Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Singapore and Hong Kong are two small highly successful economies in Asia that illustrate very divergent paths of catching up and innovation as Jue Wang reveals. Singapore and Hong Kong have a similar history: both developed from British colonies and experienced an upgrade of industrial structure from labor intensive industries such as textile and clothing to high tech industries such as electronics and to banking and financial services (Young in NBER Macroeconomics Annual 7:13–51, 1992). The two city states have comparable economic performance and competitiveness and are often placed close to each other in various rankings such as Global Competitiveness Report (WEF 2016), World Competitiveness Yearbook (IMD 2016), Global Innovation Index (GII 2016). The GDP per capita in these two economies was almost identical until the 2000s. Singapore’s economic growth slowed down in the late 1990s but quickly recovered and surpassed Hong Kong in 2004 and even overtook the US in 2011. With its recent success in finance and other sectors, Singapore is presently ahead of Hong Kong on many indicators. Although there are many similarities, the differences in the development trajectory of these two cities are clear, the most important distinction is the role of the government. Singapore is noted as government-made city-state for the high level of government intervention in various aspects of the society (Mok in Res Policy, 34, 537–554, 2005). By contrast, Hong Kong adopts a “positive non-intervention” policy that favors the free economy and minimizes the power of government in influencing the market. The difference is reflected in the innovation policy in these two economies. The Singapore government has actively implemented a series of strategies and allocated substantial funds to promote innovation and entrepreneurship. While a similar set of policies and programs are in place to drive research and innovation in Hong Kong, the scale is much smaller.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
ASTAR. (2013). National survey of R&D in Singapore 2012. Singapore: Agency for Science, Technology and Research.
C&SD. (2013). Hong Kong innovation activities statistics 2012. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.
C&SD. (2014). Hong Kong innovation activities statistics 2013. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.
C&SD. (2015a). Hong Kong Statistics, http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp250.jsp?tableID=036&ID=0&productType=8. Accessed November 6th 2015.
C&SD. (2015b). 2014 Gross Domestic Product. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.
CEDB. (2015). 2015 Policy Address—CEDB Major Policy Initiatives: Innovation and Technology, http://www.cedb.gov.hk/about/policy3.htm. Accessed 15th November 2015.
Cheung, A. B. L. (2000). New interventionism in the making: Interpreting state interventions in Hong Kong after the change of sovereignty. Journal of Contemporary China,9(24), 291–308. CrossRef
Davies, H. (1996). High IQ and low technology: Hong Kong’s key to success. Long Range Planning,29(5), 684–690. CrossRef
DOS. (2013). Yearbook of Statistics Singapore 2013. In Department of Statistics Singapore (ed.), Singapore.
Fuller, D. B. (2010). Government neglect and the decline of Hong Kong’s integrated circuit design industry. In D. B. Fuller (Ed.), Innovation policy and the limits of Laissez-fair: Hong Kong’s policy in comparative perspective (pp. 242–266). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
GII. (2016). The global innovation index 2016 report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization.
Goodstadt, L. F. (2005). Uneasy partners: The conflict between public interest and private profit in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Huang, C., & Sharif, N. (2009). Manufacturing dynamics and spillvers: The case of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan (HKMT). Research Policy,38(5), 813–828. CrossRef
Huff, W. Gregg. (1995). The developmental State, Government, and Singapore’s economic development since 1960. World Development,23(8), 1421–1438. CrossRef
IMD. (2016). IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2016. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD World Competitiveness Center.
ITC. (2015). Innovation and technology fund: Memorandum note. Hong Kong: Innovation and Technology Commission.
Li, J. (2015). Hong Kong to Foster IT Industry with New Bureau Established, CRIEnglishhttp://english.cri.cn/12394/2015/11/21/4203s905183.htm. Accessed 24th November 2015.
Mok, K. H. (2005). Fostering entrepreneurship: Changing role of government and higher education governance in Hong Kong. Research Policy,34, 537–554. CrossRef
NRF. (2015). Innovation and Enterprise Milestones, http://www.nrf.gov.sg/innovation-enterprise/innovation-enterprise-milestones. Accessed 5 June 2015.
Sharif, N. (2012). Facilitating and promoting innovative entrepreneurship in Hong Kong: Theory and practice. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences,29, 139–153. CrossRef
Shih, C., & Chen, S.-H. (2010). On reform of Hong Kong’s Public Research Funding System. In D. B. Fuller (Ed.), Innovation policy and the limits of Laissez-faire: Hong Kong’s policy in comparative perspective (pp. 114–144). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
Teo, C. H. (2015). Opening of the Singapore Scientific Conference 2015, https://www.mha.gov.sg/Newsroom/speeches/other-speeches/Pages/The-Opening-of-the-Singapore-Scientific-Conference-2015-Speech-by-Mr-Teo-Chee-Hean,-Deputy-Prime-Minister.aspx. Accessed 15 November 2015.
USPTO. (2015). Types of patents, http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/patdesc.htm. Accessed 16 November 2015.
Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
WEF. (2016). The global competitiveness report 2016–2017. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Wong, P.-K. (2001). The role of State in Singapore’s industrial development. In P.-K. Wong & C.-Y. Ng (Eds.), Industrial policy, innovation and economic growth: The experience of Japan and the East Asian NIEs (pp. 503–569). Singapore: Singapore University Press.
World Bank. (2016). GDP per capita (current US$), http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?page=6. Accessed January 15 2016.
Yam, R. C. M., et al. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Research Policy,40, 391–402. CrossRef
Yeung, H. W.-C. (2000). State intervention and neoliberalism in the globalizing world economy: Lessons from Singapore’s regionalization programme. The Pacific Review,13(1), 133–162. CrossRef
Young, A. (1992). A tale of two cities: Factor accumulation and technical change in Hong Kong and Singapore. NBER Macroeconomics Annual,7, 13–51. CrossRef
- A Tale of Two Cities: Innovation in Singapore and Hong Kong
- Springer Singapore
- Chapter 5
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Wissenstransfer im Outsourcing/© WrightStudio | stock.adobe.com