nach oben

Journal of Business and Psychology

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015

A Within-Person Examination of the Effects of Telework

verfasst von: Ronald P. Vega, Amanda J. Anderson, Seth A. Kaplan

Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine telework using a within-person research methodology and to broaden the typical outcomes investigated in regards to telework.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were obtained from a large U.S. government organization from both supervisors and non-supervisors. Surveys were completed on five consecutive workdays when employees were either teleworking or not (n = 180). On average, employees teleworked 2.13 days during data collection.

Findings

Employees generally have a more positive work experience while teleworking. They report higher levels of job performance and job satisfaction, and did better on an objective creative task when teleworking.

Implications

Research findings can vary in magnitude and even direction when considered at different levels of analysis. The results of this study support the generally positive findings about telework from between-person research at the within-person level. Managers can utilize this information to appropriately consider when employees need to be in the office and when teleworking is a viable alternative.

Originality/Value

This is the first study to examine telework from a within-person perspective using modern teleworking employees. In addition, the outcomes associated with telework were expanded to include a broader conception of performance (i.e., creative performance). By using a within-person methodology, we can more comprehensively understand the phenomenological experience of telework.

Vorheriger Artikel Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding with an Infrequency Scale: Evaluating Validity and Participant Reactions

Nächster Artikel Internet-Based, Unproctored Assessments on Mobile and Non-Mobile Devices: Usage, Measurement Equivalence, and Outcomes

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S., & Oakley, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: Empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 221–232. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.221.CrossRefPubMed

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997.CrossRef

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.CrossRef

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity”. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231–253. doi:10.1080/10400418909534321.CrossRef

Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80, 52–61.PubMed

Apgar, M. (1998). The alternative workplace: Changing where and how people work. Harvard Business Review, 76, 121–136.PubMed

Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 283–400. doi:10.1002/job.144.

Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496–513. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.496.CrossRef

Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554–571. doi:10.2307/30040649.CrossRef

Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203.CrossRefPubMed

Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. E. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307–311. doi:10.1037/h0055617.CrossRef

Brooks-Shesler, L., & Tetrick, L. E. (2010). Perceptions of the frequency and effectiveness of organizational innovations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Diego, CA.

Campione, W. (2008). Employed women’s well-being: The global and daily impact of work. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 346–361. doi:10.1007/s10834-008-9107-x.CrossRef

Chen, G., Bliese, P. D., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 375–409. doi:10.1177/1094428105280056.CrossRef

Chen, M., & Kaufmann, G. (2008). Employee creativity and R&D: A critical review. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 71–76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00471.x.CrossRef

Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1082–1103. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082.CrossRefPubMed

Dalal, R. S., Lam, H., Weiss, H. M., Welch, E. R., & Hulin, C. L. (2009). A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship–counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1051–1066. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.44636148.CrossRef

Donaldson, S. I., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002). Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 245–260. doi:10.1023/A:1019637632584.CrossRef

Duxbury, L. E., Higgins, C. A., & Neufeld, D. (1998). Telework and the balance between work and family: Is telework part of the problem or part of the solution? In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds.), The virtual workplace (pp. 218–255). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

Duxbury, L., & Neufeld, D. (1999). An empirical evaluation of the impacts of telecommuting on intra-organizational communication. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 1, 1–28.

Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 336–361. doi:10.1080/00909882.2010.513998.CrossRef

Gajendran, R. S., & Harrision, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524.CrossRefPubMed

Golden, T. D. (2006). The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 319–340. doi:10.1002/job.369.CrossRef

Golden, T. D. (2007). Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations, 60, 1641–1667. doi:10.1177/0018726707084303.CrossRef

Golden, T. D. (2012). Altering the effects of work and family conflict on exhaustion: Telework during traditional and non-traditional work hours. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 255–269.CrossRef

Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31, 301–318. doi:10.1177/0149206304271768.CrossRef

Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior-subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009.CrossRef

Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412–1421. doi:10.1037/a0012722.CrossRefPubMed

Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting’s differential impact on work-family conflict: Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1340–1350. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1340.CrossRefPubMed

Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. B. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004.CrossRef

Hill, E. J., Ferris, M., & Märtinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 220–241. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00042-3.CrossRef

Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., & Miller, B. C. (1996). Work and family in the virtual office: Perceived influences of mobile telework. Family Relations, 45, 293–301. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00042-3.CrossRef

Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332.CrossRefPubMed

Hunter, S. T., Cushenberry, L., & Friedrich, T. (2012). Hiring an innovative workforce: A necessary yet uniquely challenging endeavor. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 303–322. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.01.001.CrossRef

Janssen, O., & van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 368–384.CrossRef

Kaplan, S. A., Warren, C., Barsky, A., & Thoresen, C. (2009). A note on the relationship between affect(ivity) and differing conceptualizations of job satisfaction: Some unexpected meta-analytic findings. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 29–54. doi:10.1080/13594320701873264.CrossRef

Konradt, U., Hertel, G., & Schmook, R. (2003). Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 61–79. doi:10.1080/13594320344000020.CrossRef

LaHuis, D. M., Hartman, M. J., Clark, P. C., & Hakoyama, S. (2013). Explained variance measures for multilevel models. In: Poster presented at the 28th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Houston, TX.

Lister, K., & Harnish, T. (2011). The state of telework in the U.S.: How individuals, business, and government benefit. Telework Research Network. Retrieved February 2, 2013 from http://www.workshifting.com/downloads/downloads/Telework-Trends-US.pdf.

Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual team: What do we know and where do we go from there? Journal of Management, 30, 805–835. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002.

Montag, T., Maertz, C. P., & Baer, M. (2012). A critical analysis of the workplace creativity criterion space. Journal of Management, 38, 1362–1386.CrossRef

Morganson, V. J., Major, D. A., Oborn, K. L., Verive, J. M., & Heelan, M. P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 578–595. doi:10.1108/02683941011056941.CrossRef

Noonan, M. C., & Glass, J. L. (2012). The hard truth about telecommuting. Monthly Labor Review, 135, 38–45.

Ramsower, R. M. (1983). Telecommuting: The organizational and behavioral effects of working from home. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.

Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66.CrossRefPubMed

Smart Valley Telecommuting Team. (1994). Smart valley telecommuting guide. San Mateo, CA: Smart Valley, Incorporated.

Smith, P. G. (2007). Enhancing flexibility in dispersed product development teams. In S. P. Mac Gregor & T. Torres-Coronas (Eds.), Higher creativity for virtual teams: Developing platforms for co-creation (pp. 246–263). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference/IGIGlobal.CrossRef

Sparrow, P. (2000). Teleworking and the psychological contract: A new division of labor. In K. D. Lamond & P. Standen (Eds.), Managing telework: Perspectives from human resource management and work psychology. London: Thomson Learning.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, R. J. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677–688. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677.CrossRef

Taylor, D. S., & Kavanaugh, J. K. (2005). Developing a model of leadership in the teleworking environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications, and Conflict, 9, 73–95.

Telework Enhancement Act of 2010, Public Law 111-292, 124 Stat. 3165 (2010).

United States Office of Personnel Management. (2010). Status of telework in the Federal Government. Retrieved January 20, 2013 from http://telework.gov/Reports_and_Studies/Annual_Reports/2010teleworkreport.pdf.

Van Mierlo, H., Vermunt, J. K., & Rutte, C. G. (2009). Composing group-level constructs from individual-level survey data. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 368–392. doi:10.1177/1094428107309322.CrossRef

Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., & Williams, A. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationship among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 605–620. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.605.CrossRefPubMed

Virick, M., DaSilva, N., & Arrington, K. (2010). Moderators of the curvilinear relation between extent of telecommuting and job and life satisfaction: The role of performance outcome orientation and worker type. Human Relations, 63, 137–154. doi:10.1177/0018726709349198.CrossRef

Weaver, C. N. (1977). Relationships among pay, race, sex, occupational prestige, supervision, work autonomy, and job satisfaction in a national sample. Personnel Psychology, 30, 437–445. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1977.tb00436.x.CrossRef

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 173–194. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00045-1.CrossRef

Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305.CrossRef

Willis, G., DeMaio, T., & Harris-Kojetin, B. (1999). Is the bandwagon headed to the methodological promised land? Evaluating the validity of cognitive interviewing techniques. In M. Sirken, D. Herrmann, S. Schechter, N. Schwarz, J. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition and survey research (pp. 133–153). New York: Wiley.

World at work. (2011). Telework 2011: A world at work special report. Retrieved January 27, 2013 from http://www.worldatwork.org/waw/adimLink?id=53034.

Titel: A Within-Person Examination of the Effects of Telework
verfasst von: Ronald P. Vega
Amanda J. Anderson
Seth A. Kaplan
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9359-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Design/Methodology/Approach

Findings

Implications

Originality/Value

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Why do Situational Interviews Predict Job Performance? The Role of Interviewees’ Ability to Identify Criteria

The Interplay Between Follower Core Self-Evaluation and Transformational Leadership: Effects on Employee Outcomes

Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Promotion Focus and Creative Process Engagement

RWA Web: A Free, Comprehensive, Web-Based, and User-Friendly Tool for Relative Weight Analyses

Does Emphasizing Different Types of Person–Environment Fit in Online Job Ads Influence Application Behavior and Applicant Quality? Evidence from a Field Experiment

The Associations between Ethical Organizational Culture, Burnout, and Engagement: A Multilevel Study