free fractional step method for incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(41):5537–5551CrossRef
55.
Nomura T, Hughes TJR (1992) An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element method for interaction of fluid and a rigid body. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95(1):115–138CrossRef
56.
Norberg C (2003) Fluctuating lift on a circular cylinder: review and new measurements. J Fluids Struct 17(1):57–96CrossRef
57.
Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2017) Space-time VMS computational flow analysis with isogeometric discretization and a general-purpose NURBS mesh generation method. Comput Fluids 158:189–200MathSciNetCrossRef
58.
Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J, Tezduyar TE (2010) Wall shear stress calculations in space-time finite element computation of arterial fluid–structure interactions. Comput Mech 46(1):31–41MathSciNetCrossRef
59.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Asada S, Kuraishi T (2016) Space-time method for flow computations with slip interfaces and topology changes (ST-SI-TC). Comput Fluids 141:124–134MathSciNetCrossRef
60.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Otoguro Y, Terahara T, Kuraishi T, Hattori H (2017) Turbocharger flow computations with the space-time isogeometric analysis (ST-IGA). Comput Fluids 142:15–20MathSciNetCrossRef
61.
Teixeira PRF, Awruch AM (2005) Numerical simulation of fluid–structure interaction using the finite element method. Comput Fluids 34(2):249–273CrossRef
62.
Témam R (1968) Une méthode d’approximation de la solution des équations de Navier–Stokes. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 96:115–152MathSciNetCrossRef
63.
Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28:1–44MathSciNetMATH
64.
Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94(3):339–351MathSciNetCrossRef
65.
Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94(3):353–371MathSciNetCrossRef
66.
Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95(2):221–242CrossRef
67.
Wall WA, Ramm E (1998) Fluid–structure interaction based upon a stabilized (ALE) finite element method. In: Idelsohn SR, Oñate E, Dvorkin E (eds) Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on computational mechanics: new trends and applications. CIMNE, Barcelona, pp 1–20
68.
Wang S, Khoo BC, Liu GR, Xu GX, Chen L (2014) Coupling GSM/ALE with ES-FEM-T3 for fluid-deformable structure interactions. J Comput Phys 276:315–340MathSciNetCrossRef
69.
Williamson CHK, Roshko A (1988) Vortex formation in the wake of an oscillating cylinder. J Fluids Struct 2(4):355–381CrossRef
70.
Yao J, Liu GR, Narmoneva DA, Hinton RB, Zhang ZQ (2012) Immersed smoothed finite element method for fluid–structure interaction simulation of aortic valves. Comput Mech 90(6):1292–1320MathSciNetMATH
71.
Yoo JW, Moran B, Chen JS (2004) Stabilized conforming nodal integration in the natural-element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 60(5):861–890CrossRef
72.
73.
Zhang ZQ, Liu GR, Khoo BC (2012) Immersed smoothed finite element method for two dimensional fluid–structure interaction problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 90(10):1292–1320MathSciNetCrossRef
74.
Zhang ZQ, Liu GR, Khoo BC (2013) A three dimensional immersed smoothed finite element method (3D IS-FEM) for fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Mech 51(2):129–150MathSciNetCrossRef
75.
Zhang ZQ, Yao J, Liu GR (2011) An immersed smoothed finite element method for fluid–structure interaction problems. Int J Comput Methods 8(4):747–757MathSciNetCrossRef
76.
Zhou CY, So RMC, Lam K (1999) Vortex-induced vibrations of an elastic circular cylinder. J Fluids Struct 13(2):165–189CrossRef
77.
Zienkiewicz OC, Nithiarasu P, Codina R, Vazquez M, Ortiz P (1999) The characteristic-based-split procedure: an efficient and accurate algorithm for fluid problems. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 31(1):359–392MathSciNetCrossRef
78.
Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Nithiarasu P (2014) The finite element method for fluid dynamics, vol 3, 7th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordMATH
Metadaten
Titel
A smoothed finite element approach for computational fluid dynamics: applications to incompressible flows and fluid–structure interaction
verfasst von
Tao He
Hexin Zhang
Kai Zhang
Publikationsdatum
23.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1549-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Computational Mechanics 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

A gradient enhanced plasticity–damage microplane model for concrete

Original Paper

Efficient numerical method with a dual-grid scheme for contact of inhomogeneous materials and its applications

Original Paper

A 2D Daubechies finite wavelet domain method for transient wave response analysis in shear deformable laminated composite plates

Original Paper

A technique to remove the tensile instability in weakly compressible SPH

Original Paper

Stability analysis of rough surfaces in adhesive normal contact

Original Paper

An adaptively refined XFEM with virtual node polygonal elements for dynamic crack problems

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise